PAIUCC PAIUCC MEETING Terry Barnaby, Director Bureau of School Leadership and Teacher Quality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Educator Effectiveness System November 5, Agenda – Town Hall Meeting Community Builder/Video (OPTIONAL) Today, we will be presenting an overview.
Advertisements

Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Specialists and Licensed Professionals Spring Mini-Pilot Angela Kirby-Wehr.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness April 23, 2012 revision.
Measuring Educator Effectiveness Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness Project Specialist Effectiveness October 15, 2013.
Overview for Teachers. Session Objectives I.Review Teacher Effectiveness System II.Define SLO process III.Exploring SLO Templates -Assessment Literacy-
Educator Effectiveness ACT 82 Overview 1. ACT 82 Within Act 82, new requirements for Educator Effectiveness have been defined for teachers, principals,
Measuring Principal Effectiveness Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Measuring Principal.
Differentiated Supervision
EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION UPDATE Michigan Association of School Personnel Administrators Conference December 3, 2010 Flora L. Jenkins, Director Office of.
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1.
Measuring Educator Effectiveness Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness Project Specialist Effectiveness October 15, 2013.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness May 3, 2012 revision.
Measuring Educator Effectiveness
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Principals’ Council Meetings May  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify.
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Differentiated Supervision
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1 for Districts & Schools for Educators.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ William E. Harner, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Principal Effectiveness: Domains Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural.
Principal Effectiveness: Domains Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Measuring Principal Effectiveness Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education CIU 20 Principal.
Non Teaching Professionals ½ Day Training. Act 82 of 2012 Passed on June 30, 2012 Defined Three Groups of Educators ◦ Teaching Professionals  Began
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Non-Teaching Professionals’ Effectiveness Dr. Patricia DiRienzo October 1, 2014.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness May 3, 2012 revision, modified.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Applying the Danielson Framework for Teaching to Specialists and Licensed Professionals A Guided.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Teacher Effectiveness Pilot II Presented by PDE. Project Development - Goal  To develop a teacher effectiveness model that will reform the way we evaluate.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Choosing Excellence: National Board Certification You’re at the head of your class. Now go to the top of your profession.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Favorite Teacher Graffiti 1 National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Who was your favorite teacher? On the front wall write three qualities that.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness Educator Effectiveness:
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Act 82 Boot Camp Day 1 July 29 th, 2015 Angela Kirby-Wehr, Educator Effectiveness.
A Guided Review and Discussion
Pennsylvania’s State Personnel Development Grant “Improving Student Results: A Focus on Highly Qualified Special Education Personnel” An Overview PDE Conference.
Teacher Effectiveness Pilot II Presented by PDE. Project Development - Goal  Evaluate educators based on their effectiveness in serving students  “Highly.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
Choosing Excellence: National Board Certification You’re at the head of your class. Now go to the top of your profession.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Educator Effectiveness Digging into Domain 4. Educator Effectiveness in PA  PDE has been working since 2010 to develop an educator effectiveness model.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
TIMS/ACT 48/NEW EVALUATIONS
Professional Learning – October 12, 2015
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Overview for School Leaders
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Advisory Committees for Educator Preparation Programs
Presentation transcript:

PAIUCC PAIUCC MEETING Terry Barnaby, Director Bureau of School Leadership and Teacher Quality

PAIUCC Act 24 of 2011 School Code Bill Certification Changes Effective Immediately

PAIUCC School Code 2011 Superintendent, Alternate Route Act 24 Requirements Graduate degree in business or finance 4 years of relevant experience in business, finance or management Attorneys included for 3 years PIL Requirement Traditional Route no longer states certified experience, requires “successful” experience

PAIUCC School Code 2011 Superintendent, Alternate Route Approved Policy Guidelines Additions Candidates will be eligible for a Commission, not a Letter of Eligibility Commission relies on offer of employment from School Board

PAIUCC Act 82 of 2012 Superintendent, Alternate Route - Commission Qualification Letter Pre-hiring review of legal requirements GMC Review Not a letter of Eligibility Candidate must apply for commission when hired

PAIUCC School Code 2011 Principal Certificate, Alternate Route Initial Requirements Bachelor’s Degree from an accredited College or University 3 years of relevant professional experience defined as “professional experience in an educational setting that is related to the instructional process” Offer of employment from a Local Education Agency (LEA)

PAIUCC School Code 2011 Principal Certificate, Alternate Route Requirements to be completed within 2 years: An Approved college or university program or Within 2 years of employment must produce satisfactory evidence of completing an approved leadership development program Demonstrated knowledge of Basic School Laws and regulations

PAIUCC Principal Certificates Administrative I, Traditional Route Bachelor’s Degree Verification of 3 years of relevant professional experience defined as “professional experience in an educational setting that is related to the instructional process” Completion of approved program of graduate study in education. (preparation completed outside of Pa must meet Pa standards) Satisfactory achievement on the required Praxis test

PAIUCC School Code 2011 Principal Certificate, Level II Requirements Both Provisional I and Administrative I candidates: Complete the PIL induction program Provide 3 years of satisfactory service Both Administrative I and Provisional Administrative I are valid for 5 years of service and cannot be renewed.

PAIUCC School Code 2011 Vocational Director Certificate, Alternate Route Bachelor’s Degree from an accredited College or University 3 years of relevant professional experience defined as “professional experience in an educational setting that is related to the instructional process” Offer of employment from an Local Education Agency (LEA)

PAIUCC School Code 2011 Vocational Director Certificate, Alternate Route Requirements to be completed within 2 years: An Approved vocational administrative director preparation program or Proof of completion of an introductory Pennsylvania Inspired Leadership (PIL) program approved by PDE Demonstrated knowledge of Basic School Laws and regulations

PAIUCC School Code 2011 Vocational Director Certificate, Traditional Route Bachelor’s Degree Verification of 3 years of relevant professional experience defined as “professional experience in an educational setting that is related to the instructional process” Completion of approved program of graduate study in education. (preparation completed outside of Pa must meet Pa standards) Satisfactory achievement on the required Praxis test

PAIUCC Also on the Website: r.pt./community/administrative_supervisor y/8820/administrative_level_ii_certification / r.pt./community/administrative_supervisor y/8820/administrative_level_ii_certification / OR… Go to Certifications, Level II, Administration Level II Certification and the PIL Induction Requirement

PAIUCC Out of State Candidates Valid Instructional Certificate from another state Bachelor’s Degree 2 years of successful classroom experience Demonstrates subject matter competency School Code 2011

PAIUCC School Code 2011 Postbaccalaureate Certification Programs Includes traditional post bacc programs, accelerated programs, intern and residency programs and administrative programs Provides for PDE approved providers other than institutions of higher education Requires PDE to develop guidelines for the approval of flexible postbacc programs The bill requires specific postbacc content

PAIUCC School Code 2011 Residency Certificate Requirements Areas of shortage Masters or Doctorate or Bachelors degree with 3 years of experience in related field Continuously enrolled in an approved residency program Satisfactory achievement on the appropriate content test Offer of employment from LEA Valid for 3 years, one time only

PAIUCC School Code 2011 Instructional Intern Certificate Requirements Bachelors degree Continuously enrolled in an approved intern program Satisfactory achievement on the appropriate content test Offer of employment from LEA Valid for 3 years, one time only

PAIUCC Measuring Educator Effectiveness Project Goal To develop educator effectiveness models that will reform the way we evaluate school professionals as well as the critical components of training and professional growth. The term “educator” includes teachers, education specialists, and principals. 18

PAIUCC Educator Effectiveness 3

PAIUCC Background A multi-phase project that began with $800,000 Gates Foundation grant to facilitate the development of statewide policy, tools and processes to evaluate teachers and principals in which student achievement is a significant factor affecting performance ratings PDE is closely following the work of the Pittsburgh Public Schools, recipients of a $40 million Gates Foundation grant that is more comprehensive in scope but similar in redesigning evaluation policy, tools and processes A University of Pittsburgh researcher is conducting a qualitative analysis regarding the effectiveness of principal training and the comprehensiveness, validity, transparency, practicality, and quality of the teacher evaluation system A third party researcher is conducting a quantitative analysis evaluating the relationships between professional practices as measured by classroom observation scores and teacher contributions to student achievement 20

PAIUCC Phase I Sites Allentown School District Cornell School District Mohawk School District IU 5 – Northwest Tri-County 21

PAIUCC Phase II Sites 119 Local Education Agencies, including School Districts, CTCs, Charter Schools and IUs 363 Buildings 658 Supervisors 2,348 Teachers in PSSA tested subjects 2,586 Teachers in non-PSSA tested subjects 22

PAIUCC Phase III Sites 293 Local Education Agencies, including School Districts, CTCs, Charter Schools and IUs 1,255 Schools 1,972 Supervisors 20,360 Teachers in PSSA tested subjects 3,771 Teachers in non-PSSA tested subjects 23

PAIUCC Participation Methods Teacher Effectiveness Phase III SIG districts with schools implementing a Transformation Model Race to the Top Recipients 24

PAIUCC Multiple Measures of Teacher Effectiveness 7

PAIUCC Danielson Framework, Domain 3: Instruction Component1. Failing2. Needs Improvement3. Proficient4. Distinguished 3a: Communicating with students Expectations for learning, directions and procedures, and explanations of content are unclear or confusing to students. Teacher’s use of language contains errors or is inappropriate to students’ cultures or levels of development Expectations for learning, directions and procedures, and explanations of content are clarified after initial confusion; teacher’s use of language is correct but may not be completely appropriate to students’ cultures or levels of development. Expectations for learning, directions and procedures, and explanations of content are clear to students. Communications are appropriate to students’ cultures and levels of development. Expectations for learning, directions and procedures, and explanations of content are clear to students. Teacher’s oral and written communication is clear and expressive, appropriate to students’ cultures and levels of development, and anticipates possible student misconceptions. 3b: Using questioning and discussion techniques Teacher’s questions are low-level or inappropriate, eliciting limited student participation, and recitation rather than discussion. Some of the teacher’s questions elicit a thoughtful response, but most are low-level, posed in rapid succession. Teacher’s attempts to engage all students in the discussions are only partially successful. Most of the teacher’s questions elicit a thoughtful response, and the teacher allows sufficient time for students to answer. The students are engaged and participate in the discussion, with the teacher stepping aside when appropriate. Questions reflect high expectations and are culturally and developmentally appropriate. Students formulate many of the high- level questions and ensure that all voices are heard. 26

PAIUCC Educational Specialist Effectiveness 19

PAIUCC Who are Educational Specialists? Educational Specialists are defined in Pennsylvania School Code with the scope of their certificates and assignments described in Certification and Staffing Polices and Guidelines (CSPGs). Currently CSPG 75 through 81 list the following specialist certifications: – Dental Hygienist – Elementary School Counselor – Home and School Visitor – Instructional Technology Specialist – Secondary School Counselor – School Nurse – School Psychologist PDE is in the process of working with stakeholder groups from across the Commonwealth to revise the Danielson Framework for Teaching to reflect the specific roles and functions of the identified specialist groups 28

PAIUCC Specialists-What about Other Licensed Staff Hired under Teacher Contracts? Given that many LEAs hire licensed professionals under teacher contracts who are not certificated as specialists under Pennsylvania School Code, PDE has made a decision to develop revised Danielson Framework for Teaching rubrics for the following roles: – Occupational Therapist – Physical Therapist – Social Workers – Behavior Analysts – Educational Interpreters PDE is in the process of working with stakeholder groups from across the Commonwealth to revise the Danielson Framework for Teaching to reflect the specific roles and functions of the identified licensed professionals. 29

PAIUCC 30

PAIUCC The “Elective” Portion of Teacher Effectiveness Measuring Student Performance for Teachers in Tested and Non ‐ Tested Grades and Subjects 31 The Goal: To have an effective teacher in every classroom

PAIUCC What Model Might be Most Appropriate for PA to Develop? Student Learning Objective Models Models of Student Assessment Measurement of Student Performance & Teacher Effectiveness

PAIUCC The Approach Provide a method for teachers to write SLOs. Provide a method for teachers to design assessments appropriate to the SLO. Provide piloted and peer-reviewed models on the PDE SAS website. Provide professional development appropriate to SLO development. The Methodology: AN SLO TEMPLATE

PAIUCC Looking at the Components of PA’s SLO Template Teacher Information Course Information Learning Objective Data and Targets Used to Establish the SLO Assessment/Performance Task Administration of the Assessment/Performance Task Data Collection Implementation Timeline Teacher Effectiveness Measure

PAIUCC Teacher Effectiveness Measure Classroom Objective How will the aggregated scores of individual student assessment results be used to define teacher effectiveness? Failing: few students achieve content mastery or growth Needs Improvement: less than a significant number of students achieve content mastery or growth Proficient: A significant number of students achieve content mastery or growth Distinguished: An exceptional number of students achieve content mastery or growth Fewer than 50% of students will move a minimum of 5 levels. 50%-70% of students will move a minimum of 5 levels 70%-80% of students will move a minimum of 5 levels 80% -100% of students will move a minimum of 5 levels Less than 50% of students will achieve proficient or advanced levels in 6 out of 8 components (mastery) or will achieve improved scoring in 3 out of 8 components, with some decrease in the other 5 components (growth). 50% -74% of students will achieve proficient or advanced levels in 6 out of 8 components (mastery) or will achieve improved scoring in 3 out of 8 components, with some decrease in the other 5 components (growth). 70 % -84% of students will achieve proficient or advanced levels in 6 out of 8 components (mastery) or will achieve improved scoring in 3 out of 8 components, with no decrease in the other 5 components (growth). 85% -100% of students will achieve proficient or advanced levels in 6 out of 8 components (mastery) or will achieve improved scoring in 3 out of 8 components, with no decrease in the other 5 components (growth).

PAIUCC What Does the PA SLO Process Hope to Accomplish? To meet federal Race to the Top Requirements To meet state legislated teacher evaluation requirements To utilize some processes that teachers already have in place To inform principals as to appropriate processes in content areas with which they may not be familiar

PAIUCC To provide teachers in non-tested grades and subjects an opportunity to be evaluated in their content area To inform and instruct teachers in non-tested grades and subjects about standards-based education design: 1)Curriculum Frameworks 2)Standards 3)Backward Design 4)Transfer of Learning 5)PA Standards Aligned System Website

PAIUCC To have an effective teacher in every classroom.

PAIUCC Observation/Evidence Danielson Framework Domains 1.Planning and Preparation 2.Educational Environment 3.Delivery of Service 4.Professional Development Student Performance of All Students in the School Building in which the Nonteaching Professional Employee is Employed District Designed Measures and Examinations Nationally Recognized Standardized Tests Industry Certification Examinations Student Projects Pursuant to Local Requirements Student Portfolios Pursuant to Local Requirements Non Teaching Professional Employee Effectiveness System in Act 82 (HB 1901)

PAIUCC Principal Effectiveness 22

PAIUCC Principal Effectiveness Domain 1 - Strategic/Cultural Leadership : The school leader will systematically and collaboratively develop a positive culture to promote continuous student growth and staff development. The leader articulates and models a clear vision of the school’s culture that involves students, families, and staff. Domain 2- Managerial Leadership: The school leader will ensure that the school has processes and systems in place for budgeting, staffing, problem solving, communicating expectations and scheduling that result in organizing the work routines in the building. The school leader must efficiently, effectively, and safely manage the building to foster staff accountability and student achievement. 41

PAIUCC Principal Effectiveness Domain 3 – Leadership for Learning: The school leader assures school-wide conversations occur regarding standards for curriculum, instruction, assessment, and data on student learning based on research and best practices, and ensures that the ideas developed are integrated into the school’s curriculum and instructional approaches. Domain 4 – School and Community Leadership: The school leader will promote the success of all students, the positive interactions among building stakeholders, and the professional growth of staff by acting with integrity, fairness and in an ethical manner. 42

PAIUCC

Additional Items Inter-Rater Reliability Professional Development Alternative Educator Effectiveness System Implementation Guidelines – Formula – Differentiated Supervision – Other 44

PAIUCC Professional Development and Teachscape Products

PAIUCC Professional Development: Inter-rater Reliability Teachscape Framework for Teaching Proficiency System (FFTPS) Overview 20 hours of training content o Self paced o Total training time can be faster or longer 11 online learning modules for observers o Orientation to observer training o Minimizing bias o 9 modules on Framework for Teaching o Overview o Framework for Teaching Components in Domain 2 and Domain 3 detailed rater training on each component and performance level Over 100+ master scored videos

PAIUCC Professional Development Teachscape’s Framework for Teachers Effectiveness Series (FFTES) Self-Paced and Video-Rich Online Learning Resources The Framework for Teaching Effectiveness Series includes 2 sets of learning modules: 1. Laying the Foundation Orientation to course materials Understanding the Framework for Teaching Applying the Framework for Teaching 2. Framework Components 8 individual learning modules which explore the eight observable components in Domains 2 and 3 of Danielson’s Framework for Teaching

PAIUCC Professional Development on SAS

PAIUCC 49 Built for PDE – Designed for You Now Showing On a Screen Near You! Teacher Information Management System

PAIUCC Dateline TIMS Released December 19, 2011 Paperless February 16, 2012 Updated weekly through June Release Three June 25, 2012 Emergency Permit Reissuance July 16, 2012 Release Four Projected August or September 2012

PAIUCC Release 3 Highlights More hints on each screen Applicant sees only relevant screens Business logic improved to meet requirements More uploads (Health Certificate) Enhanced cover sheet material Applications Tailored to the Credential 51

PAIUCC Release 3 Dashboards and Searches Dashboards Applicant, LEA (Local Education Agency), IHE (Institutions of Higher Education) and PDE dashboards updated Buttons moved and renamed Section heading text revised Searches Sortable Results! (Click on column heading to sort.) LEA Search and Print Permits on one screen LEA Reissue Permits from one screen 52

PAIUCC Release Four – August/September Non-US Citizens – Alien Provisional Certificates Eliminated – No Fee Profile Update for Citizenship Activities Act 97 Waivers Added New Alternate Credentials Added New Vocational Intern Category (same requirements) Vocational & Program Specialist Process Customized 53

PAIUCC More enhancements are still on the drawing board… Public Website Messaging System Overhaul, including Automatic Expedites for LEA 54

PAIUCC Questions? 55