AAC&U/ Minnesota Collaborative Pilot (MCP) Project: Artifacts and Assessment Aug. 19, 2014 Professional Development Day 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multi-State Collaborative to Advance Learning Outcome Assessment Pilot Project and PCC.
Advertisements

Pilot Study Introduction and Overview 1.  Julie Carnahan Senior Associate - SHEEO MSC Project Director  Terrel Rhodes Vice President.
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Multi-State Collaborative 1.  Susan Albertine Vice President, Office of Diversity, Equity, and Student Success, AAC&U Faculty Engagement Subgroup, MSC.
Working with Rubrics: Using the Oral Communication, Writing, and Critical Thinking Rubrics VALUE Rubrics Ashley Finley, Ph.D Senior Director of Assessment.
NSE Assessment (Session 2): The Final Story Project
The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Crowd-Sourcing Innovative Practices: Assessing Integrative Learning at Large Research Institutions.
Assessment Consultant to THECB’s Undergraduate Education Advisory Committee (UEAC): Danita McAnally, Chief of Planning and Advancement.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Structuring and Scaling Up Embedded Assessment of General Education Outcomes at St. Louis Community College Thomas M. Dieckmann, English Faculty Joyce.
Multi-State Collaborative 1.  Ashley Finley ◦ Senior Director of Assessment and Research – AAC&U  Bonnie Orcutt ◦ Director of Learning.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
Writing Across the Curriculum Pilot Project – DABCC Susan Wood.
On Scoring Guides everything you were afraid to ask PART TWO.
Promoting Student Engagement: Involving Students with NSSE Planning and Results William Woods University NSSE Users’ Workshop October 6-7, 2005.
EPortfolio Assessment Pilot. Agenda Purpose of the ePortfolio assessment pilot CSD use of ePortfolio English department use of ePortfolio Future applications.
NSE Assessment (Session 1): The Academic Plan Assignment for MEP
Frequently asked questions about development, interpretation and use of rubrics on campuses 1.
University Of North Alabama General Education Assessment Paradigm Shift: A plan for Revising General Education Assessment at UNA.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Assessment Leader Training General Education Student Learning Assessment GEO Training Series: 2 of 5 Spring 2012 February 13, 2012.
T HE R OLE OF C ALIBRATION IN A DVANCING F ACULTY L EARNING A BOUT S TUDENT L EARNING Terry Rhodes & Ashley Finley AAC&U Institute on Integrative Learning.
Helping Your Department Advance and Implement Effective Assessment Plans Presented by: Karen Froslid Jones Director, Institutional Research.
California State University East Bay
Everything you wanted to know about Assessment… Dr. Joanne Coté-Bonanno Barbara Ritola September 2009 but were afraid to ask!
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.
Drake Curriculum Analysis Committee Update December 2012.
The Role of the NCATE Coordinator Kate M. Steffens St. Cloud State University NCATE Institutional Orientation September, 2002.
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
School of Education California Baptist University Overview of Assessment Project.
Fall 2015 Professional Development Days C. Cruz-Johnson & R. Gamez August 28, Walking with Integrity Towards Student Success.
NSE Assessment Overview: Your Role in Outcomes-Based Assessment What Will We Learn About Our Students?
Competency Assessment Advisory Team (CAAT) QUANTITATIVE REASONING DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS REP – ROB NICHOLS 1.
VALUE/Multi-State Collaborative (MSC) to Advance Learning Outcomes Assessment Pilot Year Study Findings and Summary These slides summarize results from.
AASCU Academic Affairs Summer Meeting Portland Oregon ▪ July 28-31, 2011 Christine M Keller VSA Executive Director.
Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.
Texas Tech University PROGRAM-LEVEL ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP WRAP-UP SESSION FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 11,
Faculty Driven Assessment Karla Guilford Shipp Tidewater Community College Virginia Beach, VA.
Assessment Committee. Communicate what we Think about Assessment. Learn to Integrate assessment into our teaching practice and Act on it toward continuous.
Where do LEP & Program Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Align? Assessment Academy Project: Phase 1 Mr. Scott Crowell Dr. Betsy Desy Ms. Pam Gladis Mr.
Unit Meeting Feb. 15, ◦ Appreciative Inquiry Process-BOT Steering Committee and Committee Structure. ◦ Four strategies identified from AIP: Each.
AAC&U VALUE Project: Minnesota Collaborative Demonstration Year 2 ( ) Demonstration Year 3 ( ) 1.
& YOUR PROGRAM How to Get Started Thinking About it All…
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U.
Assessment of Industrial Internships Karyn Biasca.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
Taking Institutional Level Assessment to the Course Level Journey – Challenges – Discoveries Mesa Community College DIVING INTO DEEPER LEARNING.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Orientation Meeting Humanities Distribution- Cycle B Fall 2012.
MUS Outcomes Assessment Workshop University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment at The University of Montana Beverly Ann Chin Chair, Writing Committee.
+ Montgomery College Program Assessment Orientation Spring 2013.
CIAS Program Level Assessment Office of Educational Effectiveness Assessment September 6, 2016.
Outcomes Assessment Committee
Beyond the “A” Word Assessment that Empowers Faculty to
2017 Multi-State Collaborative (MSC) to Advance Student Learning
General Education Assessment
Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment
The Pain and Promise of CRITICAL CORE Implementation
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
AY College-Wide Learning Outcomes Results
General Studies ePortfolio Pilot
Jillian Kinzie, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research
General Education Redesign Task Force
Assessment Spring 2016.
Curriculum Coordinator: Pamela Quinn Date of Presentation: 1/19/18
General Studies ePortfolio Pilot
Presentation transcript:

AAC&U/ Minnesota Collaborative Pilot (MCP) Project: Artifacts and Assessment Aug. 19, 2014 Professional Development Day 1

2

Talk Overview This talk about SMSU’s role in the AAC&U initiative titled the Minnesota Collaborative Pilot (MCP) will: 1.describe the project’s history & its goal; 2.explain what artifacts are being requested & how they will be used; 3.explain how this project benefits SMSU faculty & the campus community; 4.explain how SMSU faculty can play a major role in the pilot project’s success; 5.present and discuss the project’s timeline. Aug. 19, 2014 Professional Development Day 3

Project History & Key Players 4 Multi-State Collaborative (MSC) Project 9 states: CT, IN,KY,MA,MO,MN,OR,RI,&UT 67 colleges, community colleges, & universities

Minnesota Collaborative Project (MCP) Aug. 19, 2014 Professional Development Day 5 10 Participating schools: SMSU St. Cloud State North Hennepin C.C. Minneapolis Com. & Tech. C. U-M Morris Augsburg Gustavus Adolphus Hamline St. Olaf St. Scholastica

MSC & MCP Goals Gather student artifacts (papers & tests) from participating campuses that demonstrate evidence of learning related to AAC&U VALUE rubrics This year’s focus will be on these AAC&U student learning outcomes: – written communication, – critical thinking, & – quantitative reasoning Aug. 19, 2014 Professional Development Day 6

Artifacts Being Requested A random sample of 100 artifacts for each of the three student learning outcomes for a total of 300 artifacts Students must be enrolled in a Bachelor degree program Students must have completed a minimum of 75% total credits to be graduated as of the end of the 2014 spring semester (i.e., juniors and seniors) Artifacts must be from the fall 2014 semester. Aug. 19, 2014 Professional Development Day 7

How Artifacts Will Be Used Identifying information will be removed Artifacts will be rated by raters selected from participating institutions Individuals and individual schools WILL NOT be identified in public reports of data Data will ONLY be reported in aggregate Individual institutional data will be returned to the campus IF the campus asks for it Individual institutional data WILL NOT be retained at the state or multi-state level Aug. 19, 2014 Professional Development Day 8

Project Benefits for Faculty 1.Have a say in the national conversation about assessing student work 2.Learn more about direct assessment of student work using VALUE rubrics 3.Learn more about the ways VALUE rubrics reinforce our LEP learning outcomes 4.Re-use student work collected for our own campus-wide assessment of LEP outcomes and/or for program review 5.Demonstrates to HLC reviewers SMSU faculty commitment to high-quality, sustainable assessment of student learning, particularly of LEP Aug. 19, 2014 Professional Development Day 9

Project Benefits for Campus 1.Publicly affirms our commitment to improve the quality of student learning 2.Helps elevate the importance of the work our students regularly produce on our campus 3.If we request that our data be returned, we can use that data to look for trends that can be useful for all kinds of planning including curricular and programmatic (e.g., program reviews) Aug. 19, 2014 Professional Development Day 10

Roles for Faculty 1.Provide feedback : EVERYONE will do that today 2.Volunteer to be 1 of 30 faculty to provide an assignment sheet (or test) & 10 artifacts for 1 of the following areas: 1.Written Communication 2.Critical Thinking 3.Quantitative reasoning 3.Apply to be a faculty rater 4.Apply to be project coordinator for next year (focus: information literacy, ethical reasoning, and intercultural competence) 5.EVERYONE (even if you are opting out) should complete and TURN IN the faculty interest form at the end of today’s session Aug. 19, 2014 Professional Development Day 11

Project Timeline Highlights Today: Receive faculty feedback on sampling plan August-September Project briefings with IRB, LEP, & CIA committees Get 30 Faculty Volunteers Submit sampling plan to MCP & revise, if necessary Late September-Mid October Generate random sample and contact faculty volunteers Put out calls for raters & next project coordinator Late October-November CIA reviews rater & coordinator applications; coordinator notifies candidates Collection of artifacts begins DECEMBER 1: ALL ARTIFACTS DUE December 1-14: Coordinator uploads artifacts Aug. 19, 2014 Professional Development Day 12

Questions & Group Activity 1.Participate in Q & A 2.Form a team of 8 to 10 3.Select a team leader 4.Team leaders: ask your group for feedback on the sampling protocol AND record that feedback 5.Team leaders: ask faculty to complete the faculty interest form 6.Team: turn in your work and go to break Aug. 19, 2014 Professional Development Day 13