The Research Excellence Framework. Purpose of REF The REF replaces the RAE as the UK-wide framework for assessing research in all disciplines. Its purpose.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RAE 2008: Goldsmiths Outcomes. Sample Quality Profile.
Advertisements

Overview of the Research Assessment Exercise Iain Richardson School of Engineering and the Built Environment
GSOE Impact Workshop Impact and the REF 19 th May 2010 Lesley Dinsdale.
Research Excellence Framework Jane Boggan Planning Division Research Staff Forum - January 2010.
Main Panel A: Subpanels and Chairs A1: Clinical Medicine - Christopher Day, Newcastle University A2: Public Health, Health services and Primary Care -
Impact workshop Phil Hannaford VP Research and Knowledge Exchange.
REF2014 Pauline Muya Jo Lakey.
Research Excellence Framework and equalities Belfast 29 November 2011 Ellen Pugh Senior Policy Adviser, ECU.
REF2014 HODOMS Birmingham 8 th April Ann Dowling: Chairman of REF Main Panel B John Toland: Chairman of REF Sub-Panel B10: Mathematical Sciences.
RAE 2008 Engineering Ann Dowling, Chairman Main Panel G - Engineering EPC Congress March 2005.
Accessing Research Outputs for RAE 2008 UKSG Ed Hughes, RAE Manager.
Supporting & promoting Equality & Diversity through REF Dianne Berry, Chair REF E&D Advisory Panel Ellen Pugh, Senior Policy Officer ECU.
The Research Excellence Framework Assessment framework, guidance on submissions and panel criteria.
Guidance on submissions Chris Taylor, Deputy REF Manager Graeme Rosenberg, REF Manager.
Research Excellence Framework 2014: A briefing for Staff Professor Ros Foskett Deputy Vice Chancellor.
These slides have been produced by the REF team, and were last updated on 3 September 2011 They provide a summary of the assessment framework and guidance.
Communicating the outcomes of the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise A presentation to press officers in universities and colleges. Philip Walker, HEFCE.
The Research Assessment Exercise in the United Kingdom Paul Hubbard International colloquium “Ranking and Research Assessment in Higher Education” 13 December.
Research at York Presentation to Council Alastair Fitter Pro-Vice-Chancellor, Research.
What does ‘being returned’ to the REF mean?
Research Excellence Framework : Equality and Diversity Working Methods and Code of Practice University of Wales, Trinity Saint David Matt Briggs Eleri.
The Research Excellence Framework Panel criteria [Main Panel Chair] Graeme Rosenberg.
Achieving and Demonstrating Research Impact John Scott.
Demonstrating research impact in the REF Graeme Rosenberg REF Manager
The Research Excellence Framework. Presentation outline The REF assessment framework and guidance on submissions: - Overview - Staff - Outputs - Impact.
Consultation on panel criteria and working methods.
REF Information Session August Research Excellence Framework (REF)
The UK Experience of Quality Assurance in Research and Doctoral Education Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities.
A month in the life of a university bibliometrician Dr Ian Rowlands University of Leicester, UK.
The REF assessment framework and guidance on submissions Linda Tiller, HEFCW 16 September 2011.
Introduction to the Research Excellence Framework.
The Research Excellence Framework Briefing event for REF institutional contacts Graeme Rosenberg REF Manager.
Research Assessment Exercise RAE Dr Gary Beauchamp Director of Research School of Education.
Page 1 RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FRAMEWORK : RESEARCH IMPACT ASESSMENT LESSONS FROM THE PILOT EXERCISE Professor John Marshall Director Academic Research Development.
Chair: Professor Dame Ann Dowling Sub-panel Chairs: Panel Advisers: SP07: Professor David Price Dr Karen Ness SP08: Professor Richard Catlow Ms Lesley.
Professor Andrew Wathey Vice-Chancellor and Chief Executive Northumbria University.
Main Panel D Criteria and Working Methods Main Panel D covers: Area Studies Modern Languages and Linguistics English Language and Literature History Classics.
The Research Excellence Framework Impact: the need for evidence Professor Caroline Strange 22 June 2011.
THE IMPACT OF RAE ON SERIAL PUBLICATION Professor Judith Elkin UK Serials Group March 2004.
The REF assessment framework (updated 23 May 2011)
1 Research Context and the RAE John Saunders Head of School, Aston Business School IDEAS Factory 23/24 October 2006.
Delivering Strength Across the Piece David Sweeney Director, Research, Education and Knowledge Exchange HEPI, Royal Society 31 March 2015.
Research Excellence Framework 2014 and Open Access 23 rd October 2012.
Main Panel A Criteria and Working Methods Cardiff School of Biosciences Ole H Petersen Chair.
What is impact? What is the difference between impact and public engagement? Impact Officers, R&IS.
Research Impact Sarah Hall Research Impact Strategy and Policy Manager.
Research Excellence Framework 2014 Michelle Double Hyacinth Gale Sita Popat Edward Spiers Research and Innovation Support Conference.
1 An introduction to research policy Professor John Strachan VERITAS Visit, 20 November 2015.
Impact and the REF Consortium of Institutes of Advanced Study 19 October 2009 David Sweeney Director (Research, Innovation and Skills)
The Research Excellence Framework Assessment framework and guidance on submissions Graeme Rosenberg, REF Manager.
Current R& KE Issues David Sweeney
Towards REF 2020 What we know and think we know about the next Research Excellence Framework Dr. Tim Brooks, Research Policy & REF Manager, RDCS Anglia.
Phil Quirke RAE 2008 & REF 2014 panels
Research Day 2017 Generating Impact breakout session
Welcome slide.
Impact and the REF Tweet #rfringe17
WP2. Excellent university for the researchers
RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FRAMEWORK 2021
REF 2021 Briefing 25 January 2018.
REF 2021 What we know and thought we knew, in preparation for the next Research Excellence Framework Dr. Tim Brooks, Research Policy & REF Manager, RDCS.
Law Sub-panel Generic Feedback - Impact
These slides have been produced by the REF team, and were last updated on 30 January 2012 They provide a summary of the assessment framework and guidance.
REF 2021 Briefing Consultation on the draft guidance
These slides have been produced by the REF team, and were last updated on 30 January 2012 They provide a summary of the assessment framework and guidance.
REF 2021 & ECRs: policy & planning in an uncertain landscape
Research Update GERI May 2010.
Webinar on Staff circumstances in REF 2021 Follow us on Twitter
REF and research funding update
UCML, London 18 January 2019 REF 2021 Susan Hodgett (D25)
Understanding Impact Stephanie Seavers, Impact Manager.
Presentation transcript:

The Research Excellence Framework

Purpose of REF The REF replaces the RAE as the UK-wide framework for assessing research in all disciplines. Its purpose is: To inform research funding allocations by the UK funding bodies (approx £2 billion per year) Provide accountability for public funding of research and demonstrate its benefits To provide benchmarks and reputational yardsticks

Timetable 2011– Panels appointed 2012– Final panel criteria and methods (Jan) – HEIs submit codes of practice (Jul) – Survey of submission intentions (Dec) 2013 – Staff census date (31 Oct) – Submissions deadline (29 Nov) 2014 – Panels assess submission – Publish outcomes (Dec)

Framework overview Overall quality Outputs ‘rigour, originality and significance’ Maximum of 4 outputs per researcher Environment ‘vitality and sustainability’ Template and data Impact ‘reach and significance’ Template and case studies 65% 15%20%

Example of a quality profile Outputs EnvironmentImpact 4*3*2*1*u/c *3*2*1*u/c % Overall Quality Profile 12 4* u/c1*2*3* 4*3*2*1*u/c %20% Quality Level % of the submission

Submissions Each submission in a UOA provides evidence about the activity and achievements of a ‘submitted unit’ including: Staff details (REF 1a/b/c) Research Outputs (REF 2) Impact template and case studies (REF 3a/b/) Environment data (REF 4a/b/c) Environment template (REF 5)

Staff: Individual circumstances Up to 4 outputs must be listed against each member of staff This can be reduced without penalty where circumstances have constrained an individual’s ability to work productively or produce 4 outputs during the assessment period These circumstances will be treated consistently across panels:  Clearly defined circumstances: a tariff to determine how many outputs may be reduced  Complex circumstances requiring judgement will be referred to the Equality and Diversity Advisory Panel

Staff: Individual circumstances Clearly defined circumstances Qualifying as an Early Career Researcher Part-time working Maternity, paternity or adoption leave Secondments or career breaks outside of HE Complex circumstances Disability Ill health or injury Mental health conditions Constraints relating to pregnancy or maternity in addition to maternity leave Childcare or other caring responsibilities Gender reassignment Other circumstances relating to characteristics protected by the Equality Act 2010

Research outputs: Criteria The criteria for assessing the quality of outputs are originality, significance and rigour Four star Quality that is world-leading in terms of originality, significance and rigour Three star Quality that is internationally excellent in terms of originality, significance and rigour but which falls short of the highest standards of excellence Two star Quality that is recognised internationally in terms of originality, significance and rigour One star Quality that is recognised nationally in terms of originality, significance and rigour UnclassifiedQuality that falls below the standard of nationally recognised work. Or work which does not meet the published definition of research for the purposes of this assessment

Research Outputs: Eligibility Outputs must be:  A product of research (as defined for the REF)  First brought into the public domain between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2013  Authored/co-authored by the member of staff against whom it is listed (regardless of where they were employed prior to the census date) Outputs may include but are not limited to: printed or electronic publications, materials, devices, images, artefacts, products, buildings, confidential or technical reports, patents, performances, exhibits or events All forms of output shall be assessed on a fair and equal basis

Impact: Criteria The criteria for assessing impacts are reach and significance Four star Outstanding impacts in terms of their reach and significance Three star Very considerable impacts in terms of their reach and significance Two star Considerable impacts in terms of their reach and significance One star Recognised but modest impacts in terms of their reach and significance UnclassifiedThe impact is of little or no reach and significance; or the impact was not eligible; or the impact was not underpinned by excellent research produced by the submitted unit.

Impact: Definition for the REF An effect on, change or benefit to the economy, society, culture, public policy or services, health, the environment or quality of life, beyond academia Impact includes an effect, change or benefit to:  The activity, attitude, awareness, behaviour, capacity, opportunity, performance, policy, practice, process or understanding  Of an audience, beneficiary, community, constituency, organisation or individuals  In any geographic location whether locally, regionally, nationally or internationally It excludes impacts on research or the advancement of academic knowledge within HE; and impacts on teaching or other activities within the submitting HEI

Impact: Submissions Impact template (REF3a) Sets out the submitted unit’s general approach to enabling impact from its research One template per submission – with a page limit depending on the number of staff submitted Covers the period 1 Jan 2008 to 31 Jul 2013 Contributes 20% to the impact sub-profile Case studies (REF3b) Specific examples of impacts that were underpinned by the submitted unit’s research The number of case studies depends on the number of staff submitted (2) Impacts during 1 Jan 2008 to 31 Jul 2013; underpinned by research since 1 Jan 1993 Contributes 80% to the impact sub-profile

Environment: Criteria The criteria for assessing the environment are vitality and sustainability Four star An environment that is conducive to producing research of world-leading quality, in terms of its vitality and sustainability Three star An environment that is conducive to producing research of internationally excellent quality, in terms of its vitality and sustainability Two star An environment that is conducive to producing research of internationally recognised quality, in terms of its vitality and sustainability One star An environment that is conducive to producing research of nationally recognised quality, in terms of its vitality and sustainability UnclassifiedAn environment that is not conducive to producing research of nationally recognised quality.

Environment Quantitative information Research doctoral degrees awarded Research income Research income-in-kind Qualitative information Overview Research strategy People (including staffing strategy and staff development; and research students) Income, infrastructure and facilities Collaboration and contribution to the discipline

Codes of practice on staff selection The funding bodies encourage HEIs to submit the work of all their excellent researchers, and HEIs have legal obligations affecting their staff selection procedures We are required to develop, document and apply a code of practice on the fair selection of staff for the REF:  To be submitted to the REF team by 31 July 2012  The REF Equality and Diversity Panel will examine these in advance of the submission deadline  They will be published at the end of the assessment process

Bucks Code of Practice Our Code of Practice (currently in draft form) can be found at: _framework_internal_information/ This lists the personal circumstances which HEFCE will take into consideration that may have constrained an individual’s ability to produce 4 outputs between 1 January 2008 and 31 December These include clearly defined circumstances such as qualifying as an Early Career Researcher (started as an independent researcher after 1 August 2009), part-time working or maternity leave, or more complex circumstances as indicated in the Code.

Invitation If you would like to be considered for submission for the REF and have (or expect to have) 4 research outputs of international quality in the REF period or there are personal circumstances that have constrained your ability to produce this number in the assessment period then: Please declare your interest by 2 December 2011 – contact Dr Anne Evans

Further information (includes all relevant publications)