Strongsville City School District Facilities Utilization Advisory Committee OSFC Presentation November 3, 2009

Strongsville City School District Classroom Facilities Assistance Program (CFAP) Provides funding for a share of the entire facilities needs within a district Exceptional Needs Program (ENP) Application based building replacement program to address health & safety of students Ohio School Facilities Commission Programs: Expedited Local Partnership Program (ELPP) Allows school districts estimated to be over two years away from eligibility for state assistance (CFAP) to fund a portion of their facilities master plan through local monies prior to the time state funding becomes available through the CFAP; a district-wide assessment and master facilities plan is provided by the commission

Strongsville City School District Evaluate Curriculum and Educational Delivery Evaluate and Realign (if desired) Vertical Organization (i.e., grade groupings) Evaluate Current Population Centers for Building Locations Right Size District’s Capital Assets with Projected Student Population Develop Partnerships for Community Learning Centers Deliver Quality Education More Efficiently and Reduce Operating Costs What are the Opportunities in Developing a Comprehensive Master Facilities Plan?

Strongsville City School District November 2000 – ELPP application May 2001 – Facilities Assessment November 2002 – Withdrew from ELPP February 2008 – Reapplied for ELPP February 2009 – Facilities Reassessment April 2009 – District accepted ten-year Enrollment Projections Master Plan options developed based on February 2009 Assessment and April 2009 Enrollment Projections Where does Strongsville City Stand?

Strongsville City School District ODE 2010 Eligibility Ranking #560 * Based on FY10 ODE Eligibility Ranking List State Share 8% Local Share* 92% How is the District’s Local Share Determined?

Strongsville City School District Historical Equity Ranking

Strongsville City School District Enrollment Projection by Grade

Strongsville City School District Enrollment Projections:  5 year out planning for declining enrollment  10 year out planning for increasing enrollment 2/3rds Guideline:  Waiver Process Must demonstrate safe, educationally adequate operationally efficient Co-funding up to 100% replacement cost 1/3rd Guideline:  District discretion on scope  Code, health and safety scope must be included OSFC Policies / Guidelines / Planning Principles

Strongsville City School District 350 Rule (ORC (c)):  Minimum 350 students to be housed (renovate or new) Square Foot / Student Allocation:  Sliding Scale (based on grade grouping and population)  Oversized Space Calculation (renovated buildings)  Excess Space (renovated buildings) OSFC Policies / Guidelines / Planning Principles:

Student Population SF / StudentCost / SF 350 – $ – $ – $ and up 115$ site size recommendation = 10 acres + 1acre per 100 students *Region 8 Elementary School Middle School Student Population SF / StudentCost / SF 350 – $ – $ – $ and up 141 $ site size recommendation = 20 acres + 1acre per 100 students High School Student Population SF / StudentCost / SF 350 – $ – $ – 1, $ ,201 and up $ site size recommendation = 35 acres + 1acre per 100 students

Strongsville City School District 350 Rule (ORC (c)):  Minimum 350 students to be housed (renovate or new) Square Foot / Student Allocation:  Sliding Scale (based on grade grouping and population)  Oversized Space Calculation (renovated buildings)  Excess Space (renovated buildings) OSFC Policies / Guidelines / Planning Principles:

- 19,193 sf (oversized sf) 173,110 sf (total building less oversized sf) = (additional excess sf) 7,110 (total PALFI sf) 20,110 31,000 6,000 7,000 17,000 5,000 Corridors Gymnasium Natatorium Auditorium Media Center Actual SF 29,307 SF Per OSDM 14,000 3,500 Non-OSDM 1,693 Oversized SF 3,000 1,500 7,000 6,000 19,193 Excess SF (PALFI) 7,000 6,000 13,000 OSDM (total sf required) 166,000 sf (1,000 st. x 166 sf/st.) Existing High School 192,303 sf (total building sf) OSDM (total sf required) 166,000 sf (1,000 st. x 166 sf/st.) -

Strongsville City School District Locally Funded Initiatives (LFI):  Project Agreement LFI (PALFI)  Elective Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED):  Silver Certification w/emphasis on points in energy category Segmenting- CFAP:  Entire building project minimum (i.e., complete renovation, complete new building)  Minimum local share = 4% of district’s assessed valuation OSFC Policies / Guidelines / Planning Principles:

Strongsville City School District State of Ohio Summary of New Construction “ Opinion of Probable Costs” per square foot of floor area Region 8 (northeast) 2009 Design Manual Update OSFC Budgeting Guidelines:

Strongsville City School District Assessment Cost Guidelines A.Heating System The Assessment Consultant shall evaluate the HVAC system and determine the requirements for each building or building addition using the funding chart below. * Does not include regional cost factor HVAC System Replacement$25.00 sf* (* includes demo of existing system & reconfiguration of piping layout, new controls for air conditioning and duct work) Convert to Ducted System Replacement:$ 7.50 sf* (* includes costs for vert. & horz. Chases, cut openings, soffits, etc.) Heating System (Only):$ 8.50 sf (for boilers, pump & piping replacement, not AHU) Controls (Only):$ 2.50 sf

Strongsville City School District Assessment Summary

FACILITY ASSESSMENT Cost Set : 2009 Rating Dollar Assessment C A.Heating System1$0.00- B.Roofing3$494, C.Ventilation / Air Conditioning3$674, D.Electrical Systems3$792, E.Plumbing and Fixtures1$0.00- F.Windows3$2,339, G.Structure: Foundation2$ H.Structure: Walls and Chimneys2$25, I.Structure: Floors and Roofs1$0.00- J.General Finishes3$744, K.Interior Lighting3$173, L.Security Systems3$102, M.Emergency/Egress Lighting3$40, N.Fire Alarm3$61, O.Handicapped Access3$394, P.Site Condition2$387, Q.Sewage System1$0.00- R.Water Supply1$0.00- S.Exterior Doors3$24, T.Hazardous Material2$49, U.Life Safety3$94, V.Loose Furnishings3$163, W.Technology2$112, X. Construction Contingency / Non- Construction Cost -$1,631, Total$8,307, *HA=Handicapped Access *Rating =1Satisfactory =2Needs Repair =3Needs Replacement *Const P/S=Present/Scheduled Construction AdditionDateHANumber of FloorsCurrent SF Original Building 1962yes1 20,034 Classroom Addition 1968yes1 2,316 Clssrm, Art, Music,Kitch 1977yes1 12,381 Classrooms 1991yes1 6,234 Total 40,965 Current GradesK-6Acreage:10.23 Proposed GradesN/ATeaching Stations:25 Current Enrollment370Classrooms:23 Projected EnrollmentN/A District:Strongsville City SD County:CuyahogaArea:Northeastern Ohio (8) Name:Whitney Elem Contact:Ms. Tricia Culotta Address:13548 Whitney Rd Phone:440/ Strongsville,OH Date Prepared: By:Tony Schorr Bldg. IRN:41053 Date Revised: By:Tony Schorr C=Under Contract Renovation Cost Factor % Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $8,653, The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is requested from a Master Plan. CEFPI Appraisal Summary SectionPoints PossiblePoints EarnedPercentageRating Category Cover Sheet———— 1.0 The School Site %Satisfactory 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features %Borderline 3.0 Plant Maintainability %Borderline 4.0 Building Safety and Security %Borderline 5.0 Educational Adequacy %Borderline 6.0 Environment for Education %Borderline Commentary— —— Building Summary – Whitney Elem (41053 (1) Building data, assessor data and assessment dates. (2) Includes building inventory details about all the buildings that were assessed. (3) Listing of each of the 23 building systems, rating and cost data. Each item is linked to a detailed description of the assessor’s findings and recommendations. (4) Council of Educational Facility Planners International (CEFPI) -- Appraisal is an instrument that yields data about the ability of the building to support the educational program. Each item is linked to a detailed description of the assessor’s findings. Cost to renovate “regional cost factor” applied. BUILDING and ASSESSOR DATA District:Strongsville City SD County:Cuyahoga Area: Northeastern Ohio (8) Name:Whitney Elem Contact:Ms. Tricia Culotta Address:13548 Whitney Rd Strongsville, OH Phone:440/ Date Prepared: By:Tony Schorr Bldg. IRN:41053 Date Revised: By:Tony Schorr *HA= Handicapped Access *Rating =1 Satisfactory =2 Needs Repair =3 Needs Replacement *Const P/S= Present/Scheduled Construction AdditionDateHANumber of FloorsCurrent SF Original Building1962yes1 20,034 Classroom Addition1968yes1 2,316 Clssrm, Art, Music,Kitch1977yes1 12,381 Classrooms1991yes1 6,234 Total 40,965 Current GradesK-6 Acreage: Proposed GradesN/A Teaching Stations:25 Current Enrollment370 Classrooms:23 Projected EnrollmentN/A FACILITY ASSESSMENT Cost Set : 2009 Rating Dollar Assessment C A. Heating System1$0.00- B. Roofing3$494, C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning3$674, D. Electrical Systems3$792, E. Plumbing and Fixtures1$0.00- F. Windows3$2,339, G. Structure: Foundation2$ H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys2$25, I. Structure: Floors and Roofs1$0.00- J. General Finishes3$744, K. Interior Lighting3$173, L. Security Systems3$102, M. Emergency/Egress Lighting3$40, N. Fire Alarm3$61, O. Handicapped Access3$394, P. Site Condition2$387, Q. Sewage System1$0.00- R. Water Supply1$0.00- S. Exterior Doors3$24, T. Hazardous Material2$49, U. Life Safety3$94, V. Loose Furnishings3$163, W. Technology2$112, X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost-$1,631, Total$8,307, CEFPI Appraisal Summary SectionPoints PossiblePoints EarnedPercentageRating Category Cover Sheet———— 1.0 The School Site %Satisfactory 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features %Borderline 3.0 Plant Maintainability %Borderline 4.0 Building Safety and Security %Borderline 5.0 Educational Adequacy %Borderline 6.0 Environment for Education %Borderline Commentary— —— C=Under Contract Renovation Cost Factor104.16% Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied)$8,653, The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is requested from a Master Plan.

Strongsville City School District OSFC DOES NOT SHARE IN *: Purchase of Land Offsite Utility Costs Performing Arts Halls (Fixed seat auditoriums) Bus Garages District Administration Facilities Stadiums, Tracks, etc. Desktop Computers / Software *list not all inclusive

Strongsville City School District Whitney Elementary94% Allen Elementary77% Zellers Elementary77% Chapman Elementary66% Drake Elementary62% Surrarrer Elementary40% Muraski Elementary34% Kinsner Elementary 6% Center Jr. High65% Albion Middle57% Strongsville High 11% Renovations vs. Build New Ratio:

Strongsville City School District DRAFT Master Plans: The following Draft Master Plans are for discussion purposes only. These plans should be considered as a starting point as the Strongsville City School District partners with the OSFC to best meet the needs of the students and community.

Strongsville City School District Draft MP 1 Scope:Renovations/Addition to Chapman Elementary to house grades K-5 Renovations/Addition to Drake Elementary to house grades K-5 Renovations to Kinsner Elementary to house grades K-5 Renovations to Muraksi Elementary to house grades K-5 Renovations/Addition to Surrarrer Elementary to house grades K-5 Renovations to Albion Middle School to house grade 6 Renovations/Addition to Center Junior High to house grades 7-8 Renovations/Addition to Strongsville High to house grades 9-12 and CT Allowance to abate and demolish Allen Elementary, Whitney Elementary, and Zellers Elementary Schools Please note the PALFI detailed in master plan options is not inclusive of all Locally Funded Initiatives the district may choose to include in their project(s). Additional LFI scope should be discussed and budgets established with the assistance of the district’s design professional prior to finalizing bond language to secure the local share of the project funds. Master Plan utilizes District Accepted Enrollment Projections dated April 20, 2009 ( planning year). Approved Enrollment Projections will be required for final plan approval. EEA studies have not been completed on all existing buildings. Local Share percentage based on 2010 Equity Ranking. Total Master Plan Cost: State Share: Local Share: LFI: Total Local Share: $98,925,892 $7,914,071 $91,011,821 $0 $91,011,821 Co-Funded 8% Co-Fundable 92% Co-Fundable; FY 10 Equity Ranking PALFI – n/a this plan Co-Fundable Local Share + PALFI

Strongsville City School District Draft MP 2 Scope:Renovations/Addition to Chapman Elementary to house grades K-6 Renovations/Addition to Drake Elementary to house grades K-6 Renovations to Kinsner Elementary to house grades K-6 Renovations to Muraksi Elementary to house grades K-6 Renovations/Addition to Surrarrer Elementary to house grades K-6 Renovations/Addition to Albion Middle School to house grade 7-8 Renovations/Addition to Strongsville High to house grades 9-12 and CT Allowance to abate and demolish Allen Elementary, Whitney Elementary, Zellers Elementary, and Center Junior High Schools Please note the PALFI detailed in master plan options is not inclusive of all Locally Funded Initiatives the district may choose to include in their project(s). Additional LFI scope should be discussed and budgets established with the assistance of the district’s design professional prior to finalizing bond language to secure the local share of the project funds. Master Plan utilizes District Accepted Enrollment Projections dated April 20, 2009 ( planning year). Approved Enrollment Projections will be required for final plan approval. EEA studies will need to be completed on all existing buildings. Local Share percentage based on 2010 Equity Ranking. Total Master Plan Cost: State Share: Local Share: LFI: Total Local Share : $102,908,181 $8,232,654 $94,675,526 $0 $94,675,526 Co-Funded 8% Co-Fundable 92% Co-Fundable; FY 10 Equity Ranking PALFI – n/a this plan Co-Fundable Local Share + PALFI

Strongsville City School District OSFC Annual Inflation Costs:

Strongsville City School District Next Steps in OSFC Planning Process: Develop Final Master Plan  Validate Assessment Scope (adjust scope and budget if required)  Evaluate Enhanced Reprogramming (incorporate scope and budget if required)  Evaluate Swing Space Needs (incorporate scope and budget if required)  Discussions on Site Safety Access Allowance (incorporate into plan if required)

Strongsville City School District