N-W.F.P University of Engineering & Technology Peshawar

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Torsion of a Circular Cylinder A Course Project By George Kodikulam Mukesh Nagapuri Bharath Kumar Vudhamari Pradeep Kumar Bitla SriLakshmi Ganoothula Continuum.
Advertisements

Chapter 3 – Stress and Deformation Analysis (ref MCHT 213!!)
Chapter 6 Bending.
Shear Force and Bending Moment
LRFD-Steel Design Dr. Ali Tayeh Second Semester
3 Torsion.
3 Torsion.
1 Classes #3 & #4 Civil Engineering Materials – CIVE 2110 Torsion Fall 2010 Dr. Gupta Dr. Pickett.
Torsion: Shear Stress & Twist ( )
3 Torsion.
3 Torsion.
STRUCTURAL MECHANICS: CE203
Strength of Materials I EGCE201 กำลังวัสดุ 1
Topic Torsion Farmula By Engr.Murtaza zulfiqar
Torsion  Introduction -- Analyzing the stresses and strains in machine parts which are subjected to torque T Circular -- Cross-section Non-circular.
3 Torsion.
CHAPTER 5 TORSION.
CHAPTER 6 BENDING.
SAFE 605: Application of Safety Engineering Principles Strength of Materials.
CHAPTER 7 TRANSVERSE SHEAR.
4 Pure Bending.
CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 14: Stresses in Beams
Strength of Materials I EGCE201 กำลังวัสดุ 1
Stress Analysis -MDP N161 Bending of Beams Stress and Deformation
Solid mechanics 1.1 – key points
3 Torsion.
Beams Beams: Comparison with trusses, plates t
Beams – Internal Effects The external load applied to a beam can cause changes in the shape of the beam, it can bend for example. We do not want.
10 Pure Bending.
BFC (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 3: Stress in Beam
BENDING MOMENTS AND SHEARING FORCES IN BEAMS
Beams Session Subject: S1014 / MECHANICS of MATERIALS Year: 2008.
CTC / MTC 222 Strength of Materials Final Review.
Mechanics of Materials – MAE 243 (Section 002) Spring 2008
9 Torsion.
Civil Engineering Materials – CIVE 2110
3. Stresses in Machine Elements Lecture Number – 3.1 Prof. Dr. C. S. Pathak Department of Mechanical Engineering Sinhgad College of Engineering, Pune Strength.
Mechanics of Materials – MAE 243 (Section 002) Spring 2008 Dr. Konstantinos A. Sierros.
MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Third Edition Ferdinand P. Beer E. Russell Johnston, Jr. John T. DeWolf Lecture Notes: J. Walt Oler Texas Tech University CHAPTER.
UNIT-05. Torsion And Buckling of columns
3 Torsion.
3 Torsion.
☻ 2.0 Bending of Beams sx 2.1 Revision – Bending Moments
Stress and Strain ( , 3.14) MAE 316 – Strength of Mechanical Components NC State University Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Stress.
EULER, CARNOT, TORSION by Evie Antholis A Cluster 3 Production.
MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Fourth Edition Ferdinand P. Beer E. Russell Johnston, Jr. John T. DeWolf Lecture Notes: J. Walt Oler Texas Tech University CHAPTER.
EGM 5653 Advanced Mechanics of Materials
Sanklchand Patel College of Engineering Visnagar Structural Analysis II.
 2005 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd 6. Bending 1 CHAPTER OBJECTIVES To determine stress in members caused by bending To discuss how to establish.
3.9 Linear models : boundary-value problems
BME 315 – Biomechanics Chapter 4. Mechanical Properties of the Body Professor: Darryl Thelen University of Wisconsin-Madison Fall 2009.
BME 315 – Biomechanics Chapter 4. Mechanical Properties of the Body Professor: Darryl Thelen University of Wisconsin-Madison Fall 2009.
Mechanics of Materials -Beams
PLASTIC ANALYSIS OF BEAMS - SANDEEP DIGAVALLI. AT A GLANCE OF THIS TOPIC  BASIS OF PLASTIC THEORY  STRESS-STRAIN CURVE OF PLASTIC MATERIALS  STRESSES.
STRENGTH OF MATERIALS UNIT – III Torsion.
Shear in Straight Members Shear Formula Shear Stresses in Beams
Shear Force and Bending Moment
Pure Bending.
3 Torsion.
Shear Force and Bending Moment
3 Torsion.
4 Pure Bending.
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
Theory of Simple Bending
Chapter 6 Bending.
3 Torsion.
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Discuss effects of applying torsional loading to a long straight member Determine stress distribution within the member under torsional.
Shear Force and Bending Moment
4 Pure Bending.
Presentation transcript:

N-W.F.P University of Engineering & Technology Peshawar Subject CE-51111 Advanced Structural Analysis-1 Instructor: Prof. Dr. Shahzad Rahman

Topics to be Covered Overview of Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory Overview of Theory of Torsion Static Indeterminancy Kinematic Indeterminancy

Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory Leonardo Da Vinci (1452-1519) established all of the essential features of the strain distribution in a beam while pondering the deformation of springs. For the specific case of a rectangular cross-section, Da Vinci argued equal tensile and compressive strains at the outer fibers, the existence of a neutral surface, and a linear strain distribution. Da Vinci did not have available to him Hooke's law and the calculus. So mathematical formulation had to wait till time of Bernoulli and Euler In spite of Da Vinci’s accurate appreciation of the stresses and strains in a beam subject to bending, he did not provide any way of assessing the strength of a beam, knowing its dimensions, and the tensile strength of the material it was made of.

Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory This problem of beam strength was addressed by Galileo in 1638, in his well known “Dialogues concerning two new sciences.  Illustrated with an alarmingly unstable looking cantilever beam. Galileo assumed that the beam rotated about the base at its point of support, and that there was a uniform tensile stress across the beam section equal to the tensile strength of the material. 

Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory The correct formula for beam bending was eventually derived by Antoine Parent in 1713 who correctly assumed a central neutral axis and linear stress distribution from tensile at the top face to equal and opposite compression at the bottom, thus deriving a correct elastic section modulus of the cross sectional area times the section depth divided by six.  Unfortunately Parent’s work had little impact, and it were Bernoulli and Euler who independently derived beam bending formulae and are credited with development of beam theory

Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory Leonhard Euler ( A Swiss Mathematician) and Daniel Bernoulli (a Dutch Mathematician)  were the first to put together a useful theory circa 1750. The elementary Euler-Bernoulli beam theory is a simplification of the linear isotropic theory of elasticity which allows quick calculation of the load-carrying capacity and deflection of common structural elements called beams. At the time there was considerable doubt that a mathematical product of academia could be trusted for practical safety applications. Bridges and buildings continued to be designed by precedent until the late 19th century, when the Eiffel Tower and the Ferris Wheel demonstrated the validity of the theory on a large scale. it quickly became a cornerstone of engineering and an enabler of the Second Industrial Revolution. (1871-1914)

Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory Assumptions The beam is long and slender. Length >> width and length >> depth therefore tensile/compressive stresses perpendicular to the beam are much smaller than tensile/compressive stresses parallel to the beam. The beam cross-section is constant along its axis. The beam is loaded in its plane of symmetry. Torsion = 0

Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory Assumptions Deformations remain small. This simplifies the theory of elasticity to its linear form. no buckling no plasticity no soft materials. Material is isotropic Plane sections of the beam remain plane. This was Bernoulli's critical contribution

Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory Derivation b d P

Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory Derivation P

Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory Derivation

Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory Derivation

Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory Derivation

Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory Derivation

Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory Derivation: Equilibrium Equations w V + dv M V M + dM dx V – w dx – ( V + dV) = 0 Neglect

Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory Derivation: Equilibrium Equations P dx V 1 P V M + dM M w = P/dx V 1 M V M + dM dx V – P – V1 = 0 Neglect Abrupt Change in dM/dx at load Point P

Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory Derivation

Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory Derivation

Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory Derivation

Bernoulli-Euler Beam Theory Derivation

Theory of Torsion Derivation

Theory of Torsion Derivation

Theory of Torsion Derivation

Theory of Torsion Derivation

Theory of Torsion Derivation Torsion Formula We want to find the maximum shear stress τmax which occurs in a circular shaft of radius c due to the application of a torque T. Using the assumptions above, we have, at any point r inside the shaft, the shear stress is τr = r/c τmax. ∫τrdA r = T ∫ r2/c τmax dA = T τmax/c∫r2 dA = T Now, we know, J = ∫ r2 dA is the polar moment of intertia of the cross sectional area J = πc4/2 for Solid Circular Shafts

Theory of Torsion Derivation γ = τ/G For a shaft of radius c, we have φ c = γ L where L is the length of the shaft. Now, τ is given by τ = Tc/J so that φ = TL/GJ

Theory of Torsion Fig. 1: Rotated Section

Theory of Torsion Torsional Constant for an I Beam For an open section, the torsion constant is as follows:   J = Σ(bt3 / 3) So for an I-beam   J = (2btf3 + (d - 2tf)tw3) / 3   where     b = flange width     tf = flange thickness     d = beam depth     tw = web thickness

Static Determinancy Equilibrium of a Body y x z Three Equations so Three Unknown Reactions (ra) can be solved for

Static Determinancy Structure Statically Determinate Externally z Structure Statically Determinate Externally Structure Statically Indeterminate Externally

Static Determinancy ra = 3, Determinate, Stable ra > 3, Indeterminate, Unstable ra =3, Unstable

Kinematic Determinancy and Indeterminancy Kinematic Indeterminancy (KI) = 1 Kinematically Determinate, KI = 0 KI = 5