LibQUAL+ and Beyond: Using Results Effectively 23 rd June 2008 Dr Darien Rossiter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LibQUAL+ in the local context: results, action and evaluation Selena Lock & Stephen Town Cranfield University 6th Northumbria International Conference.
Advertisements

Evaluation Mary Rowlatt MDR Partners. Definition of project evaluation Evaluation focuses on whether the project was effective, achieved its objectives,
The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.
Reading Rodski: User Surveys Revisited The 25 th IATUL Annual Conference Krakow 2004 Dr. Grace Saw University of Queensland Cybrary Brisbane, Australia.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience J. Stephen Town and Selena Lock, Cranfield University.
Library Service Quality Survey Results Yeo Pin Pin Li Ka Shing Library April 2013.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
Two Decades of User Surveys The Experience of Two Research Libraries from 1992 to 2011 Jim Self, University of Virginia Steve Hiller, University of Washington.
1 Wymagania informacyjne uzytkownikow bibliotek akademickich 21 wieku Maria Anna Jankowska University of Idaho Library Biblioteki XXI wieku. Czy przetrwamy?
Presented by Beverly Choltco-Devlin Reference and Electronic Resources Consultant Mid-York Library System September 25, 2009 REVVED UP FOR REFERENCE CONFERENCE.
The Student Experience Project Overview for Kosovo Higher Education visit Mark Wilkinson October 2014.
TM Project web site Quantitative Background for LibQUAL+ for LibQUAL+  A Total Market Survey Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson January.
LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.
LibQUAL Tales from Past Participants Vanderbilt University Library Flo Wilson, Deputy University Librarian
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Selena Killick ARL/SCONUL LibQUAL+ Administrator Cranfield University Introduction to LibQUAL+
Alice’s Adventures in LibQual-Land Kitty Tynan Assistant Director for Public Services CUA Libraries All illustrations from The Victorian Web: A Tenniel.
University Strategy Marcus Williams. Contents 0.1 Strategic goals 0.2 Re-positioning 0.3 Campus infrastructure 0.4 Sussex off campus 0.5 Malaysia Office.
UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2008 LIBQUAL RESULTS. Number of Respondents UAAAPU Undergraduate1,388 Graduate267 Faculty233 Library Staff33 Staff157 Total2,078.
Library Assessment in North America Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia American Library Association Mid-Winter.
The votes are in! What next? Introduction to LibQUAL+ Workshop University of Westminster, London 21st January 2008 Selena Killick Association of Research.
WVU Libraries LibQual Surveys 2003, 2005, 2007 “ The WVU library system is outstanding. I honestly cannot think of anything that needs improvement within.
Reliability and Validity of 2004 LibQUAL+™ Scores for Different Language Translations Martha Kyrillidou Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Annual Conference.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
Proposal for Enhancement of the CAUL Statistics
Getting Staff Involved in Assessment at the University of Connecticut Libraries Brinley Franklin 17 August 2009.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.
The New Library User in Sweden: a LibQUAL+™ study 6th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measures in Libraries and Information Services.
Old.libqual.org What will ARL do for you? What will you do? January 2005 Shrivenham, UK.
LibQUAL+ at Cranfield University Selena Lock LibQUAL+ International Results Meeting 17 th July 2006.
E-books: a snapshot from the UK Dr Hazel Woodward University Librarian, Cranfield University, Chair, JISC E-Books Working Group G ö teborg University,
Perspectives from two UK institutions Stephen Town University of York, UK LibQUAL+ Exchange Florence, 2009.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2011 LIBQUAL RESULTS APU Faculty Assembly – February 15, 2012.
Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn.
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results Dr Pam Wells Adviser, Evidence-Informed Practice.
LibQUAL 2005 at London South Bank. Peter Godwin London South Bank University 2 February 2006.
LibQUAL+™ Process Management: Using the Web as a Management Tool Amy Hoseth Massachusetts LSTA Orientation Meeting Boston, MA October 21, 2005 old.libqual.org.
After the Academy Selena Lock LibQUAL+ Results Meeting 22nd August 2005.
Effectively utilising LibQUAL+ data J. Stephen Town.
LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers Jim Self Management Information Services University of Virginia Library ALA Conference Washington DC June 25, 2007.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
Columbia University. Data source LibQUAL Service Quality Survey –Administered on a three-year cycle since 2003 –Adequacy Gap Scores from the 22 core questions.
Texas State University LibQUAL Survey 2015 Core Survey Section IC 1-8 Information Control Ray Uzwyshyn Director, Collections and Digital Services Texas.
Library Satisfaction Survey Results Spring 2008 LibQUAL Survey Analysis User Focus Team (Sharon, Mickey, Joyce, Joan C., Paula, Edith, Mark) Sidney Silverman.
Project web site: old.libqual.org LibQUAL+™ Process Management: Using the Web as a Management Tool ALA Midwinter Conference San Diego, California January.
® LibQUAL+ ® Implementation Procedures The Third Lodz [Poland] Library Conference Technical University of Lodz June, 2008 Presented by: Bruce Thompson.
LibQual at UAB Lister Hill Library Pat Higginbottom Associate Director for Public Services
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Administration LibQUAL+® Exchange Northumbria Florence, Italy August 17, 2009 Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics.
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
LibQUAL 2005 at London South Bank and a Lincolnshire man in Chicago.
LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.
Monmouth University LibQUAL Survey Results Lead to Improvements in Library Services October 31, 2007 Eleonora Dubicki
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Leeds University Library LibQUAL+ at Leeds - one year on Pippa Jones Head of Customer Services, Leeds University Library.
TM Project web site Presented by Colleen Cook June 26, 2004 Orlando, FL ALA.
Focus on SCONUL Institutions: Cranfield University – DCMT Campus Stephen Town.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics and Service Quality Programs Association of Research.
Answer Me 13Text Ltd. Answer Me... Do you need to RELY on your critical calls being answered by your Support Team each and every time, be they internal.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Listening to the Customer: Using Assessment Results to Make a Difference.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
BY DR. M. MASOOM RAZA  AND ABDUS SAMIM
How to participate LibQUAL+
Results and Comparisons for SCONUL
International Results Meeting LibQUAL+TM
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience
LibQUAL+® Survey Results
Presentation transcript:

LibQUAL+ and Beyond: Using Results Effectively 23 rd June 2008 Dr Darien Rossiter

Cranfield University at DCMT, Shrivenham Postgraduate University 22 year contract with MOD for academic services 1000 military and civilian students Subject range - defence, management and technology

DCMT Library

Why LibQUAL+ LibQUAL+ meets our need to measure service quality and benchmark our performance 2003 –First user survey since late nineties –Aim to measure and evaluate performance 2005 –Approaching contract negotiations, results help inform future strategy 2006 –DCMT Library runs LibQUAL+ to measure impact of library move and launch of the Information Literacy tutorial 2007 –Cranfield University runs LibQUAL+ as part of the Charter Mark process 2008 –DCMT Library runs LibQUAL+ to help inform strategic review

2008 New Organisational Context Academic departments restructured Academic provision yearly review by the MOD Central services review by the University

LibQUAL+ at Cranfield 2008 Shrivenham campus only in 2008 Later launch date - five weeks from the end of April to the end of May 2008 One optional question change –Old - Teaching me how to locate, evaluate, and use information –New - Making me aware of library resources and services

Other Performance Measurement Activities in 2008 Focus group –Looking at opening hours and the Digital Library, informing the local survey. Local questionnaire run in parallel with LibQUAL+ –Questions addressing specific local issues Opening hours The Digital Library Off-campus survey –Exploring the question “Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office”

Using Lib Qual + Effectively DCMT Overall 2007

DCMT Results 2007 IDQuestion Text Superiority Mean Desired Rank IC-1Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office IC-4The electronic information resources I need IC-2A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own IC-8Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work IC-6Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own IC-3The printed library materials I need for my work LP-1Library space that inspires study and learning LP-2Quiet space for individual work IC-5Modern equipment that lets me easily access needed information LP-4A haven for study, learning, or research IC-7Making information easily accessible for independent use AS-5Library staff who have the knowledge to answer user questions AS-9Dependability in handling users' service problems

Using Lib Qual + Effectively Results by Campus Results by Discipline Longitudinal Analysis Benchmarking (Internal and External) Comment Analysis Exploring Issues

Two Campus Results

Longitudinal Analysis Yearly Comparison

External Benchmarking

Using the Data Secondary analysis conducted on LibQUAL+ results to exploit the data Used in combination with other information sources –Statistical counts –User comments –Other surveys

Five-Year Trends – Library as Place Dramatic rise in desired and mean scores for “Space for group learning and group study”

Five Year Trends Library Environment

Staff Support

Library Web Site

Access Tools

Utilising the data - results Reports Presentations –Library staff –Senior management Web pages Displayed on notice boards

Issues for consideration - High quality, detailed data Limited administration required to implement the survey Benchmarking and longitudinal capability Respectability Quick turn around of basic results and excel files Real-time access to comments

Issues for consideration Fixed “position” question, categories do not suit our situation Average of 35% complete the survey after opening it –Interface off putting? –Complexity? Wording of optional questions do not meet our needs exactly Unable to add specific questions on local issues Further analysis of data requires specialist skills and staff time

Survey Fatigue Surveys conducted in 2008: –LibQUAL+ –Local Questionnaire –Off Campus usage survey –Student satisfaction survey –SERCO Survey –Staff satisfaction survey University now reviewing survey use by departments with an aim of having a more centralised approach.

Conclusion Additional analysis critical to exploit the value of the tool LibQUAL+ continues to be a strong marketing tool for Cranfield University

Dr Darien Rossiter Director of Knowledge Services Cranfield University Defence College of Management and Technology Tel: +44 (0)