1 Toggle Fullscreen mode with this button above Audio also available via phone: 866-823-7699 For assistance, call: 814-865-5355 If.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bankfull / Effective / Dominant
Advertisements

A section has been added regarding Stream Restoration Design Criteria: A. Designs for stream restoration try to mimic natural conditions present in stable.
Step 4: Complete PFC assessment §17 questions about attributes and processes §Reminder – PFC based on: l Water (hydrology), l Vegetation, and l Soil &
Riparian Zone Habitat Assessment Vegetation and More.
Optimum Design in Rural Roads Introduction. Optimum Design in Rural Roads ….1 Introduction to topic: What is intended to be discussed? Optimum and/or.
Earth Disturbance Programs  Chapter 102 –Erosion Control & NPDES Permits  Chapter 105-General Permits  Dirt & Gravel Roads Program.
Road Decommissioning Monitoring For every 10 miles of road decommissioned, one ¼ mile monitoring segment is established and monitored. Segments are monitored.
Pine Valley Country Club Stream Restoration: Phase 2 Proposal Presented March 17, 2003 Greg Jennings, NC State Univ Barbara Doll, NC Sea Grant Dave Bidelspach,
1 Low Volume Road Traffic Counts Toggle Fullscreen mode with this button above For audio, call conference line: For.
Design of Open Channels and Culverts
Channel Repair of Montezuma Creek in Coronado National Memorial following Fire and Flood Damage Stephanie Yard, P.E. & Allen Haden, Aquatic Ecologist Natural.
Examples for Mitigation Category 1 and 2 Streams.
1 Quality Assurance Boards Toggle Fullscreen mode with this button above Audio also available via phone: For assistance,
Detours – Selection and Design Highways & Engineering Conference March 2, 2006.
1 Mixing engineering and biology. Where Fish Passage is required Connectivity is required across the landscape wherever there are fish. Fish and fish.
Ecology and environment, inc. International Specialists in the Environment The McKinstry Creek & Riparian Area NYSDOT Rt. 219 Mitigation Project Analysis.
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Regional General Permit (RGP) 31 Interagency Meeting June 11, 2015.
Modern Urbanized Stream Water Quality Improvement Technologies Creating a Net Zero Water Quality Impact Solution in the Natural Environment.
1 Toggle Fullscreen mode with this button above Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call: If.
Site Selection and Security Considerations Mark Heggli Innovative Hydrology, Inc. Consultant To The World Bank Expert Real-Time Hydrology Information Systems.
Materials Transport & NSCD Material Classes Velocity to Transport Relationships York NSCD Restoration PSY CCREP.
Step 1: Assess Riparian Resource Function Using PFC §1d. Complete PFC assessment l 17 questions about attributes and processes l Reminder – PFC based on:
Natural Riparian Resources Water Landscape & SoilVegetation.
1 If you are reading this, then you are successfully seeing the webinar video. Audio will be through the conference call phone line.
Rehabilitation of Flat Creek, Teton County, Wyoming; Planning, design and implementation A cooperative effort between: Trout Unlimited, Jackson Hole Chapter.
Chapter 33 Dam Construction. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Give reasons why.
Site Selection and Security Considerations Mark Heggli Innovative Hydrology, Inc. Consultant To The World Bank Expert Real-Time Hydrology Information Systems.
1 Toggle Fullscreen mode with this button above Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call: If.
Structures: Design and construction of stream crossings
Coos Watershed Association Watershed Restoration Projects.
1 Toggle Fullscreen mode with this button above If you are reading this, then you are successfully seeing the webinar video. Use.
1 Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call: If you are reading this, then you are successfully.
Stream/River formation and features
Design and Implementation of Large Wood Structures at Twelvemile Creek Prince of Wales Island Tongass National Forest The Nature Conservancy TEAMS Enterprise.
Natural Riparian Resources Water Landscape & SoilVegetation.
Natural Riparian Resources Vegetation Landscape/Soil Water.
TWS/SELC Road Condition Study Two Duke University Nicholas School of the Environment, Masters Candidates and one Duke University, Undergraduate.
1 Toggle Fullscreen mode with this button above Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call: If.
Replenishment and Direct Deposit 4/18/2017 Starts at 9am
CD Education and Outreach
Annual Summary Details
Bridges Reach analysis Fundamental tool for design
There are 2 Types of Bridge Inspectors – Class B and Class A.
DSA Administrative Webinar 5/19/16 Starts at 9am
Annual Summary Details
Admin Manual Changes 4/13/2017 Starts at 9am
Workshop and Training Overview
6/18/2018 Starts at 9am DGLVR Webinar Quarterly Report
Road-Stream Interface:
1/23/2018 Starts at 10am DGLVR Webinar
Annual Summary Report Refresher 12/12/17 Starts at 10 am
Annual Summary Report Refresher 12/6/16 Starts at 2pm
Worksite Assessment Overview 1/31/2017 Starts at 9am
CDGRS Quarterly Report
Annual Summary Report And GIS Q&A 1/7/2016 w Will start at 2 pm.
3/7/2019 Starts at 9am DGLVR Webinar GIS Analysis for CDs
CDGRS Annual Summary Report
Module # 17 Overview of Geomorphic Channel Design Practice
Session II – data analysis in Excel
Kastanis- Existing Conditions
Module # 16 Restoring Functions to Streams Through Design
CD Spending and 5-year agreement update
Reporting, and Spending
Longitudinal Profile Survey for Successful Culvert Replacement
7/1/19 Starts at 9am GIS Changes Update DGLVR Webinar
Stream Crossing Replacement Policy
In-Stream Structures & Grade Control
Shaver Creek Permitting
GIS Updates: Admin & Edu Tracker, Project Completion Date
Presentation transcript:

1 Toggle Fullscreen mode with this button above Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call: If you are reading this, then you are successfully seeing the webinar video. In addition to audio on the webinar, we have opened a phone conference line to allow attendees to listen and ask questions directly: Please use either the webinar audio or conference line, but not both (will produce feedback). Use Chat box to ask Questions 3/13/15 Starts at 10am

2 Toggle Fullscreen mode with this button above Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call: Use Chat box to ask Questions Participant phone lines will be muted until after initial presentation

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Special Thanks to Jake Tomlinson at Trout Unlimited and Mike Lovegreen with Bradford County for many of the pictures and slides used in this webinar. J. Tomlinson

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Background & Purpose Policy Overview Impacts of undersized crossings Bankfull Policy Details Evaluation Form Summary J. Tomlinson

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Background & Purpose Policy Overview Impacts of undersized crossings Bankfull Policy Details Evaluation Form Summary J. Tomlinson

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Background – “Stream Crossing” in presentation and policy applies to ANY structure (bridge, pipe, box…). – This policy applies to STRUCTURAL REPLACEMENT ONLY (you can always fund work around crossing) Background & Purpose Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Background – Replacement of stream crossing structures has always been an eligible expense. – The Program has not replaced many large (8’ or bigger) structures. Why? Background & Purpose Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Background – Replacement of stream crossing structures has always been an eligible expense. – The Program has not replaced many large (8’ or bigger) structures. Why? $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Background & Purpose Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Background – With more funding comes new funding requests. – Many districts getting pressured from County or others to fund bridge replacements. – Needed a policy to prevent Program from becoming a bridge replacement program, but still allow for the replacement of structures where it provided an environmental benefit. Background & Purpose Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Background & Purpose Policy Overview Impacts of undersized crossings Bankfull Policy Details Evaluation Form Summary J. Tomlinson

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Policy Overview – Program replacement eligibility not based on structural condition of bridge (there is other money for that). – Program replacement eligibility based on environmental impacts caused by bridge (undersized). Policy Overview Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Simplified Policy Overview – If a structure is significantly undersized compared to the stream channel, it may be eligible for replacement with an appropriately sized structure. – Details of policy to come. – Why focus on opening size??? Policy Overview Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Background & Purpose Policy Overview Impacts of undersized crossings Bankfull Policy Details Evaluation Form Summary J. Tomlinson

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Hourglass caused by undersized crossing Impacts of Undersizing pipe/ bridge Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Impacts of Undersizing 6’ Bradford CCD

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Hourglass caused by undersized crossing Gravel bar formation upstream – Reduced pipe capacity. – Requires constant in- stream maintenance. Impacts of Undersizing pipe/ bridge Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Impacts of Undersizing 18’ 6’ Gravel bar formation upstream Reduced pipe capacity. Requires constant in- stream maintenance. Bradford CCD

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Hourglass caused by undersized crossing “Firehouse effect” “Waterfall” at pipe outlet – Prevents AOP Erosion of bed and banks downstream – Constant stream instability. – Can “eat away” at road bank. Impacts of Undersizing pipe/ bridge Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Impacts of Undersizing 18’ 24’+ Bradford CCD Erosion of bed and banks downstream Constant stream instability. Can “eat away” at road bank. Bradford CCD

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Impacts of Undersizing “Waterfall” at pipe outlet – Prevents Aquatic Organism Passage US Forest Service

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Over 8,000 stream crossings on D&G worksites – Only incudes “blueline” streams and no LVRs Recent surveys indicate up to 85% may be undersized – Increased sedimentation – Increased maintenance costs – Increased risk of failure – Aquatic organism barriers Impacts of Undersizing J. Tomlinson

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Background & Purpose Policy Overview Impacts of undersized crossings Bankfull Policy Details Evaluation Form Summary J. Tomlinson

Stream Xing Replacement Policy DGLVR Program policy is based on “Bankfull” Note: Bankfull is a complicated concept that can’t be taught in a webinar. What follows in an overview/primer only. Bankfull Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Bankfull 7.1 Stream Crossings BANKFULL WIDTH Bankfull elevation: Point where water fills the channel just before accessing floodplain Bankfull width: With of channel at bankfull elevation.

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Bankfull J. Tomlinson

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Bankfull width: Width of channel just before water accesses floodplain. Bankfull Indicators: – Elevation at the top of the highest depositional features such as point-and mid-channel bars. – Changes in slope on banks. – Changes in particle size on banks. – Changes in vegetation on banks. – Erosion and scour features (only when other features not present) Bankfull

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Bankfull J. Tomlinson

28 POLL: What is the comfort level of someone at your District in determining bankfull elevation and width on a stream.

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Background & Purpose Policy Overview Impacts of undersized crossings Bankfull Policy Details Evaluation Form Summary J. Tomlinson

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Policy Details J. Tomlinson In order to be eligible for replacement, EXISTING structures must: 1. Have a structure to bankfull width ratio of 50% or less. 2. Show signs of streambank erosion. 3. Show signs of streambed erosion/aggradation. Stream crossings OVER 7ft 2 opening (3’ diameter)

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Policy Details In order to be eligible for replacement, EXISTING structures must: 1. Have a structure to bankfull width ratio of 50% or less. 2. Show signs of streambank erosion. 3. Show signs of streambed erosion/aggradation. The NEW REPLACEMENT structure must (all four): 1. Have a structure width at least equal to bankfull width (100% ratio). 2. Be properly aligned with the channel. 3. Consider additional floodplain connectivity when possible. 4. Be designed and constructed to accommodate the passage of aquatic organisms through the structure. Stream crossings OVER 7ft 2 opening (3’ diameter)

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Policy Details In order to be eligible for replacement, EXISTING structures must: 1. Have a structure to bankfull width ratio of 50% or less. 2. Show signs of streambank erosion. 3. Show signs of streambed erosion/aggradation. The NEW REPLACEMENT structure must (all four): 1. Have a structure width at least equal to bankfull width (100% ratio). 2. Be properly aligned with the channel. 3. Consider additional floodplain connectivity when possible. 4. Be designed and constructed to accommodate the passage of aquatic organisms through the structure. Stream crossings UNDER 7ft 2 opening (3’ diameter)

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Background & Purpose Policy Overview Impacts of undersized crossings Bankfull Policy Details Evaluation Form Summary J. Tomlinson

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form Site Info Site Evaluation: width considerations Site Evaluation: erosion considerations Eligibility Determination Stream Crossing Evaluation Form Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form Site Info Site Evaluation: width considerations Site Evaluation: erosion considerations Eligibility Determination Stream Crossing Evaluation Form Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form Site Info Site Evaluation: width considerations Site Evaluation: erosion considerations Eligibility Determination Stream Crossing Evaluation Form Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form Site Info Site Evaluation: width considerations Site Evaluation: erosion considerations Eligibility Determination Stream Crossing Evaluation Form Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form Site Info Site Evaluation: width considerations Site Evaluation: erosion considerations Eligibility Determination Stream Crossing Evaluation Form Audio also available via phone: For assistance, call:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form 33

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form 3 More Examples:

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form EXAMPLE 1: Bankfull Width = 6.5 feet Existing Structure width = 4 feet Bank Erosion = slight Bed Erosion = moderate

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form 62 EXAMPLE 1: Bankfull Width = 6.5 feet Existing Structure width = 4 feet Bank Erosion = slight Bed Erosion = moderate 4/6.5= 62% NO

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form EXAMPLE 2: Bankfull Width = 5 feet Existing Structure width = 3 feet Bank Erosion = slight Bed Erosion = slight

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form EXAMPLE 2: Bankfull Width = 5 feet Existing Structure width = 3 feet Bank Erosion = slight Bed Erosion = slight 3/5= 60% YES New structure must have 5’ opening

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form EXAMPLE 3: Bankfull Width = 10 feet Existing Structure width = 5 feet Bank Erosion = severe Bed Erosion = moderate

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Evaluation Form 50 EXAMPLE 3: Bankfull Width = 10 feet Existing Structure width = 5 feet Bank Erosion = severe Bed Erosion = moderate 5/10= 50% YES New structure must have 10’ opening

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Background & Purpose Policy Overview Impacts of undersized crossings Bankfull Policy Details Evaluation Form Summary J. Tomlinson

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Summary: Existing structures less than 3’ opening can be replaced. Larger structure must be undersized at 50% of bankfull or less to be replaced All new structures should have openings at 100% bankfull or more. Summary

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Summary: Note we have no policy on what TYPE of structure you should use, only the opening size. Note this policy is for funding structural replacement only. You can always do work around the structure. Summary

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Is this policy perfect? NO! This policy was developed to give you support to avoid becoming a bridge replacement program. It will likely be re-evaluated and “tweaked” in the future. Summary

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Special Thanks to Jake Tomlinson at Trout Unlimited and Mike Lovegreen with Bradford County for many of the pictures and slides used in this webinar. J. Tomlinson

Stream Xing Replacement Policy Policy Details In order to be eligible for replacement, EXISTING structures must: 1. Have a structure to bankfull width ratio of 50% or less. 2. Show signs of streambank erosion. 3. Show signs of streambed erosion/aggradation. The NEW REPLACEMENT structure must (all four): 1. Have a structure width at least equal to bankfull width (100% ratio). 2. Be properly aligned with the channel. 3. Consider additional floodplain connectivity when possible. 4. Be designed and constructed to accommodate the passage of aquatic organisms through the structure. Stream crossings OVER 7ft 2 opening (3’ diameter)