Authors: Armando Miciano M.D. 1 Robert Castillo, M.S., B.S. Chad Cross, PhD, Pstat(R) 2 Presenter: Armando Miciano MD 1. Nevada Rehabilitation Institute, Las Vegas NV 2. Crossroads Wellness LLC, Las Vegas NV American Academy of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2014 Annual Assembly, San Diego CA, November Research – Pain & Spine Medicine: Scientific Presentation
Inclusion of functional measures into outcome determination of individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) using a patient- centered approach may provide the factors most potent for care planning. A core set of measures should include the following five domains: back specific function, generic health status, pain, work disability, and patient satisfaction. [1] [1] Bombardier C. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Dec 15;25(24):
Describe a measurement system based on five cardinal constructs of the core set of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for CLBP: 1. Symptom quality 2. Pain-related impairment (PRI) 3. Life quality/satisfaction (LQS), 4. Global health status (GHS), and 5. Work disability.
Retrospective study outpatient PM&R clinic
Individuals with CLBP sub-divided to: Study group (SG) ◦ n=60 ◦ defined by those with PROMIS-57 Pain Impact (PROMIS-PI) T-scores >/=60 Comparison group ◦ n=11 ◦ defined as those with PROMIS-PI <60. The International Classification of Functioning (ICF) framework (body functions/structures, activity, participation) was used to classify the PRO used: ◦ Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) to describe symptom quality; ◦ Pain Disability Questionnaire (PDQ), Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI), and Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) for PRI; ◦ PROMIS-57 Satisfaction with Social Role (PROMIS-SSR) for LQS; ◦ PROMIS-57 Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) for GHS; and, ◦ Work Productivity & Activity Impairment for work disability.
Body Functions & Structures Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Activity PDQ MODI RMDQ Participation PROMIS-57 v1.0 WPAI: GH PDQ=Pain Disability Questionnaire; MODI = Modified Oswestry Disability Index; RMDQ = Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; WPAI: GH = Work Productivity & Activity Impairment: General Health
Symptom quality Pain-related Impairment Life Satisfaction Global Health Status Work Productivity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Generic: i.PDQ Disease- specific: i.MODI ii.RMDQ PROMIS-57 - Satisfaction with Social Role PROMIS-57 Physical Function WPAI: GH
Owing to sample size difference, a nonparametric test, Mann-Whitney U-Test, was used to compare scores between groups. In all cases a statistically significant difference was found between groups: ◦ NRS (U=146;p=.006); ◦ PDQ (U=73;p<.001); ◦ MODI (U=46.5;p<.001); ◦ RMQ (U=73.5;p<.002); ◦ PROMIS-SSR (U=118.5;p<.001); and, ◦ PROMIS-PF (U=72;p<.001).
Significant positive association between: ◦ SG and impairment Cramer’s V=.357,p =.004 ◦ SG and employment status Cramer’s V=.283,p =.005 Significantly greater proportion of the SG: ◦ Had severe/extreme PRI 67% vs. 18%;G2=9.220,p=.005 ◦ Was unemployed 68% vs. 30%;G2=5.207,p=.032 as compared to the comparison group.
Individuals with CLBP and a high pain impact reported: ◦ higher pain severity, ◦ more severe/extreme pain-related impairment, ◦ decreased LQS, ◦ lower GHS, ◦ no work productivity.
Study supports the concept of the five cardinal constructs of the PRO core set for CLBP. Future research should be on whether patient’s satisfaction with quality of care provided is influenced when these constructs are assessed.