Comprehensive System of Learning Supports. Outcomes for Today Share how ISBE currently provides support to Illinois district/schools Provide Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

RTI: Questions and Answers June, Response to Intervention (RTI) What is it? a problem-solving systema problem-solving system a way to monitor progressa.
Response to Intervention: What is it?. RtI is… A process for achieving higher levels of academic and behavioral success for all students through: High.
Next Generation of Accountability Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support Summer 2012.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention MN Response to Intervention Center Ann Casey, Ph.D. Director St. Croix River Ed. District
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
January 2010IDEA Partnership1 Response to Intervention: Basics for families and community members.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Evaluating Systems of Support for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders Session at the PBIS “Forum for Change - SW-PBS: Planning for Systems Change”
Manson School District Elementary: How did we do last year? SMART Goals Reading – 78% of students met the targeted SMART goal Math – 89% of.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
AGENDA Welcome! 3:10 Meeting Expectations: Be Present Engage
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
STUDENT ASSISTANCE AND THE 7 SCHOOL TURNAROUND PRINCIPLES Dale Gasparovic, MSed., Administrator Student Assistance Center at Prevention First
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
The Bullying Prevention and Intervention Plan Presentation to School Committee December 20, 2010.
Office of Special Education Improving Results for Students with Disabilities.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Tom Corbett, Governor Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Ed.D., Acting Secretary.
Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Celeste Rossetto Dickey PBIS/MTSS Coordinator
RTI: How do we make all the pieces fit into the puzzle? Lynn Wallasky and Marnie Zabel.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
Organizational Conditions for Effective School Mental Health
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
“Lessons learned” regarding Michigan’s state-wide implementation of schoolwide behavior and reading support Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Steve Goodman.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
RTI Response to Intervention A View of the Ascension Experience.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Illinois Association of Regional Superintendents of Schools IARSS: Working Hard to Address Your Professional Development Needs.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Comprehensive System of Learning Supports. Challenges.
RTI Essential Components Jenice Pizzuto Jenice Pizzuto Jenice Pizzuto National Consultant, Learning Forward, President, Learning Forward Oregon Leadership.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
C4K Overview Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools.
Secondary Systems Overview What to Know Before Venturing Out of Bounds OrRTI Project January 15, 2009.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) What’s New in North Carolina?
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Aligning PBIS to Achieve Educational Excellence Rob Horner University of Oregon Acknowledge: George Sugai, Lucille Eber, Susan Barrett, Justyn Poulos,
PBIS District Leadership Team Overview Administrative Team Meeting August 13, 2008.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
SISEP IN ILLINOIS INTEGRATED SYSTEM FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT October 8, 2009 PBIS National Forum.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Kent ISD MTSS Implementation Team.
RTI Response to Intervention Connecting the Pieces.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Comprehensive Planning
Statewide System of Support Foundational Services April 2015 Illinois State Board of Education In Collaboration with Regional Offices of Education/Intermediate.
Theory into Practice: On-site Expectations for the Administrative Internship Candidate Selection.
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Welcome to the NJTSS Early Reading Project!
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Comprehensive System of Learning Supports

Outcomes for Today Share how ISBE currently provides support to Illinois district/schools Provide Overview Information Regarding SSOS: – Continuous Improvement Process – CIP Indicator System – District/School System structures Provide Overview Information Regarding Learning Supports: – Comprehensive System of Learning Supports – Content – Specialists Share how ISBE in the future will provide support to Illinois district/schools

Challenges

What is the Current Structure of the SSoS? ISBE Content Area Experts MathELA Assessment Learning Supports Areas I-B-B I-B-C I-B- D Districts and Schools CPS Districts and Schools Area I-C Districts and Schools Area II Districts and Schools Area III Districts and Schools Area Coordinators Area IV Districts and Schools Area V Districts and Schools Area VI Districts and Schools IPA ISBA Districts and Schools

Continuous Improvement Comprehensive Planning Learning Environment Conditions for Learning Community and Family Educator Quality Professional DevelopmentLeadership Teaching and LearningCurriculumInstructionAssessment 4CATEGORIES4CATEGORIES 8 ELEMENTS8 ELEMENTS

Curriculum & Instruction Governance/ Management

Curriculum & Instruction Curriculum Instruction Governance/ Management Leadership Comprehensive Planning Professional Development Assessment

Curriculum & Instruction Governance/ Management Learning Supports

Curriculum & Instruction Curriculum Instruction Governance/ Management Leadership Learning Supports Comprehensive Planning Professional Development Assessment Conditions for Learning Community and Family Engagement

ELA & Math“ Content Specialists” Data/ Assessment “Content Specialists” Learning Supports’ “Content Specialists”

Comprehensive System of Learning Supports (Systems, Data, & Practices) Promotion Prevention Early Intervention Intensive Interventions

Trauma Informed Classrooms Bullying Prevention PBIS SEL ATOD Wraparound SASS LRE Autism Transition Planning Health Centers Special Education Parent Engagement 21 st Century Poverty Mental Health Military families

Learning Supports

Curriculum & Instruction Governance Management Learning Supports

Illinois State Board of Education Roundtable The Center for School Improvement SSOS Partners Illinois Association of School Boards Illinois Principal Association Illinois Resource Center ISTAC RtI Network Center Director Chief Officer for District Accountability and Oversight comprehensive interventions for the state’s chronically lowest performing districts, which are hereafter referred to as high-priority districts. Staffing TBD Center Manager for Curriculum and Instruction Content Specialist Math ELA Data/Assessment Learning Supports Center Manager for Regional Supports Assistant Directors District Assistance Teams Center Manager for Priority Services Turnaround Specialist Rapid Response Teams Areas I-B-B I-B-C I-B-D I-C CPSAREA IIAREA IIIAREA IVAREA VAREA VI Districts and Schools Districts and Schools Districts and Schools Districts and Schools Districts and Schools Districts and Schools Districts and Schools What is the Future Structure of the SSoS?

Universal Professional Development Provided to all districts/schools once they have met Criteria GOAL of Professional Development: Provide awareness and understanding regarding the development of Effective District/School Improvement Planning What are the infrastructure pieces needed to develop an effective an efficient district/school governance & management system? What are the infrastructure pieces needed to develop an effective and efficient district/school curriculum & instruction system? What are the infrastructure pieces needed to develop an effective and efficient district/school learning supports system? OUTCOME of Professional Development: Teams will identify “First Steps” in their District/School Improvement Planning Process and begin to develop their Action Plans (DIP/SIP) Universal System Principles Prevention focused Team-based, Data-based decision making & problem solving Evidence-based interventions in the least restrictive environment Continuous Progress Monitoring for Continuous Improvement Implementation Integrity

Foundational Services Districts with schools at Star Levels 3, 4, & 5 (80% of Title I Schools) REGIONAL DISTRICT CAPACITY BUILDING Integrate professional development services for districts among ISBE divisions (e.g., DII, ELL, SPED, CTE, etc.) Build district capacity to implement Eight Essential Elements (8 EE’s) across schools through regional initiatives/trainings/guidance/ materials/tools Foundational Services Regional Support Assistant Directors Regional Coaches

Targeted Professional Development (Content specific, identified through needs assessment/data collection) GOAL of Professional Development: Provide content-specific (A-Z Topics) Professional Development to build capacity of administrators and teachers for improved student outcomes Where are the students performing in district/school? Where do we want them to be? What Professional Development for Administrators/Teachers is needed based upon data. OUTCOME of Professional Development: Administrators/Teachers build capacity to effectively lead, teach, provide necessary supports to improve student outcomes. Targeted System Principles Prevention focused Team-based, Data-based decision making & problem solving Targeted Function- based, Evidence-based interventions in the least restrictive environment Continuous Progress Monitoring for Continuous Improvement Implementation Integrity

Intensive, Individualized Professional Development Turnaround/Takeover Districts GOAL of Professional Development: Individualized, intensive programming directly coordinated through ISBE-contracted group. Intensive/ Individualized System Principles Prevention focused Team-based, Data-based decision making & problem solving Targeted Function- based, Evidence-based interventions in the least restrictive environment Continuous Progress Monitoring for Continuous Improvement Implementation Integrity

Curriculum & Instruction Curriculum Instruction Governance/ Management Leadership Learning Supports Comprehensive Planning Professional Development Assessment Conditions for Learning Community and Family Engagement

Focused Direction