Franklin Consulting Towards an effective framework for the evaluation of e-learning Tom Franklin Jim Petch Jill Armstrong
Franklin Consulting Types of evaluation Formative Summative Illuminative Integrative Auditive After Oliver 2000
Franklin Consulting Purposes of evaluation Control Understanding Action Evaluation forValues areSelf evaluation External evaluation Empirical evaluation Action & understanding Local and personal ToolkitsPeer reviewFormative evaluation Action and control External and fixed ChecklistsQA reviewOutcomes based league tables
Franklin Consulting Stakeholders Institution Department / school / faculty Course team Students External authorities
Franklin Consulting Proposed model
Franklin Consulting Example models Institute for Higher Educatrion Policy American Council for EducationOpen and Distance Learning Quality Council Quality Assurance Agency Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications
Franklin Consulting
Major dependencies in the e-learning life Cycle
Franklin Consulting Jim Petch - Uniform
Franklin Consulting Jill Armstrong – business school
Franklin Consulting John Davey – Edge Hill
Franklin Consulting Tony Toole - Glamorgan
Franklin Consulting Gayle Calverly - Manchester
Franklin Consulting Computer aided assessment
Franklin Consulting Open University
Franklin Consulting
Conclusion Evaluation must be designed for action if it is to have any impact A coherent framework is needed to understand the processes We offer a model of the full life-cycle which can Support greater understanding of the processes Help identify critical issues
Franklin Consulting Towards an effective framework for the evaluation of e-learning Tom Franklin Jim Petch Jill Armstrong