The Vision Implementation Project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Presentation to the Cabinet A Presentation to Stakeholders
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Response to Recommendations by the National Association of Child Care Resource & Referral Agencies (NACCRRA) The Massachusetts Child Care Resource & Referral.
The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence A framework for continuous improvement.
Capacity Building Global Support Program Enhance the institutional capacity necessary to support professionals in implementing tiger conservation over.
Developing Our Leaders – Creating a Foundation for Success
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
Overview of Mission Statement & Organization. Development Communication Division External Affairs Vice Presidency DevComm Vision To put communication.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
(Title) Name(s) of presenter(s) Organizational Affiliation Welcome WI Mental Health Collaborative V February 24, 2014.
THREE YEAR PLAN PRESENTATION MANDATE Tasked with the responsibility of improving productivity in all spheres of the nation’s economic and.
Improving Your Business Results Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec – All Rights Reserved June 26, 2002 BEYOND SIX SIGMA: A HOLISTIC.
SEM Planning Model.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
System Office Performance Management
Orientation to Performance and Quality Improvement Plan
System Office Performance Management
Using An Organizational Assessment : A framework to Help Agencies Build on Strengths, Recognize Challenges, and Develop a Comprehensive Work Plan, CWDA.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Political Leadership How to influence! And Current OH Issues Carol Bannister Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
AugusBoth checks were cut the was cut on1/16 and the other one for was cut yesterday, both went out yesterday Marybeth Tahar Interaction.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Stages of Commitment to Change: Leading Institutional Engagement Lorilee R. Sandmann, University of Georgia Jeri Childers, Virginia Tech National Outreach.
District Workforce Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Workforce Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 62 slides.
Human and Institutional Capacity Development Project in Rwanda (HICD-R) CORE TEAM KM WORKSHOP February 26, 2015 Delivered by Courtney Roberts.
EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAINING Group 5. Effectiveness of Training  What is “effectiveness of training”? Effectiveness means producing an intended result.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
C Coaching for Performance E.S. Tunis and Associates Inc. Welcome to ESTA’s learning design workshop. The ideas developed in this workshop will set the.
Sustaining Community-Based Programs and Supporting Families: The Virginia Tech Interactive Training On Sustainability Training Developed by: Lydia I. Marek.
BPK Strategic Planning: Briefing for Denpasar Regional Office Leadership Team Craig Anderson Ahmed Fajarprana August 11-12, 2005.
1 Analysing the contributions of fellowships to industrial development November 2010 Johannes Dobinger, UNIDO Evaluation Group.
Managing Organizational Change A Framework to Implement and Sustain Initiatives in a Public Agency Lisa Molinar M.A.
WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
The Community Collaboration Coaches Roles, Strategies, and Tools.
Management of teacher education and the issue of quality inclusive education Prepared by Dr. Reda Hegazy Egypt focal point for the "international Task.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
The Value Driven Approach
Ready to Raise PowerPoint Resource The Work of Early Years Community Developers Please feel free to adapt these PowerPoint slides to your needs. Credit.
Assessment of Student Learning in General Education AAHE/NCA 2003 Assessment Workshop Omaha, Nebraska ● June 2003.
System Office Performance Management Human Resources Fall 2015.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
Needs for changes and adjusting to them in the management of statistical systems Panel discussion Prospects and Risks for the Future: How to manage uncertainties.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
SAN FRANCISCO’S FAMILY AND CHILDREN’S SERVICES BUILDING A COMPETENCY BASED ORGANIZATION.
The Los Angeles Public Health Leadership Institute: An Intra-organizational Approach To Leadership Development APHA Session: The Challenge of Leadership.
SunCoast Region Transformation Implementation Team November 2, 2012.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Today’s managers & leaders are challenged unlike any of the past generations in their roles.
Contents Playbook Objectives Playbook Value Details Playbook Design
The Equity Business Case Why Workforce Equity is Good for Business
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Thursday 2nd of February 2017 College Development Network
District Leadership Team Sustainability Susan Barrett Director, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network Sheppard Pratt Health.
Roadmap to an Organizational Culture of QI
Blueprint Outlines practical, consumer-focused, state and local strategies for improving eating and physical activity that will lead to healthier lives.
Implementing Race to the Top
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Building Capacity for Quality Improvement A National Approach
Presentation transcript:

The Vision Implementation Project

Excellent Client Service The Tennessee Department of Human Services (DHS) strategic plan calls for creating excellent client service delivery systems. The Vision Implementation Project builds on the Department’s ongoing organizational development and performance initiatives and is aimed at creating an exemplary organization, determined to improve its human service delivery system for the sake of those who needs its services most: Tennessee's families.

Phases and Customer Groups DHS Staff DHS Organization Individual Clients External Organizations External Community Phases Vision and Plan Design and Build Implement Network and Sustain Disseminate

Overview of Plan for Each Grand Division Deliver prototype for each Grand Division Design Team â Leadership Institute å æ Off. 1 Off. 2 Off. 3 Regional Network

Phases Activities Products Process Evaluation Outcome Evaluation I Vision What we do What we create How was it done? What was accomplished? II Design III Implementation IV Network V Dissemination

I. Vision and Plan Phase Activities Convene team Intervention audiences determined Listen to stakeholders Conduct needs/ resources assessment Define skills required Identify objectives and outcomes Prioritize work Begin work on immediate priorities Product Action plan for design and implementation phases Framework for work Shared ownership Research project determined Fix the present technical skills orientation process for new hires Teach case managers how to be better managers using the curriculum created by UT.

Research During Vision and Plan Outcome Research and Evaluation Do we have a clear vision of goals and objectives for the project? Do we have a solid foundation to proceed to the design phase? Process Research and Evaluation How well is the design team functioning? How inclusive of diverse voices and opinions is the team? What factors contribute or inhibit ownership and participation in the process?

II. Design and Build Phase Activities What to teach? Determine “core” competencies needed by all DHS members Turn “outcomes” into training curriculum that meets skill requirements for all levels (map of skill areas and audiences to drive curriculum) What methodology to use? Who to involve? Determine and recruit content experts Determine and recruit prospective trainees Product Design document Construct curriculum and technology-based courses Identify, coach, and certify facilitators Logistics determined regarding institute

Research During Design and Build Outcome Research and Evaluation Is the design document ready for implementation? Is curriculum for the leadership institute ready? Are facilitators for the institute trained and ready? Are delivery schedule and logistics in place for implementation? Process Research and Evaluation What practices enabled or inhibited the successful training of facilitators? What factors contributed to the development of the curriculum?

III. Implementation Phase Activities Pilot “institute” open Deliver curriculum Core competencies Special competencies Field Support Product Deliver curriculum Roll out technology tools (e.g., Self assessments, decision support tools, and job aspirations tools)

Research During Implementation Outcome Research and Evaluation What is the baseline level of staff performance on parameters such as core and specialized competencies and job satisfaction? What is the baseline level of organizational performance on parameters such as turnover, workplace affiliation, team climate, and efficiency? What is the baseline level of client satisfaction with DHS services, employment skills, education level, and economic sufficiency? Process Research and Evaluation What were some of the enabling and inhibiting factors during the training process at the leadership institute? What were some of the enabling and inhibiting factors during the dissemination of the project at the county offices?

IV. Networking and Sustaining Phase Activities On site implementation of training Begin network activities (professional development, peer support) Begin “hand-off” capacity building through structured support Process research into feedback for future cohort and continuous support Product Tools to transfer “learnings” to other sites Demonstrated impact of interventions Continued support mechanisms in place and accessible Customized, targeted tools and resources

Research During Networking and Sustaining Outcome Research and Evaluation Has a regional network been created? Are regional networks operating and fulfilling their mission of support and sustainability? Process Research and Evaluation What support systems or resources are deemed useful for the dissemination of the project within county offices? What types of support are required for the establishment of regional networks? What processes and factors contribute to the development of self-sustaining VIP teams within county offices? What processes and factors contribute to self-sustaining and supportive regional networks?

V. Dissemination Phase Activities Design team reassesses local application and local need Two new institutes started at 18-24 months Transfer learning Customize the tools for local use Product Effective practices used broadly Preliminary research issued regarding the impact of the interventions Regional work teams are fully operational Tools and resources are continually refined

Research During Dissemination Outcome Research and Evaluation Have we incorporated feedback from prototype into the design of two new institutes? Have we considered local needs and resources in the creation of two new institutes? Have we replicated best practices learned through the prototype in creation of two new institutes? Process Research and Evaluation What enabling and inhibiting factors contributed to the dissemination process? What processes, if any, had been put in place to maximize the lessons from the prototype?’

Post Dissemination Evaluation Have there been any changes in staff performance (in core and specialized competencies, knowledge, behaviors, and job satisfaction) as compared to baseline levels? Have there been any changes in organizational performance in parameters such as turnover, workplace affiliation, climate, and efficiency as compared to baseline levels? What conclusions can be drawn about optimizing the deployment of training resources in the future based on learning from this process Have there been any changes in client satisfaction, self sufficiency, education levels, skill acquisition, and employability as compared to baseline levels? Have there been any changes in utilization of community resources and opportunities such as social support, peer support, training opportunities, and child care? How has implementing this process influenced the economic health of the community* What economic returns have been generated by this process?* *Note: Answers to research questions involving long term economic health of the community may require a longer time span and would involved the participation of the University of Memphis and its team on economic indicators and statistics.

Internal actors and/or beneficiaries of change Principles Participation Ownership Meaning Support/growth Structures Leadership institute Regional networks Messages Content of new model (curr.) Form of delivery (Tech) Internal actors and/or beneficiaries of change (Workers in DHS) External actors and/or beneficiaries of change (Community members) External promoters of change (Vanderbilt team and partners) Internal promoters of change (Organizational leaders in DHS) Key Factors Key Players Phases 3 and 4: Implementation and Networking Phase 5: Dissemination Phase 1: Vision Phase 2: Design

Organizational Alignment Model (Nadler & Tushman, 1988) Balance of work/ formal and people/ informal

Questions Guiding the Analysis of the Alignment among Organizational Initiatives within DHS’s Strategic Plan

The effects of the behavior of the parts of a system are interdependent and that if each part is taken separately and made to perform as efficiently as possible, the systems as a whole will not function as effectively as possible (Benko & Sarvimaki, 2000; Patton, 2000). The performance of a system is not the sum of the independent effects of its parts; it is the product of their interactions. Therefore, the effective management of a system requires managing the interactions of its parts, not merely managing the actions of its parts separately. (Gharajedghi & Ackoff, 1986, pp. 23-24)