NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Our National Parks Founded in part by John Muir. John Muir
Advertisements

National Parks Research Project. National Parks The purpose of the United States National Parks system is to protect the scenery, wildlife and natural.
ALASKA Denali – (video) Denalivideo Gates of the Arctic Glacier Bay (videos) Glacier Bayvideos Katmai Kenai Fjords Kobuk Valley Lake Clark Wrangell –St.
PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
Assessing PM 2.5 Background Levels and Local Add-On Prepared by Bryan Lambeth, PE Field Operations Support Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Biomass Smoke Aerosol: Spatial and Temporal Pattern over the US October 2005
1 The Asian Aerosol Contribution to North American PM Pollution: Recognizing Asian Transport Composition and Concentration Modeling Regional Aerosol Burdens.
Partially Supported by Inter-RPO WG – NESCAUM F ast A erosol S ensing T ools for N atural E vent T racking FASTNET CAPITA September 2004 Natural Aerosol.
Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham.
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effect of Air Pollutants (ICAP) Second Workshop, October 21-22, 2004, Chapel Hill, NC Intercontinental Aerosol.
IMPROVE Report 2006 L. Debell, K. Gebhart, B. Schichtel and W. Malm.
References: Acidic Deposition:State of Science and Technology (report 24) 1990 Visibility: Existing and Historical.
National Parks Research Project. Project Requirements Create a research project that details: –History of your park –Ecology of park (habitat, animals,
BART – Source Attribution of Visibility Impairment WESTAR August 31, 2005 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Todd Hawes
Physical Regions of the U.S.. Coastal Lowlands Southeastern Maine to Eastern and Southern U.S. to Eastern Texas. –Forests of hickory, oak, pine, and other.
Wind Blown Dust Monitoring and Modeling at Owens Lake, CA Duane Ono Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District July 2004 WRAP Dust Emissions Joint.
Reason for Doing Cluster Analysis Identify similar and dissimilar aerosol monitoring sites so that we can test the ability of the Causes of Haze Assessment.
Results of Ambient Air Analyses in Support of Transport Rule Presentation for RPO Workshop November 2003.
Colorado Plateau Sulfate Episode Worst 20% at 5 sites: INGA, BRCA, MEVE, WEMI & SAPE Best 20% at GICL, SACR, CHIR, SIAN, GUMO, TONT, and most California.
California’s Amazing 4 regions
Evolving Understanding of Pollutant Transport from Asia to North America Richard (Tony) VanCuren Research Division, California Air Resources Board Department.
MODELS3 – IMPROVE – PM/FRM: Comparison of Time-Averaged Concentrations R. B. Husar S. R. Falke 1 and B. S. Schichtel 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
Case study for September 3, 1997-Eastern US sulfate transport to Colorado Plateau 12 spatially coherent sites in TX, NM, AZ, CO 20% worst haze,with sulfate.
Global and Local Dust over North America Direct questions to Rudolf B. Husar
Cloud Types Dr. Dave Dempsey Professor of Meteorology Department of Geosciences San Francisco State University Dr. Dave Dempsey Professor of Meteorology.
Incorporating Monitoring, Modeling, and EI Data into AoH Analysis AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Application of Combined Mathematical and Meteorological Receptor Models (UNMIX & Residence Time Analysis) to IMPROVE Aerosol Data from Brigantine.
Regional Haze Rule Reasonable Progress Goals I.Overview II.Complications III.Simplifying Approaches Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Reasonable.
Chemical Composition of PM2.5 over N. America Big Bend (scale 0-15 ug/m3) G.Smoky Mtn. Yellowstone Mammuth Cave Sequoia ? ?
Jenny Hand CIRA Acadia National Park, ME Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE)
Exceptional Event Analysis Draft, July 13, 2005
Estimating the Contribution of Smoke and Its Fuel Types to Fine Particulate Carbon using a Hybrid- CMB Model Bret A. Schichtel and William C. Malm - NPS.
Spatial Pattern of PM2.5 over the US PM2.5 FRM Network Analysis for the First Year: July 1999-June 2000 Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf.
Global and Local Dust over North America R. B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis (CAPITA) Washington University, St. Louis, MO Prepared.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Geology Unit Project Landforms. Mid-Atlantic Ridge.
Oil & Natural Gas Partnership. Problem We are having problems meeting NAAQS and regional haze standards in the West Our existing programs are sometimes.
AoH Conference Call October 8, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
PM Event Detection from Time Series Contributed by the FASNET Community, Sep Correspondence to R Husar, R PoirotR Husar, R Poirot Coordination Support.
Bret A. Schichtel Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis (CAPITA) Washington University St. Louis, MO, Presented at EPA’s National Exposure.
WRAP Meeting Sept 13, 2006 Air Resources in Western National Parks Chris Shaver Air Resources Division National Park Service.
Global and Local Dust over North America Initial Assessment by a Virtual Community on Dust Coordinated by R.
National Parks System America’s Crown Jewel. People and National Parks of Significance O John Muir O Theodore Roosevelt O National Parks Service (1916)
MARAMA/NESCAUM/LADCO Project: MARAMA/NESCAUM/LADCO Project: Source Apportionment of Air Quality Monitoring Data: Paired Aerosol / Trajectory Database Analysis.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)
Proposal to NARSTO: Incorporation of Canadian and Mexican PM data into NAM Spatio-Temporal Analysis Submitted to NARSTO Rudolf Husar May 2001.
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW) Model Performance Evaluation CAMx and CMAQ 2011b University of North Carolina (UNC-IE)
August 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Characterizing PM23 Spatial Patterns Urban spatial patterns: explore PM concentrations in urban settings. Urban/Rural.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
Aerosol Pattern over Southern North America Tropospheric Aerosols: Science and Decisions in an International Community A NARSTO Technical Symposium on.
National Parks Research Project. What are National Parks? America's National Parks An Introduction to National Parks - PBS.
Impact of Transported Background Ozone on Western U.S. Air Quality David Parrish CIRES University of Colorado NOAA/ESRL Chemical Sciences Division Boulder,
Natural Haze Levels II: Application of the New IMPROVE Algorithm to Natural Species Concentrations Estimates Final Report by the Natural Haze Levels II.
“You Ask Me Why I Love Her ?” – John Wayne
Jeannine Kuropatkin Arizona State Coordinator, 2016 GAWeek
The average PM2.5 mass concentration based on IMPROVE data available from September 2000 to December 2002 is 3.3 mg/m3 The highest occurrence of the 20%
National Parks Project
Evaluating Revised Tracking Metric for Regional Haze Planning
Tom Moore (WESTAR and WRAP) and Pat Brewer (NPS ARD)
Causes of Haze Assessment Brief Overview and Status Report
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
From a manuscript draft courtesy of Bill Malm, National Park Service
PM2.5 Annual primary standard currently 15 ug/m3
Natural Haze Levels II: Application of the New IMPROVE Algorithm to Natural Species Concentrations Estimates Final Report by the Natural Haze Levels II.
Sulfate Contributions to Regional Haze in the WRAP Region
Marc Pitchford NOAA/EPA
Presentation transcript:

NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM Total PM Local PM Speciated Seasonal over the Central EUS TOCIntroductionDataGlobal PatternNAM DustNAM SmokeNAM Total PM The seasonal aerosol aerosol pattern at the IMPROVE sites is examined using two methodologies: – Seasonal Mass Balance Charts – Seasonal Percentile Frequency Charts

Method 1: Cumulative Seasonal PM2.5 Composition PM2.5 chemical components were calculated based on the CIRA methodologyCIRA methodology In addition, the the organics were (tentatively) further separated as Primary Smoke Organics (red) and Remainder organics (purple) PSO = 20*(K *Si – 0.02* Na) Remainder Org = Organics - PSO Also, the ‘Unknown’ mass (white area) is the difference between the gravimetrically measured and the chemically reconstructed PM2.5. The daily chemical composition was aggregated over the available IMPROVE data range ( ) to retain the seasonal structure. I order to reduce the noise the daily data were smoothed by a 15-day moving average filter. Shenandoah

Method 2: Seasonal Percentiles, At Lye Brook, VT, the clean days (20 percentile) corresponds to ~4 ug/m3 throughout the year The dirty days are (80-90%-ile) have 2-5 times higher concentration than the clean days. Great Smoky Mtn. Lye Brook Clean days (20%) ‘Clean’ days (20%) Dirty days, 80-90% At the Smoky Mtn, the clean days in the winter are also ~4 ug/m3. However in the summer, even the ‘clean’ days have 14 ug/m3 PM2.5. The dirty days are have 2-3 times higher than the clean days through out the year. The charts depict the magnitude of seasonal and synoptic variation The synoptic-scale variation (day-to-day) can be measured by the percentile spread

Regional Grouping of Sites For this presentation the IMPROVE sites were grouped as follows: –New England () –Mid-Atlantic () –Central EUS () –Peripheral () For each region, the seasonality is displayed for: –Chemical Mass Balance –Carbonaceous Mass Balance –Fine Particle Mass Percentiles –Coarse Mass Percentiles –Sulfate Percentiles –Fine Soil Percentiles –Tot. Carbon. + 'Unknown' Percentiles –Smoke Organics Percentiles

South WUS: Chemical Mass Balance Tonto Bandelier Petrified F. Saguaro NM Chiricahua

Southwest : Chemical Mass Balance Bryce Canyon Mesa Verde Hopi Point Weminuche W G Sand Dunes Canyonlands White River

Idaho: Chemical Mass Balance Sawtooth Crater Moon Salmon Scoville Three Sisters

Brooklyn L Bridger, WY Nevada-Wyoming: Chemical Mass Balance Jarbidge Yellowstone Lone Peak Great Basin Mt. Zirkel Rocky Mt

Washington-Oregon: Chemical Mass Balance Columbia RG Crater Lake Columbia G. Glacier NP Sula MT

San Joaquin Valley: Chemical Mass Balance Lassen VolcanDeath Valley Pinnacles Bliss StatePark Yosemite

Mntn and Valleys: Chemical Mass Balance San GorgonioDeath Valley Sequoia South Tahoe Snoqualamie

WUS Coastal Sites: Chemical Mass Balance Mauna LoaPuget Sound Point Reyes Haleakala Redwood Denali

Big Bend and Guadal: Chemical Mass Balance Guadalupe Big Bend

South WUS: Carbonaceous Mass Balance Tonto Bandelier Petrified F. Saguaro NM Chiricahua

Southwest : Carbonaceous Mass Balance Bryce Canyon Mesa Verde Hopi Point Weminuche W G Sand Dunes Canyonlands White River

Idaho: Carbonaceous Mass Balance Sawtooth Crater Moon Salmon Scoville Three Sisters

Bridger, WY Nevada-Wyoming: Carbonaceous Mass Balance Jarbidge Yellowstone Lone Peak Great Basin Mt. ZirkelRocky Mt

Washington-Oregon: Carbonaceous Mass Balance Columbia RG Crater Lake Columbia G. Glacier NP Sula MT

San Joaquin Valley: Carbonaceous Mass Balance Lassen VolcanDeath Valley Pinnacles Bliss StatePark Yosemite

Mntn and Valleys: Carbonaceous Mass Balance San GorgonioDeath Valley Sequoia South Tahoe Snoqualamie

WUS Coastal Sites: Carbonaceous Mass Balance Mauna LoaPuget Sound Point Reyes Haleakala Redwood Denali

Big Bend and Guadal: Carbonaceous Mass Balance Guadalupe Big Bend

South WUS: Fine Particle Mass Percentiles Tonto Bandelier Petrified F. Saguaro NM Chiricahua

Southwest : Fine Particle Mass Percentiles Bryce Canyon Mesa Verde Hopi Point Weminuche W G Sand Dunes Canyonlands White River

Idaho: Fine Particle Mass Percentiles Sawtooth Crater Moon Salmon Scoville Three Sisters

Bridger, WY Nevada-Wyoming: Fine Particle Mass Percentiles Jarbidge Yellowstone Lone Peak Brooklyn L Great Basin Mt. Zirkel Rocky Mt

Washington-Oregon: Fine Particle Mass Percentiles Columbia RG Crater Lake Columbia G. Glacier NP Sula MT

San Joaquin Valley: Particle Mass Percentiles Lassen VolcanDeath Valley Pinnacles Bliss StatePark Yosemite

Mntn and Valleys: Fine Particle Mass Percentiles San GorgonioDeath Valley Sequoia South Tahoe Snoqualamie

WUS Coastal Sites: Fine Particle Mass Percentiles Mauna LoaPuget Sound Point Reyes Haleakala Redwood Denali

Big Bend and Guadal: Fine Particle Mass Percentiles Guadalupe Big Bend

South WUS: Coarse Mass Percentiles Tonto Bandelier Petrified F. Saguaro NM Chiricahua

Southwest : Coarse Mass Percentiles Bryce Canyon Mesa Verde Hopi Point Weminuche W G Sand Dunes Canyonlands White River

Idaho: Coarse Mass Percentiles Sawtooth Crater Moon Salmon Scoville Three Sisters

Nevada-Wyoming: Coarse Mass Percentiles Jarbidge Yellowstone Lone Peak Bridger, WYGreat Basin Mt. ZirkelRocky Mt

Washington-Oregon: Coarse Mass Percentiles Columbia RG Crater Lake Columbia G. Glacier NP Sula MT

San Joaquin Valley: Coarse Mass Percentiles Lassen VolcanDeath Valley Pinnacles Bliss StatePark Yosemite

Mountain Passes and Valle: Coarse Mass Percentiles San GorgonioDeath Valley Sequoia South Tahoe Snoqualamie

Western US Coastal Sites: Coarse Mass Percentiles Mauna LoaPuget Sound Point Reyes Haleakala Redwood Denali

Big Bend and Guadalupe: Coarse Mass Percentiles Guadalupe Big Bend

South WUS: Sulfate Percentiles Tonto Bandelier Petrified F. Saguaro NM Chiricahua

Southwest : Sulfate Percentiles Bryce Canyon Mesa Verde Hopi Point Weminuche W G Sand Dunes Canyonlands White River

Idaho: Sulfate Percentiles Sawtooth Crater Moon Salmon Scoville Three Sisters

Bridger, WY Nevada-Wyoming: Sulfate Percentiles Jarbidge Yellowstone Lone Peak Brooklyn L Great Basin Mt. Zirkel Rocky Mt

Washington-Oregon: Sulfate Percentiles Columbia RG Crater Lake Columbia G. Glacier NP Sula MT

San Joaquin Valley: Sulfate Percentiles Lassen VolcanDeath Valley Pinnacles Bliss StatePark Yosemite

Mountain Passes and Valleys: Sulfate Percentiles San GorgonioDeath Valley Sequoia South Tahoe Snoqualamie

Western US Coastal Sites: Sulfate Percentiles Mauna LoaPuget Sound Point Reyes Haleakala Redwood Denali

Big Bend and Guadalupe: Sulfate Percentiles Guadalupe Big Bend

South WUS: Fine Soil Percentiles Fine dust Tonto Bandelier Petrified F. Saguaro NM Chiricahua

Southwest : Fine Soil Percentiles Fine dust Bryce Canyon Mesa Verde Hopi Point Weminuche W G Sand Dunes Canyonlands White River

Idaho: Fine Soil Percentiles Fine dust Sawtooth Crater Moon Salmon Scoville Three Sisters

Nevada-Wyoming: Fine Soil Percentiles Fine dust Jarbidge Sawtooth Yellowstone Lone PeakBridger, WY Brooklyn L Great Basin Mt. Zirkel Rocky Mt

Washington-Oregon: Fine Soil Percentiles Fine dust Columbia RG Crater Lake Columbia G. Glacier NP Sula MT

San Joaquin Valley: Fine Soil Percentiles Fine dust Lassen VolcanDeath Valley Pinnacles Bliss StatePark Yosemite

Mountain Passes and Valleys: Fine Soil Percentiles Fine dust San GorgonioDeath Valley Sequoia South Tahoe Snoqualamie

Western US Coastal Sites: Fine Soil Percentiles Fine dust Mauna LoaPuget Sound Point Reyes Haleakala Redwood Denali

Big Bend and Guadalupe: Fine Soil Percentiles Fine dust Guadalupe Big Bend

South WUS: Tot. Carbon + 'Unknown' Percentiles Tonto Bandelier Petrified F. Saguaro NM Chiricahua

Southwest : Tot. Carbon + 'Unknown' Percentiles Bryce Canyon Mesa Verde Hopi Point Weminuche W G Sand Dunes Canyonlands White River

Idaho: Tot. Carbon + 'Unknown' Percentiles Sawtooth Crater Moon Salmon Scoville Three Sisters

Bridger, WY Nevada-WY: Tot. Carbon + 'Unknown' Percentiles Jarbidge Yellowstone Lone Peak Rocky Mt Great Basin Mt. Zirkel

Washington-OR: Tot. Carbon + 'Unknown' Percentiles Columbia RG Crater Lake Columbia G. Glacier NP Sula MT

San Joaquin V: Tot. Carbon + 'Unknown' Percentiles Lassen VolcanDeath Valley Pinnacles Bliss StatePark Yosemite

Mntn and Val: Tot. Carbon + 'Unknown' Percentiles San GorgonioDeath Valley Sequoia South Tahoe Snoqualamie

WUS Coastal : Tot. Carbon + 'Unknown' Percentiles Mauna LoaPuget Sound Point Reyes Haleakala Redwood Denali

BigB and Gu: Tot. Carbon + 'Unknown' Percentiles Guadalupe Big Bend

South WUS: Smoke Organics Percentiles Tonto Bandelier Petrified F. Saguaro NM Chiricahua

Southwest : Smoke Organics Percentiles Bryce Canyon Mesa Verde Hopi Point Weminuche W G Sand Dunes Canyonlands White River

Idaho: Smoke Organics Percentiles Sawtooth Crater Moon Salmon Scoville Three Sisters

Bridger, WY Nevada-Wyoming: Smoke Organics Percentiles Jarbidge Yellowstone Lone Peak Brooklyn L Great Basin Mt. Zirkel Rocky Mt

Washington-Oregon: Smoke Organics Percentiles Columbia RG Crater Lake Columbia G. Glacier NP Sula MT

San Joaquin Valley: Smoke Organics Percentiles Lassen VolcanDeath Valley Pinnacles Bliss StatePark Yosemite

Mntn and Valleys: Smoke Organics Percentiles San GorgonioDeath Valley Sequoia South Tahoe Snoqualamie

WUS Coastal Sites: Smoke Organics Percentiles Mauna LoaPuget Sound Point Reyes Haleakala Redwood Denali

Big Bend and Guadalu: Smoke Organics Percentiles Guadalupe Big Bend