Ozone Monitoring Issues & Opportunities - II Ozone Transport Commission MANE-VU Fall Meeting November 19, 2014 Crystal City, VA Will Ollison 1220 L Street,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Our Vision – Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
Advertisements

Determination of Size Fractions and Concentrations of Airborne Particulate Matter Generated From Construction and Demolition Waste Processing Facilities.
Ambient Air Monitoring for the Revised Lead NAAQS Daniel Garver US EPA Region 4.
PM-2.5 FEM Requirements for Met One BAM Glenn Gehring, Technology Specialist Tribal Air Monitoring Support (TAMS) Center
Transport of Air Pollutants
Impact Area 1-hour standards. SILs used to determine when a proposed source’s ambient impacts warrant a comprehensive (cumulative) source impact analysis.
Dependence of PM on Elevation Background and Rationale Influence of the Seasonal Variation in Mixing Heights on the PM Elevation Dependence Vertical Profile.
Personal Monitoring for Air Pollution Exposure Philip M. Fine, Ph.D. Atmospheric Measurements Manager South Coast Air Quality Management District CAPCOA.
Objective for the Day Today, the we will learn how mountains affect the climate and complete a worksheet with 100% accuracy.
Ozone and Ozone Monitoring 2015 National Tribal Forum Glenn Gehring, Technology Specialist III Tribal Air Monitoring Support (TAMS) Center Institute for.
Division of Air Quality -- Ambient Monitoring -- EMC Member Continuing Education Session Donnie Redmond Section Chief March 7, 2012.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Washington July 2013.
Indiana Environmental Health Summit Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) June 6, 2011 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP Commissioner,
Air Chemistry GISAT 112. Scientific and Technical Concepts Phases of airborne matter- gases, particles Inorganic and organic chemicals Balancing chemical.
Gaseous Pollutants mini-course TAMS Center February 2009 Creating a Test Atmosphere.
Impact Studies: Malé Declaration Achievements Ms. Adelaida B. Roman Head, Network Support Component Air and Atmospheric Pollution RRCAP, Thailand.
1 Key Monitoring Issues Status of PM 2.5 monitoring methodologies Criteria for acceptance of monitors and sites Special considerations for comparing ambient.
PM Model Performance Goals and Criteria James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling Meeting Denver, CO May 26,
1 CE Air Pollution Measurements, Emission Estimates Jeff Kuo, Ph.D., P.E.
1 of 35 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 4 - Specify Boundaries (30 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 4.
Introduction to BGI Instruments
DETERMINATION OF TOTAL PARTICULATES USING A HIGH VOLUME AIR SAMPLER.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
June 12 &13, 2007 Mickey Leland National Urban Air Toxics Workshop II – Houston, Texas 1 Albuquerque, New Mexico Community Scale Ambient Air Monitoring.
TPB Technical Committee May 7, Forecast and Ozone Action Day Program.
Introduction to Air Quality ATCEM November 6, 2012 Pat Ellsworth Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals 1.
Update on Proposed Ozone FRM Ozone Transport Commission Spring Committee Meeting April 10, 2014 Washington, DC Will Ollison 1220 L Street, NW Washington,
Gordon Pierce WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Denver, CO November 6, 2013.
NAAQS Altitude Effects Ozone Transport Commission Annual Meeting June 11, 2014 Baltimore, MD Will Ollison 1220 L Street, NW Washington, DC
1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and State Implementation Plans North Carolina Division of Air Quality National Ambient Air Quality Standards and.
Overview and Status of Lead NAAQS Review and Overview of Agency Technical Documents on Lead NAAQS Monitoring Issues Kevin Cavender and Joann Rice Presented.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Virginia May 2013.
Air Quality Forecasting Program and Ozone Season 2004 COG Board of Directors May 12, 2004 Joan Rohlfs, Chief Air Quality Planning.
An Overview of EPA’s Quality Assurance Guidance for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data Data Analysis and Interpretation February 12 – 14, 2008, Tempe,
Environment 1 The current work on Air Quality Indicators Best needed “ Population exposure” vs. Best available “Population weighted concentrations” Ute.
August 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Characterizing PM23 Spatial Patterns Urban spatial patterns: explore PM concentrations in urban settings. Urban/Rural.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Division of Air Quality Ambient Monitoring Donnie Redmond Section Chief May 7, 2014.
1. How is model predicted O3 sensitive to day type emission variability and morning Planetary Boundary Layer rise? Hypothesis 2.
Highlights of June 2008 NACAA Ambient Air Monitoring Steering Committee Meeting Westar Fall Business Meeting Seattle, WA October 2, 2008.
Exposure Assessment for Health Effect Studies: Insights from Air Pollution Epidemiology Lianne Sheppard University of Washington Special thanks to Sun-Young.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
HF Modeling Task Mike Williams November 19, 2013.
Take a deep breath! Please read the board. Please find your notes from yesterday.
Testing of New Ozone Photometers Ozone Transport Commission/MANEVU Fall Meeting November 14, 2013 Washington, DC Will Ollison 1220 L Street, NW Washington,
Assessing Ambient Air Quality James Payne Morongo Band of Mission Indians.
PM Methods Update and Network Design Presentation for WESTAR San Diego, CA September 2005 Peter Tsirigotis Director Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis.
Prof. Jiakuan Yang Huazhong University of Science and Technology Air Pollution Control Engineering.
August 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Characterizing PM23 Spatial Patterns Urban spatial patterns: explore PM concentrations in urban settings. Urban/Rural.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
Presented by: Rich Baldauf, EPA National Air Monitoring Conference Denver, CO May 15,
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
Ozone and Lead Monitoring Issues Under Revised NAAQS Monitoring Steering Committee June 21-22, 2007 Washington, DC Phil Lorang, OAQPS.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
Optimization of O 3 Monitor NAAQS Compliance Networks OTC/MANE-VU Spring Meeting Hotel Palomar Philadelphia 117 South 17 th Street Philadelphia, PA
Statewide Compliance Monitoring and Local Monitoring Projects
N Engl J Med Jun 29;376(26): doi: 10
Which method is most appropriate for assessing exposure?
Session 4: Air Pollution Measurements
Optimization of O3 Monitor NAAQS Compliance Networks - II
Optimization of O3 NAAQS Compliance Networks
آلودگی هوا Lecture note Transportation Planning میقات حبیبیان.
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
TCEQ AMBIENT Air Monitors in Corpus christi
Ozone Monitoring Issues & Opportunities
Brief Synopsis of Air Quality and Local/Regional Meteorology
Sulfur Dioxide 1-Hour NAAQS Implementation
Predictors of Ambient NO2 in North Seattle
Presentation transcript:

Ozone Monitoring Issues & Opportunities - II Ozone Transport Commission MANE-VU Fall Meeting November 19, 2014 Crystal City, VA Will Ollison 1220 L Street, NW Washington, DC

Recommendations EPA should allow elevation adjustments to O 3 design values (DVs) to account for population dose, as they presently do for PM DVs, to reduce over-regulation of elevated (> 1000 feet) locations Similarly, EPA should allow inlet height DV adjustments to 2 meters, within the 2-15 meter inlet height limit, to account for typical outdoor breathing zone heights EPA should facilitate NO-scrubber upgrades of the existing compliance UV monitor network to reduce network positive interference bias 1220 L Street, NW Washington, DC

Compliance with PM NAAQS PM 2.5/10 Compliance Addresses Altitude Effects 40 CFR Part 50, Appendix L, Section 2.2: Each filter is weighed…before and after sample collection to determine the net gain due to collected PM2.5. The total volume of air sampled is determined by the sampler from the measured flow rate at actual ambient temperature and pressure and the sampling time. The mass concentration of PM2.5 in the ambient air is computed as the total mass of collected particles in the PM2.5 size range divided by the actual volume of air sampled, and is expressed in micrograms per cubic meter of air L Street, NW Washington, DC

O 3 Risk Assessment (EPA- 452/R , August 2014) “The controlled human exposure studies drawn upon for this lung function risk assessment were conducted at low altitudes (< 600 feet). It is not known whether it is more appropriate to use a mass concentration (µg/m³) or a mixing ratio concentration (ppm) at higher altitudes where the barometric pressure is lower…if in fact mass concentrations are the appropriate exposure metric, then the lung function responses in a high-altitude city such as Denver (5300 feet) could be overestimated by about 15%.” (p. 6-8) 1220 L Street, NW Washington, DC

High Elevation O 3 Monitors ( > 1000 feet) ● 14,100 ft DV cut 28 ppb ● ,000 ft DV cut ppb ● ft ● ft DV cut ppb ● ft DV cut ppb ● ft DV cut 5-9 ppb ● ft DV cut 2-4 ppb 1220 L Street, NW Washington, DC

40 CFR Part 58, Appendix E to Part 58 – O 3 Inlet Height “ The probe…must be located between 2 and 15 meters above ground level for all O 3 …monitoring sites …at least 1 meter vertically or horizontally away from any supporting structure, walls, etc…[and] located on the [prevailing] windward side of the building during the season of highest concentration potential for the pollutant being measured.” 1220 L Street, NW Washington, DC

O 3 Monitor Inlet Heights Above Grade 1220 L Street, NW Washington, DC

Quarterly O 3 Gradient by Monitor Inlet Height AGL(m) 1220 L Street, NW Washington, DC

Altitude/Inlet Height-Estimated 75 ppb/2 meter Equivalent D Vs Altitude > MSL (m) Altitude Adj. Eqv. DV (ppb) Inlet Height AGL (m) Inlet Height Eqv. DV (ppb) L Street, NW Washington, DC