2014 Grand Challenge Symposium UseIT Undergraduate Studies in Earthquake Information Technology Southern California Earthquake Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development Group Buddy Bernhard, Tarana Farhat, Ryan Lacey, Amy Lim, Sulaimon Paseda, Marshall Rogers-Martínez and Christine Sawyer.
Advertisements

CyberShake Project and ShakeMaps. CyberShake Project CyberShake is a SCEC research project that is a physics-based high performance computational approach.
Progress Report: Hazard Map Generation with OpenSHA E-DECIDER IU Team.
E-DECIDER Workshop: QuakeSim Tools and Products Marlon Pierce Indiana University.
16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop Terry Tullis Steve Ward John RundleJim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger Fred Pollitz Generic Description of Earthquake.
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake Monitoring and Reporting through the Advanced National Seismic System Briefing for.
Faults in Focus: Earthquake Science Accomplishments Thomas H. Jordan Director, Southern California Earthquake Cente r 28 February 2014.
ATC 58 Performance Assessment Calculation Tool (PACT)
38° 37.5° 37° 123°122°121° google: cisn shakemap nc
Code Walkers Final Presentation Report Ethan Bowyer Andrew Doyle Chad Sloan Stephanie Shaver.
Devany Brown, Marylin Contreras, Arnol Deolarte, and Jakayla Walker.
1 High Performance Computing at SCEC Scott Callaghan Southern California Earthquake Center University of Southern California.
Importance of OEF to the USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Michael L. Blanpied USGS Earthquake Hazards Program For Powell Center March.
Larry Braile AS-1 Workshop, September, 2008 San Francisco Bay Area Earthquake Ground Motion Simulations
Seismic/Eruption Teaching Modules Lawrence W. Braile Sheryl J. Braile Teaching About Earthquakes.
What Will a Large Earthquake be Like? Tom Heaton Caltech.
Seismic/Eruption Lawrence W. Braile Using the Seismic/Eruption Program in Teaching Larry Braile IRIS GSA Earthquake.
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
UseIT Tutorial # 3 Earthquakes in the Southern California Fault System Tom Jordan June 16, 2011.
The 1868 Hayward Earthquake Alliance Tom Brocher Alliance Chair USGS, Coordinator, NC Earthquake Hazard Investigations
AGU fall meeting, December 5-9, 2011, San Francisco INGV Spatial organization of foreshocks as a tool for forecasting large earthquakes E. Lippiello 1,
Impact of the 1906 Bay Area Earthquake and San Francisco Fires USGS Forum on Catastrophe Preparedness David Keeton Swiss Re.
ASSESSING THE LOCAL EARTHQUAKE RISK Justin Czarka, Lehman College, CUNY – May 2013 Agung Swastika/AFP/Getty Images.
S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER Southern California: A Natural Laboratory for Earthquake Science SCEC annual meeting, 2000.
Paleoseismic and Geologic Data for Earthquake Simulations Lisa B. Grant and Miryha M. Gould.
GIS technologies and Web Mapping Services
The Next Bay Area Earthquake
The next big earthquake at SFO (coming soon) Tom Brocher USGS, Coordinator, NC Earthquake Hazard Investigations M Hayward.
StAR web server tutorial for ROC Analysis. ROC Analysis ROC Analysis: This module allows the user to input data for several classifiers to be tested.
Michael Hodges, Chris Kohlenberger, Nolan Mattox, and Christian Vanderwall Seismic Hazard Map Plugin Improvement of ShakeMap Plugin Custom Color Maps Team.
Lisa Wald USGS Pasadena U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquakes 101 (EQ101)
Exploring Planet Earth Blind Thrust Fault Earthquake Rupture Animation (Northridge, 1994) Brad Aagaard, USGS
Earthquake Information Timeline min 10-20min 1hr 2hrs 4hrs epicenter & magnitude (USGS ENS) ShakeMap (point source) Earthquake Occurs PAGER (pending.
Sponsor: Dr. K.C. Chang Tony Chen Ehsan Esmaeilzadeh Ali Jarvandi Ning Lin Ryan O’Neil Spring 2010.
Erik Danielsson Product Responsible - Proteus Quantum Solutions AS 30 minutes - October 2009.
Introduction of Geoprocessing Topic 7a 4/10/2007.
1 SCEC Broadband Platform Development Using USC HPCC Philip Maechling 12 Nov 2012.
1.UCERF3 development (Field/Milner) 2.Broadband Platform development (Silva/Goulet/Somerville and others) 3.CVM development to support higher frequencies.
A functional form for the spatial distribution of aftershocks Karen Felzer USGS Pasadena.
Estimation of Future Earthquake Annualized Losses in California B. Rowshandel, M. Reichle, C. Wills, T. Cao, M. Petersen, and J. Davis California Geological.
Zack Bick Erin Riggs Alicia Helton Cara Dickerson Presentation by:
August 6, 2008ESRI International User Conference 1 Triaging Healthcare Facilities for Emergency Operations California Office of Statewide Health Planning.
The Prajna Project Utilities for Understanding Edward Swing.
LESSONS FROM PAST NOTABLE EARTHQUAKES. Part IV Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Report on the Commemoration of the 140 th Anniversary of the 1868 Earthquake Tom Brocher Chair 1868 Hayward Earthquake Alliance
Loss-Estimation Modeling of Earthquake Scenarios for Each County in Nevada Using HAZUS-MH Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 06-1 University.
GNS Science Natural Hazards Research Platform Progress in understanding the Canterbury Earthquakes Kelvin Berryman Manager, Natural Hazards Research Platform.
GEON2 and OpenEarth Framework (OEF) Bradley Wallet School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Earthquake is Inevitable: The Disaster is Not.
Foreshocks, Aftershocks, and Characteristic Earthquakes or Reconciling the Agnew & Jones Model with the Reasenberg and Jones Model Andrew J. Michael.
Learning Teams Red - Favorite hobbies Green - Favorite place on earth Blue – Teaching situation (Grade level, courses, etc) Yellow – Favorite activity.
What is GIS? Why GIS? How to benefit from GIS?. Location of data: How many? What kind? Where? Scale of data: Local to global. Data presentation: Words,
Introduction of Geoprocessing Lecture 9. Geoprocessing  Geoprocessing is any GIS operation used to manipulate data. A typical geoprocessing operation.
February 3-5, 2009ESRI Regional User Conference 1 Triaging Healthcare Facilities for Emergency Operations California Office of Statewide Health Planning.
06/22/041 Data-Gathering Systems IRIS Stanford/ USGS UNAVCO JPL/UCSD Data Management Organizations PI’s, Groups, Centers, etc. Publications, Presentations,
Some General Implications of Results Because hazard estimates at a point are often dominated by one or a few faults, an important metric is the participation.
112/16/2010AGU Annual Fall Meeting - NG44a-08 Terry Tullis Michael Barall Steve Ward John Rundle Don Turcotte Louise Kellogg Burak Yikilmaz Eric Heien.
Dr. Walter Hays US Geological Survey (Retired) Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction.
Earthquakes 101 (EQ101) Lisa Wald USGS Earthquake Hazards Program
THE MAGNITUDE 6.0 NAPA, CA EARTHQUAKE 3:20 AM, AUGUST 24, 2014 Dr. Walter Hays US Geological Survey (Retired) Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction.
A proposed triggering/clustering model for the current WGCEP Karen Felzer USGS, Pasadena Seismogram from Peng et al., in press.
Michael Hamilton, Vanessa Rivera del Rio and Sean Askay University of California James San Jacinto Mountains Reserve.
Project Information Abstract Project Objectives The objective of this project is to: Create a visual designer that will allow inexperienced end- users.
PROWIND (Positioning Relay over Wirelessly Networked Devices) Team Members: Alexander Smithson, Dian Ding, Yeh Cheng Yuan Graduate Advisor: Eric Liao Faculty.
PEER 2003 Meeting 03/08/031 Interdisciplinary Framework Major focus areas Structural Representation Fault Systems Earthquake Source Physics Ground Motions.
ShakeAlert CISN Testing Center (CTC) Development
Population Density & Counties, Roads and Railways
Philip J. Maechling (SCEC) September 13, 2015
google: cisn shakemap nc
VII. Earthquake Mitigation
Presentation transcript:

2014 Grand Challenge Symposium UseIT Undergraduate Studies in Earthquake Information Technology Southern California Earthquake Center

The Grand Challenge  Use SCEC-VDO to visualize earthquake scenarios, in particular Loma Prieta type aftershock sequences, in honor of the 25 th anniversary the 1989 M6.9 earthquake.

Loma Prieta M6.9 Background This was one of more than 20 relevant earthquake forecasts made in the 83 years before the earthquake. Loma Prieta provided the first test of ATC-20, the post-earthquake review process that places red, yellow, or green placards on shaken buildings. Its successful application has led to widespread use in other disasters including the September 11, 2001, New York City terrorist incident.

The Grand Challenge Process 1. Rupture Selection Process 2. Visualizing the Risk- ShakeMaps and HAZUS 3. Improving SCEC-VDO 4. Creating Visualizations 5. Conclusions

UCERF3 UCERF3 Uniform California earthquake rupture forecast 3 Four main model components: 1.Fault models 2.Deformation models 3.Earthquake rate models 4.Probability models

Hazard Curve – OpenSHA By Location

List Generation

Final Rupture ID’s: Loma Prieta “Like”

USGS List

SCEC-VDO & UCERF3 Obtained rupture ID’s Obtained rupture ID’s

Super Computer Generated Simulations

List Generation 23 x 500 = 11,500 Simulations!

Final Simulations Simulation for rupture ID North San Andreas Fault M7.2 Substantial Typical Minor

Probabilistic Interpretation Analysis Team Gutenberg-Richter relation

Data & Statistical Analysis Analysis Team Main Magnitude M7.2 This graph shows that scenarios with higher number of aftershocks have a greater probability of having a magnitude larger than the main event.

ShakeMaps Visualization

Implementing ShakeMaps into HAZUS Analysis Team HAZUS uses census data to help determine economic losses as well as injuries and fatalities for a given area. In addition to census data, HAZUS requires the user to supply a ShakeMap in a file format that it can interpret.

HAZUS and GIS Once specific parameters are set, HAZUS is able to generate loss estimates based on economic investments, injuries, and fatalities. Using the raw data generated from HAZUS, the user can then map this data via GIS.

SCEC-VDODevelopment What is SCEC-VDO? Southern California Earthquake Center-Virtual Display of Objects A software application that allows the exploration of faults, earthquakes, and other geological events in a 3-dimensional environment

SCEC-VDODevelopment

SCEC-VDODevelopment How does it work? SCEC-VDO is built using Java – Java3D, a separate library for 3D visualization – It is program that has numerous plugins that allow the user to display different geological features on a map

SCEC-VDODevelopment How does it help the scientific community? SCEC-VDO is widely used by geologists and seismologists to develop new models – UCERF3 Visual representation of a complex natural phenomena – Geometry of fault ruptures – Connections – Topography – Video-making Capability

HAZUS Plugin in SCEC-VDO Development

Development Updates Events class was hard-coded and required over 5000 lines of code Now has under 800 lines of code and new HAZUS info can be added easily New color scheme Legend Updates Importing Process Information needed is put into XML file New tab is added if necessary

Loma Prieta Near You Videos Visualization The team created videos for each of the 23 rupture scenarios.The team created videos for each of the 23 rupture scenarios. Each video contains three- dimensional viewing of the rupture plane.Each video contains three- dimensional viewing of the rupture plane. ShakeMaps and HAZUS were integrated into each visualization.ShakeMaps and HAZUS were integrated into each visualization. Rupture Plane of a Magnitude 7.2 Scenario on the Northern San Andreas Fault

Scripting Plugin Development Why is it important to have video production capabilities in SCEC-VDO? What are its shortcomings?

Timeline Scripting Plugin Development

Aftershock Scenario Sorting Development o Eliminating Spontaneous Events and related aftershocks o Filtering events by various attributes

Aftershock Visualizations Visualization Team  Typical Scenarios- contained an average amount of aftershocks based on the five hundred simulations provided.  Minor Scenarios- contained less than the average number of aftershocks.  Substantial Scenarios- contained more than the average number of aftershocks. Substantial Aftershock Scenario for the Great Valley 4b Fault The team created videos that spatially demonstrated three different types of aftershock scenarios for each rupture.

Media Team Michael Matchen Michael Gonzalez Sarah Vargas Terri Mcintosh Michael Francisco Analysis Team Rachel Hausmann Sheila Bart Elena Pierce Georgina Campos Krystel Rios Thanh Le Development Team Ernest Scapini Ali Sellsted Mark Krant Brandon Green Greg Berger Francisco Raygoza Paulo Dos Santos Visualization Team Jackie Felix Ryan Meier Krista McPherson Rory Norman Paulo Dos Santos Dr. Tom Jordan Dr. Bob de Groot Nick Rousseau Mark Benthien