FSMA Produce Rule and the Produce Safety Alliance Elizabeth A. Bihn, Ph.D. Produce Safety Alliance Director CASA 99 th Annual Meeting April 23, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LGMA California Leafy Green Marketing Agreement
Advertisements

FDA’s Proposed Rule under FSMA for Preventive Controls
Overview of Significant Issues and Identified Alternatives for Draft Environmental Impact Statement: Produce Safety Rule Michael Mahovic, Ph.D. Produce.
THE F OOD S AFETY M ODERNIZATION A CT P ROPOSED R ULES : M AIN I SSUES FOR F ARMERS OEFFA Webinar, September 2013 Ariane Lotti, National Sustainable Agriculture.
Produce Safety Rule Supplemental Proposal 1
Intentional Adulteration Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
GAP/Food Safety for Fruit and Vegetable Growers
1 Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration
China Stakeholder Session China September 24-27, 2013.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Food Safety Modernization Act Supplemental Proposed Rules (Commenting period, Round 2 closes December 15, 2014!!)
Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.
Food Safety For Fruit & Vegetable Growers: What is a food safety program that incorporates Good Agricultural Practices / Good Handling Practices? Tracy.
FSMA: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going Supplemental Notices of Proposed Rulemaking Public Meeting November 13, 2014 Roberta F. Wagner, B.S., M.S.
Produce Safety Rule Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act
Focus on Prevention FDA Food Safety Modernization Act.
Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Version 1/15/2013.
Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration 1.
GAP and Its Impact on Us as Growers Rich Bonanno UMass Extension.
Food Safety Richard Paterini Food Safety Supervisor
Association of Food and Drug Officials April 20-23, 2015 Steve Stich.
Proposed Rules to Help Ensure the Safety of Imported Food 1.
Preventive Controls Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
Farm Food Safety: Training an Angry Mob Robert Hadad Regional Vegetable Specialist Cornell Cooperative Extension Cornell University
SETH URBANOWITZ & CAROL BISHOP PRODUCE SAFETY: LESSONS FROM NEVADA.
Natural Resource Concerns. In 2007 there were a number of food borne illness attributed to fresh produce People became sick Business’s lost market share.
Proposed Rule for Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food
Exporting Food to the United States: What You Need to Know Prepared for Panhellenic Exporters Association Conference December 9, 2014 Erik R. Lieberman.
FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D says “Preventing problems before they cause harm is not only common sense, it is the key to food safety in the.
Food Safety Modernization Act The U.S. Food Safety Regulatory Revolution David Gombas, Ph.D. United Fresh Produce Association June 23, 2013.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Apple Cider Food Safety Workshop FDA’s Good Agricultural Practices Dr. Michelle A. Smith July 15, 1999.
Food Safety Modernization Act Proposed Rules Tim Slawinski Food and Dairy Division Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development.
Preventive Controls Rules: Coverage and Farm Definition 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
FDA Regulatory Counseling Lake Bluff, Illinois, USA (847) Regulatory Update Richard O. Wood 2014 Mid-Year Meeting.
Produce Safety Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) 1.
Proposed Regulations for Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVPs)
Impact of FSMA on the Regulation of Domestic and Imported Animal Food by Daniel G. McChesney, Ph.D. at Wild Bird Feeding Industry 2011 Annual Meeting Naples,
Preventive Controls for Human Food S upplemental Proposal 1
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
PSA Training Opportunities & Updates FSMA: Produce Safety Rule Gretchen L. Wall, M.S. Produce Safety Alliance Coordinator Cornell University.
Final Rule on Produce Safety 1.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs 1.
& Food Safety Modernization Act Update North American Agricultural Marketing Officials July 15,
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food to Wild Bird Feed Industry Annual Meeting 2015 by Daniel G. McChesney, Ph.D. Director, Office of Surveillance.
The National GAPs Program Food Safety Begins on the Farm An Education and Extension Program Designed to Provide Food Safety Information to Farm Owners,
Training Update: FSMA Preventive Controls & MFRP Training
FDA Preventive Control Regulation Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health AFDO 2014.
FSMA: Preventative Controls for Human Food Final Rule In this presentation we discuss the Preventative Controls for Human Food rule and compliance dates.
Food Safety Important? Aug 22-28, Food Safety recalls on FDA Website 25% for fresh produce – Salmonella, Listeria.
Produce Safety University Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) Good Handling Practices (GHPs) 1.
Final Rule for Sanitary Transportation. Background Proposed Rule: February 5, 2014 Public Comments: More than 200 Final Rule: On Display April 5, 2016.
CAROL BISHOP RISK MITIGATION IN EDIBLE HORTICULTURAL PRODUCTION SYSTEMS.
Import Safety Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
16 Lesson Plans to Prepare Small and Mid-scale Farmers to Enter Food Hubs, Groceries, Restaurants and Cooperatives.
GROWN & CERTIFIED PROGRAM
Final Rule on Produce Safety
FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)
INDIANA AGRICULTURE Grow With Us!.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
FSMA Implementation Jennifer Thomas
FSMA: All on the Same Page
Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration
E. Coli & Fresh Produce: Some Lessons Learned
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs
FINAL RULE OVERVIEW Prepared By: Danielle Bauer
Presentation transcript:

FSMA Produce Rule and the Produce Safety Alliance Elizabeth A. Bihn, Ph.D. Produce Safety Alliance Director CASA 99 th Annual Meeting April 23, 2015

2 Key Goals for Today Summarize FSMA Produce Rule Share info about the Produce Safety Alliance (PSA)

FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Produce Safety Rule Draft released Supplemental released Final Rule expected October 2015 Proposed Produce Rule: Focus on the growing, harvesting, and post-harvest handling of produce Focus is on the prevention, not detection of issues

Produce Rule: Areas of Focus – Agricultural water – Biological soil amendments – Domesticated and wild animals – Personnel qualifications, training, and health and hygiene – Equipment, tools, buildings, and sanitation Do you have any idea why there areas are included?

Definition of a ‘Farm’ Farm means an establishment under one ownership in one general physical location devoted to growing and harvesting crops, the raising of animals (including seafood), or both.  Pack/hold raw ag commodities  Pack/hold processed food, provided that all processed food is consumed on that farm or on another farm under the same ownership  Manufacture/process food that is not consumed on the farm but consists only of dehydrating/drying commodities, packaging and labeling without additional processing

Definition of a ‘Farm’ Why does the definition of a ‘farm’ matter?  On-farm packing and holding of produce are not subject to PC Rule unless they meet the definition of processing or manufacturing  Farms that pack or hold produce from another farm are not subject to the PC Rule  A farm would not need to register as a food facility merely because it packs or holds raw agricultural commodities grown on another farm under different ownership

Proposed Agricultural Water Standards for surface water that contacts the edible portion of the crop <126 CFU/MPN generic E. coli per 100 ml, geometric mean (n=5) AND a statistical threshold value of <410 CFU/MPN generic E. coli per 100 ml

How Often Should You Test Surface Water? Source: Surface Water Testing Frequency Baseline20 samples over 2 years AnnuallyMinimum 5 samples per year If annual test does not support water quality profile Current annual survey, combined with new data for a total of 20 samples

Establishing a Water Quality Profile for Surface Water START: Establish water quality profile Take 20 samples over two years ANNUALLY: Take 5 samples Compare to established water quality profile SAMPLING DOES NOT MATCH PROFILE: Use the 5 annual samples, plus an additional 15 new samples (20 total) to establish a new profile SAMPLING DOES MATCH PROFILE: Continue to test 5 samples annually TEN YEAR RE-EVALUATION: Take 20 samples to establish a new water quality profile -APPLY ALTERNATE METHODS: - Time interval to achieve 0.5 log microbial die-off per day between water application and harvest -Time interval between harvest and end of storage to achieve microbial die-off -Other activities that may achieve microbial die-off, i.e. washing -Discontinue use

Soil Amendments FDA has proposed deferring action on the use of raw soil amendments and has proposed to remove the 9 month application interval FDA will be working with USDA ARS to facilitate research, risk assessment, and incentivizing composting practices

Proposed Exemptions 1.Produce rarely consumed raw 2.Produce destined for ‘kill-step’ processing 3.Produce for personal/on-farm consumption 4.Make <$25,000 in all produce sales (3 year average)

Proposed Qualified Exemptions Farms may be exempt if they:  Average gross sales of food sold in previous 3 years is <$500,000 AND  Sell to qualified end users either: A. Direct to consumer B. Restaurant, retail food establishment in same state or within 275 miles of where produce was grown

Produce Farms Exempt or Not Covered by the Produce Rule 189,000 Total Produce Farms 154,000 Exempt/ Not covered 35,000 Covered

Growers may be exempt from the regulation, but not from the market place.

FSMA Time Frame…in Theory! Draft Rule Released Final rule published in Federal Register Large growers (>$500K) comply - 2 years Small growers ($ K) comply - 3 years Very small growers ($25-250K) comply - 4 years Jan 2013 Nov 2013 Oct Public Comment End November 22, 2013 Supplemental Comments Due Dec. 15th Fall We are here Add an additional 2 years to each business size for compliance with the water standards

It Depends! 16 Which is why it is good to be talking about it now! How is it likely is it to impact fresh produce growers? How is it likely is it to impact state food and drug officials?

We are here! Things you should know about FSMA and produce safety!

18

Focused on education and extension to assist growers with meeting regulatory and market food safety requirements Cooperative agreement between Cornell University, FDA, and USDA Established in October 2010 Produce Safety Alliance

Target Audiences Fresh produce growers, packers, and grower cooperatives with special emphasis on small and very small scale farms and packinghouses – Not to the exclusion of any farmer Regulatory personnel – As part of their training All others interested in produce food safety, GAPs, and co-management

Primary Goals Education and outreach to improve understanding and implementation of Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs), co-management strategies and regulatory requirements Collecting and providing access to information related to produce safety, GAPs, co- management and FDA's produce safety regulation GAPs Education and Training Materials Conference in June 2011 Producesafetyalliance.cornell.edu

More Primary Goals Develop a standardized educational curriculum to increase understanding of produce safety issues and co-management strategies to reduce risks to fresh produce – As proposed, training will be required as part of the FSMA Produce Rule Build national networks Train trainers to build cadre of qualified instructors Conduct grower trainings Collaborate for international training

Curriculum Development Process Complete: May 2012 Complete: June 2012 TTT Pilot Dec 17-18, 2014 Grower Pilot Jan 26, 2015 Complete: Dec WCs, 72 calls 178 Unique WC Members 549 Total WC Members 8 Nationwide grower focus groups

Produce Safety Alliance Curriculum ~ Seven hours of dedicated instruction including: Worker Health, Hygiene, and Training Water Soil Amendments Wildlife and Domestic Animals Facilities, Equipment, and Tools How to Develop a Farm Food Safety Plan Completion of course results in certificate from Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO) to meet regulatory requirement for training

PSA Right Now! Just about ready for national launch – Pilots Complete! – Final edits and review of evaluations Building collaborative networks Finalize trainer certification process – Competency areas and interview Process Finish AFDO certification specifics Expanding the PSA – Hiring regional PSA personnel

Future Work Train-the-trainer workshops to build a network of qualified trainers across the country Make grower trainings widely available and accessible *Prepare growers to meet market demand and regulatory requirements * Training will begin BEFORE release of the final produce rule.

Challenge #1: Building Cadre of Qualified Trainers Diverse expertise required – Produce microbiology and production Ability and desire to be involved – Extension people already busy or GONE – Private trainers need to make it pay Funding – Growers have limited funds to pay for all associated expenses Trainers required to be trained – Expense and effort involved

Challenge #2: Reaching Growers Located in rural locations and in every state Diversity in geographical location Many are exempt from the regulation  But not the MARKETPLACE !  Expected to have produce safety knowledge Sell into markets that do not have produce safety pressure…yet Small vs Large Operations

Things on the Horizon Water Testing Labs, labs, labs Water Calculations Geometic Means Statistical Threshold Values Manure application window Sanitation questions Sanitary design (buildings and equipment) Detergents and sanitizer options Sanitation practices on the farm

Beyond the PSA Curriculum PSA curriculum is a brain filling day Growers need a written food safety plan Third party audit Buyer demand Turning knowledge into action Hands on activities Implementing practices on the farm

Options to Support Growers Incorporate PSA training INTO current multi-day GAPs trainings  Day 1: PSA certification  Day 2: Farm food safety plan writing  Already successful collaboration between Cornell, CCE, NYSDAM  Long-term survey data shows progress Continuing education  Online and in-person modules  Hands-on workshops o Postharvest water management

32 Access to New Educational Materials

Each Decision Tree Portfolio Has… Overview of the topic Decision tree Sample Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Sample log sheets Template food safety language

34 Management_of_Food_Safety_and_Sustainability/ Co-Management Information

35 Training Materials: Foodborne Illness Stories

36Summary Collaboration has been key to our progress and will be the foundation of our success Focused on providing information and training growers need to maintain markets and meet regulatory requirements Will expand to meet regulatory personnel needs and integrate it with grower training Provide a trail of how progress has occurred Always open to ideas and ways to improve

The PSA Website You can even friend us on Facebook! Join the listserve! Contact us! Elizabeth A. Bihn, Ph.D., PSA Director, Gretchen L. Wall, M.S., PSA Coordinator,