Erin Packwood 2005 Competitive Compensation Review Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) January 17, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated.
Advertisements

Compensation 101 Today’s lesson plan: Compensation How To Use Market Data To Support Your Compensation Philosophy.
Radford Surveys + Consulting Preparing for An IPO – A Total Compensation Approach N.A.C.D. September 27, 2005 Ed Speidel
International Personnel Management Association Making 360 Degree Evaluations Work October 17, 2000 Jim Fox Charles Klein.
Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Meeting
Human Resources Peer Network Fundamentals of Compensation and Utilizing the CPCA Compensation & Benefits Survey April 3, 2014 Presented by: Brenda Gilchrist,
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Compensation Philosophy Performance-driven and market-referenced –We value high performance and compensate employees based on their contributions to the.
Management Forum Presentation November 3, 2008 Lynne Gervais, Associate Vice-Principal Human Resources 1.
1 Surveying Market Pay Just as skill, effort, responsibility, and working conditions have been used to differentiate rates of pay among major job groupings,
Salary Administration East Carolina University Department of Human Resources Classification and Compensation.
Compensation management
© 2007 Hay Group. All rights reserved. Salary Survey Report January 30, 2007 State of Kansas.
Total Rewards and Compensation
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson 8-1 COMPENSATION Third Canadian Edition Milkovich, Newman, Cole.
STAFF COMPENSATION PROGRAM TOWN HALL MEETINGS FEBRUARY 2004.
Competitive Market Compensation Review July 2009 Project Overview.
FAR Roundtable Luncheon Program Developing Market – Based Pay Practices March 22, 2006 Jim Moss Managing Director.
Prentice Hall, Inc. © A Human Resource Management Approach STRATEGIC COMPENSATION Prepared by David Oakes Chapter 8 Building Market-Competitive.
Market Pay. Company’s Compensation Strategy Example: Base Pay will lag market (25 th percentile) Base Pay will lag market (25 th percentile) Base + Target.
1 Classified Staff Salary Study. 2 Overview Provide an overview of study Provide an overview of study Review study methodology Review study methodology.
Sherri Coxon Executive HR Consultant Business Sherpa Group.
© 2007 Hay Group. All rights reserved. Review of Unclassified Pay Plan February 1, 2007 State of New Hampshire.
Staff Compensation Program – Phase 2 Internal Equity Adjustments October 2005.
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
Surveying Market Pay & Compensation Practices
2005 Supervisory and Professional Salary Survey Final Report September 14, 2005.
1 ACC FY07 Classification and Compensation Study.
Jayendra Rimal.  This type of compensation policy should be developed to fit in with the competitive advantage of a company.  It has a role in attracting.
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MIHE Mashal Institute of Higher Education.
Elementary Assessment Data Update Edmonds School District January 2013.
Employee remuneration  Employee Remuneration refers to the reward or compensation given to the employees for their work performances.  provides basic.
Compensation Project Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Finance Committee Meeting Project Overview
1 Pay Study Review City Auditor’s Office December 8, 2003.
Advances in Human Resource Development and Management
Valley Medical Center Executive Compensation Study November 23, 2009 Presented by: John Hankerson 1301 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, Washington
1 Fall Managing TXSTATE For Supervisors Office of Human Resources 601 University Drive Suite340 J. C. Kellam Bldg San Marcos, Texas Classification.
JOB EVALUATION & SALARY STRUCTURE DESIGN
-09/06/13, - Page 1 The Ohio State University - Classification and Compensation Talking Points - CONFIDENTIAL – for internal use only -  Compensation.
Agenda Review Major Changes from January 8 Presentation of Draft Preliminary Results Review Final Recommendations Other Progress to Date  
TOTAL REWARDS ANNUAL ACTION ITEM #2. 2 AGENDA  Purpose of the Presentation  Our Approach  Total Rewards Philosophy Review  Compensation- Current State/Future.
Illinois Energy Careers Graphs Summary Employment and Wage Data provided by Illinois Pathways July 2013.
Compensation Management. Compensation Employee compensation – refers to extrinsic and intangible rewards. – refers to all forms of pay or rewards going.
Chapter 7 Rewards and Performance Management
Chapter 9 Managing Compensation
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Overview Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services October 26, 2015.
Advances in Human Resource Development and Management Course code: MGT 712 Lecture 12.
SES Performance-Based Pay System and FY04 Year End Activities Jack Kelly Office of the Deputy Under Secretary December 15, 2004.
Agenda Study Process Outreach Summary Salary Quartile Analysis
Customised Solutions Sample Reports 2009 Australia.
Managing Compensation By Muhammad Zohaib Sufyan SZABIST.
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services January 11, 2016.
Creating a Salary Structure 101
Unit 5 Seminar Topics Compensation Strategy: External Competitiveness
8 - 1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 8 Designing Pay Levels, Mix and Pay Structures.
Dallas  Seattle  Austin  Cleveland THE WATERS CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Presented by: Report on Total Compensation.
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
Fair Pay for Northern California Nonprofits: The 2016 Compensation & Benefits Survey HIGHLIGHTS AND TRENDS May 12, 2016 Sponsored by CompassPoint Nonprofit.
Is There Hidden Liability in Your Compensation System? Identifying and Eliminating Pay Inequity.
Town of Carolina Beach Executive Summary for the Town Council Classification and Pay Study March 2015.
City of Galveston Classification & Compensation Study Discussion Preliminary Findings and Recommendations.
New Mexico Highlands University
FURMAN UNIVERSITY Compensation Structure. INTRODUCTION  Compensation Study  Salary Grades  Cost of Living/Merit Increases.
Compensation and Classification Study for Midwestern State University April 29, 2015 Presentation of Results.
Management Advisory Group, Inc. Executive Summary City of Fairfax Compensation and Classification Study July 1, 2016.
Compensation Structure and Merit Process
Associate Changes Policy: Manager Training
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Don’t Get Stuck in Compensation Jeopardy®
Agenda • Introductions • Project Objectives • Project Steps
Presentation transcript:

Erin Packwood 2005 Competitive Compensation Review Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) January 17, 2006

Mercer Human Resource Consulting 2 Background ERCOT and the Public Utilities Commission of Texas (PUCT) asked Mercer to conduct a review of a benchmark sample of jobs to determine the competitive market position of ERCOT’s: – Base pay (annualized hourly wage or salary) – Total cash compensation (base pay plus cash bonus awards) Based on the results of the competitive review, Mercer was also asked to recommend changes to ERCOT’s pay program(s), where appropriate

Mercer Human Resource Consulting 3 Process and Methodology To complete the study, Mercer performed the following: Met with ERCOT and PUCT representatives to develop an understanding of ERCOT’s business operations, compensation philosophy and the jobs included in the study Assessed value of ERCOT’s benefits relative to other Texas employers Reviewed ERCOT job documentation to understand job content Obtained data from 22 published survey sources, the Texas State Auditor’s Office, Austin Energy, LCRA, and CPS Adjusted data, as appropriate, to reflect differences in job scope, responsibilities, reporting levels, skill requirements, and a 9/15/05 effective date Researched geographic differential practices for Austin, Texas

Mercer Human Resource Consulting 4 Process and Methodology (continued) Additional project steps included: Developed 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile market composite statistics for base pay and total cash compensation for 135 ERCOT benchmark jobs, representing 336 employees or 66% of ERCOT’s workforce Assessed ERCOT’s base pay and total cash compensation relative to the market 50th percentile (median) Combined benefits and compensation competitive assessment findings to develop relative market position for ERCOT’s total remuneration Met with ERCOT and PUCT to review draft findings and discuss warranted revisions and additional reviews Prepared final summary of findings and recommendations

Mercer Human Resource Consulting 5 Base Pay Analysis Our assessment of ERCOT’s base pay for the benchmark sample relative to aggregate market practices indicated the following: On average, base pay is approximately 2% above the median of the market In general, base pay tends to exceed the market median for lower level positions and fall below the market median for higher level positions Individual pay levels are widely dispersed – market variances range from 28% below to 49% above the market median, indicating salaries are not administered according to a consistent, market-aligned standard Salary ranges for many jobs are not aligned with market practices 32% of the benchmark employees fall outside a typical market competitive range (+/-15%)

Mercer Human Resource Consulting 6 Base Pay Analysis (continued)

Mercer Human Resource Consulting 7 Total Cash Compensation Analysis Our assessment of ERCOT’s target total cash compensation (TCC) for the benchmark sample relative to aggregate market practices indicated the following: On average, TCC (actual base pay plus target bonus award, where eligible) is approximately 1% below the median of the market Bonus eligible employees average target TCC that is 1% above the market median Target TCC is generally less competitive for higher level roles than for lower level roles As with base pay, individual target total cash compensation competitiveness varies widely The absence of bonus awards to lower level employees creates a short- fall when compared to market bonus practices; however, above market base salaries have helped ERCOT remain competitive with regard to TCC

Mercer Human Resource Consulting 8 Total Cash Compensation Analysis (continued) The use of variable pay is at all organizational levels is becoming common among employers in all industries:

Mercer Human Resource Consulting 9 Total Remuneration Analysis The combined results of our benefits and compensation assessments indicated the following: ERCOT’s benefit programs are valued at approximately 113% of the market median Total remuneration for the average ERCOT employee is 4% above the market median Employee Profile Base Pay LevelAverage Employee $25,000$50,000$75,000 ERCOT Target Total Cash Compensation Market Position 97%99% ERCOT Benefits Value Market Position 2 114%117%118%113% Market Benefits Value as a % of Base Pay71%60%56%60% ERCOT Total Remuneration Value$45,698$88,560$134,948$87,360 Market Total Remuneration Value$44,000$84,000$128,250$84,000 ERCOT Total Remuneration Market Position104%105% 104%

Mercer Human Resource Consulting 10 Recommendations To the extent ERCOT desires to keep base pay and target total cash compensation in line with the median of the market, Mercer recommends the following: Add additional pay ranges to the existing ERCOT structure to ensure market alignment for all jobs Review grade assignments to ensure base pay ranges for all jobs are aligned with market practices Manage individual pay levels consistently within market-based ranges Recognize multiple career levels where consistent with market distinctions Retain existing bonus targets for roles that are currently bonus eligible and consider expanding bonus eligibility (assuming changes are made to ensure market alignment in base pay)