IPD Update CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013 iPD: Rethinking Professional Development in Districts Amy Hodges Slamp Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation College.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...

Advertisements

Partners in Learning Partners in Learning UK: Next Steps Kristen Weatherby UK Programme Manager Partners in Learning.

COMMON CORE The COMMON CORE state standards are a way to prepare students for the challenges of a constantly changing world – by learning the real-world.

Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.

Marshal Hurst LDC/MDC Coordinator Professional Development (501)

Page 1 Service Organization Overview October, 2006 Oakland Unified School District Redesign Oakland Unified School District.

FIVE KEY STRATEGIES FOR DEVELOPING HIGH-GROWTH SCHOOLS.

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.

Network for College Success The School of Social Service Administration at The University of Chicago A community of Chicago public high school leaders.

Presentation to the HKPR District Health Unit Board of Health September 18, 2014 Presented by Karen Pettinella Haliburton, Kawartha, Pine Ridge District.

The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.

STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) education is an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to learning that provides hands-on and relevant.

Professional Learning in the Learning Profession: A Status Report on Teacher Development in the United States and Abroad Stephanie Hirsh Executive Director.

PRIDE Professional Rubrics Investing & Developing Educator Excellence

Education to Careers. Education-to-Careers in Illinois Also known as school to work Commitment to improve quality and relevance of education for every.

Help Wanted: Qualified Physics Teachers Cornell University June 21, 2006 Ed Reinfurt, Vice President The Business Council of New York State, Inc.

Career Clusters 101: An Introduction Session #2 – SD School Counselor Professional Development Series October 30, 2008.

Studies of high-performing school districts highlight the key to raising student achievement: Improvement must begin in the classroom. By working to get.

TIM MEYER CLINTON TOPEL JENNA BRENDEMUHL Poor Staff Development Districts Not Using Funds Properly.

Leading Innovative Teaching & Learning in the 21 st Century Fostering innovation and excellence in teaching within an accountability environment Hug High.

Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.

Building a Culture of Continuous Improvement in Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Network Team Institute May 14-17, 2012.

Strategic HR Management

Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.

Introduction to digiCOACH Empowering Instructional Leaders Common Core Edition.

Common Core State Standards CCSS What Parents & Board Members Need to Know.

Next Generation Professionals Opportunities, Practice & Outcomes Opportunities, Practice & Outcomes Interim Joint Committee on Education July 12, 2010.

Kentucky Integrated Strategy September 29, College & Career Readiness Agenda—Literacy/Mathematics Design Collaborative Tools Offer tools for the.

1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.

APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.

Assessing the CCSS landscape, Messaging Guidance Messaging, and Earned/Social Media Tactics Getting the Word Out About the Common Core State Standards.

NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,

Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.

Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.

The of a Successful Workforce Readiness Program. Creating Communities that Work. Advancing the profession of Human Resource Management. Building a strategic.

Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.

Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.

Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.

PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT

“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”

LITERACY PROFESSIONAL LEARNING RESOURCE Primary Schools Program Session 4: Professional Learning.

10/6/20151 David G. Loomis, Ph.D. Professor of Economics Illinois State University Lead Entity, Energy Learning Exchange Illinois Energy Learning Exchange.

APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.

The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.

ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.

1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.

Student Achievement Partners – Who We Are 1 Who we are: SAP is a nonprofit organization founded by three of the contributing authors.

TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.

BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.

Community College Focus: First Comes Measurement, Then Comes Alignment Presentation for: Michigan Community College Association July 2014 OAKLAND COMMUNITY.

DEVELOPING COLLEGE AND CAREER READY STUDENTS Ed Shafer SUMMER SEMINAR NEW YORK STATE CTE PROFESSIONAL ORGAINIZATIONS.

EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.

PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.

1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.

Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Emerging Trends in K-12 Education in Oregon Patrick Burk, PH.D. Educational Leadership and.

Tuning Indiana: Education. Originally focused on: Elementary education Math education Special education.

OHIO HSTW and ASCD WEBSITES GOLD MINES FOR RESOURCES.

Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.

Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.

What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL

Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.

Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.

Leading Innovative Teaching & Learning in the 21 st Century Fostering innovation and excellence in teaching within an accountability environment Hug High.

Agenda  Introduction to Forward - About MCPS - Program Components - Two Types of Integration  Market  Implementation Support  Resources  Leadership.

A Forum at the Center for Improving Research Evidence (CIRE)

Organizational Conditions For Excellence

Shelton School District

Implementing Race to the Top

PBC Mary dowling.

Presentation transcript:

iPD Update CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013 iPD: Rethinking Professional Development in Districts Amy Hodges Slamp Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation College Ready Work Team May 24, 2013

© 2011 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | EVERY PERSON DESERVES THE CHANCE TO LIVE A HEALTHY, PRODUCTIVE LIFE. 2

© 2011 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | Our Areas of Focus at the Foundation 4 25 % United States Program 50 % Global Health Program 25 % Global Development Program

© 2011 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 9 By 2025, 80% of students graduate from high school college and career ready so they can be successful in their the community and the world.

Empowering Effective Teachers Milestones OutcomesImpact College-Ready Work Research & Data Next Generation Learning 80% College Readiness Rate Transformed Education System Advocacy More Effective Teachers with better tools & supports Will lead to

iPD Update CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013 What’s the problem we are trying to solve with PD?

iPD Update CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013

iPD Update CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013

iPD Update CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013 The good news is, we know what matters!

The difference in student learning between having a teacher in the top quartile of effectiveness and the bottom quartile is 7.5 months in math. (MET)

iPD Update CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013

iPD Update CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013

iPD Update CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013 PD today vs iPD: Source: Professional Learning in the Learning Profession: A Status Report on Teacher Development in the U.S. and Abroad, Darling-Hammond, Linda, Stanford University, WhatCurrent ContextFuture ContextiPD Impact Access One shot workshops with limited follow- up. Job embedded with easy access to supports. PD resources available to teachers 24/7 at work and at home. FrequencyLimited and/ or sporadic support. On demand and accessible support initiated by teacher. Teachers participate in professional learning daily. Quality Most systems do not define or measure PD. PD has a demonstrated impact on student learning. PD quality assessed through linkage to student learning data Delivery Labor intensive limits the frequency of PD. Menu of quality options offered on demand. Increased access to PD without increasing labor costs. FeedbackLimited feedback; not tied to PD. Unlimited opportunities for feedback to inform PD. Teachers have access to a range of informal, high quality feedback to support their instruction. DesignOne size fits all.Differentiated learning strategies. Teachers have access to different modes of support through collaboration, 1:1 and alone. ContextNo or little connection to data. PD informed by reliable sources and types of data. Teachers have up to date information on how to improve student learning. CoherenceFragmented.Aligned with CCSS and measures of effective teaching. Professional learning is integrated into the daily routine of teachers.

iPD Update CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013  PERSONALIZED  TECH ENABLED  JOB EMBEDDED  ADAPTIVE & MASTERY BASED  DATA INFORMED  FRAMED BY DISTRICT’S INSTRUCTIONAL THEORY OF ACTION & DEFINED MEASURES OF EXCELLENCE IN MULTIPLE DOMAINS Key components of iPD:

PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS STANDARDS FOR EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION CURRENT TEACHING PERFORMANCE PERSONALIZED QUALITY PD PROTOCOLS & EXPERIENCES COMMUNITIES & NETWORKS

iPD Update CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013 Thank you TeachLive for giving us a model of what great PD and teacher training look like. We are excited you are partnering with us in our work!!!

iPD Update CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013 Launching the iPD Challenge: Launching with 5 districts as proof points Adding additional districts this fall and networks next year Districts must commit to a set of priorities, sharing learning and participating in research We are hoping to catalyze the market by both supply and demand

iPD Update CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013 iPD Challenge Participants Commit to: Whole system redesign Aligned initiatives/coherence goal Data systems in place or in process Supporting value propositions of teacher voice, job embedded and mastery based PD Research for group learning and participation in community of practice

iPD Update CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013 Tight Outcomes, Loose Metrics: Outcome #1: Improve processes for identifying individual teacher professional development needs Outcome #2: Improve the match of professional development plans with teacher needs. Outcome #3: Broaden the topics and delivery modes of high quality professional development. Outcome #4: Improve the feedback provided teachers on their instruction linked to the district’s method of measuring instructional quality Outcome #5: Increase the proportion of teachers who are empowered and effective

iPD Update CRW Team Meeting May 1, 2013 What’s next? We are just at the beginning but we are excited and hopeful We are working with great partners to do great things We want to learn and share what we learn “Swing for the Fences”