The 2012-2013 Advanced Modeling Aeronautics Team’s Humanitarian Aid Delivery Aircraft Captains: Ilya Anishchenko, Alex Beckerman, Logan Halstrom Faculty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aircraft Design Competition Comparison SAE Open SAE Regular SAE Micro AIAA.
Advertisements

College of Engineering and Computer Science Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Wright State University Regular Class Aircraft SAE Aero.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 Design.
Daniel Graves –Project Lead James Reepmeyer – Lead Engineer Brian Smaszcz– Airframe Design Alex Funiciello – Airfoil Design Michael Hardbarger – Control.
Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Proposal Presentation February 17 th, 2005 Matthew Chin Advisor: Prof. S. Thangam Aaron Dickerson Brett J. Ulrich Tzvee Wood.
AE 1350 LECTURE #3 TOPICS PREVIOUSLY COVERED Roadmap of Disciplines “English” to “S.I.” units Common Aerospace Terminology Airplane Axes and Motion This.
October 28, 2011 Christopher Schumacher (Team Lead) Brian Douglas Christopher Erickson Brad Lester Nathan Love Patrick Mischke Traci Moe Vince Zander.
ME 480 Introduction To Aerospace: Chapter 2 Prof. Doug Cairns.
Florida International University Mechanics and Materials Engineering SAE Aero Design® Brazil Competition Senior Design Project Presentation Team 6: PanthAir.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Brian Martinez.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane William Gerboth, Jonathan Landis, Scott Munro, Harold Pahlck February 18, 2010.
SAE Aero Design Guidelines Rev A, 2013 Aero Design Oral Presentation Guidelines How to Deliver a Presentation The Judges will Notice.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
Team USYD National Aircraft Design-Build-Fly Competition.
Project Status Update II R09230: Open Architecture, Open Source Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Imaging Systems A. Benjamin Wager (ME) B. Michael Skube (ME)
Christopher Cottingham
Oculus Superne 1 1.) Introduction 2.) Mission & Market 3.) Operations
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Group #1 Matthew Chin, Aaron Dickerson Brett J. Ulrich, Tzvee Wood Advisor: Professor Siva Thangam December 9 th, 2004.
BATTAGLIA MARIO FACCIO PEDRO SALAZAR ANDRES 2015 SAE Aero Design East Competition Faculty Advisor: Dr. Dulikravich.
Group 13 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Stephen McNulty Richard-Marc Hernandez Jessica Pisano Yoosuk Kee Chi Yan Project Advisor: Siva Thangam.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane William Gerboth, Jonathan Landis, Scott Munro, Harold Pahlck October 8, 2009.
CLARKSON UNIVERSITY Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering Introduction to AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES Ratan Jha (CAMP 364, ,
[SAE Heavy Lift Cargo Plane] Joe Lojek : James Koryan : Justin Sommer : Ramy Ghaly [Ducks on a Plane] : Advisor Professor Thangam : Thursday, February.
SAE Aero Design West 2008 Information Session. What is the SAE competition? Who - Undergrad and Grad Students (SAE Members) Competition Components - Design.
SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 SAE Aero Design ® East 2005 University of Cincinnati AeroCats Team #039 Design.
Brian Martinez Chase Beatty Mohammed Ramadan Noe Caro.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Chase Beatty.
Team 6: “Soldier Portable UAV” David Neira TJ Worden Matthew Martin Joshua Mellen Ona Okonkwo Josiah Shearon A IR HERCULES 1.
Vanderbilt Aerospace Club Rocket Launched Reconnaissance UAV Design Team William Runge (ME) Kyser Miree (ME) Thomas Carroll (ME) Thomas Bowden.
2015 SAE Aero East Design Team 2015 SAE Aero Design East Team Mid-Term Status Report (3/5/2015)
The Lumberjacks Team /16/12 Brian Martinez.
HALE UAV Preliminary Design AERSP 402B Spring 2014 Team: NSFW Nisherag GandhiThomas Gempp Doug RohrbaughGregory Snyder Steve StanekVictor Thomas SAURON.
Western Hills HS Aeronautical Engineering A Primer to Aircraft Structure and Design: Project Lead the Way - A Discussion on Career Potential and Opportunities.
Design Chapter 8 First Half. Design Requirements and Specifications Payload Range Cruising Speed Takeoff & Landing Distance Ceiling.
Group 13 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Richard-Marc Hernandez Yoosuk Kee Stephen McNulty Jessica Pisano Chi Yan Project Advisor: Siva Thangam.
Aircraft Familiarization
DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44.
Miguel Jimenez Ricardo Lugo Carlos Rojas Advisor: Andres Tremante.
Final Design Team 6 December 2 nd, UAV Team Specializations David Neira – Power & Propulsion Josiah Shearon – Materials Selection & Fabrication.
Subsystem Level Design Review.  Project Review  System Level Changes ◦ Tail Dragger ◦ Airfoil Change and Discussion  Subsystem Selection ◦ Fuselage.
Introduction to Aerospace – Historical Perspective Dr. Doug Cairns.
2015 SAE Aero Design East Team
MAE 155A Aerospace Engineering Design I
R15901: Student-Initiated-Project SAE Aero Aircaft.
Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Joe Lojek Justin Sommer James Koryan Ramy Ghaly November 7, 2006 Ducks on a Plane.
SAE Aerospace Regular Class High Lift Competition Educational Aircraft Design Objective: To develop a stable, controllable, high lift aircraft to serve.
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Structures Preliminary Design Review #1 October 12, 2000.
Yaqoub Almounes John Cowan Josh Gomez Michael Medulla Mohammad Qasem
Sae – aero micro capstone
Team 3 Structures and Weights PDR 2
2007 SAE Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Aircraft Design Process
Advanced Aero Vehicle Group
Conceptual Design Report
Key Performance Characteristics
SAE Aero 2017 Midterm Presentation Joe Zongolowicz, Nick Montana, Frank Dixon, Kevin Scheventer, Kathy Hansen, Marquis Ward, Gerald Short, Zhangsiwen Xiao,
Aerospace System Prototyping and Validation- Lecture 2
SAE AERO 2017 Joseph Zongolowicz, Kathy Hansen, Nick Montana, Marquis Ward, Frank Dixon, Thomas Houck, Gerald Short, Zhangsiwen Xiao, Kevin Schesventer,
SAE Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Voice of Customer Presentation
Structures and Weights 1 QDR
Warm-Up – 9/5 – 10 minutes Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: What are the four forces of flight? Describes what.
c/Maj Christopher Greves
Matching of Propulsion Systems for an Aircraft
SAE Aero East 2017 MAE 435 Mid-Term Progress Presentation
Sae – aero micro capstone
ME 423 Design Progress Nugget Chart
Structures PDR #1 AAE451 – Team 3 October 28, 2003
Presentation transcript:

The Advanced Modeling Aeronautics Team’s Humanitarian Aid Delivery Aircraft Captains: Ilya Anishchenko, Alex Beckerman, Logan Halstrom Faculty Advisors: Jean-Jacques Chattot and Stephen K. Robinson Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA INTRODUCTION AMAT is multi-disciplinary group of 23 engineering undergraduates drawing from majors of Aerospace, Mechanical, Electrical, Computer Science, and Chemical Engineering. The team participates annually in the Advanced Class challenge of the Aero Design competition put on by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), for which the members must design and manufacture a model aircraft to meet specific requirements in payload, weight, and flight precision. AMAT performed extremely well in this year’s competition, and the team plans to use this experience to bring further improvement in the coming academic year. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS PROPULSION COMPETITION RESULTS STABILITY STRUCTURE AERODYNAMICS The team selected the OS 46 AXII MAX nitromethane 2-stroke engine as its powerplant. Its displacement is the maximum allowed, and it is mounted in a tractor configuration. Static thrust tests and dynamic thrust simulations indicated optimum performance with a 12x4 propeller. The international Aero Design West competition took place from April 12 th to 14 th in Van Nuys, CA this year and had 75 total competitors for all three classes (Micro, Regular, and Advanced), 9 of which were Advanced. AMAT designed its aircraft’s structure as a hybrid of ideas from traditional model aircraft design and composite material construction. The main spar is a composite of balsa and carbon fiber, and it absorbs wing bending stress while positioning precise, laser-cut balsa ribs. Ultracote skin and a balsa wing box provide torsional resistance. Ailerons, winglets, and wing trailing edges are constructed from carbon fiber composites due to the high strength and precision demands of these components. The fuselage is an exceptionally light box structure made of a balsa and carbon fiber composite, weighing a total of only ½ lb. All layups are arranged to have alternating fiber directions so that they are strong in both bending and shear. Longitudinal stability of the aircraft was accounted for in the sizing equilibrium analysis. A static margin of 8% (non- dimentionalized by the fuselage length) was selected to provide sufficient stability and maneuverability. The team also analyzed lateral stability and sized the ailerons accordingly for roll control. This project is the product of the diligent work of all of our team members, and would not have been possible without their dedication. PERFORMANCE AMAT determined aircraft performance characteristics by using engine test data in an aircraft equilibrium analysis. For each iteration of the configuration, takeoff capability was evaluated using a simulation of the takeoff acceleration phase to ensure that the aircraft was capable of reaching the necessary velocity. AMAT chose to use the Selig 1223 airfoil for the main wing because of its high maximum lift coefficient. A rectangular planform was chosen for ease of construction, and winglets were designed to improve efficiency at takeoff by 10% by redistributing the wing’s circulation so as to make the downwash profile constant as with the ideal elliptic distribution. The entire configuration is sized so as to have a lifting tail at takeoff, obtaining the maximum amount of lift from a given configuration’s structural weight. The empennage is elevated by an angled tailboom so that the tail is removed from the main wing’s wake, making it more efficient. This year’s Advanced Class mission was to design and construct an aircraft for the purpose of aerial delivery of humanitarian aid. For the competition, an aid package was represented by a 3 lbf sandbag, because of its similarity in size, weight, and physical properties to a package of food or supplies. The aircraft was also required to lift a 15 lbf static weight representative of fuel reserve, since on actual humanitarian missions, the aircraft would be required to travel long distances to reach those in need. Aircraft design was also dictated by other factors including an empty weight restriction of 8 lbf and a Data Acquisition System (DAS) capability requirement of real-time altitude measurements and First Person View (FPV) telemetry transmission. Scoring was based upon a written design report, an oral presentation of the design, and a flight score based on the accuracy of payload delivery. Elevated lifting tail configuration Wing bending failure test Optimum layup configuration determined through testing Additionally, we would like to thank Professor Chattot for his valuable guidance and advice throughout this and the many past years of AMAT. We are also excited to have the assistance of Professor Robison as the AMAT advisor. Finally, we would like to acknowledge our technical advisors Michael Akahori, Shawn Malone, and Dave Kehlet in the Engineering Fabrication Laboratory for the extensive technical knowledge and experience they provide. Michael Wachenschwanz (DAS Lead) Gene AngRobert EdwardsSara LangbergJason Petersen Joshua BarramHashmatullah HasseebKelley LundquistPatricia Revolinsky Max BernS. Sheida HosseiniArlene MaciasAdam Simko James DionisopoulosSteven HungRobyn MurrayStefan Turkowski Louis EdelmanChris LorenzenNohtal Partansky Custom designed and built front landing gear shock absorber AVIONICS The AMAT aircraft is outfitted with an extensive avionics system to aid its pilots in accomplishing its primary task of precision aerial targeting and delivery. An Ardupilot 2.5 manages telemetry data measured by an array of devices including a 6-axis inertial measurement unit, a magnetometer, an offboard GPS, and an onboard camera. Payload trajectory prediction AMAT’s Performance: