Title I School Restructuring Meeting NH Department of Education April 14, 2010 9:00am-12:00pm.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title One Parent Involvement
Advertisements

Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Delaware Statewide Title I Conference 1 School Improvement – The Ever-Changing Landscape – Part I June 29, 2010 Bill McGrady U. S. Department of Education.
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Rules and Regulations.  Requirements (Title I and Title III)  Notices  Timeline  Schools on Improvement  Use of Funds.
North Carolina ESEA Flexibility Request Frequently Asked Questions April 30, 2012 April 27,
Next Generation of Accountability Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support Summer 2012.
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program May 7, 2013.
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
NH Department of Education NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan April 15, 2011 Referencing requirements for Schools in Need.
STAR (Support through Assistance & Reforms) Report.
Parent Involvement in the Title I Law Title I State Parent Advisory Council (SPAC) PAFPC Conference April 3-6, 2011.
CESA 10 February,  Overview of the the legal requirements  Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) formerly known as No Child Left Behind.
2007 Institute for School Improvement and Education Options How the System Might Address Parental Involvement.
How Does Solid Foundation Work?. Thank you for considering Solid Foundation® as your tool in building strong school communities that support student success.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
Indistar Summit – Coaching with Indistar February 2012 Presenters: Yvonne Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director, Office of School Improvement Michael Hill.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training School Improvement.
Title I School Improvement Committee of Practitioners Bridgeport Conference Center June 9, 2008.
Utilizing the School Restructuring Resources Lauren Morando Rhim & Bryan C. Hassel Public Impact For Center on Innovation and Improvement.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
2011 School Improvement Technical Assistance Meeting Dr. Reginald Eggleston Assistant Superintendent Division of Federal and Special Programs October 27,
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program CCSA March 25, 2013.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting West Hialeah Gardens Elementary September 8, 2015 Sharon Gonzalez, Principal.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Information for NH Title 1 Restructuring Planning Year Schools (SINI 4) Stephanie Lafreniere, NH Title I Director Monday, April 16, 2012.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
Title I Faculty Presentation (Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation) 1 Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Statewide Systems of Support Oregon School Improvement Facilitators Carol Larson, Willamette ESD Christina Reagle, Oregon Dept. of Education.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Welcome Katherine Cox Print Download Help Exit View Notification from TA Choose Document : Proposal Report Proposal Approved Proposals/Reports.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
A Capacity Building Program of the Virginia Department of Education Division Support for Substantial School Improvement 1.
Why are we here? All Title I schools are required to hold an annual meeting for Title I parents* for the purpose of informing you of: our school’s participation.
GUIDANCE ON SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT Region VII Comprehensive Center The University of Oklahoma 555 Constitution Street Norman, OK David.
Needs Assessment: Conducting, Completing and Aligning with the Budget November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker, ESE Worcester Public Schools: Gregg Barres, Manager.
NH Restructuring Planning Year (SINI 4 ) Schools: Submitting the Restructuring Plan Presenter: Karen Laba, NH DOE Consultant for School Improvement.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Welcome Katherine Cox Print Download Help Exit View Notification from TA Choose Document : Proposal Report Proposal Approved Proposals/Reports.
A GUIDE FOR CANTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT’S PARENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS The Mississippi Literacy-Based Promotion Act
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Annual Title I Parent Orientation Meeting
Annual Title I Parent Orientation Meeting
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Presentation transcript:

Title I School Restructuring Meeting NH Department of Education April 14, :00am-12:00pm

What does it mean to be in restructuring?  Your school has missed its annual achievement targets for five years.  You will take a year to develop a school restructuring plan.  You will continue: Parent notification School choice Supplemental Education Services (SES) Title I, Part A set asides for professional development Implementation of SINI improvement plan

Restructuring Timeline  – Restructuring School in planning phase  – Restructuring School implementing plan

Big Picture Issues  Intensive and far-reaching interventions to revamp completely the operation and governance of the school  Must be substantial enough to transform and sustain change  A major reorganization of a school’s governance structure arrangement by the LEA.  Include fundamental reforms to improve student academic achievement in the school.  Must have substantial promise to improve student academic achievement

Notification Requirements  Provide both teachers and parents notice of school status;  Provide both groups with an opportunity to comment before you take any restructuring action (i.e. developing and implementing the plan); and  Invite both teachers and parents to participate in the development of the school’s restructuring plan.

Alternative Governance Options A restructuring plan must include one of the following “alternative governance” arrangements for the school:  Reopen the school as a public charter school;  Replace all or most of the school staff, which may include the principal, who are relevant to the school’s inability to make AYP;  Enter into a contract with an entity, with a demonstrated record of effectiveness to operate the school as a public school; or  Implement any other major restructuring of the school’s governance arrangement that is consistent with NCLB principles of restructuring. *There is another option under the US ED guidance that allows a State to take over the operation of the school, but this is not permitted under NH State law

What does “Other Major Restructuring of the School” mean?  This option provides the LEA the flexibility to choose additional reform solutions that best meet the needs of students in the school and community. Examples may include: Diminishing school-based management and decision making. Increasing control, monitoring and oversight of the school’s operations and educational programs by the LEA; Reopening the school as a focus or theme school with new staff or staff skilled in the focus area. Reconstitute the school into smaller autonomous learning communities (e.g. school-within-a-school model)

Choosing the best restructuring option  It must best address the identified needs of the school and school community.  It needs to be tailored to what the school has already been working on and the success or failure of previous efforts.  A change in governance cannot be seen as replacing/stopping all ongoing improvement efforts.

Making all the pieces fit together  The school’s improvement effort must still consider such issues as staff development, curriculum and instruction, use of technology, assessment and other factors that are essential to the school’s ability to have all children meet state standards.

Phase 1 Requirements  Due date: October 15, 2010  Include at a minimum: Cover Page-restructuring contact Restructuring Team Membership Two page narrative:  district’s role in the restructuring process;  process and timeline established  steps taken to provide opportunities for comment prior to starting the plan; and  process and timeline established for communicating the plan’s goals and strategies with stakeholders Memorandum of Understanding Parent/Teacher letter

Phase 2 – Plan Development  Due date: May 13, 2011 Include at a minimum: Restructuring option chosen with rationale District support to implement the plan Process for keeping stakeholders informed throughout the process Action steps-address school governance and decision-making processes and how it all connects to curriculum, instruction and assessment

Resources Each school must have a School Based Planning Team who will develop the plan and monitor implementation. Resources available: NHDOE Restructuring Handbook-currently being revised for the school year-but you can refer to last year’s version as a guide for now (Includes Phase I and II plan templates): ts/title_i_res_sch_hdbk.doc ts/title_i_res_sch_hdbk.doc Coaching support Assistance from the Center for Innovation and Improvement (CII)  Resources to consider: Restructuring Facilitator Principal Mentor

Frequently Asked Questions  If we begin to restructure during the school year (planning phase), can that be considered part of our plan for (implementation year)? Yes, your plan can include interventions/strategies that you have recently implemented  What happens if we plan during , but make AYP in the Spring of 2011? You do not have to implement your plan in since you remain at SINI Year 4-Restructuring Planning Year.

Frequently Asked Questions (cont.)  What happens if during this restructure, we are identified for restructuring in another area? You would need to adjust your plan to include goals related to the other identified area as well. You will not need two separate plans.  Do I still have to submit a SINI plan for ? What about for ? Yes, you must submit a SINI progress report for , but the restructuring plan will take place of the progress report for

Frequently Asked Questions (cont.)  What funds are available for restructuring schools? For , schools in the restructuring planning year (SINI Year 4) have access to $15,000 through the SINI progress reporting process. Funding for will not be determined until the Spring of 2011.

Frequently Asked Questions (cont.)  Will all restructuring schools be eligible for the Title I School Improvement Grant (SIG)? Eligibility for the SIG is based separate criteria, please see eligible list of schools and criteria. This grant is optional, but actions taken under SIG can be included as part of the school’s restructuring plan.

The NH Parent Information and Resource Center (NH State PIRC) is a US Department of Education-funded program aimed at improving student academic performance by increasing parental involvement in children’s education. The NH State PIRC promotes parent involvement in education through information, products, trainings, workshops, publications, toolkits, and technical assistance to parents, schools, school districts, PTAs, and community organizations.

The NH State PIRC focuses on 4 primary areas: 1. School-Based Family-School-Community Partnerships 2. Parental Involvement in Education 3. Early Childhood Reading and Language Development, including School Readiness 4. No Child Left Behind education law The aim is to assist parents, schools, parent-teacher groups, community organizations and businesses to take a more proactive role in promoting parents' involvement in their children's education.

Parent Involvement Support for Restructuring Schools, SINIs and DINIs:  Solid Foundation, Research-Based Parent Involvement Program PIA Analysis Solid Foundation, Path 1, Path 2, or Path 3  NH State PIRC Workshops, Trainings, Products, Publications, & Technical Assistance Support

A parent engagement process within a web-based structure to assess, plan, implement, and monitor parent involvement at the school level Solid Foundation

Step by Step Approach Web-Based Monitoring Flexible OptionsSite-Based Decision MakingSelf-Sustaining MethodsQuality ResourcesExternal Partner (Support) Features of the web based structure

Program monitoring at a glance Solid Foundation Delivers

1. School Team Meets with External Partner for Orientation Meeting 2. Principal Completes School Information Form 3. Gather Key Documents 4. External Partner Completes Policy Analysis 5. School Team Meets with External Partner to Review School Community Index 6. Principal Downloads and Prints Resource Manual 7. Team Completes Needs Assessment 8. Team Creates Action Plan with External Partner 9. Team Implements Action Plan 10. Team and External Partner Monitor and Evaluate

OPEN NH  Cost effective high quality professional development at $100 per course.  7 weeks of discussion based courses for 30 hours of professional development.  Convenient asynchronous delivery using Moodle course management system.  Part of 10 state e-Learning for Educators Initiative.  Deals available for district cohorts.  Optional graduate credits available.  More details on the web at

Contact Information Stephanie Lafreniere Title I State Director