Assessment Skills Lab Structured Decision Making (SDM) Version 1.0 | 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moving Toward More Comprehensive Assessments American Humanes 2007 Conference on Differential Response Patricia Schene, Ph.D.
Advertisements

117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Getting Started With Intake & CPS Process. Developmental Competencies SW Understands the roles and tasks of the intake process SW Understands.
S:\Child Welfare\2010 Lesson Plans\CPA FC PSI\Course Powerpoints Foster Care Service Planning & Structured Decision Making FOM
Caregiver Support. Child Intervention Intake Statistics  Calgary and Area 2013:  The Region received 14,100 reports about a child or youth who may be.
An overview of Florida’s Practice Model Florida Department of Children and Families Copyright 2013 Florida Department of Children & Families.
Overview of the Child Welfare System International Center for Innovation in Domestic Violence Practice (ICIDVP)
Child Protection Transformation Overview October 18, 2012.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Common Core 3.0 Executive Summary Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
10/ Introduction to the MA Department of Children and Families’ Integrated Casework Practice Model (ICPM) Fall 2009.
2 3 Regional Manager Employment Services Supervisors Employment Services Supervisors Social Worker Supervisors Social Worker Supervisors Adult Services.
Pregnant and Parenting Youth Tools to Support Pregnant and Parenting Youth in Care.
1 Safety, Risk And Protective Capacity. 2 Competencies Assessing safety, risk and protective capacity Gathers and evaluates relevant information about.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
Present and Impending Danger, Child Vulnerability and Protective Capacity.
Being Part of a Core Group Jacqui Westbury – CP Chair/IRO Team Manager Kate Lawson - Safeguarding Nurse Specialist.
WEBINAR, AUGUST 9, 2011 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Quality Service Review Ratings on the Quick.
Family Team Meeting Policy Updates Presented by Mitzie Smith August 10, 2009.
Structured Decision Making Child Welfare and the Law Spring 2006.
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
GEORGIA CRISIS RESPONSE SYSTEM- DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Charles Ringling DBHDD Region 5 Coordinator/ RC Team Leader.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
Present and Impending Danger, Child Vulnerability and Protective Capacity.
1 Effects of Abuse and Neglect on Child Development Dynamics of Abuse and Neglect: Signs of Maltreatment.
Critical Thinking in Safety Decision-Making: Evaluating Information Sufficiency Reconciling and Validating Information Applying the Safety Threshold Criteria.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Welcome to the … CAPMIS Refresher 1. Name Agency, unit, and primary job function or title, time “on the job” One thing you find helpful about CAPMIS Introductions.
Conducting & Documenting Monthly Health and Safety Visits with Children, and Monthly Visits with Caregivers and Parents.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
Child Safety Framework: Analyzing and Planning for Child Safety.
PowerPoint Presentation for Family Finding: Evaluation.
Common Core 3.0 Online Learning Classroom Skill Building Field Activities.
Common Core 3.0 Online Learning Classroom Skill Building Field Activities.
Making Small but Significant Changes. Learning Objectives Upon completion of this module participants will be able to: Understand how protective factors.
Teaming for Parent-Child Visitation. The Power of Partnership The Alliance for Child Welfare Excellence is Washington’s first comprehensive statewide.
 Context for the Training  Training Related to Implementation of Safety Decision Making Methodology  Fidelity of the Family Functioning Assessment.
Common Core 3.0 Online Learning Classroom Skill Building Field Activities 1.
Family Assessment Response. Welcome & Introduction Introduce yourself to the group: 1.Name 2.Where are you from? (office and role) 3. What do you hope.
Family Assessment Response. Welcome & Introduction Introduce yourself to the group: 1.Name 2.Work location 3.Work title 4.What is it about FAR that brought.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Overview.
Supervising to Permanency PRESENTED BY THE ALLIANCE FOR CHILD WELFARE EXCELLENCE.
1 Child and Family Teaming Module 2 The Child and Family Team Meeting: Preparation, Facilitation, and Follow-up.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
Child Safe Standards How effective is your leadership team in promoting a child safe culture in your organisation? 2 June 2016.
SAFETY ORGANIZED PRACTICE: EMPOWERMENT GROUP FOR PARENTS CHELSEA CORNELL, MSW Handouts for this presentation are available at:
7/6/09Office of Training and Professional Development1 Unit 3D: Safety Assessment Safety Permanency Well-being.
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
Classroom Skill Building
3-MINUTE READ WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN.
Classroom Skill Building
3-MINUTE READ WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN.
Classroom Skill Building
Family Preservation Services
Classroom Skill Building
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Classroom Skill Building
Making Small but Significant Changes
Classroom Skill Building
Case Management Pre-Service Curriculum Specialty Track
Classroom Skill Building
Classroom Skill Building
Classroom Skill Building
Ongoing Assessment and Permanency
Classroom Skill Building
Classroom Skill Building
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Skills Lab Structured Decision Making (SDM) Version 1.0 | 2014

2 Overview of the Day Welcome and overview of the plan for the day: – Review content from e-learning module – Practice completing SDM tools – Evaluation

Group Agreements Be collaborative Ask lots of questions – let us know what you think Enjoy the experience – have fun Have a “what the heck!” attitude and throw yourself into the experience Make mistakes Maintain confidentiality 3

SDM Policy Manual Organization Each section is a tool Within each section: -Tool -Definitions -Policy and procedure

Structured Decision Making Model Process Goals are to: critical decision points. Identify and structure critical decision points. Increase consistency in decision making. Increase accuracy of decision making. Target resources to families most at risk. Use case-level data to inform decisions throughout the agency.

Structure, Research, and Clinical Judgment: Partners in the workplace Research Structured Tools Clinical Judgment

What Do You Remember?

General Definition Tips Read to the period Examples are examples Beware of AND and OR Use common sense The definitions are guides and are not a substitute for knowledge or good judgment Live within the definitions, and use overrides if you disagree with where the definition is taking you

Purpose of Hotline Tools Determine whether a referral meets the statutory threshold for an in-person child welfare services (CWS) response; (and if not, whether a referral to an alternative community response is appropriate). Determine how quickly to respond.

Let’s Practice Read Vignette Complete Hotline Tool together What did you determine?

When Should You Respond? Does the child need immediate medical/mental health evaluation? 24 Hours 10 Days Are the child’s physical living conditions immediately hazardous to his/her health or safety? Is the child currently unsupervised? Is the child a drug exposed newborn who will be discharged within 10 days AND no caregiver appears willing and able to provide for the child upon discharge? 24 Hours No Yes

24 Hour Response Concerns: Child dehydrated and needs treatment Child’s living conditions impact the child’s physical health Father has fled; concern mother will flee Does the child need immediate medical/mental health evaluation? Are the child’s physical living conditions immediately hazardous to his/her health or safety? 24 Hours Yes No

Safety Assessment Tool  Once a referral is screened in for an in-person response, the question becomes “Can the child remain safely at home?”  In most counties, the Emergency Response social worker responds to the referral and completes the Safety Assessment Tool.

Safety Assessment Components Child vulnerabilities Safety Threats Protective Capacities Safety Interventions Safety Decision

The Difference a Support Network Can Make Caregiver has the ability to access resources to provide necessary safety interventions. Caregiver has supportive relationships with one or more persons who may be willing to participate in safety planning, AND caregiver is willing and able to accept their assistance. At least one caregiver in the home is willing and able to take action to protect the child, including asking offending caregiver to leave. Caregiver is willing to accept temporary interventions offered by worker and/or other community agencies, including cooperation with continuing investigation/assessment.

Safety Plans Include A family-friendly description of the identified safety threat A safety intervention to address and mitigate each threat A plan for monitoring Signatures 16

Effective Safety Plans Are detailed plans of ACTION made in response to SPECIFICALLY identified dangers (behavioral and action driven) 17

Effective Safety Plans Create clear and observable guidelines about: Contact between the children The potential danger How they are to be protected from the danger 18

Safety Plans Are … Collaboratively made with the family, child, and network; A process, not an event; A roadmap to achieve our hopes, not a guarantee; A method for keeping children safe; AND A intervention and change strategy. 19

Do We Open a Case? Utilizing the Risk Assessment Tool - Agency resources are targeted to higher risk families because of the greater potential to reduce subsequent maltreatment. Risk assessment identifies families with low, moderate, high, or very high probabilities of future abuse or neglect. The risk assessment is based on research on cases with substantiated abuse or neglect that examined the relationships between family characteristics and the outcomes of subsequent substantiated abuse and neglect.

Linking Danger and Risk What exactly we are worried about (the danger statement) Danger How worried we should be (the risk level) Risk 21

Work individually Review the continued vignette and complete the Risk Assessment Tool What is your Risk level? Do you promote the case? Why? Are there any policy overrides? Any discretionary overrides?

Your case is open, now what? Assessing Family Strengths and Needs using the FSNA Purpose of FSNA - This tool is used to systematically identify critical family needs, and it helps plan effective interventions.

Valuing the SDM Approach Ensures Consistency among Social Workers Ensures strengths and needs are looked at objectively Assesses change over time Identifies and prioritizes highest needs

Things to Consider Requires gathering information from all family members, collaterals, and a review of records. – It may be completed or modified during the course of family team meetings. – Engage family in culturally appropriate ways to make an accurate assessment.

Work individually – Read vignette – Complete FSNA – Discuss with your table

Risk/Safety Assessment Family risk reassessment for in-home cases If the case will remain open, the reassessment also includes a family strengths and needs reassessment and a case plan update.

Risk Reassessment Completed for In Home Cases NOT Reunification cases The risk reassessment determines whether the case should remain open or be closed. Completed at minimum every 6 months Updated FSNA and case plan completed.

Can the case be closed safely? Voluntary – 30 days prior to case plan completion or case closure recommendation Involuntary – 65 days prior to case plan completion or case closure recommendation All in home cases where new circumstances/new risk

Reunification Assessment Routinely monitoring critical case factors that affect goal achievement; Helping to structure the case review process; and Expediting permanency for children in substitute care.

Guides Decision Making To: 1. Return a child to the removal household* or to another household with a legal right to placement (non-removal household); 2. Maintain out-of-home placement; and/or 3. Terminate reunification services and implement a permanency alternative.

Preparing the Family for Reunification Shouldn’t be a surprise! Share the reunification reassessment form with family so that the household understands exactly what will be used to evaluate reunification potential and the threshold they must reach. Inform them of their original risk level, and explain that this will serve as the baseline for the reunification reassessment

What else? Explain that a new substantiation or failure to progress toward case plan goals would increase their risk level Discuss visits – how many and the quality Discuss Safety

Risk Based on Child’s Age Under 3 Is reunification risk level low or moderate? Yes Terminate FR Is this the 6 month hearing or before? Is visitation acceptable? Is the answer to R3 “a” or “b” OR is visitation unacceptable? Is the home safe or conditionally safe? Terminate FR Continue FR Return Home Yes No No, risk is high or very high Yes

Risk Based on Child’s Age Over 3 Is reunification risk level low or moderate? Yes Terminate FR Is this the 6 month hearing or before? Is visitation acceptable? Is the answer to R3 “a” or “b” OR is visitation unacceptable? Is the home safe or conditionally safe? Terminate FR Continue FR Return Home Yes No No, risk is high or very high Yes Is this the 12 month hearing or before? Continue FR Yes No

Evaluation Activity 36

37 Wrap Up What did you learn? Any questions? Next Steps