Department Chair Responsibilities in the Academic Personnel Review Process Fall Quarter 2003 Department Chair Forum October 23, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AP Review Overview of UCI Pilot online review system.
Advertisements

2012 Discussion of Academic Personnel Topics with CP/EVC Alison Galloway and CAP Chair Christina Ravelo October 2, 2012 Stevenson Event Center.
Promotion and Tenure Plan Early and Often, BUT What do you need to know to plan?? Susan K. Pingleton, MD Robert Klein, PhD.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.
New Five-Year Review Policy Carole Goldberg Vice Chancellor, Academic Personnel Fall Quarter October 18, 2013.
Your Career at Queen’s The annual review process for QUFA faculty Brenda Brouwer Vice-Provost and Dean School of Graduate Studies.
THE ACADEMIC PERSONNEL PROCESS FOR SENATE FACULTY Maureen Stanton Vice-Provost – Academic Affairs September 21, 2012.
Reporting Church activities. Presentation outline Why do we report? When do we report? Who reports? What do we report? How do we report? Report process.
FACULTY DEVELOPMENT DAY Brown Bag on Merit Advancement Christine Miaskowski, Shari L. Dworkin & Sally Marshall.
Pathology Faculty Promotions November, 2013 Faculty Meeting.
Brenda Chriss, Kim DeLaughder Chris diMuro, Julie Fritz-Rubert August 7, 2014 INTRODUCTION TO STEP-PLUS College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences.
Promotion & Tenure Workshop The Dossier. What the Committee Looks for: I nnovation I nitiative I mpact.
1 William Jury Vice Provost for Academic Personnel Winter Quarter Department Chair Forum February 23, 2005.
Promotion and Tenure at Ohio University Martin Tuck PhD Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
Streamlined Review Process Using the new Online UCI-AP-25 Form FOR Dean Delegated Merit Actions and Normal Review Actions Seen by CAP.
Training for Implementation of CEC§ Creating AA-T and AS-T (SB 1440 Transfer Degrees) Spring 2011 February 1, 2011.
Peer Review for Addiction Journals Robert L. Balster Editor-in-Chief Drug and Alcohol Dependence.
THROUGH AN ONLINE PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP) INDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS OCTOBER 2010 Generating and Assessing Learning.
Advance and the Electronic Packet Advance and the Electronic Packet April 5,
Communication Key Skills INSET. Outline of INSET training 1. A review of the standards for all levels of communication key skill 2. Examples of portfolios.
The Tenure and Promotion Application Process. Each candidate is responsible for compiling the materials for his/her application with the assistance of.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel Spring Quarter Department Chair Forum May 25, 2007.
Performance Improvement. 2 Steps to Performance Improvement 1. Define the Problem 2. Define Duties or Behaviors to be Improved 3. Establish Priorities.
Academic & Professional Record (APR) Raúl Curto Executive Associate Dean College of Liberal Arts and Sciences.
Call Changes APM c: “Each campus shall develop guidelines and checklists to instruct chairs about their duties and responsibilities in connection.
William Jury Vice Provost for Academic Personnel Spring Quarter Department Chair Forum May 26, 2005.
The Electronic Packet and the On-line Review Process The Electronic Packet and the On-line Review Process April
Promotion in the Clinical Track Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
Academic Advancement for Clinician-Educators: Secrets from the Dean’s Office 2/26/13 Renee Binder, M.D. Elena Fuentes-Afflick, M.D., M.P.H. SOM Academic.
Jeff Waddoups Chair, Sabbatical Leave Committee Department of Economics
Tenure and Promotion Processes Arlene Earley Carney Vice Provost for Faculty and Academic Affairs.
Promotion Process A how-to for DEOs. How is a promotion review initiated? Required in the final probationary year of a tenure track appointment (year.
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel Spring Quarter Department Chair Forum June 2, 2006.
Fall Quarter Department Chair Forum October 30, 2008 Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel.
Teaching Portfolio at McGill Laura Winer Director, Teaching and Learning Services October 21, 2014.
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, HAYWARD Academic Affairs MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3, 1995 T0: Department Chairs FROM: Frank Martino Provost & Vice President,
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #7July 14, 2015  PANEL: What do Department Chairs Look for in a Dossier?  Review Clinical Statement of.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #6 July 8, 2014  Review Clinical Statement of Endeavors  Review Supporting Materials Peer Evaluations of.
Overview of Policies and Procedures University of Missouri-Kansas City.
Dossier Evaluation. Powerpoint by James MacLachlan Vice-Chair, Committee on Academic Personnel – Oversight 2011 Revised by John Hall, 2012 DOSSIER EVALUATION.
Lynn Hollen Lees Vice Provost for Faculty. Promotion Timelines Pre-Submission Submission.
Introduction to SEPAP: An Explanation of the Program  Importance of employee participation in the appraisal process  Learn the three phases of SEPAP.
An Overview of the Promotion & Tenure Process UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY NEW FACULTY ORIENTATION AUGUST 20, 2015 KATIE CARDARELLI, PHD ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR ACADEMIC.
Changes to the CALL Spring Quarter 2004 Department Chair Forum May 25, 2004.
University p&t forum Introductions April 24, 2017.
Tenure and Recontracting August 29, 2017
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 24, 2017 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
What you need to know now to be promoted later!
What Reviewers look for NIH F30-33(FELLOWSHIP) GRANTS
Tenure and Recontracting February 7, 2018
Tenure and Recontracting August 27, 2018
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel
Tenure and Recontracting February 6, 2018
SCC Tenure Process November 9, 2016.
Tenure and Recontracting October 6, 2017
TENURE AND PROMOTION IN ECAS
Jay Farrell Professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 23, 2018 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
Observations on the UCR
Implementation of Lecturer SOE series policy changes
Tenure and Recontracting February 26, 2019
ACADEMIC PERSONNEL REVIEW PROCESS
Field monitoring Project (number and title)
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel
FA Review and Clarification of Appendix 15A
Office of Faculty Affairs
Presentation transcript:

Department Chair Responsibilities in the Academic Personnel Review Process Fall Quarter 2003 Department Chair Forum October 23, 2003

Strategy for Prompt File Evaluation MOUs between the Chancellor, IEVC, CAP, and Deans Each pledges to process files promptly Progress will be monitored centrally

Managing the Review Process Role in reviewing files beyond the department, i.e. auditing for errors of significance Department Chair Checklist Faculty Checklist Time Tracking Tables

Key Elements of the Departmental Recommendation Letter Department must establish and communicate its own standard on journal quality Departmental letter should explain reasons behind minority votes Negative aspects of the file as well as positive should be discussed Do not quote from extramural letters or from self- statements Consider using indices such as citation frequency rates, especially for candidates in later stages of his/her career (i.e. advancements to Prof VI or Above Scale)

Sample Attributes of a “good” Departmental Letter Clearly identifies the important areas of research and describes significance Uses extramural letters to reinforce identifiers of significant elements of the research record Highlights all significant achievements by candidate Explains research in non-technical terms

Sample Attributes of a “not so good” Departmental Letter Does not speak to the candidate’s contribution to research Relies on extramural comment through a series of quotations Does not describe negative aspects of a file or rebut extramural comments Merely regurgitates technical aspects of the candidate’s research

Revisions and Clarification to the CALL Changes at the Deans level – All checklists were modified to include a” file tracking table”. Dates must be noted at each stage of review. Changes at the Department level – Department letter has been formatted to include an entry for actual meeting/vote date as well as letter preparation and revision date Format Changes – All references to “appraisal in conjunction with merit” have been deleted – A checklist for Department Chairs has been added as Attachment J. – A reference checklist has been added for individual faculty members. Chairs are encouraged to share this checklist with departmental faculty in order to facilitate a candidate’s file preparation and review.