11 Reporting Outcomes Results and Improvements II Produced by Non-Instructional Subcommittee of Assessment Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 23, Todays Outcomes By the end of todays workshop, participants will be able to... Revise and/or finalize SAOs within their areas Discover.
Advertisements

Introduction to Assessment – Support Services Andrea Brown Director of Program Assessment and Institutional Research Dr. Debra Bryant Accreditation Liaison.
Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
2025 Planning Contacts Meeting November 8, 2012 K-State 2025.
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
Campus Improvement Plans
October 2, 2013 PaRC E. Kuo M. Casey. Propose a new structure for the Student Equity Committee Provide rationale for recommendation Open to feedback,
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
The Pathway to Success Goal IV Strengthen and Leverage Programs of Strength and Promise.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.
Office of Institutional Assessment and Effectiveness Workshop SUNY Oneonta Version 2, February 2014.
2012 West Texas Assessment Conference CREATING A CULTURE OF ASSESSMENT IN NON-INSTRUCTIONAL AREAS KARA LARKAN-SKINNER, DIRECTOR OF IR AND IE & KRISTIN.
1 Writing Outcomes Produced by Non-Instructional Subcommittee of Assessment Committee.
Assessment Workshop SUNY Oneonta May 23, Patty Francis Associate Provost for Institutional Assessment & Effectiveness.
11 Reporting Outcomes Results and Improvements Produced by Non-Instructional Subcommittee of Assessment Committee.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Academic Assessment at UTB Steve Wilson Director of Academic Assessment.
Updated Performance Management for Exempt Staff Fall 2009.
Educational Master Plan
Negotiations Committee Special Meeting Annual Report Ratification.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
College Planning Council 8 June Accreditation Standard 1 Standard 1: The institution demonstrates strong commitment to a mission that emphasizes.
Surviving Reaffirmation: Two TSTC Approaches to Compliance & the QEP Texas Association for Institutional.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
KATIE TOWNSEND-MERINO, PALOMAR COLLEGE KEVIN BONTENBAL, CUESTA COLLEGE JOHN NIXON, ACCJC ASCCC ACCREDITATION INSTITUTE, 2012 Implementing Improvement Plans.
Learning and Teaching Forum Higher Education Review - Update 31 May, 2016Gwendolen Bradshaw1.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
1 Development of STRATEGIC PLAN through DEVELOPMENT STEPS.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
Strategic Planning System Sacramento City College Strategic Planning System ….a comprehensive system designed to form a reliable, understood system for.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office.
Planning 101 Overview of integrated planning at SCC
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
STRATEGIC PLAN DEVELOPING ACTION PLANS April
School Development Implementation and Monitoring “Building a Learning Community”
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Preparing the Annual Assessment Reports: Guidelines and Suggestions T. Gilmour Reeve Director of Strategic Planning.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Strategic Planning: Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Strategic Planning Committee Open Forum.
1 District Office Administrative Services Unit Review (ASUR) and Annual Operational Planning November 7, 2013 Presented by Dr. George Railey Vice Chancellor.
Classified Leadership Institute 2016 Hope Ell Theresa Rees Misty Burruel Sherrie Guerrero ACCREDITATION, PROGRAM REVIEW, AND THE CLASSIFIED PROFESSIONAL.
Kennedy-King College’s Assessment Academy Project Report
General Education Assessment
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
COLLEGE OF ALAMEDA: INTEGRATED PLANNING & BUDGET MODEL
College of Alameda Integrated Planning and Budgeting Process
Promotion/Tenure Portfolio
Sam Houston State University
Associate Provost for Graduate and Professional Studies
Grantee Guide to Project Performance Measurement
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Sam Houston State University
Faculty Senate President’s Report
Accreditation follow-up report
Module 3 Part 2 Developing and Implementing a QI Plan: Planning and Execution Adapted from: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Quality.
Writing Non-Instructional Outcomes
COLLEGE OF ALAMEDA: INTEGRATED PLANNING & BUDGET MODEL
Presentation transcript:

11 Reporting Outcomes Results and Improvements II Produced by Non-Instructional Subcommittee of Assessment Committee

22 Principles of Assessment Principles of Assessment The intent of assessment at Amarillo College is to improve “the educational, cultural and community services” as identified in the Amarillo College mission. Outcomes assessments focus on achieving continuous improvement in educational programs and administrative and educational support services rather than identifying these programs’ success or failure.

33 Principles of Assessment (continued) Outcomes assessment of student learning, educational support and administrative support will be a collaborative process involving, faculty, classified staff, administration, and, whenever appropriate, students. Outcomes assessments results will not be used for evaluation of faculty, administrative, or classified staff. Results will be used to evaluate and improve the institution.

44 Principles of Assessment (continued) Whenever possible, the methodologies for assessing outcomes will be inconspicuous to students or others who are being assessed Whenever possible, submissions used for assessment will come from existing assignments instead of ones specially created for outcomes assessment. What we assess will be what we already do.

55 Principles of Assessment (continued) The assessment process itself will be evaluated. Amarillo College’s strategic plan includes evaluating student success by establishing and assessing an institutional outcomes assessment program. The President’s Cabinet supports these outcomes assessment efforts.

66 PET FORMS PET form AC Website ( Scroll to bottom of screen AC Forms & Policies Planning & Evaluation Tracking (PET) Form

77 ResultsResults

88 Results Column ANNUALLY: –Report the Results for each objective of each goal (outcomes, outputs, processes or inputs) –Reported results will be data for quantitative objectives –Reported results will be summary narrative for qualitative objectives

99 Results Column All items in the results column need to include: Same number as the goal # and the outcome # Timeline or deadline when the results were compiled If quantitative =  Total number in the population  Number that accomplished the outcome  Percentage (if relevant to the outcome) (See Sample PET forms) If qualitative =  Brief summary of the result

10 Use of Results

11 Use of Results Column All items in the use of results column include: Same number as the goal # and the outcome (Report the Use of Results for each objective - outcomes, outputs, processes or inputs) Timeline or deadline when the results were compiled

12 Use of Results Column Critical information in this column : a brief summary of the analysis in the Use of Results column before identifying the revisions and/or improvements recommended or made revisions and/or improvements recommended or made as a result of analysis (Couple of sentences describing how the department will make improvements based on the data.) plan of action for making the revisions/improvements (Answer: What will be done next? What will it take to make these revisions/improvements?)

13

14 AssignmentAssignment Recommendation: All employees in the department/office should work together to update the finalized PET form.

15 DEADLINEDEADLINE President’s Cabinet Members will submit all finalized PET forms electronically to: Brandy Hayes in the Office of Assessment & Development Deadline for submission: NOVEMBER 1, 2007