1 Intermodal Case Studies Extension & Dissemination: Intermodal Case Studies - Phase II: Progress Report Professor Patrick Sherry National Center for Intermodal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
APEC Air Cargo Security Workshop Bangkok, Thailand June 2008.
Advertisements

UATS Director’s Workshop Agenda April 30, 2001  Introduction (12:30 – 12:35)  Development Review and Mitigation (12:35 – 2:10) Break (2:10 – 2:15) 
Introduction to Transportation Systems Joseph M. Sussman JR East Professor Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering and Engineering Systems Massachusetts.
Returning to Our National Waterways Dabney Hegg U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.
Workforce in Iowa’s Creative Corridor Iowa’s Creative Corridor Regional Workforce Development Plan.
CHARLENE FITZGERALD APRIL 3, 2012 ROADS AND STREETS Yuma Metropolitan Planning Organization.
Senate Transportation Committee January 25, 2011 Eric Johnson Executive Director Washington Public Ports Association Larry Paulson Executive Director Port.
Freight Action Strategy for the Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor February 2003.
Operations / ITS Provisions in SAFETEA-LU What’s in There and What’s Not Jeff Lindley Operations / ITS Discipline Meeting August 16, 2005.
Thirty Eight APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting, Bali, Indonesia 1 – 5 July 2013 Thirty Eight APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting, Bali, Indonesia.
THE GEOGRAPHY OF TRANSPORT SYSTEMS THIRD EDITION Copyright © , Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Global Studies & Geography, Hofstra University, Hempstead,
MTF Rail Development Forum
Canada’s Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Research Consortium, Gateway and Corridor Workshop, Regina, Saskatchewan, February Gateways, Corridors.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Northwest Port Review An Overview of the Ports of Portland, Tacoma, Seattle, Vancouver, and Prince Rupert Prepared By: Michael Schwab Prepared For: Dr.
THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY CENTER (ATEEC) Summative External Evaluation July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014 PRELIMINARY OUTLINE.
APEC Second Air Cargo Security Workshop Summary Report
Mike Elliott, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen (BLET), Washington State Legislative Board (WSLB) February 2014.
Developing Global Competence for a Changing World Learning Chinese in New York Schools A Report From the New York Task Force on Chinese Language and Culture.
COURSE OVERVIEW COURSE REQUIREMENTS KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS STUDENT EXPECTATIONS Global Business.
Perspective on the Trucking Industry Jim Gill California Cartage Company March 23, 2006.
California Integrated Logistics Center. A BART TRAIN FOR FREIGHT Moving freight through the Port of Oakland without increasing highway congestion Faster.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics Office of Transportation Analysis Maritime Program November 19, 2009.
Title: Report on the status of “ Management of Security, Safety and Emerging Technology in Global Intermodal Transportation and Supply Chain Systems” Project.
GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in Asia May 2008, Manila.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
APEC-TPT Intermodal & ITS Group Action Plan (Proposed Format) May 2006 (updated – Ha Noi) CONGESTION AHEAD.
1 Florida Trade Flow Study presented to Florida Transportation Commission November 5, 2010 presented by Carrie Blanchard, Ph.D., Florida Chamber Foundation.
LA Trade Gateway Update September 10, 2015 Gene Seroka, Executive Director 1.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Meeting March 28, 2006 Item No. xx Supp. Meeting.
Action Plan Intermodal & ITS Experts Group June 2011 Update.
WRITING FOR THE REAL WORLD: STRENGTHENING WRITING AND CAREER KNOWLEDGE QUALITY ENHANCEMENT PLAN (QEP) “ Do the Write Thing !”
TPT-WG35 20–24 February 2012 Bangkok, Thailand Project Proposal : Cargo preference and Restrictions Applying to Specific Trades Speaker: MLTM Economy:
National Multimodal Freight Trends/Issues/Forecasts/ Policy Implications.
Roadmap to Bogor Goals Industry Report Roadmap Taskforce – Australia, Brunei Darussalam and Singapore.
___________________________________________________________________________ 2008/TPTWG30/IEG/01 Agenda Item: 7.0 Action Plan for the Intermodal & ITS Experts.
Project Proposal: Survey and Assessment of Current Deployment of Applications for Surface Transportation Utilizing GNSS in the APEC Region Maureen Walker.
1 Transportation Infrastructure Programs Past, Present & Future Transportation Association of Canada Fall Conference September 2011 Edmonton, Alberta.
EGNRET Projects Cary Bloyd EGNRET 27 Zhuhai, China 9-11 October 2006.
Michael R. Christensen, P.E. Deputy Executive Director October 23, 2009 AASHTO Special Committee on Intermodal Transportation and Economic Expansion: Freight.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
FAST Corridor Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Steve Sewell Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Canada’s Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative 2006.
Title: Assessing Supply Chain Workforce Development Needs & Conducting a Seminar on Assessment and Managing Safety & Security Risk In Intermodal Global.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Policy and Staff Briefing March 14, 2006 Item No. xx Supp.
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey F. Paniati Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Competitive and Efficient Freight Transportation
Southern California Association of Governments Freight Transportation: Emerging Issues for Southern California Alan Bowser Goods Movement PlanningWorkshop.
Transportation Technology Exchange Globally Presented by: Kay Nordstrom U.S. Dept. of Transportation at U.S./East Africa Workshop Arusha, Tanzania August.
Nate Asplund Director – Public Private Partnerships September 20, 2009 SCORT 2009 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.
ENHANCING OUR UNDERSTANDING OF APEC CONCEPT NOTE & PROPOSAL FORMS Chen-Sheng Ho, Ph.D. Associate Research Fellow Chinese Taipei APEC Study Center TIER.
Incorporating Connected/Automated Vehicles into the Transportation Planning Process November, 2015 Max Azizi US DOT.
Meetingthe Freight Challenges Moving Ahead/Staying Ahead The AASHTO-FHWA Freight Transportation Partnership —Meeting the Freight Challenges Moving Ahead/Staying.
Coalfield Route - Double Stack Initiative I. Introduction Concept The Coalfield Route Double Stack initiative is designed to facilitate the transfer of.
Overview of The APEC Secure Trade Project Sept 2003 Walter Kulyk Chair, ITS Experts Group.
1 USDOT Congestion Initiative Baltimore – Washington Regional Traffic Signal Forum Maritime Institute Linthicum, MD March 14, 2007 Regina McElroy Director,
Item 6.2 Survey of Workforce Development Needs and Development of Train-the-Trainer Programs in Intermodal & Global Supply Chain Management and Intelligent.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
FSM NSTT Teaching Competency Test Evaluation. The NSTT Teaching Competency differs from the three other NSTT tests. It is accompanied by a Preparation.
Linking Northern, Central and Southern California to the world and the nation.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
PORT OF TACOMA. Request adoption of Resolution , developing a Port of Tacoma Drayage Truck Improvement Program to improve the local and regional.
Rice University – Baker Institute
FAST Phase I is a $500 million investment to:
Future Interstate 11 Kevin Verre
Best Practices Consortium
GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points
Facilitating SME participation in international trade
Presentation transcript:

1 Intermodal Case Studies Extension & Dissemination: Intermodal Case Studies - Phase II: Progress Report Professor Patrick Sherry National Center for Intermodal Transportation Taipei Taiwan July 10, 2007

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 2 The Case Study: An Educational Tool  Case studies are used as a teaching tool to show the application of a theory or concept to real situations.  The “teaching case” is an empirical, field-based document that represents a slice of reality - a particular time and place in the life of a real organization.  Case studies foster learning within the organization or economy on many various issues.  The use of case studies as a teaching tool was originally pioneered by Harvard Business School.

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 3 Case Study: An Educational Tool  The case study is a teaching tool to provide a real world example used to stimulate discussion and the exchange of ideas about challenges and opportunities in intermodal transportation.  The effort to increase trade and commerce between APEC economies is based on the belief that open communication and dialogue, and a sharing of technology and techniques will benefit all economies. The case study helps to accomplish these goals.

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 4 Background  This project is both a new project, and also an extension of TPT 03/2000 T, successfully completed in Manila in March of 2002,  The workshop, entitled "The Implementation and Utilization of New Technologies in Intermodal Transportation in Asia- Pacific Trade" included a detailed study of the intermodal system of the Seattle Washington USA region.  Building upon the success of this project, the Intermodal Task Force would like to extend the work of TPT 03/2002 T, to include the development of additional case studies that could be used for similar purposes, namely, that of developing the skills and competencies of transportation professionals throughout the APEC region.

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 5 Three Phases Currently in Progress Part I: Refine and Update Existing Case Study Part II: Develop Criteria for Selecting and Identifying Sites and Issues for Additional Case Studies Planned Part III: Develop and Disseminate four (4) new case studies

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 6 Phases I & II Phase I  Update and revise content  Rewrite materials as needed  Expand data included in the supporting documentation  Conduct additional interviews as needed  Submit interviews for editing  Disseminate material on web Phase II  Develop criteria for additional case studies  Development a set of criteria that can be used to develop additional case study and educational materials.  Identify additional sites for study.

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 7 Status Report: Phases I & II Phase I  Update and revise content  Rewrite materials as needed  Expand data included in the supporting documentation  Conduct additional interviews as needed  Make video interviews available on web  Disseminate material (posted on web site) Phase II  Develop a set of criteria that can be used to develop additional case study and educational materials.  Identify additional sites for study. Completed

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 8 Criteria for Additional Case Studies After extensive discussions the following criteria were identified -Reflect a range of developed to undeveloped locations -Reflect the range of problems experienced by APEC economies -Reflect the challenges faced by APEC economies -Reflect a range of both land and sea transportation challenges -Represent best practices available -Reflect most up-to-date technologies -Reflect intermodal and nodal options -Reflect range of intelligent transportation system technologies -Location sponsors demonstrate sufficient support to gather data and material to present

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 9 Suggested Locations Locations currently under consideration:  Indonesia – Jakarta  Ho Chi Minh City  Hong Kong or Shanghai  Tokyo

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 10 The Current Case Study  APEC sponsored a study of congestion points in the APEC region  Using an area that is convenient and somewhat similar to the needs and challenges faced by other APEC economies  The Puget Sound area was identified as one of the key areas in need of further study  As such, a case study on the particular issues, concerns, and challenges of this area was prepared for use as a training tool for APEC economies

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 11 Case Study Extension  The Case Study is being extended through the addition of new material and information that is relevant to the continued development of the region.  Additional information enables more appropriate and in-depth exploration of the material in classroom settings.  The Puget Sound region has many similarities to other APEC pacific rim economies.

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 12 New Content: More Projects

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 13 The Puget Sound Region  The Port of Seattle and the Port of Tacoma together form the second largest freight gateway for containerized cargo in North America  An estimated 100 million containers a year are shipped to ports around the world  The Puget Sound Region together rank as the third largest freight gateway for containerized cargo in North America

The Supply Chain

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 15 Port Capacity  Source:Hanh (2003)

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 16 Gateway to Chicago

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 17 Puget Sound Capacity Container Traffic at West Coast Ports Source: Hanh (2003)

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 18 Supply Chain: Impacts  Road  Rail  Aviation  Ocean

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 19 Freight  Over 70% of the imported containers that enter the Puget Sound region are in fact headed for points elsewhere in the US  The majority of the imported goods passing through the port are considered “high value” which command a premium and are the main source of revenue for the railroads and shipping lines

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 20 Road  Seattle has one of the worst traffic congestion problems in the country  Approximately a 20% increase in travel times between sites  Commuter restrictions on oversized load items  Unable to deliver customer products  Long term and short term construction projects increase the congestion

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 21 Rail  Reduced service due to rail congestion  BNSF delays in Spokane cause additional delays in Seattle

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 22 Ocean Freight  Port operations are typically day shift only on weekdays  Vessels typically arrive on weekends  Truck access to ports is limited

FAST  FAST projects are strategically located along the freight corridor  A plan for developing these projects is in place  Public private partnerships develop the priorities for implementing projects

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 24 Current Challenges  Competition  Long Beach and Los Angeles  Vancouver  Tacoma  Public perception and involvement  Extremely important to its ability to maintain revenue streams and develop infrastructure  Port Operations  Excessive spending, salaries, and bureaucracy  Technology  Labor issues

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 25 Evaluation of Current Case Study

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 26 Dissemination  Text of Case study on the Web  Supplemental videos also on the web  Please Must request download access

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 27   Need password

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 30 Part III Detail Part III (planned – not underway)  Develop four (4) additional case study materials for use in educational activities throughout the APEC region.  Develop written materials for each of the case studies describing the intermodal system in the designated region.  Identify additional background and source material relevant to the location for each of the case studies.  Develop at least one of the case studies that will deal extensively with security issues.  Prepare transcripts of interviews with key individuals who have expert knowledge about the region will be provided.  Prepare video taped interviews with key informants for each case study.  Develop discussion questions for each of the case studies.

Intermodal Transportation Institute University of Denver 31 Action Plan: Phases III Phase III -Identify co-sponsors of project -Have co-sponsors nominate project for APEC funding -Submit formal funding request at next APEC meeting