Creating a Learning Organization Through the AHCA/NCAL Quality Award Program Demi Haffenreffer, RN, MBA President Haffenreffer & Associates, Inc. www.consultdemi.net.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2012 EXAMINER TRAINING Examples of NERD Comment Formatting
Advertisements

Using Baldrige to Create Organizational Alignment & Integration
EVALUATOR TIPS FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT WRITING The following slides were excerpted from an evaluator training session presented as part of the June 2011.
2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Introduction to the Baldrige Criteria Baldrige Performance Excellence Program |
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Executive View of Project Management Jim Green, Vice-President Corporate Financing and Risk Management Development Services, WWREI, T&S BMO Financial Group.
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Baldrige Excellence Framework (Health.
©2006 OLC 1 Process Management: The Foundation for Achieving Organizational Excellence Process Management Implementation Worldwide.
Baldrige National Quality Program 2003 Seven Categories of the Business Criteria l Leadership l Strategic Planning l Customer and Market Focus l Measurement,
2010 AHCA/NCAL National Quality Award Program - Gold Overview - Jeri Reinhardt Ed McMahon Tim Case.
2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Education Criteria for Performance Excellence.
Applicant Name RMPEx Site Visit Opening Meeting Team Leader - Team Members –
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Baldrige Excellence Framework A systems.
Do You Know ???.
Planning and Strategic Management
Building Performance Excellence in Health Care James R. Evans Professor of Quantitative Analysis and Operations Management College of Business University.
Leadership in the Baldrige Criteria
THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF QUALITY, 5e, © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning TM 1 Chapter 14 Building and Sustaining Total Quality Organizations.
Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award
Planning and Strategic Management
Strategic Planning Larry Potterfield Founder and CEO.
Baldrige Health Care Criteria for Performance Excellence
WAGGGS Policy & Guidelines: Adult Training, Learning and Development
INTRODUCTION Performance management is a relatively new concept to the field of management.
Introduction to Hospitality, 6e
Quality and Accreditation (1/3) Certification of Kingdom Tower for “ FIT for PURPOSE ” Series of tests of “Fitness” of sub-systems: Foundation Sub-Systems.
MGT-555 PERFORMANCE AND CAREER MANAGEMENT
Strategic Planning Larry Potterfield Founder and CEO.
SM. SM Use of the Georgia Oglethorpe Award Logo is restricted to current Key Investors, Award Recipients,
Leadership Category Jim Hyde, President Bone & Joint Hospital SSM Health Care.
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Introduction to the Baldrige Excellence.
Creating Sustainable Organizations The Baldrige Performance Excellence Program Sherry Martin HIV Quality of Care Advisory Committee September 13, 2012.
Andrew Stephen May, M.D., FAAFP Sullivan County Regional Health Department October 9, 2012.
Board Workshop February 13 th Background Journey started with the adoption of the Sterling Management Criteria Pursuing the Baldrige Education Criteria.
Scoring 1. Scoring Categories 1 – 6 (Process Categories) Examiners select a score (0-100) to summarize their observed strengths and opportunities for.
Culture Conversations The data generated by the Denison survey offers an excellent opportunity to engage your employees and colleagues in some important.
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Introduction to the Baldrige Excellence.
Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results 2006 CSR Baseline Results Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results.
Accelerating Excellence with the Baldrige Framework Rebecca Anderson, PhD, MBA, CMQ-OE ASQ 1104 Monthly Meeting September 8, 2015.
Models of Quality Assessment
Minnesota Council for Quality Driving Excellence, Sustaining the Journey Landmark Center, St. Paul, MN May 18, 2010 Minnesota Department of Human Services.
Quality and San Juan College Dr. Carol Spencer. About San Juan College.
Applicant Name RMPEx Site Visit Opening Meeting Team Leader - Team Members –
2010 AHCA/NCAL National Quality Award Program - Silver Overview - Session One Lance Reynolds Kevin Warren Tim Case.
2008 AHCA/NCAL National Quality Award Program - Step III Overview - Jon Frantsvog Ira Schoenberger Tim Case.
Region 1 Training Workshop Crowne Plaza Albany – 1-2 August 2008 Session 1A Strategic Planning Arthur W. Winston Chair, R1 Strategic Planning Committee.
The Balanced Scorecard
Factor0–5%10–25%30–45%50–65%70–85%90–100% Approach No systematic approach to Item requirements is evident; information is anecdotal. The beginning of a.
How to “Ace” Deployment Jeff Larkin Vice President-Marketing.
Tennessee Center for Performance Excellence Section 2 – Process Evaluation Factors.
Baldrige National Quality Program Baldrige Background l Results l Baldrige Program Impacts Legal Aid Group March 11, 2002.
District Support Staff Category Sort District Strategic Directions: Highest Student Achievement Responsive Governance Effective Use of Resources Strategic.
Baldrige National Quality Program 2004 Using the Baldrige Criteria to Achieve Performance Excellence Jane Poulter, BSN, MSA Baldrige National Quality Program.
Process Improvement Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycle. “Problems breed problems, and the lack of a disciplined method of openly attacking them breeds more problems.”
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2016
Welcome, Examiners! Washington State Quality Award Return Examiner Training 2009.
Mauritius Excellence Awards for Cooperatives 2013 Criteria and Model designed By International Business Excellence Mauritius.
Albemarle County’s Departmental Assessment Process Who, What, When and How? Lori Allshouse, County Executive Department John Freeman, Department of Social.
It’s More than a List of Questions: Using the Quality Award Criteria as Your Roadmap to Excellence! Ruta Kadonoff Courtney Bishnoi.
Balanced Scorecard The University of Texas at El Paso Division of the Vice President for Business Affairs.
Help Me Understand the Basics of Non-academic Assessment A BETHUNE-COOKMAN UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP Presented by Cory A. Potter Executive.
National Quality Center Evaluating Your CQM Program and Improvement Efforts Kevin Garrett, MSW Lori DeLorenzo, RN, MSN May 19, 2016.
Human Resource Management 1 Performance Management Process.
1 Chapter 9 Implementing Six Sigma. Top 8 Reasons for Six Sigma Project Failure 8. The training was not practical. 7. The project was too small for DMAIC.
LO1 - Analyse the impact and influence which the macro environment has on an organization and its business strategies 1. P1 Applying appropriate frameworks,
Sustaining Continuous Improvement
Conducting a Self Assessment and Developing Your CQI Plan
Conducting a Self Assessment and Developing Your CQI Plan
Marcia Harrington, PhD Executive Director
Australia Local Mission Delivery and the National Strategy
Presentation transcript:

Creating a Learning Organization Through the AHCA/NCAL Quality Award Program Demi Haffenreffer, RN, MBA President Haffenreffer & Associates, Inc.

Outline Baldrige scoring, key terms & concepts Elements of a “Learning Organization” Panel discussion Audience questions

Baldrige Scoring Steps Toward Mature Processes Characterized by activities mostly responsive to immediate needs or problems rather than by processes Goals are poorly defined Strategic and Operational Goals (1) Reacting to Problems (0-25%)

Baldrige Scoring Steps Toward Mature Processes Beginning stages of using operating processes with repeatability, evaluation, improvement, and coordination Strategy and quantitative goals are being defined Strategic and Operational Goals (2) Early Systematic Approaches (30-45%)

Baldrige Scoring Steps Toward Mature Processes Systematic processes in place that are regularly evaluated for improvement Learning from processes shared Organizational units are coordinated Processes address well defined strategies and goals (3) Aligned Approaches (50-65%) Strategic and Operational Goals

Baldrige Scoring Steps Toward Mature Processes Systematic processes in place that are regularly evaluated for change and improvement in collaboration with other affected organizational units Efficiencies across units sought and achieved through analysis, innovation, and sharing Processes and measures track progress on key strategic and operational goals (4) Integrated Approaches (70-100%) Strategic and Operational Goals

Baldrige Scoring Process Scoring Guidelines ◦ Approach ◦ Deployment ◦ *Learning* ◦ Integration Results Scoring ◦ Levels ◦ Trends ◦ Comparisons ◦ Integration

Approach The methods utilized to accomplish a process The appropriateness of the methods The effectiveness of your use of the methods The degree to which the method or approach is repeatable

Deployment How your approach is applied The consistency of the application of your approach How the approach is utilized by all work units

Learning Refinement of your approaches through evaluation and improvement Breakthrough change to your approach through innovation Sharing refinements and innovations with other relevant work units

Learning Refers to new knowledge or skills acquired through evaluation, study, experience & innovation Directed toward better services & being more responsive, adaptive, innovative & efficient Two types ◦ Organizational ◦ Personal

Organizational Learning Achieved through research & development Includes evaluation & improvement cycles Includes ideas and input from workforce, residents, volunteers, & other stakeholders Includes best-practice sharing Includes benchmarking

Personal Learning Achieved through education, training, & discussion Includes opportunities for growth & development Includes building discipline knowledge & retraining Includes enhancing knowledge of measurements & outcomes Includes many delivery modes

Integration Your approach is aligned with your organizational Profile and other Process Items Your measures, information, and improvement systems are complementary across processes and work units Your plans, processes, results, analyses, learning, and actions are harmonized

Elements of Learning Organization There is a purpose ◦ Vision and mission ◦ Core values ◦ Shared vision There are systems ◦ Work systems ◦ Work processes There are core competencies ◦ Based on work processes

Elements of Learning Organization There is team learning and individual learning ◦ People feel they’re doing something that matters ◦ Every individual is growing at all levels of the organization & encouraged to share ◦ The organization is aware of its knowledge base

Elements of Learning Organization There are skillful discussions ◦ Mutual respect ◦ People feel free to inquire about each others’ & their own assumptions & biases – few if any sacred cows There is testing ◦ Use of theories, methods & tools for evaluation ◦ People take risks & no one is killed for making a mistake

Elements of Learning Organization There is knowledge sharing ◦ Results are shared across the organization & with all stakeholders ◦ Resource building There are results ◦ Marketplace sustainability ◦ Performance advantages ◦ Workforce satisfaction & motivation to excel

How can the Quality Award Help?

Introducing Our Esteemed Panel ElderWood Senior Care, Inc Williamsville, New York

Panel Discussion Robert Chur, President and CEO Michael Murphy, Executive Director of SNF Operations Anna Bozarczuk-Foy, Long Term Care Administrator ElderWood Health Wedgewood Deborah Urbank, Long Term Care Administrator ElderWood Health Lakewood

Panel Discussion Questions Please tell us a little about your organization ◦ Number of step I, II and III winners ◦ Year and first facility to start the quality award process ◦ What prompted you to begin the process?

Panel Discussion Questions As two Gold award (step III) winners, could you briefly describe where you were as a facility when applying for Bronze (step I), Silver (step II), and Gold (step III) – give us a historical view of your journey. How did the quality award application process assist with the changes you and your organization experienced?

Panel Discussion Questions Related to the “Elements” of a learning organization I discussed earlier please comment on the following: ◦ Please describe your learning cycle or process ◦ How have you encouraged shared vision? ◦ How do you share knowledge? ◦ Please give the audience an example of “organizational &/or personal” learning within your own organization (new programs, innovations or other)

Panel Discussion Questions Please comment on how the home office supports the award application process. Please comment on how the award process has led to marketplace sustainability, performance advantages, employee motivation and the desire to excel. Do you have any “words of wisdom” to give us – especially for those independent facilities in the audience?

Comments & Audience Questions