Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 AS9104/1 Certification Structures - Client and CB Agreement July 17, 2014 Tim Lee Chair - IAQG.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Mike Roberts Boeing OP Assessor Workshop Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop San Diego,
Advertisements

Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Roles & Responsibilities San Diego, California January 20, 2011 R. Darrell Taylor Raytheon.
Module 13 Oversight Assessment of Auditor Authentication Bodies
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop San Diego, CA January 20, AS9104/2 Oversight Process.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee AS9104/1 Impacts to CB’s & Organizations Bob Cruse, ANAB Vince May, ANAB Tim Lee, The Boeing Company.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Other Party Management Team (OPMT) Resolutions Stanley Faust Spirit AeroSystems Other Party.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Bogus Certifications Tim Lee Chair IAQG OPMT The Boeing Company Date: July 16, 2014.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Confidentiality & Conflict of Interest San Diego, CA January 20, 2011 R. Darrell Taylor.
IAQG OPMT OP Assessor Training Module 3 Preparing for the Face to Face Training: Instructions & Communication February 2015.
IAQG OPMT OP Assessor Training Oversight Assessment of Training Provider Approval Bodies February 2015 Module 14.
Prepared by: Tim Lee – Chair IAQG OPMT The Boeing Company October 10, 2013 International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG) Other Party Management Team (OPMT)
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) OP Assessors Need to Know 1 Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.
Registration Management Committee Body of Knowledge (BoK) for Other Party (OP) Assessors David Day GE Aviation.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) The OP Assessor Process San Diego, CA January 19, 2012 Melvin L. Jeppson ATK Propulsion Systems.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) OP Assessor Process: Office and Witness Oversight San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Melvin L.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 CB and Auditor Performance Expectations Boston, MA July 22, 2011 R. Darrell Taylor Raytheon.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) & Auditor Workshop /1 “Completing the Trilogy” Atlanta, GA July 23, 2010 Michael C.
1111 AS9104/1 and Potential Impacts to Your AS Registration November 16, 2012 Presented by Pete Kucan Director of PRI Registrar Operations.
The OP Assessor Process
Company Confidential 1 Revisiting CB Use of AS9101 Rev D Tim Lee 12 March 2012.
Michelle Barton – Lead Technical Reviewer/Auditor UL DQS Inc.
Company Confidential 1 AS9104/1 Transition and Oversight Assessment of Accreditation Bodies Tim Lee 12 March 2012.
IAQG OPMT OP Assessor Training SMS, CBMC and OASIS Oversight Assessment February 2015 Module 16.
Company Confidential 1 AS9104/1: The Main Changes Tim Lee 12 March 2012.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) & Auditor Workshop 11 ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know About 9104/1 Boston, MA July 22,
Other Party Management Team (OPMT) Status Briefing Americas Aerospace Quality Group (AAQG) Registration Management Committee (RMC) Tim Lee – Chair The.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) What’s Next for Oversight? 1 Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.
Company Confidential Improvement Opportunities for Audit Reporting Tony Marino and Rick Downs July 19-20, 2012 Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) & Auditor Workshop 11 ‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know About 9104/1 OP Assessor Workshop.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Completing Independent Assessments Robert Flaharty & John Horan January 17, 2013 OP Assessor Workshop.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee OP Assessor Workshop, San Diego, CA - 17 January 2013 Body Of Knowledge for OP Assessors Will S.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP) Oversight Market Surveillance AS9104/2A Supplemental Oversight.
Company Confidential 1 AS9104/1 Transition and Oversight Assessment of Certification Bodies Mike Roberts 12 March 2012.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Audit Calc Program Palm Beach, Florida January 16, 2014 Tim Lee The Boeing Company.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) :2009 Revision Workshop Tony Marino The Boeing Company Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party Management Team (OPMT) Resolutions San Diego, CA January 19, 2012 Stanley Faust.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) AS9104/2A Presentation San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Tim Lee The Boeing Company 1 Other Party.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July Ballot: What is it all about? Information.
Other Party Management Team (OPMT) Status Briefing Americas Aerospace Quality Group (AAQG) Registration Management Committee (RMC) Tim Lee – Chair The.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July Supplemental Oversight AS9104/2A & Special.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) OASIS Enhancements San Diego, CA January 19, 2012 Bryan Blunt IAQG OASIS Administrator 1 Other.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July 2015 The OASIS Feedback Process Empowering Communication.
Hosted by AAQG RMC Certification Structures Impacts to Auditors Impacts to Stakeholders Transition.
CSOC – Certification Structure Oversight Committee Application Guidance October 2015.
Company Confidential 1 AS9104/2A Oversight Standard Revision Report Tim Lee Project Chair September 11, 2012.
Company Confidential 1 Other Party Management (OPMT) 9104/1 Special Sub Team Recommendation Summary Tim Lee & Ian Folland June 23, 2010.
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party (OP) Assessor AS Oversight Training January 25, 2007 – Dallas, Texas Confidentiality &Conflict.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 AS9104/1 Certification Structures July 22, 2015 Tim Lee Chair - IAQG OPMT The Boeing Company RMC.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Audit Calc Program San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Tim Lee The Boeing Company Bill.
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party Assessor Workshop January 16, 2009 – Orlando, Florida AS/EN/SJAC Oversight Process Tim Lee The.
Company Confidential 1 Other Party Management (OPMT) 9104/1 Special Sub Team Recommendation Summary Tim Lee September 14, 2010.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 July 17, 2014 Bryan Blunt IAQG OASIS Administrator OASIS Tools for Continuous Improvement / Next-Gen.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Independent Oversight Assessments 1 Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop Palm Beach Gardens,
Company Confidential IAQG Workshop October 21, IAQG Workshop 9100 Certification Scheme Certification status – Changes implemented Tim Lee The Boeing.
RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July 2015 Registration Management Committee Company Confidential RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC
To the Greater Phoenix Chapter of ASQ January 10, 2013.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July Ballot: What is it all about? Information.
Company Confidential 1 Tim Lee July 2016 Developed by: Bryan Blunt OASIS Report Availability & Use.
AS9104/1 Interpretation Consistency Working Group
ISO 9001:2015 Auditor / Registration Decision Lessons Learned
AAQG Member AS/JISQ Supplemental Oversight
Witness Assessment AS9104/2A
‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know About 9104/1
AAQG Member AS/JISQ Supplemental Oversight
AS9104/1 Transition and Oversight Assessment of Accreditation Bodies
‘Top Ten’ Things Auditors Should Know About 9104/1
Tim Lee The Boeing Company Chair IAQG OPMT October 22, 2010
Tim Lee – Chair The Boeing Company May 21, 2013
AS9104/1: The Main Changes Tim Lee 12 March 2012.
Presentation transcript:

Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 AS9104/1 Certification Structures - Client and CB Agreement July 17, 2014 Tim Lee Chair - IAQG OPMT The Boeing Company

RMC Workshop 16 – 17 July 2014 Registration Management Committee Objectives To review the certification structures defined within AS9104/1 –Focus on eligibility criteria CB & Client Responsibilities Lessons Learned –FAQ’s –IDR/SDR Feedback –Certification Structure Oversight Committee (CSOC) reviews 2

Certification Structure A term utilized to describe how the certification activities of an aviation, space, and defense organization will be structured and managed by the contracted CB. AS9104/1 Criteria Certification Structure Review and Determination The CB shall maintain documented evidence of the review and determination of all certification structures, including the audit duration calculation Certification Structure Eligibility Criteria CBs shall assess the client’s certification structure, site locations, and value streams. Both CB and client shall agree upon the type of certification structure. RMC Workshop 16 – 17 July 2014

4 AS9104/1 Definitions To understand the structures more fully we need to understand some terms from AS9104/1: –Value Stream (clause 3.27) »An end-to-end business process which delivers a product or service to a customer. The process steps along the way may both use and produce intermediate goods, services and information to achieve the end product or service. –Organisation (clause 3.22) »Any legal entity or defined part of a legal entity owning a single quality management system that is subject to an ICOP audit and certification process –Central Office (also referred to as Central Function) (clause 3.8) »The organisation location/activity that controls the ‘common’ quality management system for the organisation under a single AQMS standard certificate. RMC Workshop 16 – 17 July 2014

Certification Structures are defined in clause 3.11 of AS9104/1: They reflect the unique organisational structures that exist in our industry today They can be any one of the following: ‒ Single Site ‒ Multiple Site - has two sub categories Category 1 and Category 2 ‒ Campus ‒ Several Sites ‒ Complex Page 5 AS9104/1 Cert Structures

CB and client to select and agree on the conforming structure type To assess and select the correct certification structure the CB needs to examine the clients: ‒ Site (see 3.25) location(s) » A permanent location where an organisation carries out work or a service ‒ Value stream(s) (see 3.27) » An end-to-end business process which delivers a product or service to a customer. » The process steps along the way may both use and produce intermediate goods, services and information to achieve the end product or service. Clients should review customer expectations –OASIS linkage Page 6 AS9104/1 Cert Structures

AS9104/1 Annex B Eligibility Criteria for each structure 7

8 Focus on Structure Eligibility Note: An organization must meet ALL criteria. Single Site AS9104/1 - Annex B – Single Site

9 Focus on Structure Eligibility Multiple SiteCampusCommon Criteria AS9104/1 - Annex B - Multiple Site, Campus, Several Sites Several Sites

CB to retain records of the review and structure determination Must be more than just the AS9104/1 Audit Calc Tool printout –Evidence of the review and determination of all certification structures (8.1.3). A defined certification structure will: ‒ Assist CBs with the development of a robust and conforming audit program, and ‒ Provide industry with visibility of the structure within the OASIS database. Page 10 AS9104/1 Records

Single Site An organisation having one location. The organisation may be organised under one large building or several buildings at one location. The organisation may have one or multiple products or product families flowing though one or multiple processes. Page 11 Example Diagram

Multiple Site Example: ‒ An organisation has two sites, A and B. ‒ They make two product families X and Y. ‒ Product family X is made the same way using the same processes on both sites A and B. ‒ Product family Y is only made on site A. ‒ This organisation makes to customer specification. ‒ The central function is located on site A. Page 12 Example Diagram

Multiple Site Explanation: ‒ Site B conducts the same but fewer processes than site A making the same product X. In this way the organisation is eligible for a multiple site approach. Page 13

Campus Example: ‒ The organisation has four sites ‒ Four buildings on site A, four buildings on site B and one building on each site C and D. ‒ The organisation has multiple products and product families that all flow through substantially (>=80%) similar processes and methods i.e. one value stream Page 14 Example Diagram

Several Sites Example: ‒ This organisation has three essentially different sites with three mainly different sets of processes and methods. ‒ The organisation does not qualify for multiple site because of the different processes and does not qualify for campus as products in the value stream do not flow from one site to another. Page 15 Example Diagram

Complex An organisation having an identified central function (the central office, but not necessarily the headquarters of the organization) at which certain activities are planned, controlled, or managed A network of locations that are any combination of multiple site, campus, several sites, or more than one campus Page 16 Example Diagram

Certification Structure Oversight Committee (CSOC) The CSOC has been established to support the review of complex certification structures and review of certification structure complaints Page 17 CSOC website contains: Operating procedure Guidance Material Application Link to FAQ’s

Please make it simple! Page 18

AS9104/1 Certification Structures - Simple Guide If it’s one site (one location) it’s a Single Site structure! –From AS9104/1 FAQ’s »A site may have one or more addresses depending on the nature of the site. »There may be multiple buildings and addresses on a single site or more than one address in single building. »There is no relationship between site and distance. »A single site may be small or large. »Normally a single site is contiguous were it not for natural or man-made features e.g. roads, rivers, canals, railroads, that may happen to cross the site or multiple businesses in the same building. »Where another feature such as a building, location or site owned or operated by another entity separates the work locations the separated locations would not be considered a single site. Page 19

AS9104/1 Certification Structures - Simple Guide For organisations with more than one site there are some common features to all of the certification structures: –All sites have a legal, organisational, or contractual link with the central office of the organisation and –Are subject to a common management system, which is laid down, established, and subject to continuous surveillance; –The organisation’s management system is centrally controlled and is subject to a common management review; –All sites are subject to the organisation’s internal audit program, controlled by the central office; –The central office has the authority to require that the site(s) implement corrective action, as needed; and Page 20

AS9104/1 Certification Structures - Simple Guide For organisations with more than one site there are some common features to all of the certification structures: –The organization collects and analyses data from all sites, including but not limited to the listed items below. –The central office is able to demonstrate its authority and ability to initiate organisational change, as required, in regard to: »system documentation; »system changes; »management review; »complaints; »evaluation of corrective actions; »internal audit planning and evaluation of the associated audit results; and »legal requirements. Page 21

AS9104/1 Certification Structures - Simple Guide The Central Office (or Central Function): –Within AS9104/1 the Central Office has a specific meaning: »the organisation location/activity that controls the ‘common’ quality management system for the organisation under a single AQMS standard certificate. –It is not any of the following(although could be the same site): »The Headquarters of the organisation »The location of centralised processes such as; Design Purchasing Manufacturing or Production Engineering Human Resources Page 22

AS9104/1 Certification Structures - Simple Guide Spotting a ‘Multiple Site’ Structure: –All quality management system processes at all sites have to be substantially (i.e., >80 %) the same and are operated to the same methods and procedures. –Some sites may conduct fewer processes than others. –One address per site Page 23

AS9104/1 Certification Structures – Simple Guide Spotting a ‘Campus’ Structure: –The outputs from one site are an input to another site to realise the final product or service; a single value stream. –Can be dissimilar processes at different sites or combination of sites that contribute to the same overall product or service. –More than one product or service may be realised provided they are substantially (i.e., >80 %) the same (e.g., a family of products) and realised through the same methods and procedures. Page 24

AS9104/1 Certification Structures - Simple Guide Spotting a ‘Several Sites’ Structure: –Processes at each of the sites are not substantially similar (i.e., <80 % similar). –Processes may be operated to the same or different methods and procedures that are controlled through one common quality management system. –Sites realise different products or services. –One address per site Page 25

AS9104/1 Certification Structures - Simple Guide Spotting a ‘Complex’ Structure: –Overall structure contains combinations of multiple sites, campus (can be more than one campus), or several sites. –Requires IAQG OPMT approval of rationale, justification, audit duration calculations, audit program, and sampling plan (for 9120, multiple site, or campus). –One address per site and per campus. Page 26

AS9104/1 Certification Structures - Simple Guide In ALL cases: –CBs shall assess the client’s certification structure, site locations, and value streams. »If in doubt, draw them out! –Both the CB and client to agree upon the type of certification structure »Do not forget the Customer –The CB shall maintain documented evidence of the review and determination of all certification structures, including the audit duration calculation. »This does not mean a tick box »Nor does it mean ‘because the last auditor said so’ »Requires documentation of why the clients fits each criteria with an explanation or evidence Page 27

28 FAQ’s Review the AS9104/1 FAQ Log:

29 Lessons Learned AS9104/1 and Certification Structure Oversight Committee (CSOC) FAQs can be accessed via the IAQG website. Links: –AS9104/1 FAQAS9104/1 FAQ –CSOC FAQCSOC FAQ The IAQG IDR/SDR process can be used to obtain clarification on the intent of the standard –Access via OASIS feedback function –Questions asked are used to generate FAQs The OPMT also issues Resolutions when specific clarification is needed for any one of the AS9104 series of standards. (Refs: AS9104/1, Section 4.16) –Link: IAQG OPMT ResolutionsIAQG OPMT Resolutions

30 THAT WAS: