Implementation of Antidegradation Policies for Indiana Waters.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Concurrency Management. What is Concurrency? Chapter , F.S. requires Comprehensive Plans to adopt a concurrency management system,
Advertisements

1 Stormwater Program Videoconference April 23, 2013 Bill Cole, Water Quality Standards Unit.
Antideg and Municipal Stormwater Discussion Sept. 23, 2009.
Presented to: Minnesota Chamber of Commerce October 1, 2012.
Watershed Staff Videoconference October 17, 2012.
A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management
Welcome! Water Pollution Control Advisory Council.
The WQCD Permitting Perspective Janet Kieler Permits Section Manager.
Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality
General Waste Discharge Requirements for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations within the Santa Ana Region Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa.
Water Quality Standards and MS4 Storm Water Permitting.
ANTIDEGRADATON and NITROGEN IN GREAT BAY Paul Currier, P.E., P.G. New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services NHEP Technical Advisory Committee.
RIPDES Storm Water Program: Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s)
1 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Budget Presentation FY
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System -NPDES Permit Process-
The Compact  Legally enforceable contract among the Great Lakes States  Provided for in the U.S. Constitution  Ratification by State legislatures 
SUMMARY OF GALLATIN RIVER OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATER (ORW) DESIGNATION Presented to: Water Pollution Control Advisory Council August 31, 2006 Presented.
Water Quality Standards: Rulemaking Pipeline Adrienne Nemura Geosyntec Consultants US Conference of Mayors Water Council Washington, DC April 30, 2015.
Notebook Ref Summary of the Issue ADEC policy states: “If the quality of a water exceeds levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish,
Developing a Waste Water Discharge Fee Programme in Sri Lanka Kolitha Himal Muthukuda Arachchi Deputy Director General, Pollution Control Central Environmental.
WQBELs Karen Holligan May 6, WQBELs – A Four-Piece Puzzle Numerical criteria (toxic pollutants) Water body quality Effluent fraction Bioavailable.
Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards rule-makings: human health-based criteria and implementation tools Cheryl Niemi Washington Department of Ecology.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Ministry of the Environment Certificates of Approval for an Anaerobic Digestion Facility Post Construction DIGGING INTO BIOGAS DETAILS WORKSHOP April 5,
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
Regulations that Protect Clean Water Jocelyn Mullen, P.E. PART 2 OF PRESENTATION Presented at The Water Course January 27, 2010 Mesa County Water Association.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
1 IDEM Overview of March 14, 2008 Draft Antidegradation Rule Presented at the April 29, 2008 Antidegradation Stakeholder Meeting.
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Brock Tabor Nancy Sonafrank Alaska Forum on the Environment 2013.
Industrial Storm Water Permitting in California: a Regulatory Perspective An intensive overview of the program, its key principles, and likely future –
STATUS OF ECOLOGY’S DRAFT FLOW BLENDING POLICY WATER QUALITY PARTNERSHIP MEETING January 20, 2005.
Antidegradation Standards and Implementation Procedures Overview of Third Notice Comments and Responses March 14,
1 Influence of Main River Basin District Plans on Environment Czech University of Life Sciences Faculty of Environmental Sciences Miroslav Martis,Vladimir.
Antidegradation Implementation: Federal Framework and Indiana Process Presented March 7, 2008.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
NPDES Wastewater Permitting Update 2015 NCMA Workshop Tom Belnick DWR/NPDES Permitting.
Orange County Board of County Commissioners Update on USEPA Rulemaking for Numeric Nutrient Criteria Utilities Department January 26, 2010 Utilities Department.
Designing De Minimis Indiana Antidegradation Workshop April 29, 2008 Brad Klein -- Environmental Law & Policy Center.
Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges Presented by: William Fletcher, ODOT February 5, 2008.
Policy for Maintaining Instream Flows in Northern California Coastal Streams Monitoring and Reporting Provisions for Water Rights Victoria Whitney Deputy.
Notebook Ref Summary of the Issue Part of a Tier II antidegradation review should incorporate the consideration of feasible alternatives, some of.
The Hydrosphere and Us BPS Our Good Health Depends Upon…  Monitoring of the hydrosphere  Water quality standards  Methods of water treatment.
Antidegradation and Alternatives Analysis Mary E. Gardner Regulatory Programs Administrator Littleton/Englewood WWTP Colorado.
ANTIDEGRADATION and THE BENEFITS OF PUMP LOGS FOR BATCH DISCHARGES Given by: Dan Murray, Terrell Hendren and Josh Frazier.
Bureau of Watershed Management Preliminary Regulatory Proposal Chapter 102 Erosion, Sediment and Stormwater Management December 19, 2007.
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS. KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF A SEP Projects must improve, protect or reduce risks to public health or environment. Projects.
Multi-Objective Decision Model for Urban Water Use: Planning for a Regional Water Re-Use Ordinance.
1 Water Quality Antidegradation: Guidance to Implement Tier II Summary of Discussion: Review the Tier II Rule requirements. Clarify what feedback we are.
1 Public Meeting Regarding US Steel’s Gary Work NPDES Permit Renewal September 26, 2007 IN Department of Environmental Management.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
1 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Budget Presentation FY
IDEM FIELD HEARING Renewal of ASU Operating Permit December 15 th, 2015 Protect Our Ground Water and the Indian Creek Watershed STOP!
PUBLIC HEARING September 15, Draft NPDES Permits for ArcelorMittal Facilities Indiana Harbor West, Central Wastewater Treatment Plant, Indiana.
Connie Brower NC DENR Division of Water Resources.
WQBELs Karen Holligan September 23, WQBELs – A Four-Piece Puzzle Numerical criteria (toxic pollutants) Water body quality Effluent fraction Bioavailable.
1 Water Quality Standards - CWA and Porter-Cologne An Overview.
Slide 1 California Implementation Water Board Policies.
David Kurz, P.E. Lead Wastewater Engineer
Module 17: MIXING ZONES A limited area or volume of water where initial dilution of a discharge takes place and where numeric water quality criteria.
Cara Cowan Watts Graduate Student Biosystems Engineering
NH MS4 Stormwater Permit -- Guidance for NHDES related provisions
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Spencer Bohaboy Policy Development Specialist Water Quality Policy
World Health Organization
Update on Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET)
Update on Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET)
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
16MN056 - Public Hearing August 26 to 29, 2019 Baker Lake, Nunavut
Presentation transcript:

Implementation of Antidegradation Policies for Indiana Waters

Outline What Are the Components of Water Quality Standards? What Are Current Antidegradation Policies for Indiana? What Are the GLI Antidegradation Rule Components? Proposed Approach How Will the Default Antidegradation Effluent Limits Be Determined? Is There a De Minimus? What Are the Requirements for a New/Increased Discharge? What Information is Required in Part 1 of the Antidegradation Application? When is Part 1 of the Antidegradation Application Considered to be Complete? What Information is Required in Part 2 of the Antidegradation Application? When is Part 2 of the Antidegradation Application Considered to be Complete? How Will the Public Be Notified About the Process? Water Quality Project in an OSRW Summary Flow Chart

What Are the Components of Water Quality Standards? Designated Uses (40 CFR §131.10)  fishing, recreation, drinking Criteria (40 CFR §131.11)  protects designated uses  narrative or numeric Antidegradation Policy (40 CFR §131.12)  3 tiers  Tier 1: maintain existing uses  Tier 2: protection of high quality waters (HQWs) Tier 2.9: Indiana Outstanding State Resource Waters (OSRWs) & Exceptional Use Waters (EUWs) limited degradation  Tier 3: ONRWS; no degradation

What Are Current Antidegradation Policies for Indiana? 1970s – IDEM adopted antidegradation policy for all waters as part of the WQS IDEM adopted antidegradation implementation procedures for the Great Lakes Basin ONLY as part of GLI initiative

What Are the GLI Antidegradation Rule Components? De Minimus Background Concentration Total Loading Capacity Unused Loading Capacity Economic Review Health Risk Review Treatment Technology Analysis Pollution Prevention / Alternatives Analysis Affordability Analysis

Proposed Approach Applicable to all surface waters  new/increased discharges that result in new/increased permit limits Technology based Default antidegradation effluent limits

How Will the Default Antidegradation Effluent Limits Be Determined? Determined based on the most stringent of:  Water Quality Based Effluent Limit (WQBEL) calculated using no in-stream dilution OR  Best Available Treatment (BAT)  best professional judgment of the state in accordance with 327 IAC (BPJ/BAT); Greater protection than current regulations

Is There a De Minimus? High Quality Waters: projected effluent limit is equal to or less than the default antidegradation effluent limit Outstanding State Resource Waters: projected effluent limit is equal to or less than the ambient water quality

What Are the Requirements for a New/Increased Discharge? 1. Determine that discharge doesn’t qualify as non- significant lowering 2.Satisfactory completion of ‘Necessary & Social/Economic’ tests (Antideg. Application Part 1) 3. If default antideg. limit(s) accepted, proceed to permitting  For OSRWs, implement water quality project/pay fee 4. If default antideg. limit(s) not accepted, complete treatment alternatives analysis (Antideg. Application Part 2) 5. If treatment alternatives analysis is acceptable, permitting proceeds with alternate limits

What Information is Required in Part 1 of the Antidegradation Application? 1. Facility Information 2. Wastewater Characterization 3. The Necessary Demonstration 4. Social/Economic Benefits Demonstration

When is Part 1 of the Antidegradation Application Considered to be Complete? Part 1 is complete when IDEM receives a letter from permittee accepting default antideg. limit(s).

What Information is Required in Part 2 of the Antidegradation Application? Wastewater Treatment/Control Alternatives Analysis  analysis of end-of-pipe treatment methods  compare pollutant removal/reduction  compare cost to install and operate  evaluation of Alternatives Analysis

When is Part 2 of the Antidegradation Application Considered to be Complete? Part 2 is complete when IDEM receives a letter from permittee accepting alternate limit(s).

How Will the Public Be Notified About the Process? By information on an IDEM website providing notice of a complete antideg. application. This information will also be available through electronic notification. By public noticing of a draft permit after the applicant has successfully completed the requirements for the Necessary and Social/Economic tests AND either accepts default antideg. limits OR successful completion of treatment alternatives analysis.

Water Quality Project in an OSRW Applicants choosing to implement a water quality improvement project,  must submit the proposed project to IDEM for concurrence approval  show adequate demonstration that project will result in an overall improvement to the water quality in the OSRW  demonstrate cooperation with local communities  implementation of project will be included in the permit as a schedule of compliance Public notice and participation May not use a water quality improvement project that is being planned/implemented due to other regulatory requirements or the settlement of an enforcement action

Summary Flow Chart

Questions??