Microcoaxial phaco using 1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Manual Vs Instrumental Phaco
Advertisements

Toric and Modern IOL Technology
TESTUPLOAD. TORSIONAL PHACOEMULSIFICATION In January 2006 Alcon Surgical incorporated Ozil torsional into the Infiniti Vision System. Unlike the conventional.
Comparison of Visual Outcomes With Toric IOL and With Limbal Relaxing Incisions in Cataract Surgery Eriko Fukuyama, MD Fukuyama Eye Clinic Fukuoka, Japan.
OHM Comparative quantification of ingress of trypan blue into anterior chamber following microcoaxial phacoemulsification with torsional or longitudinal.
David Allen Sunderland UK Financial disclosure A & E The author has had travel and lodging costs paid by as well as occasional honoraria from Alcon Surgical.
Mitra Nejad, BS, 1 and Kevin Miller, MD 1,2 1 David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 2 Jules Stein Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology,
Computer Assisted Knee Replacement Surgery By (insert surgeon name)
State-of-the-art Vision Correction
The new Akreos MI 60 lens Joel Pynson, MD - Director Design Engineering Bausch & Lomb, Toulouse - France London, September 9th 2006.
Surgical technique Incision opened up to 3.8mm, Using Monarch injector, Acrysof IOL MA 30 in first 11 cases subsequently single piece inserted first. The.
Astigmatism Following 2 IOL Injection Techniques: Wound Assisted Versus Wound Directed Jay J. Meyer, MD Hart B. Moss, MD Kenneth L. Cohen, MD University.
SPINNING THE WHEEL- STABILITY OF COMMONLY USED IOL IN-THE-BAG DR ARUP BHAUMIK DISHA EYE HOSPITALS AND RESEARCH CENTRE BARRACKPORE, WEST BEGAL, INDIA
A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Evaluation of Patients with Contralateral Implantation of Two Aspheric Acrylic Intraocular Lenses R. Cionni, MD.
Intraocular lenses for small incision surgery
DEPARTMENT OF COUNSELLING
Core Anterior Vitrectomy following Posterior Capsular Rupture SURYA.
Phaco-drainage Phacosection Amporn technique
Outcomes of surgery for posterior polar cataract using torsional handpiece Dr. Aysel Pelit, Dr. Yonca A. Akova Baskent University, Faculty of Medicine,
Phacodynamics Nakhleh E. Abu-Yaghi, MD.
Thermal Imaging Comparison of Longitudinal versus Torsional Phacoemulsification in INFINITI Young Keun Han, M.D., Kevin M. Miller, M.D. Department of Ophthalmology,
So-Hyang Chung, MD, PhD, Choun-Ki Joo, MD, PhD Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Hyun Seung Kim, M.D. Department of Ophthalmology, St. Mary’s hospital, The Catholic University of Korea Changes in Astigmatism After Clear Corneal Temporal.
Transparency of Transition from 2.75 mm to 1.8 mm Microincision Surgery Jay McDonald II, MD Adjunct Clinical Professor University of Arkansas School of.
Step by step: Learning Phacoemulsification and MICS for Tremor Surgeons Gede Pardianto Sumatera Eye Hospital Medan - Indonesia.
Recent Advances in Intraocular Lenses Jim Schwiegerling, PhD Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences Optical Sciences.
Phaco in post- vitrectomy cataracts George Kampougeris MD, MRCSEd, PhD Consultant Ophthalmic Surgeon
1.8 mm Cataract Surgery: Clinical Results 6 Months after Coaxial and Biaxial MICS and Implantation of a New Micro- incision IOL Rosa Braga-Mele, M. Ed,
New Phaco Technology Mark Packer, MD, FACS Clinical Associate Professor of Ophthalmology Oregon Health & Sciences University Drs. Fine, Hoffman & Packer,
Spending 40 cc in an entire Cataract Surgery. Comparative study. Arturo Pèrez-Arteaga M.D. Medical Director & Founder Centro Oftalmològico Tlalnepantla,
A Fellow Eye Comparison of Aberrations, Modulation Transfer Function and Contrast Sensitivity After AcrySof IQ and AcrySof Natural IOL Implantation. Mayank.
Rumex International Co. Bridge between innovative technology and perfect surgery Rumex International Company th Street North, Suite 317 Clearwater,
Mitchell A Jackson MD Lake Villa IL USA Relevant financial disclosure: Member Bausch + Lomb speaker’s bureau.
Jorge L. Alio MD PhD Ma. Cecilia C. Agdeppa MD VISSUM-Instituto Oftalmologico de Alicante ASCRS Convention 2010 Boston Efficiency of MicroIncision Cataract.
Mitsui Memorial Hospital Takayuki Akahoshi, MD The author has no financial interest in the products introduced in this presentation.
Daniele Tognetto MD, Pia Leon MD, Paolo Cecchini MD, Silvia Rinaldi MD, Giuseppe Ravalico MD The Authors have no proprietary interest in any products.
Thermal Study of Longitudinal and Torsional Ultrasound Phacoemulsification : Tracking the Temperature of Corneal Surface, Incision and Handpiece Bokkwan.
Surgeon Generated Tip Travel Comparing Longitudinal vs. Torsional Ultrasound with Interjected Longitudinal Segments James A. Davison, MD FACS Wolfe Eye.
Trilinear Phaco Using the Dual Linear Foot Pedal and Burst Mode Phacoemulsification Terence M. Devine, M.D. USA.
COMPARISON OF OCULAR RESULTS OF MECHANICAL CHOPER VS ULTRACHOPER FERNANDO AGUILERA MD. INSTITUTO DE OJOS, MEXICO NO FINANCIAL INTEREST.
Modern Cataract Surgery Professor Ejaz Ansari, FRCOphth MD.
Wound Architecture and Wound Healing after Torsional and Longitudinal Phaco in a Rabbit Model Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC Research Assistant Professor.
Johns Hopkins Hospital
THE OUTCOMES OF MICS WITH CRUISE CONTROL SYSTEM VS MICS WITH WHITESTAR ICE AND CASE SETTINGS IN HARD CATARACTS HELVACIOGLU Firat, MD, SENCAN Sadik, MD,
Corneal shape and corneal aberrations after MicroIncision Cataract Surgery (MICS) NOCHEZ Y, BUREL B, MAJZOUB S, PISELLA PJ C.H.U.
Torsional Phaco with a straight needle and “Spade” tip A bench test and clinical examination comparing it with the standard bent “Kelman” needle… Nigel.
Comparison of two differents ultrasound mode in BMICS technique : Pulse and Continuous US Danielle DEIDIER M.D. Clinique Saint Vincent Toulon - France.
Kavita Gala David Spalton Mayank Nanavaty St Thomas’ Hospital , London
1 Bimanual Microincision Cataract Surgery with Stellaris Advanced Flow Module Mark Packer, MD, FACS Clinical Associate Professor Oregon Health & Science.
Studený P., Dědková B., Farkaš A., Vokrojová M., Siveková D., Břešťák M. Oční klinika FNKV a 3 LF UK Praha Oční oddělení, Karlovarská krajská nemocnice.
J. E. “Jay” McDonald, II M.D. McDonald Eye Associates Fayetteville, Arkansas Financial disclosure: Bausch and Lomb – Consultant; Addition.
OUR EXPERIENCE WITH PRELOADED IOL CT LUCIA 601P(Y)
Consultant for Alcon. AMO, Bausch and Lomb
Evaluation of the efficacy and of the safety of the new
Evaluation of Akreos AO micro-incision IOL, implantation in 350 eyes :
Prospective Study Comparing Outcomes of Torsional versus Traditional Phacoemulsification Systems on Dense Cataracts Bonnie An Henderson MD, Kelly J Grimes.
Comparison in Reduction of Preoperative Astigmatism after Cataract Surgery with Toric IOLs versus Limbal Relaxing Incisions Alexander Chop PhD MD (no.
MI60 INTRAOCULAR LENSES – OUR EXPERIENCE
Experimental evaluation of various disposable micro-incision knives in comparaison to a diamond knife G. LESIEUR ALBI P: Royalty from a PhysIOL ophthalmic.
Microincision Cataract Surgery with a Scleral Approach
Sherleen Chen, M.D. and Roberto Pineda II, M.D.
Özcan R. Kayıkçıoğlu, Sinan Emre
B.MALYUGIN MD,PhD A.GOLOVIN MD
성모병원 안센터 CHANGES IN ASTIGMATISM RELATIVE TO IOL HAPTIC INSERTION AXIS IN WITH-THE-RULE AND AGAINST-THE-RULE ASTIGMATISM PATIENTS Hyun Seung Kim, M.D.
Authors have no financial interests
Cataract procedure Date 23/05/2019.
Five-Year Experience With Routine Use of Healon5 in Cataract Surgery
A Simple and Easy Procedure
Young Jeung Park, M.D. Ph.D. Won Suk Choi, M.D.
SPINNING THE WHEEL- STABILITY OF COMMONLY USED IOL IN-THE-BAG
Presentation transcript:

Microcoaxial phaco using 1 Microcoaxial phaco using 1.8mm incisions: comparison of two machines and IOL systems Richard Packard Windsor England Consultant for Alcon, AMO and Bausch and Lomb

Reasons for making incisions smaller Less leakage and therefore better controlled surgery Minimal if any induced astigmatism Faster rehabilitation visually for the patient Safer more rapidly healing wounds Because we can!

3.2mm 2.5mm 2.2mm 1.8mm

Microincisions with coaxial give: Protected wounds due to sleeve Less changes in technique and equipment than B-MICS Ability to use established IOL technology Minimal astigmatism

What do we need for C-MICS Wounds and therefore knives that match instrumentation Microsurgical capsulorhexis forceps New sleeves that are thin and allow enough fluid passage Thinner phaco tips? Understanding hydrodissection with microincisions No change in cataract removal techniques Phaco machines with appropriate power modulation and excellent fluidics IOLs capable of being injected with wound assistance through unopened Co-MICS incisions

Incisions for 1.8mm C-MICS

Capsulorhexis and hydrosteps and tip insertion for 1.8mm C-MICS

Stellaris System Overview EQ Fluidics equalises fluidic dynamics for solid chamber stability in vacuum or flow modes Ergonomic six crystal handpiece and tubing for efficient cutting and smooth removal of the nucleus in all techniques CustomControl™ Software II for customisable power modulation for all cataract grades Wireless Dual Linear foot pedal for instantaneous surgeon control of aspiration and ultrasound Sleek and ergonomically designed for operating room efficiency Modular design customisable to both EQ Fluidics options, the Advanced Flow Module or Vacuum Fluidics Module, plus all future upgrades

Stellaris EQ Fluidics Management Technology EQualising aspiration and irrigation for unsurpassed safety, efficiency and predictability in either flow or vacuum modes for solid chamber stability throughout the procedure EQ Advanced Flow Module (AFM) EQ Vacuum Fluidics Module (VFM) AFM is Advanced Flow Module - for Flow or Vacuum characteristics; VFM is Vacuum fluidics module Dr. Lindstrom – EQ Fluidics stands for B&L brand of fluidics technology. It stands for Equal, as in equal or balanced control of flow and aspiration. In the system, EQ Fluidics refers to both vacuum and flow/vacuum modules. Single module allows surgeons to toggle intra-operatively between flow and vacuum modes; flow for sculpting, vacuum for capsule polishing and I/A Latest generation vacuum fluidics with StableChamber tubing delivers exceptional accuracy and efficiency for MICS

INFINITITM Vision System Tri-modal AquaLaseTM OzilTM Improved Traditional Ultrasound Fluidics User Interface Ergonomics

Fluidic Management System Pump roller interface Vent valve interface Irrigation pinch valve Infusion pressure membrane Vacuum Pressure Sensor IntrepidTM low compression tubing

MICS tip and sleeve for 1.8mm surgery with B and L Stellaris Straight MICS tip 30 degree bevel 0.9mm at widest 0.5mm internal diameter

Mini-flared tip and Nano sleeve for 1.8mm surgery with Alcon Infiniti Curved 45 degree mini-flared tip 0.9mm at widest 0.57mm internal diameter

Stellaris Handpiece - efficient cutting Increased stroke length for efficient cutting of the nucleus Tighter, more focused and consistent delivery of stroke CustomControl™ II Software for customisable, programmable wavefront power modulations for all techniques

Translates = about 1/3 of thermal dissipation OzilTM technology Torsional (side) stroke at tip end (action) -oscillations occur at tip/hub/horn junction -distal end of Kelman tip exhibits a “side to side” displacement due to tip geometry More Efficient Cutting with 32KHz Torsional induces (“shearing” stress ) vs. Longitudinal u/s (“compression stress”) Longitudinal cuts on the “forward” stroke Torsional cuts both “right or left” = efficiency Translates = about 1/3 of thermal dissipation

Now that we have removed the nucleus which IOL can we use?

Akreos Microincision Lens Optimised for MICS Akreos Microincision Lens: Akreos MI60 Implantable through a 1.8 mm incision using a wound-assisted injection Biocompatible hydrophilic material with a proven record of safety, used in 2 million implantations since its introduction in 1998 The innovative haptic design ensures excellent 3-Dimensional stability of the IOL

AcrySof IQ* Aspheric Natural IOL (Alcon model SN60WF) Thinner aspheric optic design for 1.8mm insertion with wound assistance and D-cartridge Blue Light-Filtration AcrySof Single-Piece Platform Low PCO Material with 17years track record *IQ (Image Quality)

So how do they really compare? Both deliver 1.8mm surgery with early visual rehabilitation due to no induced astigmatism Both require specific knives, capsulorhexis forceps, phaco tips and sleeves Wound assisted insertion is mandatory Time will tell how the IOLs perform in the long term as far as PCO is concerned

Thank you