Rocky Mountain Area Transmission Study Transmission Projects Recommendations to RMATS Steering Committee June 9, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Demand-Side Management Influence on Reliability NERC Demand-Side Management Task Force (DSMTF) Rick Voytas, Chair November 2007 Presented To The U.S.
Advertisements

1 Western Interconnection 2006 Congestion Assessment Study Prepared by the Western Congestion Analysis Task Force May 08, 2006.
Northern Tier Transmission Group SPG Report to TEPPC June 17, 2010 Denver To ensure efficient, effective, coordinated use & expansion of the members transmission.
Study Results High Hydro Study Low Hydro Study This slide deck contains results from the 2011 TEPPC Study Program. This study shows the impacts of low.
TransWest Express and Gateway South WECC Planning Coordination Committee David Smith, National Grid October 25-26, 2007 Vancouver, B.C.
Study Results Wyoming Firmed Resource Option This slide deck contains results from the 2012 TEPPC Study Program related to the Wyoming Firmed Resource.
Rocky Mountain Area Transmission Study RMATS Economics Economic Comparisons Preliminary: Distribution of Gains and Losses RMATS Steering Committee July.
Energy Alternatives (A) Diesel (B) Combined Diesel/Hydro Dam (C) Medium Hydro Dam (D) Large Hydro Dam.
NTTG Economic Study and Biennial Study Update NTTG Economic Study and Biennial Study Update NTTG Study Cycle.
SPP’s 2013 Energy Consumption and Capacity 2 12% annual capacity margin requirement CapacityConsumption Total Capacity 66 GW Total Peak Demand 49 GW.
WECC PCC Meeting Salt Lake City, UT March 26, 2014.
Study Case Report PC 10 High Carbon Price PC 11 Low Carbon Price W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
ColumbiaGrid Planning Update to PCC Marv Landauer October 7, 2014.
Borah Mitigators Remedial Action Scheme for the Borah West Path Sponsored by: IDAHO POWER Team Members: Kyle Jones Mark Magee Jason Rippee.
1 Local Area Planning Update to TRANSAC – July 29, 2015 Mitigation Update, Uncertainty Scenarios, and Next Steps.
© 2000 PACIFICORP | PAGE 1 WYOMING WEST AREA STUDY DECEMBER 2013 Seongtae Kim/Jeremy Viula.
WGG Coal Retirement Case Transmission Repurposed for Renewables.
Electrical Power Distribution in America % Coal 20.4% Nuclear 20.3% Natural Gas 6% Hydro Electric 3.4% Other
Montana Ambassadors Helena, Montana February 25, 2011.
Rocky Mountain Area Transmission Study RMATS Economics Reference Cases Economic Comparisons Distribution of Economic Gains and Losses RMATS Steering Committee.
Energy Gateway Gateway West Project Gateway South Project
2013 Alternative Transmission Development Robert H. Easton March 17, 2004 RMATS Stakeholder Meeting.
Rocky Mountain Area Transmission Study Connecting the Region Today for the Energy Needs of the Future Rocky Mountain Area Transmission Study Recommendations.
Rocky Mountain Power Load Growth and Network Planning April 27, 2007 Mark Adams.
JACKSBORO TO WEST DENTON 345-kV PROJECT Presentation to Technical Advisory Committee April 8, 2004 Transmission Services Operations.
Base Case Draft – For Comment Rocky Mountain States Sub-Regional Transmission Study December 9, 2003.
Lyndonville Electric Department Feasibility Analysis Review December 2,
Electric Transmission Planning Local Area Planning Update Presentation to TRANSAC January 24, 2013.
Energy Gateway Update for Wyoming Infrastructure Authority January 27, 2009 Darrell Gerrard Vice President Transmission System Planning.
Bob Easton WAPA-RMR Planning Manager September 1, 2010.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generating.
Local Area Study Local Area Study Mitigation Plan Update and Uncertainty Scenarios
Plan Today. Power Tomorrow. The Utility Perspective PNUCC June 11, 2009.
Study Results High EE/DG/DR Study This slide deck contains results from the 2011 TEPPC Study Program. This study shows the results of an increase of EE/DG/DR.
Rocky Mountain Area Transmission Study Steering Committee Meeting January 13, 2003 RAWG proposed Alternatives.
“DRAFT” RMATS 2008 Base Case (To be presented at the RMATS Stakeholders Meeting) March 17, 2004.
Proposed Analytical Approach - Modeling Phase 3 - Formation of new team December 9, 2003 Steering Committee Presentation.
Rocky Mountain Area Transmission Study Steering Committee Meeting 2013 Case Alt 1 & 2 - Iteration 2 – Test Transmission Solutions Alt 3 & 4 – Iteration.
2015 Mace Advocacy alliance policy conference
Rocky Mountain States Sub-Regional Transmission Study December 9, 2003 Generation Additions Strawman.
Base Case Rocky Mountain Area Transmission Study Presentation to Steering Committee February 5, 2004.
TRANSMISSION CONSTRAINTS KENNETH A. DONOHOO, P.E. Manager of System Planning, Technical Operations
PC21 Coal Retirement Study TAS/TEPPC – Nov W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL WECC System Adequacy Planning.
© 2000 PACIFICORP kV LINE WALLA WALLA – WALLULA – Mc NARY 500 kV LINE HEMINGWAY – CAPTAIN JACK – REGIONAL PLANNING MEETING REGIONAL PLANNING PROJECT.
Transmission Capital Project Updates. Transmission Expansion Plan Sigurd to Red Butte 345 kV line in-service May, 2015 Permitting activities continue.
Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2011 and 2013 Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting July 21, 2008.
PC21 Coal Retirement Study TAS/TEPPC – Nov W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL WECC System Adequacy Planning.
1 Where Does Electricity Come From?. 2 Overview of Electricity.
Rocky Mountain Area Transmission Study Overall Economics of Alternatives Steering Committee Meeting April 29, SLC.
Update on the North Carolina Transmission Planning Collaborative January 30, 2007 For the North Carolina Utilities Commission and the North Carolina Public.
May14, 2010 RPG Meeting Houston Import Study Update Jeff Billo.
June 11, 2010 RPG Meeting Houston Import Study Update Jeff Billo.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 5/09/2011 West of Cascades – North (WOCN) Path BPA Studies Path Definition (for studies) 
Biennial Transmission Plan Studies Update - DRAFT April 6, 2011.
Northern Tier Transmission Group Report to Columbia Grid Planning Committee February 9, 2012 “To ensure efficient, effective, coordinated use & expansion.
Houston Import Study Update
PC05 Low Hydro Study Results
PC04 High Hydro Study Results
4/23/2018 Steering Committee Meeting 2013 Case Alt 1 & 2 - Iteration 2 – Test Transmission Solutions Alt 3 & 4 – Iteration 1 - Define Congestion.
Borah Mitigators Problem Definition: Sponsor: Idaho Power
Warren Lasher Manager, Long-Term Planning and Policy
Team Members: Kyle Jones Mark Magee Jason Rippee
2017 Integrated Resource Plan
Keegan Moyer Interim Manager, Transmission Expansion Planning
Lancaster “Project” Tracy Rolstad Avista Transmission System Planning.
Naughton RAS (Southwest Wyoming Generation Tripping Scheme) – LAPS
Western Electricity Coordinating Council
Naughton RAS (Southwest Wyoming Generation Tripping Scheme) – LAPS
Study Results California In-State Net-Short California Out-State Net-Short California Out-State Net-Short w SWIP N This slide deck contains results from.
ColumbiaGrid Planning Update to PCC Marv Landauer October 7, 2014
Presentation transcript:

Rocky Mountain Area Transmission Study Transmission Projects Recommendations to RMATS Steering Committee June 9, 2004

2 RMATS Run Configurations- 05/27/04 Ant Mine/Reno Dave Johnson LRS Cheyenne Tap Ault Green Valley Miners Jim Bridger Naughton Ben Lomond Midpoint 345 kV Borah Recommendation 1 Four projects Added Phase Shifter Broadview Colstrip Added Series Compensation Only Ringling Taft Missoula Intermountain Adelanto DC Upgrade Montana Upgrades WY-ID-UT Paths WY- CO Paths IPP DC upgrade Mona Red Butte Crystal Treasureton JB to Miners 345kV is present in all runs Also, Amps phase shifter, Flaming Gorge transformer, Midpoint to Boise 230kV are present in all runs

3 RMATS Run Configurations- 05/27/04 Tesla Table Mtn. Grizzly Ashe Bell Taft Missoula Great Falls Broadview Ringling Colstrip Ant Mine Dave Johnson LRS Cheyenne Tap Ault Green Valley Miners Jim Bridger Naughton Grand Junction Emery Mona IPP Red Butte Ben Lomond Borah Kinport Midpoint Boise Crystal Market Place 500 kV 230 kV Adelanto Option 1 Option 2 Option 4 Option 3 Recommendation 2 Longer-term export options Added Phase Shifter Noxon Hot Springs This recommendation requires two 500 kV lines for export

4 RMATS Run Configurations- 05/27/04 Incremental Resource Additions (MW) Alternative Coal 210 Gas 500 Wind 280 Wind 575 Coal 140 Gas 250 Wind 700 Coal 250 Coal 125 Wind 100 Wind 500 Wind 1150 Wind 575 Coal 359 Coal 50 Wind

5 RMATS Run Configurations- 05/27/04 Recommendation 1 Interfaces Changes from Line Additions InterfaceAdditionBefore (Reverse) – Forward After (Reverse) – Forward Incremental (Reverse) – Forward West of ColstripAdded Series CapacitorN/A - 2,598N/A – 3, West of BroadviewAdded Series CapacitorN/A – 2,572N/A – 3, Montana to NorthwestAdded Series Capacitor(1,350) - 2,200(1,350) - 2, Bridger WestBridger to Treasureton 345kV Bridger to Naughton 345kV N/A – 2,200N/A – 3,400+1,200 Borah WestBorah to Midpoint 345kVN/A – 2,307N/A – 2, Path CLoop in Ben Lomond to Treasureton Ben Lomond to Treasureton 345kV (1,000) – 1,000(1,500) – 1, West of NaughtonNaughton to Ben Lomond 345kVN/A – 920N/A – 1, West of Treasureton2-345 kV lines from Treasureton to Borah+1,000 Bridger EastMiners to Jim Bridger 345kV(600) - 600(1,100) – 1, Black Hills to C. WyomingAnt Mine to DJ 345kV(332) - 332(832) Black Hills to LRSAnt Mine to LRS 345kV(332) - 332(832) LRS to C WyomingDJ to LRS 345kV(640) - 640(1140) TOT 3Cheyenne Tap to Ault 345kVN/A – 1,424N/A – 1, TOT 7Ault to Green Valley 345kVN/A – 890N/A – TOT 4AMiners to Cheyenne Tap 345kVN/A – 810N/A – IPP DCUpgrade Capacity(300) – 1,920(300) – 2, TOT 1AEmery to Grand Jct 345kVN/A – 650N/A – 1, TOT 2CMona to Red Butte 345kV(300) - 300(800) Idaho to MontanaRingling to Borah 500kV(337) - 337(1,337) – 1,337+1,000 Montana Lines Comp Bridger System Additions Colorado/Wyoming Additions

6 RMATS Run Configurations- 05/27/04 Interface Performance * Black Hills to Central Wyoming in Run 4- binds 74% of the time, with an opportunity cost of $378,050 Sort

7 RMATS Run Configurations- 05/27/04 VOM Costs by Area ($ Millions)

8 RMATS Run Configurations- 05/27/04 See Comparative Economic Analysis Tables (3)

Rocky Mountain Area Transmission Study Sensitivities Sensitivities (applied to Alternative 3 – Option 3) Hydro (high & low) Gas (low: $4.5) Add Mohave CO 2 Adder ($5 & $15) DSM

10 RMATS Run Configurations- 05/27/04 Annual VOM Costs Sensitivities – ($Millions)

11 RMATS Run Configurations- 05/27/04 CO 2 Adder Sensitivity Methodology 1.Started with reference case’s emissions 2.Calculated emissions delta from reference case 3.Multiplied step 2’s emissions by $5 & $15

12 RMATS Run Configurations- 05/27/04 Change in Loads with DSM (MW) - Year 2013  RMATS load growth from 2008 to 2013 with DSM sensitivity is equivalent to 100 MW  If generating resources in the 2013 alternatives are added, then 3,900 MW would be exportable  Sensitivities: DSM Option 1 makes use of 2013 loads applied to 2008 resources and transmission DSM Option 2 includes 2013 loads, Alternative 2 resources and DSM amount equivalent 1X Rocky Mountains sub-region load growth. It does not take into account resources that also may be required for planning margin.

13 RMATS Run Configurations- 05/27/04 Transmission Additions DSM Sensitivity- Option 2 AsheTaft Missoula Broadview Ringling Colstrip Ant Mine Dave Johnson LRS Cheyenne Tap Miners Jim Bridger Naughton Mona IPP Red Butte Ben Lomond Borah Crystal Market Place 500 kV Additional DC 345 kV 230 kV Added TransformerAdelanto Added Phase Shifter Added Series Compensation Only Bell Great Falls Noxon Hot Springs * Option 1 requires no new transmission As with Alternative 3, two- 500 kV lines are required to export 3,200 MW

14 RMATS Run Configurations- 05/27/04 Change in Opportunity Costs with Tx Solutions DSM Sensitivities Sort

15 RMATS Run Configurations- 05/27/04 VOM Costs No Generation/ No Tx Solutions DSM – ($Millions) Negative (red) values indicate reduction in fuel cost due to displacement Positive (black) values indicate increased fuel cost due to higher dispatch