Economic Implications of Global Convergence on Emission Intensities Govinda R. Timilsina Senior Economist The World Bank, Washington, DC 32 nd USAEE/IAEE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantifying future emission paths: What is needed from whom to keep stabilization in reach 18 October 2005 Niklas Höhne, ECOFYS Cologne,
Advertisements

Is Asia the next growth engine? Probably, but not if rest of world doesn’t help. One region drags others down, e.g., euro banking problems. IMF: Growth.
The Impact of Population Growth on CO2 Emissions: An Empirical Analysis Presented by GÖKHAN ÜNLÜ.
Energy and Climate Outlook: 2013
Global Dynamism Index (GDI) 2013 summary report Model developed by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU)
International Climate Policy Hamburg Institute of International Economics International Climate Policy Graduation and deepening: a suggestion to move international.
Global Economic and Energy Outlook International Aviation Fuel Conference and Exhibition Christof Ruehl, Chief Economist, BP p.l.c. Beijing, April 2012.
Stern review comments 1. UNFCCC goal – stabilisation of GHG concentration preventing dangerous impact to the climate system. The exact level is stil being.
America’s Role in the Emerging Global Dairy Market Philip Turner 24 May 2005 Washington DC.
Avoiding „Dangerous“ Climate Change Jennifer L. Morgan April 24, 2006.
1 TETRIS Work Package 6 – Quantitative Analysis of International Emissions Trading Christoph Böhringer, Ulf Moslener, and Niels Anger TETRIS Final Conference,
2015/6/21 Development of Emissions Scenarios Database for the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report and Regional Mitigation Analysis - A Review of Post-SRES Scenarios.
12 th GTAP Conference, “Trade Integration and Sustainable Development: Looking for an Inclusive World”, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean,
Climate. History of Energy Use Energy for Sustainability (2008)
World Wine Trade in 2014 April 17, 2015 Rafael del Rey Spanish Observatory of Wine Markets.
DG Research and Innovation, CDMA building, 21 rue Champ de Mars, Brussels AUGUR AUGUR stakeholder’s workshop, November 2011 Bipolar scenario Presentation:
June GTAP Conference Purdue University Welfare Cost for Europe of Non Participation in the Market for Tradable Permits and Comparative Efficiency.
J. Frankel, Harvard1 Emission paths implied by target formulas The 11 regions: EUROPE = –Old Europe + –New Europe US = The United States KOSAU = Korea.
Economic and Environmental Impacts of Increased U.S. Natural Gas Exports Kemal Sarica Wallace E. Tyner Purdue University July 28-31, 2013 ANCHORAGE 32.
Global Warming & the Kyoto Protocols. The topic of global warming inspires heated debates among world leaders. The topic of global warming inspires heated.
Energy and Climate Outlook: 2012 Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Massachusetts Institute.
global marketplaces and business centers
Where Are More and Less Developed Countries Distributed?
Does Shale Gas have a role in Annex 1 climate change commitments? Prof Kevin Anderson and Dr John Broderick Tyndall Manchester.
The Global Economic Environment
Govinda R. Timilsina The World Bank, Washington, DC Fourth Berkeley Bioeconomy Conference March 24-26, 2011 Economic and Environmental Impacts of Biofuels.
Threats and opportunities in milk and dairy products trade
Climate Change Policy: Cost Effective Strategies Dr. Margo Thorning Managing Director, International Council for Capital Formation Brussels Office: Park.
An Introdution of Energy Situation and Policy of ROK September 2010 Park, Jimin.
Global Economy, Energy and Environment: An Overview.
CO 2 Emissions Embodied in Austrian International Trade Kurt Kratena, Ina Meyer Austrian Institute of Economic Research – WIFO 11. FIW-Workshop Studien.
International linkages and policy coordination Cambridge Endowment for Research in Finance (CERF)Alphametrics Ltd. The Cambridge Alphametrics Model LINK.
Does Northern Mitigation Affect the Developing World?
Janine Berg ILO-Brasilia Understanding and Responding to the Labour Impact of Globalization RIAL Workshop “Labour Dimension of Globalization” Santo Domingo,
Global Economic Environment. World Population Top In Millions China: 1,208 India: 939 Rest of World: 2,397 Pakistan: 131 Indonesia: 194 Brazil:
Chapter 15 New Global Players in the Twenty- First Century Global Issue 3.
HOW SINKS IN WOOD PRODUCTS AFFECT THE COST OF KYOTO PROTOCOL AND WORLD TRADE OF WOOD PRODUCTS: results from a global economywide model Johanna Pohjola.
APEC EGCFE Workshop March 21-23, 2005 The Grand Hotel, Chinese Taipei Cooperation & Competition in Asia-Pacific LNG Market Cooperation & Competition in.
The Global Economic Environment The Coming Boom Wealthy Industrial Countries Developing Countries East Asia South Asia Latin America
Markus Amann, Janusz Cofala, Zbigniew Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Progress on modelling emission scenarios.
Fredrik Hedenus Physical Resource Theory Fredrik Hedenus Physical Resource Theory Chalmers University of Technology. The role of.
Sustainable Energy Systems The EU “WETO” World Energy, Technology and climate policy Outlook 2030 Domenico Rossetti di Valdalbero European Commission,
The Economics of Climate Change Policy By: Dr. Margo Thorning, Ph.D. Senior Vice President and Chief Economist American Council for Capital Formation Washington,
Post-Kyoto: Copenhagen Copenhagen Accord – Leading up to the meeting – developing country arguments: Developed countries must “take the lead” NAMAs must.
© OECD/IEA 2015 Budapest, 19 October © OECD/IEA 2015 Energy & climate change today A major milestone in efforts to combat climate change is fast.
The Kyoto Protocol’s Flexibility Mechanisms. Major Issues in Implementing Flex Mechs Supplementarity Additionality – Baselines – Additionality – Leakage.
THE GLOBAL POLITICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE By Emil Salim Member of the President’s Council of Advisors Bali, 13 November 2007
The Economics of Climate Change Policy Prepared for: CEO Climate Change Task Force Meeting American Public Power Association Washington, D.C. December.
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research Research Domain Sustainable Solutions 1 Analysis of Post-2012 Climate Policy Regimes Marian Leimbach/Lavinia.
SARS: Estimating the Economic Impacts Warwick J McKibbin ANU and Brookings Institution Presentation prepared for “Forum on Microbial Threats” Institute.
Feasible Climate Targets Richard Richels International Energy Workshop June 17, 2009 Venice, Italy.
US Strategy on Climate Change Policy: Does it make sense? Prepared by: Dr. Margo Thorning Managing Director, International Council for Capital Formation.
Lead off 5/1 Should we buy things from other countries? Why or why not? Should the government do things to discourage/prohibit us from buying things from.
Petroleum sector in Turkey Petroleum Engineering 2017
Sustainable use of Natural Resources
Ecological Footprint.
Progress on modelling emission scenarios
The World Market.
ECON 331 INTERNATIONAL TRADE and ECONOMICS
Economic Crisis International Finance April 28, 2009.
Economic Growth to Remain Uneven Around the World in 2017
World Leading Exporters 2016 Pulp, Paper and Sawn Timber
Global Espresso Coffee Market Status and Outlook Phone No.: +1 (214) id:
Global Hand Soap Market Status and Outlook Phone No.: +1 (214) id:
Global Nitrile Gloves Market Status and Outlook Phone No.: +1 (214) id:
Global Pan Masala Market Status and Outlook Phone No.: +1 (214) id:
FMA 601 Foreign Market Analysis
Energy Efficiency and Renewables role in the future energy needs
Environmental and Natural Resource Economics 3rd ed. Jonathan M
Latin America’s Missing Middle: Rebooting inclusive growth
Presentation transcript:

Economic Implications of Global Convergence on Emission Intensities Govinda R. Timilsina Senior Economist The World Bank, Washington, DC 32 nd USAEE/IAEE North American Conference Anchorage, Alaska July 28-31, 2013

Disclaimer The views expressed in this presentation are those of the speaker’s only, and do not necessarily represent the World Bank and its affiliated organizations

Introduction (1/3) CO2 Emissions in 2010 (Million tons) (2): 43% (5): 58% (20): 81% (30): 88% (10): 68%

Introduction (2/3) Countries in terms of absolute emissions and per Capita emissions in 2010 Vertical Axis – Per capita emissions (ton per capita) Horizontal axis – CO2 emissions (Million Tons)

Introduction (3/3) Per capita CO2 emissions (tons) 14% lower from 1990 level 72% higher from 1990 level Intensity gap (7.4) (11.8 tons) (10.2 tons) (1.6 tons) (2.7 tons) (-20%) Intensity gap (10.3) Although, emission intensity gap is decreasing, industrialized countries, on average, still release 3.7 times as high as CO 2 emissions per capita than developing countries

The Question  Is stabilization of GHG concentrations to avoid climate change possible while converging the emission intensities between industrialized and developing countries? Provided that:  To avoid climate change (or avoiding dangerous consequences in the earth’s atmosphere), the earth mean average surface temperature should not be higher than 2 degree Celsius from the pre-industrialization level  Concentrations of CO 2 emissions should be stabilized below 450 PPM  Global emissions to peak before 2020, followed by substantial overall reductions of around 60% below the 2000 level by 2050

Our Approach  We introduced various levels of carbon tax (US$10 to 250 per ton of CO2) to Annex I countries to reduce their fuel consumption and thereby CO2 emissions and emission intensities.  Non-Annex I countries are exempted from carbon taxation, however they are impacted from Annex I countries carbon tax through international trade.  Since the emission intensities of Annex I countries would decrease in response to the carbon tax while Non-Annex I countries emission intensities would continuously increase, the intensity gap between these two groups of countries drops (i.e., we will be moving towards global convergence of emission intensities).  We used a global CGE model to simulate the effects moving towards global convergence of emission intensities.

Model & Data  Multi-sector, multi-region, global recursive dynamic CGE model  The model is flexible enough to accommodate new regions/countries or sectors and is calibrated with GTAP database  Nested CES and CET functional forms to represent production behavior and land supply, respectively  Representation of bilateral and international trade  Data are coming from the GTAP (Version 7.1)

Per Capita CO 2 Emission (tons) under Different Carbon Tax Rates 6.8 tons US$10/tCO tons (- 9.4%) (- 36.5%) US$50/tCO tons (- 71.6%) US$250/tCO tons (- 51.6%) US$100/tCO tons

Impacts on CO 2 Emissions Annex I Non-Annex I Global

Impacts on CO 2 Emissions in 2030 Limiting temperature rise below 2°C, CO2 concentrations must be below 450ppm Global CO2 emissions should be reduced 60% below 2000 level by 2050 Even at the very high carbon tax rate of $250/tCO2, we find that global CO 2 emissions in 2030 would be only 18% below from that in the baseline

CO 2 Emissions with $250 Carbon Tax Case Compared to 2000 Emission Level Compared to 2000 emissions level, the emission convergence scenario (72% reduction of intensity gap through $250 carbon tax) would, in 2030, - decrease Annex I emissions by 52%, but - increase Non-Annex I emissions by 3 folds, thereby - increase global emissions by 28% Annex I 2000 Global 2000 Non-Annex I countries emissions would exceed global 2000 level by 2030 if there emissions are not limited Even if developed countries CO2 emissions are completely wiped out, meeting 2 degree target would be far out of reach unless Non-Annex I countries emissions are limited

Impacts on GDP in 2030 The relationship between the carbon tax level and corresponding GDP loss is exponential There would be a carbon leakage effect (carbon intensive industries would move to Non-Annex I countries from Annex I countries). Despite the strong international trade linkage between Non-Annex I countries and Annex I countries, the former are not found to be negatively affected by the carbon tax in Annex I countries.

Combining Effects on GDP and CO 2 Emissions (2030) Non-Annex I countries are also expected to reduce their GHG emissions, in that case, emission intensity will diverge instead of converge

Impacts on International Trade in 2030  The carbon tax introduced in Annex I countries would cause international trade to shrink (up to 2% in the case of $250/tCO 2 carbon tax)  Since domestic production would be more expensive in Annex I countries due to carbon tax exports would get impacted the most  Non-Annex I countries would benefit as their exports increase and imports drop

Country Results: CO 2 Emissions Country/RegionsCarbon tax rate (US$/tCO 2 ) Australia and New Zealand-14.9%-36.0%-46.2%-58.7% Canada-9.4%-26.7%-36.6%-50.8% Germany-6.4%-21.1%-30.5%-43.8% Spain-4.2%-15.2%-23.6%-37.5% France-2.9%-10.8%-17.3%-29.4% UK-12.2%-35.0%-46.2%-58.4% Italy-4.2%-15.0%-23.1%-36.6% Japan-8.0%-18.2%-25.4%-37.1% EFTA Countries & Rest of European Union-8.3%-25.6%-35.9%-50.5% Russia-16.7%-42.8%-55.7%-72.2% United States-10.8%-31.6%-43.1%-57.8% Non Annex I Europe & Central Asia0.5%1.9%3.2%4.7% Argentina0.1%0.3%0.6%1.2% Brazil0.4%1.6%2.7%4.9% Rest of Latin America & Caribbean0.3%1.2%2.1%4.1% China0.2%0.8%1.3%2.5% Indonesia0.3%1.2%2.0%3.7% Rest of East Asia & Pacific0.5%1.8%2.9%5.0% Malaysia0.2%0.8%1.3%2.4% Thailand0.3%1.2%2.1%3.7% India0.2%0.8%1.2%1.9% Rest of South Asia0.2%0.8%1.4%2.7% Middle East & North Africa0.0%0.2%0.4%1.0% South Africa0.7%2.2%2.9%3.8% Rest of Sub-Saharan Africa0.2%0.9%1.7%3.4%

Country Results: Emission Intensity CO2 emission per capitaCO2 emission per GDP Carbon tax rate (US$/tCO 2 ) Australia and New Zealand-14.9%-36.0%-46.2%-58.7%-14.8%-35.6%-45.5%-57.6% Canada-9.4%-26.7%-36.6%-50.8%-9.3%-26.2%-35.7%-49.2% Germany-6.4%-21.1%-30.5%-43.8%-6.4%-21.0%-30.2%-43.2% Spain-4.2%-15.2%-23.6%-37.5%-4.2%-15.0%-23.2%-36.7% France-2.9%-10.8%-17.3%-29.4%-2.9%-10.7%-17.1%-29.0% UK-12.2%-35.0%-46.2%-58.4%-12.2%-34.9%-45.9%-58.0% Italy-4.2%-15.0%-23.1%-36.6%-4.1%-14.7%-22.7%-35.6% Japan-8.0%-18.2%-25.4%-37.1%-8.0%-18.1%-25.1%-36.4% EFTA Countries & Rest of European Union-8.3%-25.6%-35.9%-50.5%-8.2%-25.2%-35.3%-49.4% Russia-16.7%-42.8%-55.7%-72.2%-16.2%-40.3%-51.7%-65.9% United States-10.8%-31.6%-43.1%-57.8%-10.7%-31.3%-42.5%-56.9% Non Annex I Europe & Central Asia0.5%1.9%3.2%4.7%0.4%1.8%2.9%4.3% Argentina0.1%0.3%0.6%1.2%0.1%0.4%0.7%1.4% Brazil0.4%1.6%2.7%4.9%0.4%1.6%2.7%5.0% Rest of Latin America & Caribbean0.3%1.2%2.1%4.1%0.3%1.3%2.3%4.6% China0.2%0.8%1.3%2.5%0.2%0.6%1.0%1.9% Indonesia0.3%1.2%2.0%3.7%0.3%1.2%2.0%3.5% Rest of East Asia & Pacific0.5%1.8%2.9%5.0%0.4%1.6%2.6%4.4% Malaysia0.2%0.8%1.3%2.4%0.2%0.9%1.5%2.9% Thailand0.3%1.2%2.1%3.7%0.3%1.0%1.8%3.3% India0.2%0.8%1.2%1.9%0.2%0.5%0.8%1.1% Rest of South Asia0.2%0.8%1.4%2.7%0.2%0.7%1.2%2.3% Middle East & North Africa0.0%0.2%0.4%1.0%0.2%1.1%2.0%4.0% South Africa0.7%2.2%2.9%3.8%0.8%2.2%2.9%3.7% Rest of Sub-Saharan Africa0.2%0.9%1.7%3.4%0.3%1.4%2.6%5.1%

Country Results: GDP Country/RegionsCarbon tax rate (US$/tCO 2 ) Australia and New Zealand-0.2%-0.7%-1.2%-2.6% Canada-0.1%-0.7%-1.3%-3.1% Germany0.0%-0.2%-0.4%-1.1% Spain0.0%-0.3%-0.6%-1.4% France0.0%-0.1%-0.2%-0.6% UK0.0%-0.2%-0.4%-1.0% Italy-0.1%-0.3%-0.6%-1.4% Japan0.0%-0.2%-0.5%-1.1% EFTA Countries & Rest of EU-0.1%-0.4%-0.9%-2.1% Russia-0.7%-4.1%-8.2%-18.5% United States-0.1%-0.5%-1.0%-2.1% NAI Europe & Central Asia0.0%0.2%0.3%0.4% Argentina0.0%-0.1% -0.2% Brazil0.0% -0.1% Rest of LAC0.0%-0.1%-0.2%-0.5% China0.0%0.2%0.3%0.6% Indonesia0.0% 0.1%0.2% Rest of East Asia & Pacific0.0%0.2%0.3%0.5% Malaysia0.0%-0.1%-0.2%-0.5% Thailand0.0%0.2%0.3%0.4% India0.1%0.3%0.4%0.8% Rest of South Asia0.0%0.1%0.2%0.4% Middle East & North Africa-0.2%-0.9%-1.6%-2.9% South Africa0.0% Rest of Sub-Saharan Africa-0.1%-0.5%-0.8%-1.6%

Country Results: International Trade ExportsImports Carbon tax rate (US$/tCO 2 ) Australia and New Zealand-0.4%-1.5%-2.6%-5.1%-0.1%-0.5%-0.9%-1.7% Canada-0.2%-1.1%-2.0%-4.1%-0.2%-1.1%-2.0%-4.4% Germany-0.2%-0.7%-1.2%-2.5%-0.1%-0.2%-0.5%-1.1% Spain-0.3%-1.4%-2.4%-4.8%0.0%-0.2%-0.5%-1.3% France-0.1%-0.7%-1.3%-2.6%0.0%-0.1%-0.3%-0.7% UK-0.1%-0.5%-0.9%-2.0%-0.1%-0.3%-0.6%-1.3% Italy-0.2%-1.1%-1.9%-4.0%-0.1%-0.4%-0.7%-1.8% Japan-0.4%-1.5%-2.7%-5.3%0.0%-0.2%-0.4%-1.1% EFTA Countries & Rest of European Union-0.2%-1.0%-1.9%-4.1%-0.1%-0.6%-1.1%-2.6% Russia-1.7%-6.6%-10.4%-17.1%-0.5%-2.1%-3.5%-7.1% United States-0.6%-2.5%-4.3%-8.0%0.0%-0.1%-0.2%-0.6% Non Annex I Europe & Central Asia0.0% -0.5%-0.1%-0.3%-0.5%-1.3% Argentina0.2%0.9%1.6%2.8%-0.2%-0.8%-1.3%-2.5% Brazil0.1%0.3%0.4%0.6%-0.2%-0.7%-1.3%-2.7% Rest of Latin America & Caribbean0.2%1.0%1.6%2.9%-0.2%-1.0%-1.8%-3.3% China0.0%0.1%0.2% 0.0% -0.1%-0.4% Indonesia0.1%0.6%0.9%1.6%0.0%0.1% 0.0% Rest of East Asia & Pacific0.0%0.1%0.2%0.0% 0.1% 0.0% Malaysia0.1%0.2%0.3%0.4%0.0%-0.2%-0.4%-0.9% Thailand0.0%0.1%0.2%0.1% 0.2%-0.1% India0.0% -0.1%-0.4%0.0%0.1% -0.2% Rest of South Asia0.1%0.3%0.4%0.7%0.1%0.2% Middle East & North Africa0.5%2.3%4.0%7.7%-0.7%-3.0%-5.1%-9.2% South Africa0.0%-0.2%-0.4%-0.8%-0.1%-0.3%-0.4%-0.8% Rest of Sub-Saharan Africa0.2%0.9%1.5%2.6%-0.3%-1.1%-2.0%-3.8%

Conclusions  Developing countries’ argument to converge global CO2 emission intensity could be reasonable from the equity perspective  However, their demand could not be realized in practice if global CO2 emissions are to be reduced to stabilize CO2 concentration to meet the ultimate objective of the UNFCCC  Limitations of GHG emissions is necessary in developing countries to avoid climate change; the 2 degree target can not be realized even if developed countries CO2 emissions are completely wiped out as long as developing countries’ CO2 emissions increase at the current trend

THANK YOU Govinda R. Timilsina Sr. Research Economist (Climate Change & Clean Energy) Development Research Group The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433, USA Tel: Fax: