Example Herd A 800 cow Holstein Dairy Stature Analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reproduction management for longevity Dr Carel Muller Western Cape Department of Agriculture, Institute for Animal Production, Elsenburg Dairy Information.
Advertisements

Relationship of somatic cell score with fertility measures Poster 1390 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis R. H. Miller 1, J. S. Clay 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal.
Evaluation of beef cow-calf nutrition in Yucatan, Mexico: MS thesis progress report Animal Science Kotaro Baba January 2006.
2005 ADSA/ASAS/CSAS meeting (1) Historical examination of culling of dairy cows from herds in the United States H. DUANE NORMAN, E. HARE, and J.R. WRIGHT.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
Dairy Center Research Projects
CRITICAL POINTS IN THE FEEDING OF HIGH YIELDING DAIRY COWS Gergácz, Z., †Báder, E., Szűcs, E. University of West Hungary, Faculty of Agricultural and Food.
The Dairy Industry. Dairy Industry Provides milk and other dairy foods to consumers in North America and many foreign markets.
Nutrition Programs for Growing Heifers José Eduardo P. Santos VMTRC.
December 2014 Proof Changes
Is our dairy cow sustainable for the future? L. B. Hansen University of Minnesota.
Better business decisions start here 1 A Benchmarking Tool That Allows More Effective Decisions W.J. (Bill) Grexton Manager, Herd Management Services,
Four Steps to Rotational Grazing Dairy/ Livestock Educator UConn Extension System.
Sperm are sorted. “X” sperm are saved “Y” sperm and “undetermined” sperm are discarded.
ABS Real World Data ® Bull Fertility November 2012.
Opportunities and Challenges with Sexed Semen Joseph C. Dalton, PhD.
Dairy Breeds and Selection
Breeding cattle for a more efficient and sustainable milk and meat production Oscar González-Recio, J. Pryce, M.E. Goddard, B. Hayes EURO FOOD
Forage Quality I: Nutritional Quality Lawton Stewart SE Hay Convention March 29, 2011.
Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M.
2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.
Characterizing Change in the Beef Industry Justin W. Waggoner, Ph.D. Beef Systems Specialist Kansas State University Garden City, KS.
Ration Formulation 2/05/2001 ANS Steps in Balancing a Ration Nutrient requirements generally represent the minimum quantity of the nutrients that.
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
The Dairy Industry Trends & Magnitude By Mr. Weaver.
Feed requirements of livestock Dairy, Beef, Sheep and Deer.
Breeds of Dairy Cattle Dairy CattleDairy Cattle. Focus What details can you tell me about a dairy cow? What details can you tell me about a dairy cow?
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD An Example from Dairy.
Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle - MP 391 Overview.
Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Associate Professor/Cow-Calf Extension Specialist Kansas State University
Computer Controlled Parlours & Feeders. & A Totally Integrated Solution!
Factors affecting heifer fertility in U.S. Holsteins M. T. Kuhn* and J. L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service,
Effects of dam’s dry period length on calf M. T. Kuhn,* J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Accuracy of reported births and calving dates of dairy cattle in the United States Poster 1705 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis H. D. Norman *,1, J. L. Edwards,
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Genetic Evaluations & Decision Support to Improve Feed Efficiency Dorian Garrick Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
2006 Mid-Atlantic Dairy Grazing Conference, 2006 (1) Is There a Need for Different Genetics in Dairy Grazing Systems? H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L.
2006 H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
XX International Grassland Conference 2005 (1) 2005 Genetic Alternatives for Dairy Producers who Practise Grazing H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell.
Factors affecting death rate of lactating cows in Dairy Herd Improvement herds R. H. Miller, H. Duane Norman, M. T. Kuhn* and J. R. Wright Animal Improvement.
Paul VanRaden and John Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Planned Changes to Models and Trait Definitions.
WiggansARS Big Data Computing Workshop (1) 2013 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
REARING DAIRY HEIFERS PROFITABLY Dr. Rachel J. E. Stewart.
Unit 10 Dairy Science.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA 2009 meeting.
FAS, Dairy, Livestock & Poultry Division, 1997 U.S. role in the global dairy industry.
Cow Herd Performance Testing. Introduction Help evaluate economically important traits Calving ease Birth weight Weaning weight Calving interval Calf.
Neosporosis in a Dairy Herd Jenny Cigan and Tyler Schaaf.
Lactation Curve Topic 3091 Basic Concepts Melinda Klockziem.
Feed Efficiency Genetic Projects. Terms Gain/Feed = Feed Efficiency FE Feed/Gain = Feed Conversion FC: -FE Residual Feed Intake RFI Net Feed Intake NFI:-RFI.
2001 ADSA Indianapolis 2001 (1) Heterosis and Breed Differences for Yield and Somatic Cell Scores of US Dairy Cattle in the 1990’s. PAUL VANRADEN Animal.
Genetics – Trait Selection An S 426 Fall Genetics – Trait Selection Has led to development of Economically Relevant Traits (ERT) and Indicator Trait.
Lactation Number Effects on the Genetic Variability of the Stearoyl Coenzyme-A Desaturase 9 Activity Estimated by Test-Day Model V. M.-R. Arnould 1, N.
Shortened dry cow periods Gabriella Varga Pennsylvania State University.
Jeremy Bryant NZ Animal Evaluation Ltd Manager
Lifetime Performance of Dairy Cows in Northern Ireland
RATION FORMULATION SPRING 2018.
More To Do Farms Feed analysis lab 2017.
Drought and fodder crisis What cows should I cull?
Analyzing Days Carried Calf at Abort Events
Using EPDs in Selection
Beef.
A National Sire Fertility Index
Abstr. M65 Test-day milk loss associated with elevated test-day somatic cell score R.H. Miller, H.D. Norman, G.R. Wiggans, and J.R. Wright Animal Improvement.
Data Holstein breedings from 2006 through 2008 Total breedings
Extent of sexed-semen usage
Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.
Expected Progeny Differences
Presentation transcript:

Example Herd A 800 cow Holstein Dairy Stature Analysis

***Important, run PROFILE command in Dairy Comp before you run the commands on the proceeding slides

Genetic Averages by Stud Code By CSTUD Pct Count Av AGE Av ELNM AvEMILK AvESTAT Av EPL Av EDPR ========= ==== ====== ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= Total Heifers Command: SUM AGE ELNM EMILK ESTAT EPL EDPR BY CSTUD GO4 LACT=0

Genetic Averages by Stud Code By CSTUD Pct Count Av AGE Av ELNM AvEMILK AvESTAT Av EPL Av EDPR ========= ==== ====== ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= Total Cows Command: SUM AGE ELNM EMILK ESTAT EPL EDPR BY CSTUD GO4 LACT>0

Genetic Averages by Lactation By LACT Pct Count Av AGE Av ELNM AvEMILK AvESTAT Av EPL Av EDPR ========= ==== ====== ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= Total Command: SUM AGE ELNM EMILK ESTAT EPL EDPR BY LACT GO4

Graph Estimated Stature by Age Herd has been trending down for Estimated Stature (particularly in heifers) Command: GRAPH ESTAT BY AGE GO4\RX84 BY LCTGP

GRAPH 305ME BY DIM LCTGP Since 305ME is generally underestimated in early lactation, 80 DIM was used as a cut point for more reliable 305MEs

Graph 305ME by Estimated Stature DIM>80 No Trend Observed; Greater Estimated Stature didn’t equate to higher 305MEs Command: GRAPH 305ME BY ESTAT LACT\R GO4 DIM>80

Putting Cows into Quartiles May sometimes be difficult to quartile cows based on estimated Stature due to many cows possibly having the exact same estimated Stature value Count of animals per quartile will likely never be exactly the same

Method Used to Quartile Cows Note: The following command would be used to coincide with the effect of Stature on Production 1.Generate list of cows – Command: LIST ID ESTAT FOR LACT>0 305ME>0 DIM>80 GO4 DOWNBY ESTAT\C 2.Export list to Excel 3.Determine quartile cut points in Excel

Production Averages, Estimated Stature < 0.3 By LCTGP Pct Count Av ELNM AvESTAT Av305ME Av DIM Av DOPN AvLGSCC ========= ==== ====== ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= Total Bottom 25% of Cows Sorted by Estimated Stature; DIM>80 Command: SUM ELNM ESTAT 305ME DIM DOPN LGSCC FOR ESTAT 0 DIM>80 LACT>0 BY LCTGP GO4 In the case of this example herd, I choose ESTAT<0.3 because it was determined to be the cut point for the bottom 25% of cows in this herd when I sorted them in the Excel spreadsheet

Production Averages, Estimated Stature > 1.5 By LCTGP Pct Count Av ELNM AvESTAT Av305ME Av DIM Av DOPN AvLGSCC ========= ==== ====== ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= Total Top 25% of Cows Sorted by Estimated Stature; DIM>80 Bottom 25% of cows sorted on Estimated Stature averaged 2.7 points less for Stature and 160 lbs more for 305ME Command: SUM ELNM ESTAT 305ME DIM DOPN LGSCC FOR ESTAT> ME>0 DIM>80 LACT>0 BY LCTGP GO4

Economic Impact of Stature Current cost per lb of dry matter (DM) is 8.5 cents – Source: Cows typically eat 3.5% of body weight in DM and typical DMI is between lbs per day Change in 1 point STA = 24 lbs in Mature Body Weight – 24 lbs * 3.5% = 0.84 lbs more DM/day * 365 = lbs more DM/year * $0.085 = $26.06/cow/year $26.06 * 1,000 cow dairy = $26,060/year Slide courtesy of Jenny DeMunck

Effect of Stature on Feed Costs (Example Herd A) Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4Overall Number of Cows Average Estimated Stature per Quartile ***Note: All cows with a valid Sire ID were included in the analysis Command Used: LIST ID ESTAT FOR LACT>0 GO4 DOWNBY ESTAT\C In this instance, I generated a list of all cows in the herd (milking + dry), sorted them by Estimated Stature, and then summarized the average Stature per quartile Alternate Command: SUM DOWNBY ESTAT FOR LACT>0 GO4\ZQ4 If desired, you could have Dairy Comp quartile the cows to give you the number of cows and average ESTAT per quartile as well

Effect of Stature on Feed Costs (Example Herd A) Difference between Top and Bottom Quartiles – 2.61 points for Stature – 2.61 * 24 lbs * 3.5% = 2.19 lbs more DM/day * 365 = lbs more DM/cow/year – lbs * $0.085 = $68.02/cow/year – $68.02 * 185 Quartile 1 cows = $ /year Per Cow: A Quartile 1 cow will cost $68.02 more per year to feed than a Quartile 4 cow (sorted on Estimated Stature) Per Quartile: Quartile 1 cows will cost $ more per year to feed than Quartile 4 cows (sorted on Estimated Stature)