Procedural Compliance Self- Assessment Webcast Section 3: Conducting the Self-Assessment: Evaluating Compliance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Notification to Participate in an Individualized Education Program (IEP) Meeting Los Angeles Unified School District Division of Special Education.
Advertisements

October 19, 2006 Children With Disabilities Enrolled by Their Parents in Private Schools 34 CFR §§ Equitable Participation (EP) Child Find.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Notice: An Overview Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS August 4,
Section 1 Demographic Information Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
FRANK ESPOSITO DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SOUTH PLAINFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT Effective Communication Pathways in Special Education.
The Evaluation Process Federal Law – IDEA – All eligible students, ages 3-21, are entitled to a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) in the least.
MN CIMP 2012 COMPLIANCE FOR PARTS OF THE IEP. Compliance Self-Check.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
OSEP QUARTERLY CALL WITH PARENT CENTERS PART B FINAL REGULATIONS RELATED TO PARENTAL CONSENT FOR THE USE OF PUBLIC BENEFITS OR INSURANCE Office of Special.
Procedural Compliance Self-Assessment Webcast Section 6: Overview of PCSA and Validation Activities 1.
Procedural Compliance Self-Assessment (PCSA) Webcast Section 2: Conducting the Self-Assessment: Sampling.
Q and A Regarding 34 CFR § (b)(4). On December 1, 2008, USDOE issued a series of new regulations for IDEA. These newly amended regulations took.
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA Children Enrolled by Their Parents in Private Schools.
CHRISTINA SPECTOR WENDI SCHREITER ERIN ARANGO-ESCALANTE IDEA Part C to Part B Transition.
Students with Disabilities Parentally Placed in Nonpublic Elementary or Secondary Schools VESID Special Education Services New York State Education Department.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
The SOPM Standard Operating Procedures Manual Highlights.
Selecting Students for Title I Services in a Targeted Assistance School (TAS)
April 2010 Copyright © 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Mattie T. Updated Timeline and Goals.
Writing Compliant ETRs State Approved Training Module
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education Verification Review (VR) 2013−14 TRAINING.
Planning together for service
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA) Office of Non-Public Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Office of Special.
Conducting Re-evaluations Within Tennessee’s RTI² Framework Director of Special Education Eligibility, Theresa Nicholls | Fall 2015.
2012 Change Documents ARD Process Guide & Notice of Procedural Safeguards.
1 Welcomes You To It’s Those Wonderful Rights! Welcome To read the script that goes with each slide, click on the Notes tab (to the left of this screen).
Initial Referrals NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Department November 24 th, 2008.
Compliance Training Overview Principal’s Meeting February 2012.
Procedural Compliance Self- Assessment Webcast Section 5: Correcting Noncompliance and Systems of Internal Control.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
Letter of Explanation Copy of Data Disproportionality Initial Eligibility 60-day Timeline Early Childhood Transition Secondary Transition Corrected and.
Procedural Compliance Self- Assessment (PCSA) Webcast Section 4: Reporting Results and Corrective Actions Using the Electronic Reporting System 1.
Indicator #13 Question 1 Virginia Department of Education 1.Did the LEA hold an IEP meeting to discuss measurable postsecondary goals for the student.
Private Schools August, Contact Paul Sherman, DPI Procedural Compliance Workgroup, or
REEVALUATION: BEST PRACTICES M-DCPS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN BEESS 037.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 1 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
EC Compliance Kristin Haigler and Kris Earl November 2009.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Evaluation IEP Development, Review and Revision Placement
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 3 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Special Education Meeting November 5, 2013 ASC 3:30 TENNESSEE ROOM.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
M eetings of the IEP Team Produced by NICHCY, 2007 | Updated by CPIR, 2016.
Child Find Office of Special Education Division of District Support.
Special Education Proportionate Set-Aside Requirements
Process for Enrolling New Special Education Students
Special Education Division Data Identified Noncompliance (DINC) Overview Presented by the Assessment, Evaluation, and Support Unit.
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Santa Barbara County SELPA Parentally Placed Students in Private School Training & Meaningful Consultation for Private School Representatives and Parent.
Charter School Applicant Technical Assistance Session
Compliance Monitoring
Special Education and Nonpublic School Students
TIMELINE DECISION TREE:
Oregon Department of Education
Special Education Process
Title I Program Monitoring: Common Findings from FY18
12/9/2018 Notice: An Overview The MDE released documentation and a new requirement last year for districts to utilized Notices to “finalize” IEPs rather.
Equitable Services Sections 1117 and 8501 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA),
Implementing Equitable Services Requirements
Update on the TEA Sped corrective action plan
Equitable Participation (EP) Child Find Free and Appropriate Public
IEP REPORT OF PROGRESS AND ACHIEVEMENT K-12
Presentation transcript:

Procedural Compliance Self- Assessment Webcast Section 3: Conducting the Self-Assessment: Evaluating Compliance

Compliance Areas:  Evaluation (EVAL) - 7 items  IEP - 13 items  Discipline - 4 items  No Sample  Private Schools – 2 items  Timely Initial Evaluations – 1 item Evaluating Procedural Compliance June, 20132

Evaluating Procedural Compliance Standards and Directions

ItemCompliance Statement Standards and DirectionsCorrection EVAL-1. The student’s parents were contacted and afforded an opportunity to participate in the review of existing evaluation data. 34 CFR § (a), (a)(1) Wis. Stats., § (2)(b)1 Indicator 8 Locate the Worksheet for Consideration of Existing Data (EW-1). Documentation of the parent’s participation in the review may also be found on forms IE-2, IE-3, RE-4, or RE-5. Look for both the method and the date the parent’s input was obtained. The date of the parent’s input must be 1) after the Notice of Receipt of Referral (IE-1) or after Notice of Reevaluation (RE-1) was sent and 2) on or before the date on the form requesting parental consent. (IE-2, IE-3, RE-4, or RE-5). If a meeting was held to review existing evaluation data, look for an Evaluation Report and IEP Cover Sheet (I-3) and determine whether the parent attended the meeting to review existing evaluation data. A meeting to review existing data may be held on the same day the parent receives the Notice of Receipt of Referral (IE-1) or Notice of Reevaluation (RE-1), as long as the notice is provided before existing data is reviewed and before consent for additional testing is obtained. The review may be conducted without a parent’s participation if the local educational agency (LEA) is unable to convince the parent to participate. If the parent did not participate, the LEA must document at least three reasonable attempts to convince the parent to participate. Student Level Noncompliance: Review evaluation data with parent and determine whether additional evaluation data is needed. If additional data is needed, conduct an evaluation. Current Compliance: The local educational agency (LEA) must take action to ensure future compliance including implementing a system of internal controls. The department will verify current compliance on a new student record sample. Evaluation Sample

ItemCompliance Statement Standards and DirectionsCorrection NO SAMPLE- 1 After consulting with representatives of private schools, the LEA obtained a written affirmation signed by private school representatives.** 34 CFR § Indicator: Other During the design and development of special education and related services for parentally placed private school students with disabilities, an LEA must engage in timely and meaningful consultation with representatives of private schools located in the LEA and the parents of such students. After consulting, the LEA must obtain written affirmations signed by private school representatives who were consulted. The DPI has developed an affirmation form for LEA use. It may be accessed at A private school is an institution with a private educational program that meets all of the criteria under Wis. Stats. s (1), or is determined to be a private school by the state superintendent under s A home-based private educational program is not a private school. If representatives of private elementary and secondary schools located in the LEA were consulted, and there is a signed affirmation from each private school representative who was consulted, the requirement is met. If a representative did not provide a signed affirmation within a reasonable amount of time but the LEA forwarded documentation of the consultation process to the DPI, the requirement is met. If there are no private schools within the boundaries of the LEA, mark “NA.” The LEA must consult with representatives of private schools and obtain a written affirmation signed by private school representatives. The department will verify current compliance with this requirement. No Sample

Evaluating Procedural Compliance Record Review Checklists and Recording Forms

July, 20118

WORKSHEET FOR CONSIDERATION OF EXISTING DATA TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENTS OR EVALUATION MATERIALS ARE NEEDED Form EW-1 (Rev. 7/06) ___________________________ SCHOOL DISTRICT Name of student ____________________ (Note: If a meeting is held to consider existing data, and this form is used as documentation of that meeting, complete I-3, “Evaluation Report and IEP Cover Sheet” and sections I and II below. If no meeting is held, this form is used to document the input and decision of the IEP team participants. Complete sections I, II, III, and IV and the name of the person completing the form). I.List of information/reviewed: II. Action to be taken as a result of review of considering the existing information/data: □ Additional assessments or other evaluation materials are needed □ No additional assessments or other evaluation materials are needed III. Documentation of parent involvement (including dates and method) and their input: IV.List of other IEP Team participants involved and their input (including dates): Worksheet completed by ______________________________

Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction PROCEDURAL COMPLIANCE SELF- ASSESSMENT EVALUATION RECORDING FORM PI-SA-RRC-EVAL-002 (Rev. 7-11) INSTRUCTIONS: Enter information for each student record reviewed. 26 available lines. Insert rows as needed between row 13 and row 36. Retain at the district level. If there are any "N" responses, you will be required to upload this file to the Special Education Web Portal as part of the reporting process. Transfer totals for each item to the self- assessment report. GENERAL INFORMATION LEA Name Total Number of Students Evaluated or Reevaluated and Found Eligible by Level (not the number in the sample)Required Sample Size Elementary (E)Middle (M)High School (HS)Grand Total 0 RECORD REVIEW SUMMARY Record Review Checklist Items For level, enter "E" for elementary, "M" for middle school, or "H" for high school. Use the drop down menus to select responses. Enter "Y" if requirement is met. Enter "N" if requirement is NOT met. Enter NA if the item is not applicable to the student. No item may be left blank. EVAL-2 is the only item for which NA is an acceptable response. *Independent 2r Charter schools are not required to respond to item EVAL-7. LEVELSTUDENT NAMEEVAL-1EVAL-2EVAL-3EVAL-4EVAL-5EVAL-6EVAL-7*

Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction PROCEDURAL COMPLIANCE SELF- ASSESSMENT IEP RECORDING FORM PI-SA-RRC-IEP-002 H (Rev ) INSTRUCTIONS: Enter information for each high school student reviewed. 16 available lines. Insert rows as needed between row 11 and row 24. Retain at the district level. If there are any "N" responses, you will be required to upload this file to the Special Education Web Portal as part of the reporting process. Transfer grand totals from the totals tab to self-assessment report. GENERAL INFORMATION LEA NameTotal Number of Students with IEPs (not the number in the sample)Required Sample Size Elementary (E)Middle) (MHigh School (H)Grand Total 0 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RECORD REVIEW SUMMARY Record Review Checklist Items Enter HIGH SCHOOL Level Students on this Page Enter "Y" if requirement is met. Enter "N" if requirement is NOT met. Enter NA if the item is not applicable to the student. No item may be left blank. IEP-6, IEP-11, IEP-12, and IEP-13 are the only items for which NA is an acceptable response. STUDENT NAME IEP-1IEP-2IEP-3IEP-4IEP-5IEP-6IEP-7IEP-8IEP-9 IEP-10IEP-11IEP-12IEP-13IEP-14

Evaluating Procedural Compliance Discipline Requirements

Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction PROCEDURAL COMPLIANCE SELF ASSESSMENT DISCIPLINE REC OR DING FORM PI-SA-RRC-DISC-002 (Rev ) INSTRUCTIONS: Retain at the district level. If there are any "N" responses, you will be required to upload this file to the Special Education Web Portal as part of the reporting process. Transfer the total of "N" records for each item to the self-assessment report. GENERAL INFORMATION LEA Name RECORD REVIEW CHECKLIST Total Number of Students Removed more than 10 days during the previous school year Required Sample Size Enter information for each student record reviewed. 13 available lines. Insert rows as needed between row 11 and row 21. Use dropdown to select “Yes” if requirement is met; “No” if requirement is NOT met. DISC-2 through DISC-4 are the only ones for which N/A is an acceptable response. STUDENT NAMEDISC-1DISC-2DISC-3DISC-4 Number of Items = "Y" 0000 Number of Items = "N" 0000 Number of Items = "N/A" 000

Evaluating Procedural Compliance No Sample Requirements

Janice Duff, , Allison Markoski, , Courtney Reed Jenkins, , Marge Resan, , Paul Sherman, , Christina Spector, , Paula Volpiansky, , Patricia Williams, , Questions? June,