Strategy and Competitive Advantage

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Five Generic Competitive Strategies
Advertisements

THE FIVE GENERIC COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES: WHICH ONE TO EMPLOY?
STRENGTHENING A COMPANY’S COMPETITIVE POSITION: SCOPE OF OPERATIONS
Competitive Strategy.
Business-Level Strategy: How do we compete? Business-Level Strategy: How do we compete?
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Canada Inc. 0 Chapter 3 The Internal Environment: Resources, Capabilities, and Activities.
Industry and Competitive Analysis
Building Competitive Advantage Through Business-Level Strategy
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998 Irwin/McGraw-Hill 1 AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE STRATEGY AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE CHAPTER 5 Screen graphics created.
THE FIVE GENERIC COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES -
THE FIVE GENERIC COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES: WHICH ONE TO EMPLOY?
COMPETITIVE STRATEGY - Dolly Dhamodiwala.
EVALUATING A COMPANY’S EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
Business-Level Strategy
Competing For Advantage
Chapter 4 Business Level Strategy Pages
Chapter 4: Business-Level Strategy
Building Competitive Advantage Through Business-Level Strategy
Make or Buy. Reasons for Making Lower production costs Lower production costs Unsuitable suppliers Unsuitable suppliers Assure adequate supply (quantity.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STRATEGIES Andrey G. Medvedev, Professor September 14, 2009 CEMS MIM Programme.
Building Competitive Advantage Through Business-Level Strategy
from Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining
Supplementing the Chosen Competitive Strategy
Chapter 5 Building Competitive Advantage Through Business-Level Strategy.
Supply Chain Management 2 August Introduction What: Supply Chain Management Where: Organizations that have significant costs spent on purchasing.
Chapter 5 The Five Generic Competitive Strategies.
1 Core Competencies and Strategy The resources and capabilities that have been determined to be a source of competitive advantage for a firm over its rivals.
Chapter 3 Business Level Strategy How are we going to compete in our industry/segment? Improving the firm’s competitive position Competitive advantages.
STATEGY AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
Strategy & Competitive Advantage The importance and sources of c.ad Types of competitive strategy Vertical Integration strategies Cooperative Strategies.
5 Chapter 5: Building Competitive Advantage Through Business-Level Strategy BA 469 Spring Term, 2007 Prof. Dowling.
3 Chapter 3: Internal Analysis: Distinctive Competencies, Competitive Advantage, and Profitability BA 469 Spring Term, 2007 Prof. Dowling.
3 Internal Analysis: Distinctive Competencies, Competitive Advantage, and Profitability.
Chapter 3 Internal Analysis: Distinctive Competencies, Competitive Advantage, and Profitability.
1-1 Chapter 3 Competitive Strategy and Advantage in the Marketplace McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Building Competitive Advantage through Business Level Strategy
Business Strategy and Policy
 Business Level Strategies are the course of action adopted by an organization for each of its businesses separately, to serve identified customer groups.
Building Competitive Advantage Through Business-Level Strategy
Strategic Management.
Strategic Planning Chapters 8: Competition. The Marketing Plan Marketing Strategy Product Promotion Distribution Price Marketing Mix Business Mission.
Building Competitive Advantage Through Business-Level Strategy
Understanding Business Strategy
When a Low-Cost Provider Strategy Works Best
Strategy and Competitive Advantage
The Five Generic Competitive Strategies
THE FIVE GENERIC COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RAK_IM Telkom_MM Eks 23_CSBD MODULE_ 2009.
Focus strategy Lecture No. By Salman Shahid. Business Level Strategy An organization strategy that seek to determine how an organization should compete.
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any manner.
Recap Chapter 1 & 2. CHAPTER 1 The 3 Basic Functions of Business Organizations Operations Finance Marketing Organization.
4 Strategic Management in the Multinational Company:
Chapter Five Building Competitive Advantage Through Business- Level Strategy.
1 Business-Level Strategy. 2 Business-level strategy: an integrated and coordinated set of commitments and actions the firm uses to gain a competitive.
Managing Industry Competition: Part 2 Competitive Strategies Dr. Ellen A. Drost.
Competitive Strategy Submitted by,. Process of strategic management Perform External audit Develop Vision & mission Perform Internal audit Establish Long.
1-1 Chapter 5 Analyzing a Company’s Competitive Strength and Cost Structure McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
CHAPTER 13 THE STRATEGY OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS.
If the primary determinant of a firm's profitability is the attractiveness of the industry in which it operates, an important secondary determinant.
Strategies in Action Chapter 7. Integration Strategies  Forward integration  involves gaining ownership or increased control over distributors or retailers.
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Course In charge Dr. Mustaghis-ur-Rahman.
Going on the Offensive Commit to building your competitive advantage until it is decisive Build from your most significant strengths and capabilities Attack.
Chapter 4 Crafting a Strategy Screen graphics created by:
Chapter 9 Corporate-Level Strategy: Horizontal Integration, Vertical Integration, and Strategic Outsourcing.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Competitive or Business Level Strategy
The Five Generic Competitive Strategies
Summary of Lessons Learned
Building Competitive Advantage Through Business-Level Strategy
5: Competitive Advantage
THE FIVE GENERIC COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES -
Presentation transcript:

Strategy and Competitive Advantage

Five Generic Strategies Low-cost provider Broad differentiation Best-cost provider Low-cost niche Differentiation niche

Low-cost Provider Strategy Achieve a cost advantage through: Manage internal costs better than rivals Eliminate cost-producing activities

Low-cost Provider Strategy: Controlling the Cost Drivers Economies or diseconomies of scale Learning and experience curve effects Key resources inputs Union vs. nonunion labor Bargaining power and suppliers Locational variables Supply chain management expertise

Low-cost Provider Strategy: Controlling the Cost Drivers Link with other activities Share opportunities with other business units Vertical integration vs. outsourcing Timing and first-mover advantage Capacity utilization

Low-cost Provider Strategy: Controlling the Cost Drivers Managerial decisions: Services to buyers Product features Wages and benefits Distribution channels Delivery times Incentive compensation Specifications to suppliers

Low-cost Provider Strategy: Revamping the Value Chain Shift to e-business technologies Direct to end-user sales and marketing Simplify product design Get rid of the “extras” Reengineer processes Cheaper Simpler More flexible

Low-cost Provider Strategy: Revamping the Value Chain Eliminate high-cost materials and components Relocate facilities Focus on limited products and services Consolidate work steps Eliminate low value-added activities

Low-cost Provider Strategy: When the Strategy Works Best Vigorous price competition Standardized or commodity product Differentiation has little value to buyers Buyers use the product in the same way Low buyer switching costs Buyers have bargaining power New entrants slash prices

Low-cost Provider Strategy: Risks of Strategy Cut prices more than cost savings Advantage may not be sustainable Fixation on cost savings Technological breakthroughs

Differentiation Strategy Successful implementation allows company to: Command a premium price Improve sales and market share Develop brand loyalty

Differentiation Strategy: Where to Create the “Difference” Purchasing and procurement Product design Process design Quality control Distribution channels Marketing, sales and customer service

Differentiation Strategy: When the Strategy Works Best When there are many ways to differentiate and buyers perceive value Buyer needs and uses are diverse Few rivals follow similar approach Frequent technological change and innovation

Differentiation Strategy: Risks of Strategy Value not perceived by buyer because: Focus on incorrect features, attributes, etc. Overdifferentiating Charging too high price Failing to signal value Failing to identify what buyers consider value

Best-cost Provider Strategy Give customers more value for the money Targets value-conscious customers Lower costs are a competitive advantage Risk of getting crushed between rival low-cost and differentiation strategies

Market Niche Strategy: When the Strategy Works Best Target is big enough to be profitable Industry leaders do not need presence Costly for larger rivals to enter Industry is multi-segmented Few rivals in target Have capabilities and resources to compete effectively

Market Niche Strategy: Risks of Strategy Rivals learn to compete effectively Target preferences and needs shift toward the mainstream Target becomes attractive to competitors

Strategic Alliances: Advantages Quick access to critical country markets Gain knowledge of markets and culture from partners Gain access to valuable skills and competencies in new markets Develop synergies Enhance organizational capabilities

Strategic Alliances: Disadvantages Become dependent on partners for essential skills or expertise Partners guard most valuable resources

Mergers and Acquisitions Provides more permanent ties than an alliance Dramatic strengthening of: Market position Ability to exploit opportunities Competitive advantage May achieve cost savings

Vertical Integration: Advantages Reduces costs Adds to technological or competitive strengths Helps differentiate products

Vertical Integration: Disadvantages High capital requirements Reduces flexibility in accommodating demand Need to balance capacity at each stage Reduces manufacturing flexibility Different skills are needed to manage different businesses

Make or Buy: Reasons for Making Maintain core competencies and protect personnel from layoff Lower production cost Unsuitable suppliers Assure adequate supply Utilize surplus labor and make a marginal contribution Obtain desired quality Remove supplier collusion Obtain a unique item that would entail a prohibitive commitment from the supplier Protect proprietary design or quality Increase or maintain size of company

Make or Buy: Reasons for Buying Frees management to deal with its primary business Lower acquisition cost Preserve supplier commitment Obtain technical or management ability Inadequate capacity Reduce inventory costs Ensure flexibility and alternate source of supply Inadequate managerial or technical resources Reciprocity Item is protected by patent or trade secret

Outsourcing: When to Unbundle Supplier has lower cost and/or higher quality Activities are not crucial to sustaining a competitive advantage Reduces risk of exposure to changing environment Streamlines operations Increases flexibility Reduces costs Reduces time Allows company to focus on core businesses

Outsourcing: Advantages Higher quality and/or lower cost Improves ability to innovate Enhances strategic flexibility Access to diverse expertise Firm can concentrate on core competencies Strengthen supplier commitment

Offensive Strategies Meet or exceed competitor strengths Capitalize on competitor weaknesses Simultaneous initiatives End-run offensives Guerilla offensives Preemptive strikes

Offensive Strategies: Whom to Attack Market leaders Runner-up firms Struggling firms Small regional and local firms

Defensive Strategies Build obstacles to challengers Signal that retaliation is likely Public announcements Match competitor offerings Occasional counterresponse Maintain a war chest

First-mover Strategies Advantages Build image and reputation New technology reduces overall cost Build customer loyalty Preemptive strike Long-term profits are enhanced Disadvantages Pioneering is costly Products may be easily reengineered by followers Competitors may be able to leapfrog