Preventive Ethics Beyond the Basics. Module 5 Developing a Refined Improvement Goal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing a clinical incident
Advertisements

Care and support planning Care Act Outline of content  Introduction Introduction  Production of the plan Production of the plan  Planning for.
Preventive Ethics Beyond the Basics. Module 6 Identifying Change Strategies to Address an Ethics Quality Gap.
Information Sharing 1. Overview Inquiries into sexual violence incidents are extremely sensitive. Collecting and sharing information on GBV can be dangerous,
Preventive Ethics Beyond the Basics. Module 3 Describing Best Ethics Practice.
EPE C for VE T E R A N S EPE C for VE T E R A N S Education in Palliative and End-of-life Care for Veterans is a collaborative effort between the Department.
The situation The requirements The benefits What’s needed to make it work How to move forward.
Preventive Ethics Beyond the Basics. Module 4 Describing Current Ethics Practice.
Joint Commission Survey 2014 Elizabeth Dunn, RN BSN Relevance to INTERMACS.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Increasing Your Infection Prevention Capacity Ruth Carrico PhD RN FSHEA CIC Associate Professor Division of Infectious Diseases University of Louisville.
Christina Williamson, DHA(c),MSN, RN-BC Veterans Healthcare System of the Ozarks.
Development of Competence Profile Quality managers in VET-institutions Project no: PL1-LEO This publication [communication] reflects the.
Quality Improvement Prepeared By Dr: Manal Moussa.
Call 1: Program Introduction. Safe Surgery 2015: South Carolina Call Series.
Health Care Delivery for the 21th Century Advanced Skills for Health Care Providers, Second Edition Barbara Acello Thomson Delmar Learning, 2007.
Performance Review and Staff Development (PRSD) The Role of Governors Governor Reviewer Training.
by Joint Commission International (JCI)
Legal Responsibilities HS-IHS-9 The student will explain the legal responsibilities, limitations, and implications of their actions within the healthcare.
Accreditation Challenges in Multi-College Districts ASCCC Accreditation Institute Friday, February 20, 2015, 3:45 pm - 5:00 pm Bill Scroggins, President,
[Facility Name] [Presenter Name] [Date]. Objectives 2 After this session, you will be able to 1. describe Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and Plan-Do-Study-Act.
NORTH AMERICAN HEALTHCARE INFORMED CONSENT. RESIDENT RIGHTS Make decisions Accept or refuse treatment Be free from any physical/chemical restraints Receive.
An update on revalidation for Nurses and Midwives in NHS Fife
1. Infection Control Risk Assessment Terrie B. Lee, RN, MS, MPH, CIC Director, Infection Prevention & Employee Health Charleston Area Medical Center Charleston,
Quality Directions Australia Improving clinical risk management systems: Root Cause Analysis.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Supporting Quality Care
Strengthening Health System Responses to Gender-based Violence in EECA: A resource package 7. Documentation of GBV 1.
1 What are Monitoring and Evaluation? How do we think about M&E in the context of the LAM Project?
Intensive Residential Treatment (Level III.7, III.5) Long Term Residential Treatment (Level III.3, III.1) Intensive Outpatient Treatment (Level II.1)
Viha.ca Implementing Evidence-Based Care: Falls Prevention Across Island Health Excellent health and care for everyone, everywhere, every time. Catherine.
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment LO 1.1&1.2&1.3.
Preventive Ethics Beyond the Basics. Module 1 Determining Whether an Issue Is Right for the ISSUES Approach.
How to Get Started with JCI Accreditation. 2 The Accreditation Journey: General Suggestions The importance of leadership commitment: Board, CEO, and clinical.
Kazakhstan Health Technology Transfer and Institutional Reform Project Day 2 Developing standardised patient roles.
Preventive Ethics Beyond the Basics. Module 2 Prioritizing Among Ethics Issues.
Working with people living with dementia and other long term conditions Karin Tancock Professional Affairs Officer for Older People & Long Term Conditions.
Presenter’s Name June 17, Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
Developing Innovative Partnerships to improve Services to Carers Establishing an Evidence Base James Drummond Lead Officer Integrated Carers Services Torbay.
Conducting Clinical Risk Assessments And Implementing Compliance Practices Jane L. Stratton Chiron Corporation VP/Associate General Counsel Chief Compliance.
Retha Britz Copyright 2013 All rights reserved for this presentation 1 Other important considerations for RECs Retha Britz.
AN AGREEMENT FOR SUCCESS: Title I Parent/School Compacts.
Disclosure of Medical Errors AND Risk Management
CIHC is a 2-year initiative funded by Health Canada Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice Request for a Special CIHR Competition.
Waiting Time Management Strategies for Scheduled Services Ottawa March 28, 2012 Minimizing the Cost of Waiting Ray Naden, New Zealand.
Component 1: Introduction to Health Care and Public Health in the U.S. 1.9: Unit 9: The evolution and reform of healthcare in the US 1.9d: The Patient.
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS Entry Into Professional Nursing NRS 101.
System of Shared Care (COPD) Learning Session 3. 2  Share ideas  Billing  Next steps in collaborating with services in your community  Sustainment.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
Healthy Birth Initiative  Reducing Primary Cesareans Collaborative.
Patients and doctors making decisions together GMC Guidance 2008.
Doctor of Physical Therapy Writing and Using Objectives in Clinical Education Harriet Lewis, PT, MS Co Academic Coordinator of Clinical Education Assistant.
Session 5: Selecting and Operationalizing Indicators.
Quality Metrics of Performance of Research Ethics Committees Cristina E. Torres, PhD FERCAP Coordinator.
MSc Surgical Care Practice preceptorship session Susan Hall RGN MSc (Clinical Sciences) Senior Lecturer in Surgical Care Practice Preceptorship SD introduction1.
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
Course Review 2017.
The Essentia Institute of Rural Health (EIRH) is
Gathering a credible evidence base
Understanding and learning from errors and managing clinical risks
MSc Surgical Care Practice preceptorship session
Performance Achievement a quick reference guide to
EDC ©2016. All rights reserved.
Title: Owner: Ver: Date:
Direct Enhanced Scheme for People with Learning Disabilities
Performance Achievement a quick reference guide to
VA Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative
User Personas Templates
Video consultations 6 initial steps for setting up video outpatient clinics Clinical team expresses an interest in setting up and are directed to facilitator.
Presentation transcript:

Preventive Ethics Beyond the Basics

Module 5 Developing a Refined Improvement Goal

3 Learning Objectives Identify required elements of a refined improvement goal. Apply required elements to write a refined improvement goal for a specific ethics issue.

4 ISSUES Link STUDY the Issue Diagram the process behind the relevant practice Gather specific data about best practices Gather specific data about current practices Refine the improvement goal to reflect the ethics quality gap

5 Storyboard Progression Advance Directives Issue STUDY the Issue Define the metric and gather specific data about current ethics practice. Numerator = number of times the practice actually happens. Denominator = population to whom specific ethics practice applies. 3 ÷ 30 = 10% of primary care patients who have a documented request for assistance with completing an advance directive receive it.

6 CONGRATULATIONS!

7 Review: Advance Directives Issue 1. Ethics Issue 2. Ethical Standard Source(s) 3. Ethical Standard Description(s) with Exclusions 4. Best Ethics Practice “Should” 5. Metric6. Current Ethics Practice “Is” 7. Reality Check 8. Achievable Goal 9. Refined Improvemen t Goal A recent accreditation review of primary care health records found that only a few patient requests for assistance with completing an advance directive were followed up on by clinic staff. VHA Handbook Advance Care Planning and Management of Advance Directives VHA Handbook states that additional information about advance directives and/or assistance in completing the forms must be provided for all patients who request this service. Exclusion(s): Patients who change their minds about their requests for assistance, who withdraw from the Health Care System, or who now lack decision- making capacity. Primary care patients who request assistance with completing an advance directive should receive it [unless patients change their minds about their requests for assistance, withdraw from the Health Care System, or who now lack decision-making capacity]. Numerator: The number of primary care patients provided with assistance as measured by a note template completed by a social worker or someone equally trained ________________ Denominator: Total number of primary care patients who requested assistance with completing an advance directive Method: Record review Sample size: 30 Time frame for data collection: 1 week Current ethics practice was determined based on a review of 30 primary care patient health records. Currently, 10% of primary care patients who have a documented request for assistance with completing an advance directive receive it. 1. Starting Point 2. Seriousness 3. Environment 4. Challenge MODULE 2 MODULE 3MODULE 4MODULE 5

8 Formula for Refined Improvement Goal _________________________________________________ Direction of Change (increase or decrease by % or number) _______________________________________________________________________ Ethical Practice* From ________________________ (% or n) Current Ethics Practice By __________________________________________ Time Frame (quarter or more specific, if required) *EXCLUSIONS: To _______________________ (% or n) Achievable Goal

9 _________________________________________________ Direction of Change (increase or decrease by % or number) _______________________________________________________________________ Ethical Practice* From ________________________ (% or n) Current Ethics Practice By __________________________________________ Time Frame (quarter or more specific, if required) *EXCLUSIONS: Refine the Improvement Goal 10% 4 th quarter, 20XX Patients who change their minds about their request for assistance, who withdraw from the Health Care System, or who now lack decision-making capacity. To _______________________ (% or n) Achievable Goal Increase the % of Primary care patients who request assistance with completing an advance directive should receive it.

10 Achievable Goal How much improvement over current ethics practice is expected, based on a 4-step reality check? Reality Check 1.Starting point 2.Seriousness 3.Environment 4.Challenge

11 Reality Check 1: Starting Point Performance requirements Example: Advance directives Joint Commission sets a performance requirement of 90% for the accreditation standard related to assisting patients who request assistance with completing an advance directive. Benchmark or comparative data Example: Ethics consultations per annum Literature review could show how many ethics consultations are provided annually within similarly sized health care organizations that offer comparable services.

12 Reality Check 2: Seriousness Can one occurrence be tolerated? Example: Research on human subjects without their informed consent This practice should never happen without appropriate review and is comparable to a sentinel event in patient safety. Can you publicly defend the achievable goal? Example: 65% of reportable adverse events that caused harm to patients are disclosed to patients or patients’ personal representatives. 35% of adverse events would be concealed from patients.

13 Reality Check 3: Environment Do local considerations impact the goal? – Constraints? – Supports? Each institution is unique. Examine apparent constraints to determine if they can be addressed without lowering the achievable goal.

14 Reality Check 4: Challenge Don’t go for the slam dunk. What amount of improvement would make the team proud? Avoid grandiosity. It may take more than one cycle to reach the desired level of improvement.

15 _________________________________________________ Direction of Change (increase or decrease by % or number) _______________________________________________________________________ Ethical Practice* From ________________________ (% or n) Current Ethics Practice By __________________________________________ Time Frame (quarter or more specific, if required) *EXCLUSIONS: Refine the Improvement Goal 10% 4 th quarter, 20XX Patients who change their minds about their request for assistance, who withdraw from the Health Care System, or who now lack decision-making capacity. To _______________________ (% or n) Achievable Goal Increase the % of Primary care patients who request assistance with completing an advance directive will receive it. 90%

16 Common Pitfall: Outcome vs. Strategy Outcome is what is to be achieved. Strategy is how we plan to achieve the outcome.

17 Common Pitfall Example (a) Update the policy on patients undergoing high-risk imaging procedures requiring signature informed consent by 4 th quarter, 20XX. Increase the percentage of patients undergoing high- risk imaging procedures who have signature informed consent from [current ethics practice] to [achievable goal] by 4 th quarter, 20XX.

18 Common Pitfall Example (b) Educate physicians about the problem of DNR orders not being signed by the attending physician within 24 hours. Increase the percentage of DNR orders signed by the attending physician within 24 hours from [current ethics practice] to [achievable goal] by 4 th quarter, 20XX.

19 Group Activity Instructions Handouts 5.1 and 5.3 (16 min) Ethics Issue 2 or 3 (1 issue per pair) 1.Using the information on Handout 5.1, fill in all parts of the formula on Handout 5.3 except for the achievable goal. 2.Use Handout 5.3 to guide you through the reality check. 3.Formulate your achievable goal. 4.Work together to construct a refined improvement goal. 5.Reconvene to share results with the whole group.

20 Storyboard Progression Advance Directives Issue STUDY the Issue Refine the improvement goal to reflect the ethics quality gap (include a time frame, if possible). Reality check 1. Starting point 2. Seriousness 3. Environment 4. Challenge Achievable Goal: 90% Increase the percentage of primary care patients who receive requested assistance with completing an advance directive from 10% to 90% by 4 th quarter, 20XX. Exclusions: Patients who change their minds about their request for assistance, who withdraw from the Health Care System, or who now lack decision-making capacity.

21 Takeaways Developing a refined improvement goal Formula for refined improvement goal 4 steps of reality check achievable goal Common pitfall—what to achieve, not how to achieve it

22 Module 5 Questions?