Acrylamide in Food Workshop Contaminants and Natural Toxicants Subcommittee FDA Food Advisory Committee College Park, MD December 4, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OECD GLOBAL SCIENCE FORUM SCIENTIFIC ADVICE FOR POLICYMAKING AND CONSEQUENCES FOR THE ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITY OF SCIENTISTS PRELIMINARY FINDINGS Tateo.
Advertisements

Thailand National Focal Point for IFCS Chemical Safety Section Food and Drug Administration Ministry of Public Health July 2003.
Sociedade Portuguesa de Inovação ChinaFrontier: China’s Realities from a Frontier Research Perspective Overall Objectives of the Project and a Summary.
Canada/Australia Issues being faced in the regulation of nano-materials Deborah Willcocks – Department of Health and Ageing, Government of Australia Anne-Marie.
Academia Work to date October 15, What concrete engagement? o For good research engagement: clear focus needed. o Identify overlap and synergy,
NATIONAL CAPACITY BUILDING FORTHE DEVELOPMENT OF A NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY FOR THE GLOBALLY HARMONISED SYSTEM OF CLASSIFICATION AND LABELLING.
Lessons Learned in Initiating and Conducting Risk Assessments within a Risk Analysis Framework: A FDA/CFSAN Approach Robert Buchanan DHHS Food and Drug.
Major Components of FDA’s Action Plan for Acrylamide Richard Canady, PhD DABT US Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.
PPA 503 – The Public Policy Making Process
Evolution of ICCVAM ◊National Toxicology Program Develop and validate improved test methods ◊NIH Revitalization Act: P.L Develop and.
Runway Safety Teams (RSTs) Description and Processes Session 5 Presentation 1.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.
1 OECD Work on the Safety of Manufactured Nanomaterials Environment, Health and Safety Division Environment Directorate OECD.
ILSI Risk Science Institute Acrylamide Toxicity: Research to Address Key Data Gaps Presented by Dr. Stephen S. Olin ILSI Risk Science Institute.
Communication strategy and techniques to launch InnovMed Dr. Fatma H. Sayed Vienna meeting 25 June 2007.
13/09/2015 RESOLUTION GSC-8/4: Facilitating Liaison in Relation to Measurement Methodologies for Assessing Human Exposure to RF Energy ETSI TC Safety Working.
Terezia Sinkova EFSA The new EU Food Safety Agency.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The NGGDPP's Best Practices in Data Preservation Project Brian Buczkowski U.S. Geological Survey.
European Public Health Alliance: the voice of public health in Europe Brussels, 19 February 2009 Jessica Imbert.
Participatory research to enhance climate change policy and institutions in the Caribbean: ARIA toolkit pilot 27 th meeting of the CANARI Partnership January.
1 FAO/WHO Seminar on Acrylamide in Food, Arusha, 16 March 2003 EU Commission Perspective on Acrylamide in Food Dr Martin Slayne European Commission Directorate.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.
Ensuring Food Safety in Europe through Scientific Cooperation and Networking The Role of EFSA Carola Sondermann EFSA Polish Focal Point – Annual Experts.
Working together with EFSA in making Europe’s food safe Warszawa, 16. April 2013 Cooperation between EFSA and Member States Jacek Postupolski National.
ISO Sampling Agreement Requirements and National Sampling Plan Guy F. Delius CSO FDA Tim McGrath Acting Deputy Director ORS-FDA March 10, :15-1:45.
Formation of Acrylamide in Food
U.S. Action Plan for Acrylamide Activities and Progress Terry Troxell, Ph.D.and Lauren Posnick, Sc.D., U.S. FDA March 16, 2003 FAO/WHO Seminar on Acrylamide.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 John Vandenberg Associate Director for Health National Center for Environmental Assessment.
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Statistics Related to Food Safety and Quality Food and Nutrition Division. FAO.
Presenter’s Name June 17, Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting.
Implications of the Current State of Scientific Knowledge David W K Acheson, M.D. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Major Components of FDA’s Action Plan for Acrylamide Richard Canady, PhD DABT US Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.
Module 3 Risk Analysis and its Components. Risk Analysis ● WTO SPS agreement puts emphasis on sound science ● Risk analysis = integrated mechanism to.
BCO Impact Assessment Component 3 Scoping Study David Souter.
Strategy and Policy Cohesion: “The One Health Agenda: will it deliver” Elizabeth J. Phillips, MD, FRCPC,FRACP, FACTM Professor & Director, Centre for Clinical.
Characterizing evidence in EMF risk assessment, Berlin, 4-5 May 2006 The WHO International EMF Project Dr E. van Deventer Radiation and Environmental Health.
Increasing Momentum in the Formation of State and Regional Monitoring Councils Linda Green, co-chair, Collaboration and Outreach Workgroup, National Water.
Framing the Issue: FDA Perspective Product Tracing Sherri A. McGarry Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Food and Drug Administration.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 4.2 JOINT FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE MODULE FOUR – SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR CODEX WORK 4.2 Requesting, accessing.
1 ASTRONET Coordinating strategic planning for European Astronomy.
Community Resources Assessment Training 4-1. Community Resources Assessment Training 4-2.
Idaho Energy Plan Proposal (RFI) Energy Policy Institute (EPI)
Action Plan Skills Building: Introduction January 2013.
Faisal Naru Head of Better Regulation DAI Europe Ltd November 2007 Washington London Johannesburg Ramallah RIA – An Art and not a Science.
Slide: 1 CEOS SIT Technical Workshop |Caltech, Pasadena, California, USA| September 2013 CEOS Work Plan Section 6.1 G Dyke CEOS ad hoc Working Group.
1 Bringing Global Thinking to Local Sustainability Efforts: A Collaborative Project for the Boston Region James Goldstein Tellus Institute.
Data Acquisition to Anticipate Foodborne Hazards National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection Sean Altekruse DVM, PhD November 16, 2004.
1 Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program Environmental Summit May 20, 2008 Jim Alwood Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
CITEL – San Salvador | 16 April | Electromagnetic Fields: A WHO Perspective Dr E. van Deventer.
John N. Lavis, MD, PhD Professor and Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer and Exchange McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making McMaster.
HERA Second European Stakeholder Workshop July Human & Environmental Risk Assessment An A.I.S.E and CEFIC initiative on targeted risk assessment.
1 Future Strategies to Address PPCPs Octavia Conerly Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Water Office of Water October 26, 2005 October 26,
Puget Sound Partnership Action Agenda: Roadmap to Completion.
1 PRIORITY MEDICINES FOR EUROPE AND THE WORLD Barriers to Pharmaceutical Innovation Richard Laing EDM/PAR WHO.
Subcommittee on Hydrology, ACWI New Extreme Storm Work Group Status and Plans.
Tools for Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction: Guidance Notes for Development Organisations Charlotte Benson and John Twigg Presented by Margaret Arnold.
Health and Food Safety EU strategy for Pharmaceuticals in the Environment Patrizia Tosetti DG SANTE European Commission China/EU Pharmaceutical Industry.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
November | 1 CONTINUING CARE COUNCIL Report to Forum Year
Thematic priorities Life sciences, genomics and biotechnology for health Nanotechnology Aeronautics Food quality and safety Sustainable development, global.
ITC-ILO/ACTRAV Course A Trade Union Training on Occupational Safety, Health & HIV/AIDS (26/11 – 07/12/2012, Turin) Introduction to National Occupational.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
BALTIC SEA NETWORK - ESF
CHEMICAL ACCIDENTS Programme
Strategy and Policy Cohesion: “The One Health Agenda: will it deliver”
Wyoming Mining Association
Presentation transcript:

Acrylamide in Food Workshop Contaminants and Natural Toxicants Subcommittee FDA Food Advisory Committee College Park, MD December 4, 2002

Background l Ad hoc Acrylamide Working group composed for food industry, trade associations, academic and government representatives l Began discussions shortly after Swedish release in April l Workshop, concentrating on science, was needed to openly discuss issues.

Acrylamide in Food Workshop Title: Acrylamide in Food: Scientific Issues, Uncertainties, and Research Strategies Dates: October 28-30, 2002 Location: O’Hare Ramada Plaza Hotel, Chicago

Acrylamide in Food Workshop Focus: Science – knowledge gaps and research priorities Target audience: Food industry Academia Regulatory agencies (domestic and international)

Goals/Objectives l To develop conclusions on how efforts of industry, government, and academia can be coordinated to effectively use available resources to address the scientific issues raised by the reports of acrylamide in foods, including the final report of the WHO/FAO Consultation.

Goals/Objectives l Identify data gaps in scientific knowledge – to reflect an international perspective, to the extent possible l Identify research needs l Identify a select number of high-priority research needs to be included in a coordinated research agenda l Workshop Planning Committee to identify list of short-term action items.

Participants l 170 present out of 171 acceptances l About 25 from outside the U.S. including l Laurance Castle, CSL, UK l Bryan Hanley, Leatherhead Food RA, UK l Karl-Erik Hellenas, Swedish Natl. FA l Hans Lingnert, SIK, Sweden l Manfred Leutzow, FAO, Rome l Dennis Marroni, SNF-Floeger, France

Participants l Donald Mottram, Univ. of Reading, UK l Mayumi Onishi-Kameyama, NFRI, Japan l Nadia Slimani, IARC/WHO, France l Margareta Tornqvist, Stockholm Univ. l Richard Stadler, Nestle Res. Ctr, Switzerland l Peter Varelis, CSIRO, Sydney l Carolyn Vickers, WHO, Geneva l Mitsuni Ito Yoshida, NFRI, Japan l Adam Becalski, Health Canada

Working Groups 1. Mechanisms of formation of acrylamide in food 2. Analytical methods 3. Exposure and biomarkers 4. Toxicology and metabolic consequences 5. Risk communication

Questions Addressed by Each Working Group 1. What are the primary areas concerning the occurrence of acryamide in food in which research is needed? 2. Are methods currently available to accomplish this research? 3. What is the time frame for getting results for the research identified?

Questions Addressed by Each Working Group 4. What missing information is needed to enable the proposed research to be initiated or accomplished? 5. What questions will be answered by each research area proposed? 6. Rank the research areas/projects identified in order of priority for accomplishment?

Questions Addressed by Each Working Group 7. Where is your Working Group linked to others, i.e., from what other Working Groups do you need assistance?

Workshop “Proceedings” The proceedings of the workshop are posted on the JIFSAN website ( and include an introduction, the workshop opening overview, the “strawman” position paper – summary of discussions - conclusions from each Working Group, the priority research needs identified, a listing of short-term items, and a listing of participants.

Short-term Action Items – Priority areas and projects: l Analytical Methods l Establish proficiency testing program and materials. l Toxicology l Develop data on the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion of acrylamide l Develop and conduct studies on DNAprotein glycidamide and acrylamide adducts to determine metabolic consequences of acrylamide.

Short-term Action Items – Priority areas and projects: l Methods of Formation l Develop data for various foods on quantity of free aspargine for various foods and data on the quantity of glucose, fructose (and other sugars) and other amino acids. l Develop data on time/temperature/ph/moisture/surface area- mass mapping and the kinetics of asparagine/carbonyls reactions in various matrices

Short-term Action Items – Priority areas and projects: l Methods of Formation l Define the direct relation of asparagine to acrylamide production in foods. l Develop data on the kinetics of acrylamide inhibition/destruction/scavenging under various reaction/process conditions.

Short-term Action Items – Priority areas and projects: l Exposure l Expand the database of acrylamide levels in U.S. foods through collection of additional data and establish mechanisms for information sharing, such as the WHO/FAO Acrylamide in Food Network operated by JIFSAN through its Food Safety Risk Analysis Clearinghouse. l Develop and conduct appropriate animal and/or human studies on the bioavailability of acrylamide in foods.

Short-term Action Items – Priority areas and projects: l Risk Communication l Conduct qualitative attitudinal research on consumer awareness and knowledge of acrylamide in food. Triggers for behavioral change may be identified for acrylamide and other potential health hazards. l Formally document the unique process used to develop and accomplish the Acrylamide in Food Workshop.

Short-term Action Items – Priority areas and projects: l Risk Communication l Establish an information clearing house and evidence review process with full participation by a broad group of stakeholders. The WHO/FAO Acrylamide in Food Network provides the starting foundation for this.

Acrylamide Infonet (WHO/FAO Acrylamide in Food Network) l Operated by JIFSAN ( l The objectives are: l Phase 1 – to function as a global resource & inventory of ongoing research, surveillance & monitoring, industry investigations, etc. l Serve as a discussion forum and network for active researchers/others in the field in order to identify gaps and overlaps in research & information, and make suggestions for how these could be addressed

Acrylamide – EC Meeting In Europe, the EC organized a stakeholder meeting on October for similar purposes to the JIFSAN/NCFST workshop in the U.S. The SCF and WHO/JECFA will be leading the work on toxicology and bioavailability, risk characterization and communication; the CIAA will coordinate the industry input and be their link with the Commission and with international organizations.

Acrylamide – EC Meeting Cooperative Activity Key IssueUSAEurope AnalysisNFPACIAA, Nat. author./ assocns (Nat. a/a) FormationIIT, NCFSCIAA, Nat. a/a Exposure/ CIAA, Nat. a/a, BioavailabilityGMAILSI (Europe) ToxicologyILSI (NA)ILSI (Europe) Risk Commun.IFICEUFIC