RBSP GAO Review 11 June 20091 PSBR data sharing plan Which products do you intend to make available for use by other teams in their data analysis? –We.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reporting Status or Progress. Define the Subject n Break the subject into areas of discussion n List the main subject components here.
Advertisements

A SharePoint site is a Web site that provides a central storage and collaboration space for documents, information, and ideas. A SharePoint site is a tool.
Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Data Management and Communication (DMAC) Standards Process Julie Bosch NOAA National Coastal Data Development.
Rosetta Magnetic Field PDS Review B. J. Anderson.
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Scientific Data Processing for the ECT Suite.
Advanced Multimission Operations System (AMMOS)
1 PFP IPDR 2010/6/ Particles and Fields Package (PFP) GSE Timothy Quinn.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 3.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 2.1 Requirements 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Large.
16 th International Laser Ranging Workshop, Poznan Poland, Oct. 14 th, 2008 Laser Ranging (LR)-Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Data Flow and Scheduling.
Section 15-1GLAST Ground System Design Review August 18&19, 2004 ISOC Organization ISOC Manager R Cameron Commanding, H&S Timeline Planning Command Generation.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 4.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 21 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
CS 235: User Interface Design January 22 Class Meeting
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Available Tools for planning and Data Processing I. Musso.
Sept. 2008EFW INST+SOC PDR RBSP EFW GSE and SOC-GSE GSE and SOC-GSE (Science Operations Center In Support of INT) John Bonnell Will Rachelson Matt.
Aerospace Testing 2006 A Centralized Approach To Ground Support Software To Reduce Technical Risk and Overall Mission Costs Thomas Hauck GSE Software,
ASPERA-3 Sep. 25, 00 Monthly Status Report ASPERA Monthly Status ReportMonthly 9_25/ Page 1 Monthly Status Report Report due 9/25/00 Schedule statused.
CS 235: User Interface Design August 25 Class Meeting Department of Computer Science San Jose State University Fall 2014 Instructor: Ron Mak
At A Glance VOLT is a freeware, platform independent tool set that coordinates cross-mission observation planning and scheduling among one or more space.
SPP Spacecraft Emulator (SCE) Introduction
ASPERA-3 April. 25, 01 Monthly Status Report ASPERA Monthly Status ReportMonthly 4_25/ Page 1 Monthly Status Report Report due 4/25/01 Schedule statused.
Aquarius Project Status 7 th Aquarius/SAC-D Science Team Meeting 11 April 2012.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0643r0May 2008 Terry L Cole (AMD)Slide 1 WG Technical Editor’s Mid-Plenary Report (May) Date: Authors:
Thomas C. Stein PDS Geosciences Node Washington University in St. Louis 1MS Supporting Active Surface Missions and Adding Value.
Doug Tody E2E Perspective EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting December 14-15, 2004 EVLA Software E2E Perspective.
Objectives 4 Understand the importance of communication in projects 4 Understand the need and importance of project management.
Copyright © Open Applications Group, Inc. All rights reserved OAGIS Project Definition High Volume OAGIS – EXI subgroup Kurt Kanaskie – Merck.
1 Risk Management 2 n IEEE defines risk as: “the likelihood of an event, hazard, threat or situation occurring and its undesirable consequences” [Std.
GLAST Science Support CenterAugust 9, 2004 Users’ Committee Meeting GSSC USER SUPPORT David Band – GSSC.
SSC SI Data Processing Pipeline Plans Tom Stephens USRA Information Systems Development Manager SSSC Meeting – Sept 29, 2009.
IV&V Facility 26SEP071 Validation Workshop Dr. Butch Caffall Director, NASA IV&V Facility 26SEP07.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Software Engineering Division Space Weather Tools Update Marlo.
Me thodology for mo dern bu siness st atistics = Memobust Leon Willenborg (Statistics Netherlands)
1 Stepping in everyone’s toes ( but for a good cause….) Eduardo do Couto e Silva Software Meeting – January 2001.
Plan and implement investigations 3rd-5th Grade
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Science instruments data pipeline G. Martucci.
William Thompson L-3 Communications NASA Goddard Space Flight Center STERE The STEREO Science Center.
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF Overview of the Events Kernel EK November 2014 Note: the EK is infrequently used by NASA flight projects.
Timothy QuinnFIELDS SOC CDR – CTG Solar Probe Plus FIELDS SOC CDR Command, Telemetry, and Ground Support (CTG) Timothy Quinn UCB 1.
Fall 2007 Week 9: UML Overview MSIS 670: Object-Oriented Software Engineering.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct 2, 2001 Darren Marsh1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.
CTG Command, Telemetry, and GSE (CTG) Software Design Will Rachelson
SSC Preflight Status Tested during Sim #3: –Telemetry ingest –Beacon processing –Science planning –Archiving of MOC data products, including level-0 telemetry.
Management System Consulting Services Chris Teague, CPSM June 17,
GLAST Science Support Center May 8, 2006 GUC Meeting AI#28. SAE Release Schedule David Band (GSSC/JCA-UMBC) Julie McEnery (GSFC)
ATom data management plan: Data products and submission requirements Observed data and model products will be submitted in NetCDF or ICARTT format www-air.larc.nasa.gov/missions/etc/ESDS-RFC-019-v1.1_0.pdf.
UIF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ENHANCEMENTS UPDATE May 9, 2005 Presented by: Bill Reynen Susan Restad
NASA Earth Science Data Stewardship
Instrument Teams to SOC Test Specifications
SOC Physical Resource Allocations
Software Prototyping.
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS MEP iPSR SOC Marc Pulupa April 10, 2017
Charles Acton NAIF Manager JPL July 18, 2007
ATom data management plan:
ECT data sharing plan Which products do you intend to make available for use by other teams in their data analysis? When will these products be available?
Software Engineering (CSI 321)
EIN 6133 Enterprise Engineering
D I s , a ·.... l8l8.
OSOR - new opportunities for sharing statistical software
CASSINI-UVIS TEAM WEBSITE
CASSINI-UVIS TEAM WEBSITE
CASSINI-UVIS TEAM WEBSITE
I ll I
Helping Active Missions Convert to PDS4
' 1 A ./.\.l+./.\.l
CASSINI-UVIS TEAM WEBSITE
Reporting Status or Progress
Next steps for European Consortium
Presentation transcript:

RBSP GAO Review 11 June PSBR data sharing plan Which products do you intend to make available for use by other teams in their data analysis? –We intend to provide our L0-L4 data and supporting information as specified in the PSBR/RPS PDMP. We have an informal agreement with ECT to share such data as may improve data reduction. The need for such data, and its precise form, cannot be defined until the flight models are subjected to beams. When will these products be available? –L0-L4 data will be available as specified in the PSBR/RPS PDMP. Schedule for data provided to ECT cannot be defined at this time.

RBSP GAO Review 11 June PSBR data sharing plan What products do you need from other teams? –We will need calibrated MAG data. We will also need the L*/K values provided by the ECT SOC if we are to provide our data in coordinates derived from a dynamic Tsyganenko-Sitnov model. When do you need these products to be available? –We will re-run our analysis algorithms each time a new version of the MAG or L*/K data is made available. When MAG data is not available, we will use a static model (OPQ). Therefore, we have no specific timeline requirement from MAG. As for L*/K, we do not have internal use for dynamic models, and we have the capability to create static model coordinates ourselves. We will just create the products that require L*/K in a dynamic model as those coordinates become available from ECT.

RBSP GAO Review 11 June PSBR data sharing plan What other products do you need from outside RBSP – Indices/IMF/supporting data. –GCR measurements (for on-orbit calibration) –Solor proton event measurements (supports science study, but we could do it with RBSP measurements only). What software, tools and models (if any) do you intend to make available for use by other teams in their data analysis? –None have been requested. However, we do contribute to the IRBEM library, which is an open-source, shared resource that may be used by other teams (ECT?). When will these be available? –Upon request. What software, tools and models would you like to be available for use? –The scope of this question is unclear. We are not expecting any software from any of the other instrument teams. From NASA we are expecting SPICE, which is already available on the Web. We are expecting to acquire the GSE-OS SOC template from APL or GSE-OS Inc.