AIAA Hybrid Airliner Competition 2013 The Transporters.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lesson 17 High Lift Devices
Advertisements

What is engineering? Engineering - The branch of science and technology concerned with the design, building, and use of engines, machines, and structures.
October 28, 2011 Christopher Schumacher (Team Lead) Brian Douglas Christopher Erickson Brad Lester Nathan Love Patrick Mischke Traci Moe Vince Zander.
Extremely Maneuverable UCAV
ME 480 Introduction To Aerospace: Chapter 2 Prof. Doug Cairns.
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.
The Black Pearl Design Team: Ryan Cobb Jacob Conger Christopher Cottingham Travis Douville Josh Johnson Adam Loverro Tony Maloney.
Guidelines Presentation. Aircraft Aim & Judging The aircraft needs to transport the mirror segments of the ESO European Extremely Large Telescope, being.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
1 HARP - High Altitude Reconnaissance Platform Design Proposal Dr. James D. Lang, Project Advisor Dr. Leland M. Nicolai, Project Sponsor Dr. Paul A. Wieselmann,
Aerodynamic Shape Optimization in the Conceptual and Preliminary Design Stages Arron Melvin Adviser: Luigi Martinelli Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint.
JLFANG-LDS Light Dynamic Strikefighter Dr. James Lang, Project Advisor Aircraft Design by Team Bling-Bling Marcus Artates Connor McCarthy Ryan McDonnell.
1 Design Group 2 Kat Donovan - Team Leader Andrew DeBerry Mike Kinder John Mack Jeff Newcamp Andrew Prisbell Nick Schumacher Conceptual Design for AME.
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Critical Design Review Team 1.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
The Barn Owls Chris “Mo” Baughman Kate Brennan Christine Izuo Dan Masse Joe “Sal” Salerno Paul Slaboch Michelle Smith.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 Vehicle Sizing PDR AAE 451 Fall 2006.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
DR2 Propulsion PDR I Preliminary Design Review II October 17, 2000 Presented By: Mark Blanton Team DR2 Chris Curtis Loren Garrison Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok AAE451 Aircraft Design Professor Dominick Andrisani First Flight November 21,
Lesson 24 Performance— Thrust Required and Thrust Available
Aerodynamics QDR AAE451 – Team 3 October 9, 2003 Brian Chesko Brian Hronchek Ted Light Doug Mousseau Brent Robbins Emil Tchilian.
Team 5 Aerodynamics PDR Presented By: Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer.
G.O.D.I.S Complex: “Gaurdian of Defense, Intelligence & Surveillance” Project Advisor: Dr. James Lang Team Leader: Dan Dalton Chief Engineer: Eugene Mahmoud.
Group 13 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Stephen McNulty Richard-Marc Hernandez Jessica Pisano Yoosuk Kee Chi Yan Project Advisor: Siva Thangam.
UAV UF 118 Night Falcon ONE OF THE ULTIMATE DEFENSE SYSTEMS FROM SURVAILLANCE TO TAKING OUT ANYTHING THAT MOVES.
MAE 4261: AIR-BREATHING ENGINES
Overview of Chapter 6 Douglas S. Cairns Lysle A. Wood Distinguished Professor.
AE 1350 Lecture Notes #9.
PROPRIETARY James Bearman AJ Brinker Dean Bryson Brian Gershkoff Kuo Guo Joseph Henrich Aaron Smith Daedalus Aviation Conceptual Design Review: “The Daedalus.
Ultralight Vehicles Jenna Owen University of Texas at Austin Chemical Engineering ElectroPhen, 2008.
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
Project Specifications and Scope. Presentation Outline Team Introduction Project Overview Competition Specifications Mission Profile Score Analysis Subsystem.
Team 5 Critical Design Review Trent Lobdell Ross May Maria Mullins Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer James Roesch Charles Stangle Nick White.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Chase Beatty.
Recent and Future Research for Bird-like Flapping MAVs of NPU Prof. B.F.Song Aeronautics School of Northwestern Polytechnical University.
Team 6: “Soldier Portable UAV” David Neira TJ Worden Matthew Martin Joshua Mellen Ona Okonkwo Josiah Shearon A IR HERCULES 1.
Twice as fast as Concorde: The supersonic jet that will fly from London to New York in TWO HOURS. Plans for the 20-seat craft were unveiled at the Paris.
Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006
Wind Turbine Blade Design
Mensa XE (Extra Efficiency) High Efficiency Family Airplane
HALE UAV Preliminary Design AERSP 402B Spring 2014 Team: NSFW Nisherag GandhiThomas Gempp Doug RohrbaughGregory Snyder Steve StanekVictor Thomas SAURON.
By: Sam Stromswold  I find this topic interesting because…  I think you will find this topic interesting because…
Design Chapter 8 First Half. Design Requirements and Specifications Payload Range Cruising Speed Takeoff & Landing Distance Ceiling.
Group 13 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Richard-Marc Hernandez Yoosuk Kee Stephen McNulty Jessica Pisano Chi Yan Project Advisor: Siva Thangam.
1. Mission Statement Design Requirements Aircraft Concept Selection Advanced Technologies / Concepts Engine / Propulsion Modeling Constraint Analysis.
1 Lecture 4: Aerodynamics Eric Loth For AE 440 A/C Lecture Sept 2009.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design First Flight Boiler Xpress November 21, 2000
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS PDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 18, 2003.
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review October 3, 2000 German National Holiday Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis Chris.
Introduction to Aerospace – Historical Perspective Dr. Doug Cairns.
AE 2350 Lecture Notes #9 May 10, 1999 We have looked at.. Airfoil aerodynamics (Chapter 8) Sources of Drag (Chapter 8, 11 and 12) –Look at the figures.
ME 440 Aerospace Engineering Fundamentals Hot Topic of the Week.
1 Advanced Regional Jet Darin L. Van Pelt AA 241A,B 16 March 2006.
Brian Acker Lance Henricks Matthew Kayser Kevin Lobo Robert Paladino Ruan Trouw Dennis Wilde.
비행체 구조설계 Aircraft Structural Design
Aerodynamic Design of a Light Aircraft
12/11/12 Brandon Campbell & Ernesto Chairez. Purpose  Civil Transport  Large Volume  Efficient  Quiet  Long Range.
Yaqoub Almounes John Cowan Josh Gomez Michael Medulla Mohammad Qasem
Key Performance Characteristics
AAE 251 Vehicle of the Week: Boeing 787 Dreamliner
Preliminary Wing Sizing
PROPULSION PDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
Matching of Propulsion Systems for an Aircraft
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 27, 2006
Team 5 Aerodynamics PDR #2
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 19, 2006
Extreme Altitude Mountain Rescue Vehicle
Presentation transcript:

AIAA Hybrid Airliner Competition 2013 The Transporters

The Team Project Lead: Josh Boyer Aerodynamics: Austin Conrad Tyler Carroll Colin Gibson Propulsion: Stephanie Wegener Leah Jackson Josh Boyer Structures: Bryan Brown Tyler Davidson Lance Mort Systems: Max Di Lonardo Colin Gibson Tyler Carroll CAD: Tyler Davidson

Propulsion Engine : PW1521G High bypass turbo fan providing 17,000 lbs of thrust each. Hybrid Modifications : Electric motor integrated into the input shaft of the turbofan which is powered by batteries The purpose of the battery powered electric engines is to decrease the amount of fuel used while at cruising speeds. Our goal was to maintain a high level of efficiency throughout all stages of flight. Range for this aircraft is 1350nm and the endurance is 7.25hrs.

Hybrid System The hybrid system contributes 3,293 lbs of thrust continuously. This equates to about 10% of overall thrust available when engines are at WOT. The electric motor is built into the output shaft of the gearbox. This placement keeps the motor clear of the bypass air, saves space, and keeps the drive structure contained and rotationally balanced. Two clutches are included on the shaft: one to disconnect the turbine, and the other to transfer power from the electric motor. Based on the batteries specifications, 10 batteries were selected to be used for flight and one additional battery for the electrical systems on board.

AIRFOIL SELECTION AirfoilCDo NACA 63(4) NACA 64(2) E NACA 63(3) FX63137SM0.007 NACA pmc Roncz Low Drag Airfoil

DRAG Cruise Mach0.69 Cruise Alt. (ft)35,000 V stall (ft/s)513 M stall0.52 Best Range Mach0.69 Total Thrust (lb)8,032 Minimum Drag (lb)4,495 Cruise Drag (lb)6,864

PLANFORM SIZING & HIGH LIFT DEVICES Aircraft Properites Weight/Lift Req. (lb)70,600 Wing Chord (ft)10 Wing Span (ft)100 Wing Area (ft 2 )1000 Aspect Ratio10 Span Efficiency Factor0.707 Sweep (Rad)0.349 Sweep (Deg)20 Dihedral (Deg)6 Taper Ratio0.2 Wing Loading (lb/ft 2 )70.6 Cl max W/ flap W/ flap and slot

SYSTEMS OVERVIEW

COCKPIT Fly-by-wire Large Touchscreens Contain multiple information panels Customizable Heads-up Display Electric Powered Lighting Deicing Environmental Controls

Weight by Comparison Based on other aircraft with similar missions we can plot a graph of weight verses passengers, which is our payload. From this we can get an estimated empty weight of about 45,000 lbs. This is weight without engines. Using the spreadsheet given to us by Dr. Jacob we calculated an Empty weight of 42,000 with engines. The aircraft we benchmarked are made with a large percentage of aluminum, but like the Boeing 787, we designed our aircraft to have a much greater percentage of composite material which will cut down on weight. We expect that with the advancement of composites and other materials, by the year 2030 we will be able to reduce this weight by 20%.

Tube and Wing Design Efficiency Semi-Monocoque Fuselage Shell Absorbs Partial External Loads Tapering Spar and Rib Wing Structure Full Fuel Storage in Wings Allows for Battery Placement STRUCTURES

Additive Manufacturing Additive manufacturing is the official name for 3-d printing. The process eliminates wasted material, is faster than machining some parts, and is extremely cost effective. Because of the lack of wasted material, less man hours, and 24 hour work times, additive manufacturing can save huge amounts of money. In some calculations the savings were around 90%!

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Hybrid Non-hybrid (Battery Energy)-33%±0%33% Fuel Weight (lb) Density (lb/gal)6.76 Volume (gal) Price ($/gal)5555 Cost ($)$7,461.48$7,596.83$7,727.99$7, Battery Energy Provided by an Equivalent Hybrid System Energy (kWh) Quantity10 Price ($/kWh)0.05 Cost ($)$40.42$61.24$81.44 Total Savings$24.61$139.14$ Purchase Price Cost (Weight Eqn.)$40.5M Cost (Spreadsheet)*$47.9M *Based on the sale of 250 units

CAD

Questions?