Six Sigma Green Belt Project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISO 9001:2000 Certified Next Steps? Where do we go from here?
Advertisements

Statistical Process Control Used to determine whether the output of a process conforms to product or service specifications. We use control charts to detect.
Global Supplier Quality Manual PPAP Requirements
Variation Management of Key Characteristics
Six Sigma Quality Engineering
Chapter 10 Quality Control McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Quality Management System
Statistical Process Control
Roberto lopez LSSMBB DMAIC project template.
Statistically-Based Quality Improvement
Chapter 11 Quality Control.
Paul Prunty The 7 Basic Quality Tools ~ The DMAIC Process Continuous Improvement and … To a hammer, everything’s a nail … How many tools do you have in.
Module 13: Gage R&R Analysis – Analysis of Repeatability and Reproducibility This is a technique to measure the precision of gages and other measurement.
The Quality Improvement Model
Measurement System Analysis Kevin B. Craner Boise State University October 6, 2003.
Premium Reduction & Delivery Improvement
Chapter 10 Quality Control McGraw-Hill/Irwin
1. 1. Product Control: to prove a particular gage is capable of distinguishing good parts from bad parts and can do so accurately every time. ◦ Ideal.
DataLyzer® Spectrum Gage Management System introduces……
Quality Control Prof. R. S. Rengasamy Department of Textile Technolgoy
© 2007 Pearson Education Managing Quality Integrating the Supply Chain S. Thomas Foster Chapter 12 Statistically-Based Quality Improvement for Variables.
10-1Quality Control William J. Stevenson Operations Management 8 th edition.
Quality Control McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Means Tests Hypothesis Testing Assumptions Testing (Normality)
 Did your project reduce variation or shift the mean?  How do you demonstrate improvements statistically? VIII-47.
SIX-SIGMA QUALITY Chapter Understand total quality management. 2. Describe how quality is measured and be aware of the different dimensions of quality.
Statistical Process Control Chapters A B C D E F G H.
© Open Source Six Sigma, LLCOSSS LSS Green Belt v Analyze Phase 1 Paired t-test Exercise Exercise objective: Utilize what you have learned to conduct.
North American Lighting and TQM Kevin Blatnik. My Background 1998: Graduated from EIU with BSIT 1998: Graduated from EIU with BSIT Went to work for Navistar.
11 Explanation to Participants about this template and final presentation This template is meant as a Six Sigma / Re engineering Submission Template This.
Black Belt Project Storyboard Template
Success depends upon the ability to measure performance. Rule #1:A process is only as good as the ability to reliably measure.
Paper Cutting Exercise
Chapter 10 Quality Control.
Project Review Questions Ops Review Project Facilitation Process Excellence.
TM 1 ©The McGraw/Hill Companies, Inc.,2006McGraw/Hill Readily Accessible Fast Retrieval Able to Store Legacy Data Able to Store Legacy Data Dialog Boxes.
Operations Management
Process Measurement & Process Capability Variable Data
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA) BCT 2053 CHAPTER 5. CONTENT 5.1 Introduction to ANOVA 5.2 One-Way ANOVA 5.3 Two-Way ANOVA.
Analyze Improve Define Measure Control L EAN S IX S IGMA L EAN S IX S IGMA Chi-Square Analysis Chi-Square Analysis Chi-Square Training for Attribute Data.
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA. PRODUCT CONFORMANCE Dimensional conformance - within tolerances as defined on product drawing Dimensional conformance.
Operations Fall 2015 Bruce Duggan Providence University College.
MEASURE : Measurement System Analysis
1 Prof. Indrajit Mukherjee, School of Management, IIT Bombay Bill Smith’s findings…. Bill Smith’s paper concluded that if product was found defective and.
DMAIC: Measure Robert Setaputra.
19-Feb-16 “"Dana Confidential Information - Those having access to this work may not copy it, use it or disclose the information contained within this.
Assets Returned From Lease Project: Bill Cody Black Belt Week 3 Report Out.
Green Belt – SIX SIGMA OPERATIONAL Intro to Analyze Phase.
Quality Control Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill.
Supplier Performance Development Process
LSM733-PRODUCTION OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT By: OSMAN BIN SAIF LECTURE 30 1.
DIMAC 12/2/2003Six Sigma Green Belt (Ref: The Six Sigma Way Team Fieldbook)1 Measurement and Analysis Interaction (A1) Measure Hypothesize stratification.
Chapter 10: The t Test For Two Independent Samples.
Team Payrolls... Yay, or nay?. Our Question We were curious: Do teams with one player occupying a large percentage of payroll win more games than other.
Overview Definition Measurements of process capability control
How to use SPC Before implementing SPC or any new quality system, the manufacturing process should be evaluated to determine the main areas of waste. Some.
High Density Polyethylene Pipes Quality Improvement
MSA / Gage Capability (GR&R)
acceptable quality level (AQL) Proportion of defects
Black Belt Project Storyboard Template Can be used in combination with Black Belt Storyboard Submission Guide Visit GoLeanSixSigma.com for more Lean Six.
MEASURE : Measurement System Analysis
Six Sigma Green Belt Project
10 Quality Control.
DSQR Training Destructive Testing GR&R
Implementing Six Sigma Quality
DMAIC STANDARD WORK TEMPLATE
The 7 Basic Quality Tools ~ The DMAIC Process
DMAIC STANDARD WORK TEMPLATE
Prepared By: Mr. Prashant S. Kshirsagar (Sr.Manager-QA dept.)
Six Sigma (What is it?) “Six sigma was simply a TQM process that uses process capabilities analysis as a way of measuring progress” --H.J. Harrington,
Presentation transcript:

Six Sigma Green Belt Project 1250-XX Covers Reduction of Raw Material Cost by Utilizing Regrind Green Belt Candidate, Tempe 07/13/07

-Define- The purpose of this project is to determine if the blending of 25% regrind into the GE Ultem 1000 will significantly change the Key dimensional and visual characteristics of the 1250-XX covers. We will focus on the 1250-05 for data collection as this is our highest volume part for this Customer in this category. If successful, this will eliminate the scrapping of the GE Ultem 1000 runners plus reduce the amount of virgin material necessary to complete the orders.

-Process Map- Material Purchasing

-Measure- MSA Instructions -Using the Zeiss CMM program 1250-05 Six Sigma Post Only, run sample parts in order. Samples are identified 1-10. Setup (See pictures below): Place 1.500” spacer in H2.(2x .750”) Place .750” spacer in H7. Position 1250-05 sample upside down on spacer with gate at 45 degree angle to the bottom left. Snug down with second .750” spacer. Follow instructions contained in program for Base Alignment criteria. Gate at 45 Degrees

-Measure- Measurement System Analysis

Measurement System Analysis cont’d. Less than 10% of the tolerance is taken up by measurement error indicating that the Zeiss CMM program is an acceptable way to accurately measure the Key characteristics. Gage R&R %Contribution Source VarComp (of VarComp) Total Gage R&R 0.0000000 0.99 Repeatability 0.0000000 0.99 Reproducibility 0.0000000 0.00 Part-To-Part 0.0000002 99.01 Total Variation 0.0000002 100.00 StdDev Study Var %Study Var %Tolerance Source (SD) (5.15*SD) (%SV) (SV/Toler) Total Gage R&R 0.0000483 0.0002488 9.95 2.49 Repeatability 0.0000483 0.0002488 9.95 2.49 Reproducibility 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.00 0.00 Part-To-Part 0.0004832 0.0024885 99.50 24.88 Total Variation 0.0004856 0.0025009 100.00 25.01 Number of Distinct Categories = 14

-Measure- Key Dimension Capability using 100% Virgin Material

-Measure- Key Dimension Capability using 100% Virgin Material

-Measure- Key Dimension Capability using 100% Virgin Material

-Measure- Key Dimension Capability using 25% Regrind

-Measure- Key Dimension Capability using 25% Regrind

-Measure- Key Dimension Capability using 25% Regrind

-Measure- Key Dimension Capability using 100% Regrind

-Measure- Key Dimension Capability using 100% Regrind

-Measure- Key Dimension Capability using 100% Regrind

-Analyze- A t-Test is being used to show that there is no significant difference in the means between the 100% Virgin material and the Virgin material with 25% Regrind. With the P-value being greater than Alpha (.05), we fail to reject the Null Hypothesis (Ho) on all 3 Key Characteristics.

-Analyze- Cont’d.

-Analyze- Cont’d. Samples were run with 100% Regrind to see what effect it had on the Key Characteristics. t-Tests were used to show if a significant difference in the means had been caused by the change. With P-values remaining greater than Alpha (.05), we fail to reject the Null Hypothesis (Ho) on all 3 characteristics proving there is no significant difference in dimensional readings when 100% Regrind is used.

-Analyze- Cont’d.

-Improve- The Improvement phase will implement the usage of 25% Regrind added to the virgin material during normal production runs. The Work Order template will be updated in the Shared Directory to accurately reflect the percentage of regrind allowed. Correct usage of material will be verified during the QA Sign-In and initialed. The Bill of Materials will also be amended.

-Control- The Customer defined ‘Key Characteristics’ will be monitored after the introduction of regrind during the molding operation using a variety of tools. Sign-In and In-Process dimensional inspection criteria are controlled and communicated via the Mold Data Book. The QA Sign-In at the start of the run will include the Customers current A-079 inspection form available from their Customer Website. In-Process data will be entered into real-time SPC Charts in the Quality Control Lab and will be monitored by Quality Inspectors. Any unusual variation in the SPC Charts will be investigated. Out of specification product will be quarantined and properly labeled with an Non Conforming Material Report per the ISO standard and dispositioned accordingly.

Copy of Mold Data Book Page- Sign-In Criteria -Control- Copy of Mold Data Book Page- Sign-In Criteria Copy of Mold Data Book Page- In-process Dimensional Inspection criteria.

Sample Customer A-079 Inspection Form -Control- Sample Customer A-079 Inspection Form

-Control- Copy of Blank NCMR Sample SPC Chart

-Cost Savings-

-Cost Savings- Extrapolated to include all the 1250-XX Covers that do not specify ‘100% Virgin Only’ including -02, -05, -08, -10, -11, -12:

-Conclusion- After measuring samples run with 25% Regrind/75% Virgin and samples run with 100% Regrind, it has been concluded that there were no significant differences or changes in the Customer’s Key Dimensions. Cpk levels ranged between 2.64 and 9.94 indicating all values are well above the 2.00 Cpk of a stable 6-sigma process. Taking into account normal process variation and the likeliness that the process may drift, it can be assumed that the values will remain within the Customer’s specifications. Tensile strength testing will need to be done by the Customer to verify overall strength and integrity has not been compromised due to this change. With an annual savings of $5,687.34 for the -05 configuration, the potential cost savings if applied to all of the 1250-XX part numbers would be $13,655.25 annually.