SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO Smart Grid Interoperability Panel (SGIP) Priority Action Plan (PAP) 21: Harmonized Weather.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NAESB Smart Grid Task Force PAP 03 Update Robert B. Burke – NAESB Task Force Co-Chair Jim Northey.
Advertisements

Group on Earth bservations Discussion Paper on a Framework Dr. Ghassem Asrar August 1, 2003.
World Class Standards Smart Grids ETSI Strategic Topic Philippe Lucas © ETSI All rights reserved ETSI Smart Grid workshop, June 14th 2010.
Weather Information Exchange Model - WXXM -
Grenada Sustainable Energy Plan Stakeholders Meeting April 5, 2002.
Impact of Smart Grid, ICT on Environment and Climate Change David Su Advanced Network Technologies National Institute of Standards and Technology ITU Symposium.
Development and Operation of Active Distribution Networks: Results of CIGRE C6.11 Working Group (Paper 0311) Dr Samuel Jupe (Parsons Brinckerhoff) UK Member.
UCAIug HAN SRS v2.0 Summary August 12, Scope of HAN SRS in the NIST conceptual model.
SMART GRID INTEROPERABILITY PANEL SUMMER 2012 FACE-TO-FACE PORTLAND, OREGON  JULY 10-12, 2012 WEATHER TASK GROUP SESSIONS AL HEFNER (NIST)
BOSTON CHICAGO DALLAS DENVER LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK MONTREAL NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO WASHINGTON Efficiently Powering Smart Cities: A Case for Price Transparency.
California GHG policy and implications for the power sector APEX Sydney Conference October 13, 2008 Anjali Sheffrin, PhD.
AMI & Grid Data Analytics & Analysis Management Platform Page  1 What does this platform offer? Our tool is a next generation grid management software.
Vendor Briefing May 26, 2006 AMI Overview & Communications TCM.
SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO PAP22 PEV Refueling Submetering Requirements Spring 2014 Members Meeting 05/06/2014.
IEEE JOINT TASK FORCE ON QUADRENNIAL ENERGY REVIEW Utility and Other Energy Company Business Case Issues Related to Microgrids and Distributed Generation.
IntelliGrid: Enabling The Power Delivery System of the Future Don Von Dollen EPRI IntelliGrid Program 9th International Symposium on Power- Line Communications.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Evans benefits ARAM1 jee 6/4/2015 Assessment of Aviation Delay Reduction Benefits for Nowcasts and Short Term Forecasts James Evans.
EPRI Smart Grid Demonstration and CIM Standards Development
By Lauren Felton. The electric grid delivers electricity from points of generation to consumers, and the electricity delivery network functions via two.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
A Survey of Home Energy Management Systems in Future Smart Grid Communications By Muhammad Ishfaq Khan.
1 ISO/RTO Council Wholesale Demand Response Projects & OpenADR David Forfia.
Jeju, 13 – 16 May 2013Standards for Shared ICT HIS – Smart Grid Karen Bartleson, President, IEEE Standards Association Document No: GSC17-PLEN-72 Source:
American Electric Power (AEP) Virtual Power Plant Simulator (VPPS) Tom Jones, Manger – Corporate Technology Development American Electric Power Grid-InterOp.
Jerry FitzPatrick, NIST Chair Wednesday, May 26. Introduction - IKB PAP8 PAP14 DEWG Charter What should the T&D DEWG be doing? T&D DEWG or T and D DEWGs?
Change Advisory Board COIN v1.ppt Change Advisory Board ITIL COIN June 20, 2007.
2015 World Forum on Energy Regulation May 25, 2015
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
SMART GRID INTEROPERABILITY PANEL WINTER 2012 FACE-TO-FACE IRVING, TEXAS  DEC. 3-6, 2012 PAP 16 WIND PLANT COMMUNICATIONS BILL MONCRIEF, AL HEFNER.
Accelerating the Smart Grid Globally
John McDonald 05 November 2013 SGIP Members Meeting.
Al Hefner (NIST Lead) Frances Cleveland (Technical Champion)
Know the Difference™ ITIL Solution Martin Perlin Marketing Director, Evolven BOOST YOUR ITIL ® INITIATIVES Evolven Comparison assists in many ITIL v3 areas.
Needs and expectations for the European energy system – A citizens perspective Marianne Ryghaug Professor/Deputy Director.
© 2009 IBM Corporation Smart Grid Research Consortium Customer Operations Transformation Global E&U Industry January 2011.
Facility Smart Grid Information Model
Common Information Model and EPRI Smart Grid Research
CCET as a Forum to Help Resolve Interoperability Issues Grid-Interop Stakeholders Coordination Panel Nov 11-13, 2008 Atlanta, GA Milton Holloway, Ph.D.
Doc.: IEEE /0047r1 Submission SGIP Liaison Report to IEEE Following the SGIP (2.0) Inaugural Conference Nov 5-7, 2013 Date:
Service Transition & Planning Service Validation & Testing
Halifax, 31 Oct – 3 Nov 2011ICT Accessibility For All SMART GRID ICT: SECURITY, INTEROPERABILITY & NEXT STEPS John O’Neill, Senior Project Manager CSA.
Vincenzo Artale ENEA Energy and Environment Modeling, ENEA Technical Unit (UTMEA, CR Casaccia, Rome (Italy)
© 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Ameen H. Hamdon, P.Eng President, SUBNET Solutions Inc. EMMOS 2015 September 22, 2015.
NAESB Smart Grid Standards Task Force PAP10 Discussion William Cox —
Sample Codes of Ethics in Adventure Tourism
The State Climatologist Program and a National Climate Services Initiative Mark A. Shafer Oklahoma Climatological Survey University of Oklahoma.
The Smart Grid: Re-powering America George W. Arnold National Coordinator for Smart Grid Interoperability NIST Gaithersburg, MD April 28, 2010.
Power Association of Northern California Maintaining Grid Reliability In An Uncertain Era May 16, 2011 PG&E Conference Center Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Overview of Draft Sixth Power Plan Council Meeting Whitefish, MT June 9-11, 2009.
Steady State Analysis Of A Microgrid Connected To A Power System
Open Smart Grid (OpenSG) Technical Committee Plenary October 20, 2009.
International Oceanographic Data and Information Exchange - Ocean Data Portal (IODE ODP) Enabling science through seamless and open access to marine data.
Draft Seventh Power Plan Meets RTF. Key Finding: Least Cost Resource Strategies Rely on Conservation and Demand Response to Meet Nearly All Forecast Growth.
Institutional Support Vladimir Koritarov Argonne National Laboratory April 2016.
CGMS-42-WP-21, 28 April 2014 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Slide: 1 Main outcomes of the Ad-hoc Meeting on Space Weather CGMS-42,
CIM Modeling for E&U - (Short Version)
Breakout Session on Smart Grid Data Analytics
Smart Grid Interoperability Panel (SGIP) Priority Action Plan (PAP) 21: Harmonized Weather Information Susan Hoyler, Director, Technical Operations,
Smart Grid Interoperability Panel (SGIP) Priority Action Plan (PAP) 21: Harmonized Weather Information Susan Hoyler, Director, Technical Operations,
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Opportunities in the Changing Energy System

GMD Data Request NERC Rules of Procedure Section 1600
Karen Bartleson, President, IEEE Standards Association
Enforcement and Policy Challenges in Health Information Privacy
Arslan Ahmad Bashir Student No
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO
Energy Storage Roadmap & Flexibility Roadmap Information Session
Presentation transcript:

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO Smart Grid Interoperability Panel (SGIP) Priority Action Plan (PAP) 21: Harmonized Weather Information Marty Burns, Technical Champion, Al Hefner, Co-Chair, NIST

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO Agenda Call to Order – Roll Call (record attendees and establish quorum) – Reminder of Antitrust Policy* Review of Agenda Items to Address – PAP21 Process – Weather Information Model Standards – Business Case – Use Case Development New Business Next Meetings – May 22nd 1:00P EDT – TBD – Find better time slot Adjournment “*This meeting, and all SGIP activities, are governed by SGIP’s By-laws and policies, including SGIP Intellectual Property Rights Policy and Antitrust Policy.”Intellectual Property Rights PolicyAntitrust Policy 2

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO SGIP 2.0 Antitrust Policy Notification To be read aloud by meeting chair/convenor at the start of each meeting, whether it is a virtual meeting or face-to-face meeting. Before this meeting starts, all participants on this call/ [this meeting] should be aware that SGIP has an Antitrust Policy and IPR Policy, as well as a policy for non-members who participate in any meetings. SGIP has all policies posted on its web site at A slide set highlighting the SGIP Antitrust Policy is posted on the landing page of this group in the SGIP Workspace for your reference. SGIP requires that its members, employees and other SGIP participants follow antitrust laws of the US and all applicable jurisdictions. All SGIP activities promote, rather than restrict, competition to the benefit of consumers and the marketplace. 3

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO SGIP 2.0 Antitrust Policy Notification (cont) Certain topics are never to be discussed or agreed upon at any time by any participant when engaged in SGIP activities, including but not limited to the following: Current or future prices, or any strategies relating to pricing Any price related information Output, capacity, inventory levels or costs Any market share Current or future marketing strategies If you become aware of a violation of the Antitrust Policy, you should bring it to the attention of the meeting Chair. The Chair, or you as the participant, should inform the SGIP Executive Director of any possible violations. Questions on these policies may be submitted to 4

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO This slide set provides only a short summary of the Antitrust and IPR Policies adopted by SGIP. The slides do not set out the full texts of your obligations as a SGIP Member or as an invited Expert or other non-Member participant. The SGIP website ( contains all policies and procedures including these specific policies: – Antitrust Policy 71&wg_abbrev=sgip-board 71&wg_abbrev=sgip-board – Intellectual Property Rights Policy 71&wg_abbrev=sgip-board 71&wg_abbrev=sgip-board – SGIP Participation of Non-Member Policy 60&wg_abbrev=sgip-board 60&wg_abbrev=sgip-board Questions on these policies may be submitted to SGIP 2.0 Antitrust and IPR Policies 5

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO PAP21 Process Flow Business Case State our reason for being and success Use Cases Illustrate the applications space of the result Harmonization Requirements Derive requirements for the activity Hand off to SSO(s) 6 ~Feb-Mar 2014 ~April-May 2014 ~June-July 2014

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO Business Case Outline Executive Summary – Having a more harmonized weather exchange model among the many current formats increases interoperability, improves data quality, and reduces the cost of acquisition of weather information which allows more resources to be devoted to innovative uses of weather. Who are we? – The Smart Grid Interoperability Panel (SGIP) accelerates the implementation of interoperable smart grid devices and systems. The Challenge – Detailed knowledge of weather – current, historical, and forecasted – can provide the basis for Smart Grid stakeholders to optimize current and future operations and to mitigate disruption and damage from adverse weather events. Why Harmonized Weather Standards Will Help – In order to exploit weather data, it must first be acquired and analyzed. The process of data acquisition itself is purely overhead and does not provide any direct value. Value comes from analysis of weather data once obtained. What Will Drive This Forward – Stakeholders in an open weather data ecosystem will thrive with harmonized and low- impedance availability of data for exchange 7

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO Before and After PAP 21* *note – oversimplification of the standards space 8 IEC WMO CAP MESONET Harmony PAP21 other

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO AlertsObservationsForecasts Phenomena AnalogsCodedValues High Level Data Organization of Weather* Current Weather Data standards can be described this way 9 ValueSets AnalogsCodedValues *Courtesy EPRI 2014 GeometryPhenomenaValueSetsGeometry

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO Core Weather Model Standards (semantics and syntax for weather information exchange) WMO – WMO/METCE/IWXXM Incorporates from METAR, SPECI, SIGMET, TAF, BUFR, GRIB – Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) Observation and Measurement IEC – IEC TC57WG16 Common Information Model (CIM) for Environmental Extensions IEC – IEC – Part of 7-4 including wind and photovoltaics – IEC – Communications for monitoring and control of wind power plants, TC 88 Other Standards – OASIS CAP / Emergency Interoperability Consortium – ASHRAE FSGIM (based on WXXM) – DWML - Corporate – Earth Networks (Weatherbug) - – Weather Underground - “K” factor standard for space weather NASA Weather from Satellite in RETSCREEN – tool National Mesonet Program Alliance – IOOS CSV – *FL – MADIS interface ( Lightening Data – – Earth Networks delivers this data – WMO has data representation 10

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO OASIS CAP 1.2

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO National MESONET Enhanced monitoring through hyper-local weather networks

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO ICAO IWXXM ICAO Annex 3 products: METAR/SPECI, TAF, SIGMET IWXXM US Specializations of ICAO Annex 3 products: US METAR/SPECI, US TAF, US SIGMET IWXXM- US Next-generation aviation weather products: Contours, aircraft reports, gust front, motion vector, etc. WXXM 4 - Weather Information Exchange Model - WXXM - Dennis Hart - EUROCONTROL.pptx

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO IEC – CIM Environmental Extensions

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO IEC and IEC

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO BIDIRECTIONAL CROSS-DOMAIN USE CASES 16

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO Use Case Activity The following are key groupings: – Microscale weather and climate data – Renewable and/or distributed energy resources – Federation of sources and uses of weather data – Utility Operations and Markets – Climate change Procedure (refined at meeting) – – Identify the top business oriented Use Case Topics – Review these bullets from the business case (below) – Allocate the benefits bullets to the Use Case topics – At this point we will have a small set of Key Use Cases with topic details nested under them – We then will need volunteers to help flesh out the Use Case narratives and actors lists that will form the basis of each Use Case 17

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO Business Case Benefits Notes Big Groupings – Microclimate data – Renewable and/or distributed energy resources – Federation of sources and uses of weather data – Utility operations Example Business oriented Use Case: A third party energy service provider wants to establish market-based rates for selling energy from disparate renewable sources to various clients How Customers with a building that wants to be net0 energy Goals of the activity – Need to use initial business use case to drive participants to help PAP Benefits to allocate to business oriented use cases – Microclimate data availability can enrich the quality and precision of weather data providing for better analysis at lower cost. – Localized microclimate data down to the customer premise combined with regional data can provide cost-effective and accurate localized energy efficiency analyses. – Standardized data allow deployment of services across territories without additional cost and tailoring. – For acquirers of services, standardization or harmonization reduces the occurrence of vendor lock-in due to compatibility as opposed to from availability of unique and excellent services. – The opportunity for value-added services is increased by the ubiquitous availability of sourced data. – Additional sources of weather that can be easily integrated create the opportunity for a large ecosystem of service providers. Today’s divergent sources of weather data impede the ecosystem due to the high cost of acquiring and integrating data. – A well-established harmonized reference reduces uncertainty about data quality. Combining information from varying sources of differing quality can result in a net more accurate forecast and analysis. This in turn can reduce the liability for predictions based on its use. Higher resolution and metadata can be available than could be cost justified due to ease of integration. – More accurate and quantitative availability of weather data can improve resilience including minimizing outage times and restorations. The costs of outages can be reduced through better preparation and coordination of first responders. 18

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO Bidirectional Cross-Domain Weather Data Exchange: DRGS Use Cases 19 Priority for cross-domain weather exchange Have Use CaseUse Case Application of Weather Data by Wind/Solar/CHP Generator Forecasting data may be used autonomously by a single turbine or wind farm in the middle of nowhere. Wind farm determine its own maintenance schedule, taking next few day low-wind periods into account. (cleverfarm.com) CHP generator use weather data to forecast thermal load demand and determine CHP generation schedule and projected generation availability. Microclimate data and forecasting used for storage charge management and microgrid planed islanding. Historical data for Wind/Solar/CHP plant siting. Communication of microclimate Weather Data collected by Wind/Solar/CHP Generators to forecasters: Microclimate data collected from individual rooftop solar Wind plant individual turbine and met. tower data Forecasting and Sensor Data needs for Grid Applications: Probabilistic distribution weather forecast for generator production, market and operational requirements Outage prediction/restoration from major storms using weather sensor data including lightning Disturbance analysis using rapid weather data exchange Environmental and pollution monitoring Space Weather affects grids Federated Simulation of Global Climate Types of forecasts required for Wind Power: Basic operation: Point forecasts

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO Bidirectional Cross-Domain Weather Data Exchange: EPRI Use Cases 20 Priority for cross-domain weather exchange Have Use CaseUse Case Types of forecasts required for Wind Power: Operation which takes into account asymmetrical penalties on deviations from the bid: Quantile forecasts Types of forecasts required for Wind Power: Stochastic optimization taking into account start/stop costs, heat storage, and/or ’implicit’ storage by allowing the hydro power production to be changed with wind power production: Scenarios respecting correctly calibrated quantiles and auto correlation. Observation: Situational Awareness Observation: Customer bill complaint Observation: Validate Downwind Concentration Compliance Using Historic Weather Conditions Observation: Outage Management Use of Lightning Strike Information Observation: Sample Request and Response for Environmental Value Set Information Observation: METAR Weather Data Profile Observation: TMY3 Weather Station Data Forecast: Wind Forecast Forecast: Solar Forecast Forecast: Predict resource requirements for storm (or other event) Forecast: Situational Awareness XForecast: Weather Forecast for Load Forecast Environmental Alert Environmental Event Phenomena Classification configuration Environmental Data Provider configuration Environmental Data Authority configuration Environmental Location configuration Environmental Monitoring Station configuration

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO Bidirectional Cross-Domain Weather Data Exchange – B2G Use Cases 21 Priority for cross- domain weather exchange Have Use CaseUse Case UC-1: Weather data usage to forecast near term power needs; less than 24 hours ahead UC-2: Using Weather to Forecast Medium Term Power Needs ( days) (Similar to EIS Alliance UC-3: “Forecast Power Usage”) UC-3: Using Weather to Forecast Long Term Power Needs (greater than 10 days) (Similar to EIS Alliance UC-3: “Forecast Power Usage”) UC-4: Normalize building energy use to provide baseline year UC-5: Compare building energy use against baseline UC-6: Using Weather Information to Manage and Protect Distributed Energy Resources UC-7: Weather Data Usage in Start/Stop Time Optimization UC-8: Using weather data to determine when to shift loads (produce ice, pre-cool, store DG energy, delayed start…) UC-9: Using weather data to change facility schedule (e.g. shut facility due to potential snow storm) UC-10: Using Weather Information to Manage a Facility before a Demand Response Event UC-11: Using Weather to Determine How Much Reactive Power Can be Offered for Sale and Direct Control by the Grid

SPRING 2014 MEMBERS MEETING MAY 5-8, 2014  DENVER, COLORADO Hierarchical DER Use Cases Look at Hierarchical DER Use Case Classification and their use for gap analysis standards development – Identify those that “weather” related