Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging David G. Hewett GASTROENTEROLOGY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project VIABLE: Behavioral Specificity and Wording Impact on DBR Accuracy Teresa J. LeBel 1, Amy M. Briesch 1, Stephen P. Kilgus 1, T. Chris Riley-Tillman.
Advertisements

Chapter 2 The Process of Experimentation
EQUIP Training session 2
T1 colonic carcinoma – Is endoscopic resection sufficient? HC Yip JHGR 21/7/2012.
Polyps – Where do they come from and what do you do with them?!
Role of colonoscopy in the treatment of malignant polyps Pathology of malignant colorectal polyps Assessing the risk of residual disease post-polypectomy.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Fecal Calprotectin and Immunochemical Occult Blood Tests for Diagnosis of Organic Bowel Disease in Primary Care: The.
The Adenoma/Carcinoma Sequence in the Colon
EQUIP Training session 1
Surveillance colonoscopy after polypectomy – how frequent? Dr Chu Ming Leong Tuen Mun Hospital 1.
Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal-Cancer Screening NEJM April 3, 2014 Vol 3 Imperiale, T.F. et al Presented by Melissa Spera, MD.
 The most frequent forms of inherited thrombocytopenia (IT) are characterized by platelet size abnormalities and it has been suggested that this parameter.
Editor: DrMohammad Sadrkabir. Magnifying Narrowband Imaging Is More Accurate Than Conventional White-Light Imaging in Diagnosis of Gastric Mucosal Cancer.
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
Diagnostic testing II. Previously…. Guidelines for evaluating tests have been discussed – Population spectrum – Reference standard Verification bias –
Supervised classification performance (prediction) assessment Dr. Huiru Zheng Dr. Franscisco Azuaje School of Computing and Mathematics Faculty of Engineering.
Sampling.
Practice Guidelines and Consensus on Capsule Endoscopy
Joint Hospital Surgical Grand Round 19 June 2004.
Endoscopic Ultrasound in Chronic Pancreatitis
Practice Guidelines and Consensus on Capsule Endoscopy
Upper and Lower GI Investigation of Elderly Patients who are Iron Deficient American Journal of Medicine July 1999.
Benchmarking For Colonoscopy
Andreas Adler Charité Medical University of Berlin, Virchow Clinic Campus Central Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit Narrow Band versus Conventional Endoscopic.
Critical Evaluation of colonoscopic biopsies in Crohn’s Disease Najib Haboubi MB Ch B,D Path, FRCPath Professor of Health Science, Liver and Gastrointestinal.
UOG Journal Club: January 2013
Should colonoscopy be performed one year out from colorectal cancer resection? Alexandra Kent, Philip Thompson, Prof Alan Horgan, Mr Paul Hainsworth Newcastle.
Author Classification of ARVO Conference Abstracts as Controlled Clinical Trials Roberta W. Scherer 1, Pamela C. Sieving 2, and Kay Dickersin 1, Johns.
Accuracy of EUS in diagnosis of rectal cancer KKUH experience
Basic Nursing: Foundations of Skills & Concepts Chapter 9
Serrated Polyps of the Colon Aaron Sinclair, MD University of Kansas School of Medicine – Wichita Department of Family and Community Medicine Wesley Family.
Unit 15: Screening. Unit 15 Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :呂宥達 Date : 2005/10/27.
Sessile Serrated Adenomas: A Case Presentation Kevin Witt, PGY3 Justin Whitt, MD IU Health Ball Memorial Family Medicine Residency.
Chromocolonoscopy Sashi Sagi MBBS Asst Prof of Clinical Medicine Indiana University.
Do all colorectal polyps require pathological examination? Aim To assess whether it is possible to omit the pathological examination of some polyps without.
Optical Diagnosis for Colorectal Polyps? Steve Schrock, MD, FAAFP November 5, 2015.
CT Colonography vs Colonoscopy for the Detection of Advanced Neoplasia David H. Kim, M.D., Perry J. Pickhardt, M.D., Andrew J. Taylor, M.D., Winifred K.
Towards Global Eminence K Y U N G H E E U N I V E R S I T Y Colonoscopy Surveillance After Colorectal Cancer Resection: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society.
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. Chapter 12 Clinical Epidemiology.
The Malignant Polyp Handout Version Hans Elzinga, MD Program Director- Advanced Procedures in Family Medicine Fellowship Salud Family Health Center-Longmont,
Risk of high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in gastric biopsy-proven low-grade dysplasia: an analysis using the Vienna classification R1 김진숙 / Prof. 장재영.
Methods of multivariate analysis Ing. Jozef Palkovič, PhD.
R4 채정민 / Prof 이창균. INTRODUCTION colonoscopy is a widely used screening tool for colorectal cancer adenoma detection rate (ADR) important quality indicator.
Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107:1213– June 2012 R3. 김동희 /prof. 이창균.
Screening Tests: A Review. Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
Comparative Study of Conventional Colonoscopy, Chromoendoscopy, and Narrow-Band Imaging Systems in Differential Diagnosis of Neoplastic and Nonneoplastic.
Clinical process indicators
Sessile Serrated Adenomas: An Evidence-Based Guide to Management
Sensitivity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Different Sampling Modalities with Electromagnetic Navigational Bronchoscopy & Effect of Radial EBUS on Yield Deepankar.
Full-Spectrum Endoscopy Improves Adenoma Detection Compared to Conventional Colonoscopy PLUS Right-Colon Examination With Scope Retroflexion: A Randomized,
Jasper Vleugels PhD-student AMC
Repeat Colonoscopy Recommendations
A Visual Tour of Effective Colonoscopy
A standardized imaging protocol for the endoscopic prediction of dysplasia within sessile serrated polyps (with video)  David J. Tate, MA(Cantab), MBBS,
Feeling Rushed? Does Late Start Time Predict Poor Quality Colonoscopy?
Sessile Serrated Adenomas: An Evidence-Based Guide to Management
Mark G. Erlander, Xiao-Jun Ma, Nicole C
Investigating endoscopic features of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps by using narrow- band imaging with optical magnification  Masayoshi Yamada, MD, PhD,
Nonpolypoid (Flat and Depressed) Colorectal Neoplasms
Clinical Evaluation of Endoscopic Trimodal Imaging for the Detection and Differentiation of Colonic Polyps  Frank J.C. van den Broek, Paul Fockens, Susanne.
Volume 143, Issue 3, Pages e1 (September 2012)
A Visual Tour of Effective Colonoscopy
Cesare Hassan, Perry J. Pickhardt, Douglas K. Rex 
Beyond Standard Image-enhanced Endoscopy Confocal Endomicroscopy
Colorectal cancer screening: Recommendations for physicians and patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer  Douglas K. Rex,
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 7-10 (January 2019)
David G. Hewett, MBBS, MSc, PhD, FRACP  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 
In Vivo Diagnosis and Classification of Colorectal Neoplasia by Chromoendoscopy- Guided Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy  Silvia Sanduleanu, Ann Driessen,
Evidence Based Diagnosis
Presentation transcript:

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging David G. Hewett GASTROENTEROLOGY 2012;143:599–607

Editor: DrMohammadSadrkabir

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is an image-enhanced endoscopy modality that specifically was developed to use a narrowed wavelength light source to optimize hemoglobin light absorption. Because the pattern and size of microvessels in the mucosa and submucosa change when tissue becomes neoplastic, NBI has the potential to allow endoscopists to characterize these lesions. studies have shown that NBI can be used to characterize colorectal polyps with neoplastic changes.

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging For NBI to be useful in clinical practice, simple classification systems are needed that allow both experienced and inexperienced clinicians to apply NBI. Numerous classifications of NBI findings of polyps have been described for colonoscopes with and without optical magnification. Although the overall diagnostic performance characteristics of these classifications have been reported, the validity of their component criteria has not been established. Evaluating the performance of the classification when used by even inexperienced endoscopists, are critical to ensure that use of the system will be effective and efficient.

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging In this study we sought to accomplish the following: (1) develop a practical, simple, and internationally applicable classification for determination of colorectal polyp histology using NBI. (2) establish the predictive validity of the components of the classification for determination of polyp histology; (3) evaluate the predictive validity and performance characteristics of the overall classification for determination of polyp histology. Because colonoscopy without high magnification is standard in most parts of the world, we validated our NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification using NBI without magnification.

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging Materials and Methods The study was conducted in 4 phases: phase 1, evaluation of interobserver agreement for NBI- experienced colonoscopists in predicting polyp histology; phase 2, development of a classification system for endoscopic prediction of adenomatous vs hyperplastic histology by NBI-experienced colonoscopists; phase 3, validation of the component criteria and the overall classification for real-time polyp histology by testing the criteria in endoscopy-naive subjects. phase 4, assessment of the performance and reliability of the overall classification for predicting histology using still photographs of known histology.

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging

For the first 2 phases of this study, we used an existing library of 118 high-definition still endoscopic photographs of colorectal polyps, captured using narrow-band imaging by 2 of the authors (D.G.H. and D.K.R.) without optical magnification (CF-H180AL with Exera II CLV-180 light source and CV-180 processor; Olympus America, Inc, Center Valley, PA). All polyps were less than 10 mm in diameter, and their histology was verified previously by a gastrointestinal pathologist. It is possible that some sessile serrated polyps may have been misclassified as classic hyperplastic polyps because of interobserver variability.

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging We used 4 groups of participants: (1) gastroenterologists with expert experience in NBI for polyp diagnosis (n = 5: Europe [T.P. and B.P.S.], Japan [Y.S. and S.T.], and the United States [R.S.]); (2) gastroenterologists with variable experience in NBI for polyp diagnosis (n = 2); (3) gastroenterology fellows with no experience in NBI for polyp diagnosis (n = 19: Indiana, 5; San Antonio, 12; and Australia, 3); and (4) medical students with no experience in NBI or in polyp diagnosis (n = 25).

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging Procedure Phase 1: evaluation of reliability of histologic prediction by experienced colonoscopists All endoscopists(experienced endoscopists) scored the polyps as an adenoma or hyperplastic polyp, and assigned a level of confidence to the prediction (high or low). Endoscopists were told to assign a prediction with high confidence when they had ≥90% certainty of the diagnosis.

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging Phase 2: development of the classification and component criteria We aimed to create a simple and practical classification that unified previous NBI classifications, had clear operational definitions of its components, and was readily applicable in routine practice without optical magnification by endoscopists without extensive experience in endoscopic imaging, chromoendoscopy, or pit-pattern diagnosis. We used a modified Delphi method to achieve consensus. Three working group meetings systematically deconstructed the NBI characteristics of adenomas and hyperplastic polyps, allowing specification of the component criteria on which they made an NBI diagnosis of polyp histology (color, vessels, and surface pattern).

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging

Phase 3: validation of the component criteria of the classification In phase 3, we evaluated the validity of the individual criteria within the classification using 44 raters with no previous NBI experience. We presented the image library to the novice raters composed of 25 medical students and 19 gastroenterology fellows.

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging First, the 25 medical students scored colorectal polyps for the presence and features of each criterion individually. Students were given no training about polyps or NBI, and were not informed of the overall classification, or of the relationship between the different criteria, or of the histology of the polyps they reviewed. Second, the 19 gastroenterology fellows scored colorectal polyps for all criteria simultaneously. They received formal standardized training in the use of NBI for real-time histology, classification, and its application to determining real-time polyp histology. Fellows also were given exemplar images showing the typical appearances of each criterion.

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging Phase 4: prospective validation of the classification. In phase 4, we tested the performance and reliability of the overall classification system among gastroenterology fellows. This evaluation was performed simultaneously with the component validation described earlier whereby the fellows predicted the histology of the 118 polyps according to the classification, and designated a level of confidence (high, low) for the prediction.

Results Phase 1: Experienced Raters High levels (>90%) of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value for predicting adenomatous from hyperplastic histology were seen (Table 2), reaching 98% or higher when ratings were made with high confidence.Table 2

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging

Overall, 80% (471 of 590) of predictions were made with high confidence, although the proportion of polyps predicted with high confidence differed significantly between experts ( P <.001).

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging Phase 2: Development of the Classification The classification comprised 3 simple criteria: color, vessels, and surface pattern, for which there are clear descriptors for determining adenomatous vs hyperplastic histology, although it is recognized that some polyps will not display all 3 criteria. Based on the component criteria, a polyp may be classified into 3 types: type 1 corresponds to the most likely pathology being hyperplastic, type 2 being adenoma, and type 3 being deep submucosal invasive cancer.

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging Phase 3: Validation of the Component Criteria We assessed the performance of the 3 criteria, individually and in combination, for overall prediction of polyp histology.

The surface pattern criterion yielded the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value for an adenoma diagnosis, achieving similar results to the vessel criterion, with some raters reaching 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value. Color was the least sensitive and least predictive criterion, achieving significantly lower accuracy and sensitivity than both vessels and surface pattern (P <.0001). The specificity for surface pattern (90%) was significantly lower than for color (P =.002) and vessels (P =.02). When any 1 of the 3 adenomatous criteria was present, the sensitivity and negative predictive value was 95%, achieving significantly higher sensitivity (P <.0001) and specificity (P <.0001) than any of the 3 criteria alone. The presence of all 3 criteria for adenomatous histology (color, vessels, and surface pattern) had a specificity of 100%, although sensitivity only reached 35%.

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging

Surface pattern again yielded the highest accuracy, sensitivity (88%), specificity, and negative predictive value (89%). There were no significant differences in negative or positive predictive value between the criteria. In combination, the presence of adenomatous features for any 1 of the 3 criteria achieved an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 91% and a negative predictive value of 92%. The sensitivity of the presence of at least one adenomatous feature (91%) was significantly higher than that achieved with each criterion alone (P <.001). Gastroenterology fellows achieved significantly higher accuracy than medical students.

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging Phase 4: Validation of the Classification When fellows were asked to provide a global prediction of histology using the component criteria and the overall classification, the sensitivity was 89% and the negative predictive value was 90%. Performance improved significantly (P <.0001) when global predictions were made with high confidence, achieving sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of greater than 95%. The level of interobserver agreement for the overall prediction of histology was 0.75.

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging Preliminary Clinical Evaluation We obtained performance characteristics in our pilot evaluation of real-time application of the classification during colonoscopy. Of the 220 prospectively enrolled patients, 108 patients had at least 1 polyp that was less than 1 cm. The endoscopists made a diagnostic prediction with high confidence in 75% of the 236 polyps (82% in adenomas; and 64% in hyperplastic).

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging

Discussion We showed that the classification system performed very well when applied by previously NBI-untrained fellows to the set of polyp photographs, and similar results were obtained in a pilot application during real-time colonoscopy. The use of technology to improve the cost effectiveness of colonoscopy is needed given the high cost of colonoscopy. A significant part of the high cost is the current practice to resect and submit diminutive polyps for pathologic assessment. Endoscopic determination of adenomatous vs hyperplastic histology of colorectal polyps has the most potential because it will reduce the need for pathologic examination.

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging Two clinical strategies have been proposed for the use of real-time estimation of histology. The resect-and- discard policy describes a practice of endoscopic estimation of histology of polyps ≤5 mm or <10 mm, followed by resection of such polyps and discarding them without submission to pathology. Two studies have reported that accurate endoscopic designation of histology and assignment of surveillance intervals is feasible in real time using NBI and high-definition colonoscopes without optical magnification. The second cost-saving strategy proposed (the do-not- resect strategy) is to identify diminutive distal colon hyperplastic polyps in real time by endoscopy and then leave them in place without sampling.

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has provided a guideline : 1) In order for colorectal polyps ≤5 mm in size to be resected and discarded without pathologic assessment, endoscopic technology used to determine histology of polyps ≤5 mm in size, when combined with the histopathologic assessment of polyps ≤5 mm in size, should provide a ≥90% agreement in assignment of post- polypectomy surveillance intervals when compared to decisions based on pathology assessment of all identified polyps;

Validation of a Simple Classification System for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Small Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging 2) In order for a technology to be used to guide the decision to leave suspected rectosigmoid hyperplastic polyps ≤5 mm in size in place (without resection), the technology should provide ≥90% negative predictive value (when used with high confidence) for adenomatous histology. Thus, in this study, we provided preliminary evidence of the potential of image-enhanced endoscopy technology that is supported with a well-designed and well-studied classification system to meet the criteria that has been independently and previously set forth by the endoscopy society. Further confirmatory prospective multicenter studies would allow a paradigm shift in endoscopy.

Limitations We did not use high-magnification endoscopes because high-magnification endoscopes are largely unavailable worldwide. We focused on validating the criteria for differentiating hyperplastic vs adenomatous polyps. Previous studies have indicated that the pathologic differentiation of hyperplastic polyps (which likely included some sessile serrated adenomas/polyps) from conventional adenomas is reasonably reliable with 90% or higher agreement. We did not evaluate the criteria for distinguishing sessile serrated adenoma/polyps from hyperplastic polyps because a pathologic gold standard for diagnosis has not been fully established, and the surveillance interval recommendations for serrated lesions are not standardized.

Conclusion We present a new classification system for image- enhanced endoscopy for colorectal polyps: the NICE classification. We established the validity of the classification for differentiating hyperplastic vs adenomatous polyps using high-definition colonoscopes. This classification holds promise to meet the standard minimum performance benchmarks for real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. The application of this classification may play a practical and important role in reducing the cost of colonoscopy.

THANK YOU!