Aerodynamics and Aeroelastics, WP 2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EWEA Annual Event 2013 Vienna February, 4-7, 2013
Advertisements

Delft University of Technology Aeroelastic Modeling and Comparison of Advanced Active Flap Control Concepts for Load Reduction on the Upwind.
Investigation of Stability Issues for an Adaptive Trailing Edge System Leonardo Bergami MSc + PhD student, Risø DTU, Denmark Mac Gaunaa Senior Scientist,
Aeroelasticity : Complexities and Challenges in Rotary–Wing Vehicles
The potentials of the controllable rubber trailing edge flap (CRTEF) Helge Aa. Madsen 1, Peter B. Andersen 1, Tom L. Andersen 2, Thomas Buhl 1, Christian.
Nonlinear Model Reduction for Flexible Aircraft Control Design A. Da Ronch, K. J. Badcock University of Liverpool, Liverpool, U.K. Y. Wang, A. Wynn, and.
ASME 2002, Reno, January VIBRATIONS OF A THREE-BLADED WIND TURBINE ROTOR DUE TO CLASSICAL FLUTTER Morten Hartvig Hansen Wind Energy Department Risø.
European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition 2010 Warsaw, Poland EWEC 2010 Warsaw April 2010 Aeroelastic Analysis of Pre-Curved Rotor Blades V.A.Riziotis,S.G.Voutsinas.
AeroAcoustics & Noise Control Laboratory, Seoul National University
A Comparison of Multi-Blade Coordinate Transformation and Direct Periodic Techniques for Wind Turbine Control Design Karl Stol Wind Energy Symposium AIAA.
Wind Farm Noise Impact Assessment
EWEC 2009 Marseille, France Design of Wind Turbine Passive Smart Blades ©University of Bristol Department of Aerospace Engineering Slide 1 Design of Wind.
PROJECTS WITH POTENTIAL FUNDING
Boundary Layer Correction of Viscous Flow Through 2 D Turbine Cascades
Aeroelastic Stability and Control of Large Wind Turbines
Design of Wind Turbines P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Selection of Optimal Geometrical & Kinematic Variables ….
1 CFD Analysis Process. 2 1.Formulate the Flow Problem 2.Model the Geometry 3.Model the Flow (Computational) Domain 4.Generate the Grid 5.Specify the.
Computational Modelling of Unsteady Rotor Effects Duncan McNae – PhD candidate Professor J Michael R Graham.
SIROCCO, SIlant ROtors by aCoustiC Optimisation
Design Process Supporting LWST 1.Deeper understanding of technical terms and issues 2.Linkage to enabling research projects and 3.Impact on design optimization.
Wind Modeling Studies by Dr. Xu at Tennessee State University
School of Aeronautical Engineering, Queen’s University Belfast Turbulent Wind Flow over a High Speed Train R K Cooper School of Aeronautical Engineering.
Some effects of large blade deflections on aeroelastic stability Bjarne S. Kallesøe Morten H. Hansen.
NREL – Jason Jonkman MARINTEK – Ivar Fylling Risø-DTU – Torben Larsen
Smart Rotor Control of Wind Turbines Using Trailing Edge Flaps Matthew A. Lackner and Gijs van Kuik January 6, 2009 Technical University of Delft University.
 Siemens Power Generation All Rights Reserved Siemens Wind Power.
Innovation for Our Energy FutureNational Renewable Energy Laboratory 1 Gunjit Bir National Renewable Energy Laboratory 47 th AIAA Aerospace Meetings Orlando,
Dave Corbus, Craig Hansen Presentation at Windpower 2005 Denver, CO May 15-18, 2005 Test Results from the Small Wind Research Turbine (SWRT) Test Project.
Study of Oscillating Blades from Stable to Stalled Conditions 1 CFD Lab, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow 2 Volvo Aero Corporation.
Wind Energy Program School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Computational Studies of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:
LOAD ALLEVIATION ON WIND TURBINE BLADES USING VARIABLE AIRFOIL GEOMETRY Thomas Buhl, Mac Gaunaa, Peter Bjørn Andersen and Christian Bak ADAPWING.
EWEC2007 Milano, 8 May 2007 Extrapolation of extreme loads acc. to IEC Ed.3 in comparison with the physics of real turbine response Dirk Steudel,
Integrated Dynamic Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines EWEC2007 Milan, Italy 7-10 May 2007 B. Skaare 1, T. D. Hanson 1, F.G. Nielsen 1, R. Yttervik.
REDUCTION OF TEETER ANGLE EXCURSIONS FOR A TWO-BLADED DOWNWIND ROTOR USING CYCLIC PITCH CONTROL Torben Juul Larsen, Helge Aagaard Madsen, Kenneth Thomsen,
NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF WIND TURBINE AERODYNAMICS Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California Davis OUTLINE Challenges in Wind Turbine Flows The Analysis.
European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition 2006 Athens, Greece EWEC’06 Athens 27 February-2 March 20061/16 Advanced Aeroelastic Modeling of Complete.
Tim Fletcher Post-doctoral Research Assistant Richard Brown Mechan Chair of Engineering Simulating Wind Turbine Interactions using the Vorticity Transport.
Influence of wind characteristics on turbine performance Ioannis Antoniou (1), Rozenn Wagner (1), Søren M. Pedersen (1), Uwe Paulsen (1), Helge A. Madsen.
3 th International Symposium on Integrating CFD and Experiments in Aerodynamics U.S. Air Force Academy, CO, USA June 20-21, 2007 Integration of CFD and.
EWEC 2006, AthensMartin Geyler 1 Hardware-in-the-Loop Development and Testing of New Pitch Control Algorithms EWEC 2006 Athens Martin Geyler, Jochen Giebhardt,
EWEC 2007, MilanoMartin Geyler 1 Individual Blade Pitch Control Design for Load Reduction on Large Wind Turbines EWEC 2007 Milano, 7-10 May 2007 Martin.
Rotorcraft Center of Excellence The Pennsylvania State University Rotorcraft Blade Loads Control via Active-Passive Devices Edward C. Smith Professor of.
HELICOIDAL VORTEX MODEL FOR WIND TURBINE AEROELASTIC SIMULATION Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California Davis OUTLINE Challenges in Wind Turbine.
Far Shore Wind Climate Modelling Background Far shore wind conditions are expected to be favorable for wind energy power production due to increased mean.
UPWIND, Aerodynamics and aero-elasticity
1 Fluidic Load Control for Wind Turbine Blades C.S. Boeije, H. de Vries, I. Cleine, E. van Emden, G.G.M Zwart, H. Stobbe, A. Hirschberg, H.W.M. Hoeijmakers.
An Introduction to Rotorcraft Dynamics
Challenges in Wind Turbine Flows
Modal Dynamics of Wind Turbines with Anisotropic Rotors Peter F
DEWEK 2004 Lecture by Aero Dynamik Consult GmbH, Dipl. Ing. Stefan Kleinhansl ADCoS – A Nonlinear Aeroelastic Code for the Complete Dynamic Simulation.
Bird Strike on Jet Fan. Introduction Modelling of Bird Strike using EUROPLEXUS Full Lagrangian Approach Bird modelled by SPH elements (porous gelatine.
Evan Gaertner University of Massachusetts, Amherst IGERT Seminar Series October 1st, 2015 Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Aerodynamics.
WIND TURBINE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California Davis OUTLINE Challenges in Wind Turbine Flows The Analysis.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Numerical Simulation of the Aerodynamics of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines under.
Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. Flutter of Variations on a 5 MW Swept Wind Turbine Blade 1 J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2016;138(2):
Aerodynamic Damping (WP2)
Theory of Turbine Cascades P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Its Group Performance, What Matters.……
Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Noise
INVESTIGATION OF IDLING INSTABILITIES IN WIND TURBINE SIMULATIONS
Talents of tomorrow: Aerodynamics and aeroelasticity
With Andrew Magstadt and Dr. David Thayer
UPWIND, Aerodynamics and aero-elasticity
Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
DYNAMIC STALL OCCURRENCE ON A HORIZONTAL AXIS WIND TURBINE BLADE
Dynamic analysis of wind turbines subjected to Ice loads
Control of Boundary Layer Structure for Low Re Blades
Blade Design for Modern Wind Turbines
Rotors in Complex Inflow, AVATAR, WP2
Analysis & Control of Profile Losses
Presentation transcript:

Aerodynamics and Aeroelastics, WP 2 Flemming Rasmussen Aeroelastic Design Wind Energy Department Risø DTU

WP2 Aero-dynamics and Aero-elastics OBJECTIVES Overall: To develop an aeroelastic design basis for large multi MW turbines. Specific: Development of nonlinear structural dynamic models (modeling on the micromechanical scale is input from WP3). Advanced aerodynamic models covering full 3D CFD rotor models, free wake models and improved BEM type models. (The wake description is a prerequisite for the wake modeling in WP8). Models for aerodynamic control features and devices. (This represents the theoretical background for the smart rotor blades development in WP 1.B.3) Models for analysis of aeroelastic stability and total damping including hydroelastic interaction Development of models for computation of aerodynamic noise.

WP 2.1 Structural dynamics, large deflections & non-linear effects Approach Identification of important non-linearities in large wind turbines Challenge: predict blade torsional deformation in loaded case Bending-Torsion coupling When blade flap curvature w’’ becomes large, bending moment Mζ contributes significantly to blade torsion moment My.

WP 2.1 Non-linear effects (analytical study) Additions to the baseline, 1st-order, model Formulation of dynamic equations in the deformed state (same structural couplings as in baseline but 2nd-order kinematics and dynamics) (2nd order beam-0) Tension – torsion coupling terms (2nd order beam-1) Bending – torsion coupling terms (2nd order beam-2) Pre-twist – torsion coupling term (2nd order beam-3) Wind speed: 11m/s

WP 2.1 Non-linear effects Linear vs. non linear beam model analysis, NTM at 11.4 m/s

WP2.2 Advanced aerodynamic models Objectives to identify the limitations in the engineering aerodynamic modeling in BEM type codes Approach inter comparison of results of models of different complexity applied on MW rotors, RWT- 5MW Simulation cases uniform inflow on RWT turbine (stiff model) strong wind shear in inflow unsteady inflow (turbulent)- not yet performed

Blade normal force distribution Simulations with various codes at 8 m/s uniform inflow

Wind speed with height, night- day, Høvsøre from http://veaonline.risoe.dk

Measured inflow angle on the NM80 at Tjæreborg during a period with strong shear and low turbulence

Wake pattern, CFD with strong inflow shear

WP2.2 Blade normal force 8 m/s - strong inflow shear - exponent 0.55, blade up blade down

WP2.2 Blade normal force 8 m/s -- strong inflow shear - exponent 0.55 blade 90 deg. blade 270 deg.

WP 2.3 Advanced control features and aerodynamic devices Approach: • Develope detailed models for analysis of a few promising flow control concepts (in close corporation with WP 1A5). • Deformable camberline.

Dynamic Stall model: Main input: CLst(,)

Dynamic Stall: Harmonic Alpha and Beta Blue: Alpha and Beta in phase Black: No Beta Red: In counter-phase (180 shift)

WP 2.4: Aeroelastic stability and total damping including hydrodynamics Approach: Aerodynamic damping and aeroelastic stability of the RWT 5 MW turbine Blade structural damping model CFD-structure coupling

WP 2.4: Aerodynamic damping of blade modes for RWT 5 MW First flapwise mode First edgewise mode

WP 2.5 Computation of aerodynamic noise– coupled CFD-CAA models Approach: Improve computation of aerodynamic trailing edge noise. Input from CFD simulations of boundary layer parameters at trailing edge. Validation: Eksperimental data on both aerodynamics and aeroacustics

Test Cases : VTE Model Developed at LWT (SIROCCO Project) goal: variation of boundary-layer parameters at trailing-edge requires strong contour change over major part of chord length three variations: VTE_lin, VTE_kav (and VTE_vex) Wind tunnel model with adjustable shape

Results: VTE_kav, Cl=0.7, BL Parameters

Results: VTE_kav, Cl=0.7, Noise Spectra

WP2 Aerodynamics and Aeroelastics Summary Bending-torsion coupling is important Inflow shear is non-trivial Dynamic stall model for variable trailing edge Stability analysis including non-linear effects (and structural modal damping prediction) Noise prediction: Boundary layer predictions and measurements