TREND IN INNOVATION FINANCE IN THE EU Marc Schublin, Head of Division, European Investment Fund Coordination – General Affairs – Advisory Services Knowledge Economy Forum IV, Istanbul, 23 March 2005
2 Finance for innovation = the EU side EIF as EU Fund of Funds Venture Capital: a difficult market The limits of Venture Capital in supporting innovation New Initiatives throughout the EU Towards new financial instruments and concepts Summary
3 EIF at a glance Institutional set-up : Shareholders: European Investment Bank (60%) – European Commission (30%) – 31 banks 10%) Contribute to Community objectives (entrepreneurship, research and innovation, regional development, etc …) Ensure an appropriate return on its own resources Important role in the context of Lisbon Strategy / 3% target (Innovation – Employment) EIF products – Venture capital / “Risk Capital Arm” of EIB SME Portfolio guarantees … and Advisory services / Technical assistance
4 VC investments: EIF’s role Biggest European early-stage Fund of Funds (EUR 3bn in 200 Funds) Participates as a pari-passu cornerstone investor (always commercial terms) Long-term committed and pro-active investor Know-how helps in structuring a fund / best practice Widespread network in European venture capital industry which may help to attract co-investors Neutral, supranational investor Investments based on own resources and mainly on behalf of EIB VC mandate, EC Seed Capital scheme and ERP Facility (early stage in Germany) Investment activity only in EU and Acceding Countries
5 The innovation cycle covered by EIF Future coverage Later-stage Buy-out IPOs Tech Transfer Incubators Pre-Seed Business Angels Expansion / Dev. Capital Early StageSeed * Currently covered by EIF advisory services (Technology Transfer Accelerator) ADVISORY « VENTURE CAPITAL »« PRIVATE EQUITY » Future extended coverage *
6 European VC Funds Raised 1990 to 2003: few investors stay on board Source: EVCA / Thomson Financial / PricewaterhouseCoopers
7 VC is a Risky Business Pooled IRR - December 31, 2003: Early stage: 1.9% (Top Quarter: 14.8%) All Venture: 7.2% (Top Quarter: 23.9%) best performing funds are in the segment of € m = 9.2% or 12.8% over a 10-year period All Private Equity: 9.9% (Top Quarter: 24.3%) Source: European Venture Capital Association (EVCA)
8 Constraints and limits of VC in supporting Innovation High risk; very qualified management teams needed Balance public/private investors? Good VC funds governance (independence of managers vs investors, transparence, etc.) Management costs, long maturity Critical mass Seed-early stage especially efficient near important “technological clusters” (Heidelberg, Cambridge, Finland, etc…) In the EU, about companies supported by VC (compared to a total SME population of 14 million)
9 Constraints and limits of VC in support of Innovation: some lessons learnt Mainly recent public initiatives through appropriate use of budget funding (Research, SME) Critical mass, grouping of energies, system approach necessary (national vs regional?) Legal, tax issues are key (No European patent!)
10 How to support seed? Interesting initiatives (private, public, financial, political) IP2IPO (UK)=example GBP 20m loan to Oxford Chemistry Department repaid through 50% of IPR during 15 years KAROLINSKA (S)=pooling of spin-offs sold to VCs France = merger of Public Innovation Agency ANVAR (managing grants) and SME Development Bank creation of “pôles technologiques” (super clusters) + UK, B, NL, ITA, etc Appropriation of “Lisbon Strategy” by EU Member States
11 EIF’s role in this context Be proactive (EU summit 23 March 2005) on the investment side = 1.Side funds with Business Angels (BA) (if structured as BA networks) (Specific EU funding under the Competitiveness & Innovation Programme) 2.Common approach with EIB, generation of hybrid instruments (Loan – Equity – Mezzanine) Develop Advisory Services and Technical Assistance
12 Advisory Services Complement the 2 main product lines, EIF as a “ Multilateral Development Bank ” committed to provide technical assistance and advisory services Objective is to provide financial engineering to organisations active in the field of VC and SME Guarantees Fee based activity Two domains of intervention Creation, growth and development of SMEs VC, seed capital, guarantee schemes, business angel networks, tech transfer, etc. for regional and national authorities / Agencies Complex financial structures: for the European Commission
13 Advisory Services TTA:Avoid fragmentation, incentive Research Centres to work together, bridge the gap between Research and Market CDTI project:public Innovation Fund of Funds, with targeted support to Tech SMEs (Spain)
14 TTA 1 Cluster Size Cambridge UK MunichBoston Researchers23,5509,2006,300 Publications38,00015,00010,000 Number of public companies created >38>11>4 Number of biotech companies located in cluster >200>110>60 Bay Area N/A 29,500 >44 >190 Large clusters necessary to build self-sustaining ecosystem Source:European Innovation Scoreboard, BCG Cluster Report 2001, EIF analysis and interviews
15 TTA 1 Licensing Revenues 2002 Licensing activity too small to create any noticeable effects US Europe UniversityRevenues [m€]UniversityRevenues [m€] Pasteur32.6 University of Edinburgh4.5 Utrecht*4.0 Cambridge3.1 INRIA*3.0 VIB*2.7 LMU Munich0.2 Note:*Includes other forms of revenues Source:European Innovation Scoreboard, BCG Cluster Report 2001, EIF analysis and interviews
16 TTA 2: Focus of TTA funding: Types of SPVs funded by the TTA R&D Tech transfer / Proof-of-concept Marketable product «Techno- logy» IP «Prototype » IP LAB « Licensing » SPVs « Spin off » SPVs « Hybrid » SPVs Licensing to corporation Sale to corporation Purchase / investment by other investors IPO Potential exits for the SPV projects Investment focus of TTA
17 CDTI 1 Fund of Funds Parallel supplementary vehicle The CDTI/EIF Spanish Venture Capital Investment Programme EIF Programme Manager/Advisor CDTI Programme technology partner Young Fund Window Generalist funds Tech / Innovation funds Foreign tech funds Tech SMEs Generalist SMEs Tech SMEs Co-invests 1:1