Www.usac.org How Do I Run a Good Competitive Bidding Process? Back to the New Basics Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Orlando Boston New Orleans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Contracts, Competitive Bids 2004 USAC E-rate for Beginners 2004 USAC E-rate from the Service Provider Perspective FCC Orders.
Advertisements

Better Libraries Through Technology Bob Keith Technologist Library Development Bureau New Jersey State Library.
Audit Readiness & Success I 2012 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings1 Fall 2012 Applicant Trainings The E-rate Program Audit Readiness & Success.
Beginner’s Presentation I 2012 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 Understanding the Basics Fall 2012 Applicant Trainings The E-Rate Program.
1 Preparing the Audit. 2 Preparing For An Audit  Types of audits  Preparing for the audit  Record keeping.
Tom Torlakson State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 CALNET 2.
E-rate 101 For Maine Schools and Libraries. Simplifying E-rate can be a challenge This is brief information and an outline of the process.
04/26/20071 Documentation for E- Rate Audit Purposes Amber Prioleau E-Rate Manager/Network Technician.
E-Rate 101: Overview of the Program Training for Success Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Orlando Boston New Orleans Cleveland.
The E-rate Program Understanding the Basics Fall 2011 Applicant Trainings Washington, DC I Newark I Minneapolis I Portland I St. Louis I New Orleans I.
Welcome E-Rate Presentation: Valerie Stabenow Questions/Discussion Technology Plan Overview Lunch & Technology Discussion.
E-rate Program Beginner’s Presentation: Understanding the Basics Fall 2010 Applicant Trainings.
E-rate Audits/Reviews Be prepared!! Prepared by Judy Jones, State Library of Iowa.
Introduction to E-rate I 2013 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 Introduction to E-rate Fall 2013 Applicant Trainings E-rate Program.
Openings, Closings, and Mergers Tutorial I 2013 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 Openings, Closings, and Mergers Tutorial Fall 2013 Applicant.
Craig J. Nichols, Secretary 1 SUNCOM STATE MASTER CONTRACT FILING PROCEDURES FY 2014/15.
The Path to Success (and Avoiding the Road to Denial) Training for Success September – October 2006 Schools and Libraries Division Washington,
1 Approving Technology Plans John Noran Schools and Libraries Division USAC.
Understanding and Complying with Audits I 2013 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 E-rate Program Understanding and Complying with Audits.
Oregon E-rate Training (Strategies to Maximize Funding) Funding Year Oregon Department of Education Baron Rodriguez – State E-rate Coordinator.
Intro Jeannene Hurley Michigan Department of Education 2006, Year 9 Funding Year.
Beginners Session Helping You Succeed Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Newark Atlanta Chicago Orlando Los Angeles Portland Houston.
CHANGES Fall 2012 The E-Rate Program. New and Recent Changes New – FY2013 Eligible Services List – Technology Plan requirement – Use of manufacturer’s.
Presented by: Bob Rice, President Triple R Consultants E-Rate Top 10 things you need to know! ©2011 Triple “R” Enterprises, Inc.
Program Compliance Catriona Ayer and Ray Mendiola Train-the-Trainer Workshop September 27-29, 2004 Schools & Libraries Division.
What Documents Should I Keep? Back to the New Basics Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Orlando Boston New Orleans Cleveland San.
Competitive Bidding Catriona Ayer Train-the-Trainer Workshop September 27-29, 2004 Schools & Libraries Division.
2015 Form 471 Step-by-Step for Filing the Form 471 Using DPI 470/RFP for Internal Connections and Managed Internal Broadband Service 1.
E-Rate Training for TASBO Members October 8, 2008 Presented by Susan Sullivan Director of Technology/Media.
Washington, DC I Newark I Minneapolis I Los Angeles I Kansas City I Jacksonville I Portland I Dallas/Fort Worth E-rate Program Program Compliance Fall.
Washington, DC I Newark I Minneapolis I Los Angeles I Kansas City I Jacksonville I Portland I Dallas/Fort Worth E-rate Program Beginner’s Presentation:
Audits. 97 How To Prepare For The Audit  Follow All E-rate Rules  Document, Document, Document ! –Plan ahead for an audit by documenting every.
Successful Invoicing Training for Success September – October 2006 Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Boston Seattle St. Louis.
Craig J. Nichols, Secretary 1 SUNCOM STATE MASTER CONTRACT FILING PROCEDURES FY
Program Compliance Washington, DC Newark Atlanta Chicago Orlando Los Angeles Portland Houston September/October 2009 Helping You Succeed Schools.
Issues in Competitive Bidding Washington, DC Newark Atlanta Chicago Orlando Los Angeles Portland Houston September/October 2009 Helping You.
Contracts Helping You Succeed Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Newark Atlanta Chicago Orlando Los Angeles Portland Houston September/October.
The E-rate Program Understanding the Basics Washington K-12 Statewide Training, November 23, 2015 Presentation posted at
31 2. Form 470: Starting the Application Process.
E-Rate 101: Overview of the Program Back to the New Basics Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Orlando Boston New Orleans Cleveland.
Ensuring Program Compliance I 2013 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 E-rate Program Ensuring Program Compliance Fall 2013 Applicant Trainings.
Ministerial and Clerical Errors Training for Success September – October 2006 Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Boston Seattle.
Program Compliance Training for Success September – October 2006 Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Boston Seattle St. Louis Atlanta.
Invoicing Helping You Succeed Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Newark Atlanta Chicago Orlando Los Angeles Portland Houston September/October.
© 2016 Universal Service Administrative Company. All rights reserved Applicant Training Audit Compliance September – November 2016.
The E-Rate Program Tips for Success Fall 2011 Applicant Trainings.
Understanding and Complying with Audits
After the FCC Form 471 E-rate Program Applicant Training
E-rate Filing Process Overview
Step 3: Legally Binding agreements and contracts
Sample Bid Evals and Best Practices
A YEAR IN THE LIFE OF AN E-RATE APPLICANT
Advanced Program Compliance
© 2017 Universal Service Administrative Co.
E-Rate Update Newly Eligible Services (Form 470 must show requests for these services): Voic Mobile (Cell) Services Alarm lines Administrative LAN’s.
E-Rate 101: Overview of the Program
Road to Success The E-rate Program Fall 2011 Applicant Trainings
Process Overview for Service Providers
Understanding the Audit Process
E-Rate 101: Overview of the Program
Ensuring Program Compliance
E-rate Program Program Compliance September – November 2016.
How Do I Write a Good Technology Plan?
Back to the New Basics Schools and Libraries Division
Service Provider DO’s and DON’Ts Mel Blackwell and John Noran
What Are the “New” Basics?
Introduction to E-rate
STARTING FUNDING YEAR (FY) 2020
Presentation transcript:

How Do I Run a Good Competitive Bidding Process? Back to the New Basics Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Orlando Boston New Orleans Cleveland San Francisco Phoenix September/October 2007

2 Overview  Why are we talking about this again?  Rules of the Road  What we see

3 Are there problems?  Yes!  Highly public instances of waste, fraud and abuse reported in the media, US DOJ  More instances of competitive bidding violations, which may not be intentional, but still result in funding reductions/denials.

4 % FRNs Denied Due to Competitive Bidding Funding Year 2006

5 Competitive Bidding Violations Breakdown Funding Year 2006

6 Bidding Violations  Price was not primary factor in selecting service provider  Service Provider involved with preparing 470  Service Provider involved with competitive bidding process  Applicant’s consultant associated with Service Provider  Contract signed before RFP due date  Failure to provide competitive bidding support documentation (e.g. bids, vendor bid score sheet, RFP)  Consulting services provided before Letter of Agency  Failure to advise bidders that RFP was available

7 Know Your Role  Applicants –Write tech plan, file Form 470 and write RFP, evaluate bids, select provider, document the process, file Form 471, select invoice method  Service Providers –Respond to 470/RFPs, assist with preparing Item 21, provide answers on specific goods and services requested, but NOT on competitive bidding  Consultants –Make sure that you have a Letter of Agency

8 Technology Plan  Creation date –Month and year that the plan is “written”  Sufficient detail to support and validate the services requested  Five elements –Goals/strategy for using technology –Professional development strategy –Needs assessment –Sufficient budget –Evaluation process

9 Selective Review  Further review of –Budget –Necessary Resources –Competitive Bidding and Contracts –Technology Plan  Sample Selective Review Information Request (SRIR) available on SLD websiteSelective Review Information Request  Retain your documentation!

10 Budget  Purpose is for you to show us you can fund your share  Operating budget (or draft) has dates that cover the funding year (July – June)  Budget documentation should clearly identify applicant’s share (e.g., expense line item)  Can provide letter for reasonable expectation

11 Budget  More about “reasonable expectation” –You don’t have the money in your hands now but expect to have it after July 1 –We understand that your budget cycle may not coincide with our review cycle –Will have to “show the money” during Form 486 review for the entire BEN for the year –If a shortfall, we will work with you to cancel FRNs

12 Payment Plans  Applicants are required to pay their share at the same time that USAC pays the discount amount. –Service Provider certifies that the invoices they submit are for services that “have been billed to service provider’s customers.” –Therefore, deferred payment plans that allow the applicant to pay after USAC has paid will jeopardize a funding request. –FCC Rules include a presumption that the non-discount share will be paid within 90 days.

13 Necessary Resources  Do you have the other necessary resources? –Are there end user computers? Must have reasonable plans to fully utilize all internal connections for which you are requesting discounts (e.g., 2-year plan to get computers for all network drops) –Do you have software to run on the computers? –Staff trained on how to use the technology? –Electrical capacity? –Can you maintain your eligible and ineligible equipment?

14 Form 470/RFP  Form 470 indicates types of products and services ordered on the Form 471  Form 470/RFP is based on tech plan  Form 470 and RFP must be available for 28 days  Define and document your evaluation process  Indicates who will be receiving the services

15 Form 470/RFP  Be able to explain what you were asking for (avoid generic descriptions or statements that are overly broad)  Post for what you want (multi-year contract, type of service, voluntary contract extensions)  Indicate on your Form 470 if you are issuing an RFP

16 Form 470/RFP  Applicants must be prepared to explain if and how they disqualified bids.  Applicants must inform all bidders of any requirements that could lead to disqualification.

17 Competitive Bidding  Fair and open competitive bidding process  Avoid conflicts of interest –Independent consultant  Service Provider –Applicant  Service Provider  Open competition and bid evaluation  Follow the rules – FCC and state/local  Read the contract fine print  Document the process!

18 Competitive Bidding  Selecting the winning bidder –Price must be the primary factor, considering only ELIGIBLE goods and services. –Solution must be cost-effective (not just the most cost-effective) Ysleta Order, para. 54: Routers priced at twice the market price would not be cost effective  May not use E-rate to subsidize the procurement of ineligible or unrequested products or services because that constitutes a rebate of the non-discount portion of the costs, which is a violation of FCC rules.

19 Vendor Selection  Keep documentation of your selection process  Create your selection matrix and follow it  If using a multi-round selection process, price of the eligible goods and services must be the primary factor in every round.  USAC template available!

20 Keep dates in order  Remember the correct order for dates: –Allowable Contract Date (28 days after 470) THEN –Contract Award Date THEN –Form 471 filing THEN –Form 471 Certification date ALL BEFORE –Window close

21 State Master Contracts  Applicant files Form 470 –Can use State Master Contract as a bid response –Contract Award date is date the applicant selected the State Master Contract as its winning bid  State files Form 470 –Applicants may cite that Form 470

22 State Master Contracts  Single winner –Applicants do not need to justify the selection of the winning bidder  Multiple winners –Applicants must be able to document why they selected the specific provider off the master contract

23 State Master Contracts  Multiple Award Schedules –Applicants must be able to document why they selected the specific provider off the multiple award schedule.  Only Terms and Conditions, not prices –These contracts do not meet FCC contract requirements.

24 Pattern Analysis  USAC reviews a group of applications, usually looking at competitive bidding information.  Are there any elements that are the same across applications?  Applicants are given an opportunity to explain the similarities.

25 A tale of three districts District ADistrict BDistrict C Identical RFP format, font, table of contents Identical RFP format, table of contents but font changed Identical description of services sought and quantities

26 A tale of three districts District ADistrict BDistrict C Description of how they selected the vendor identical Same typos and grammatical errors

27 A tale of three districts District ADistrict BDistrict C Forgot to change school name to own My service provider listened to my needs and then wrote the RFP and the SR responses Cancel my application I don’t know why others are similar. We often share with other districts.

28 Documentation  Retain documents to show your compliance: –Letters of Agency and any agreements with all consultants –Technology Plan and CTPA Plan Approval letter –RFP, including evidence of publication date and any solicitation you did –Any and all bids (winning and losing) – to yourself if you get no or one bid

29 Documentation  Retain documents to show your compliance: –Documents describing bid evaluation criteria and weighting –Any correspondence with potential bidders –Documents related to the selection of the service provider(s) –Signed and dated copies of contracts –Also, see further list on USAC website

30 Lack of Documentation  Leads to difficulties answering PIA  Delays your FCDL  Reduces/denies funding  Leads to further questions from Site Visitors and Auditors  Could result in you having to return cash to USAC

31 Questions?