1-1 ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1-1 ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Advertisements

EDUCATION SERVICE UPDATE
1 Chapter 4 Copyright ©2006 Thomson South-Western, Mason, Ohio William A. Raabe, Gerald E. Whittenburg, & Debra L. Sanders Administrative Regulations &
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
1 Chapter 1: Tax Research. 2 TAX RESEARCH (1 of 2)  Types of tax research  Tax research process  How facts affect tax consequences  Sources of tax.
Chapter 15 Tax Research. Learning Objectives Describe the steps in the tax research process Explain how the facts affect the tax results Identify the.
Mobility Update as of February 15, WA OR CA NV ID MT ND SD WY UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX OK KS NE MN IA MO AR LA MS ALGA FL WI IL MI IN KY TN SC NC VA.
1-1 ©2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
National Journal Presentation Credits Producers: Katharine Conlon Director: Afzal Bari House Committee Maps Updated: March 19, 2015.
MD VT MA NH DC CT NJ RI DE WA
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
©2009 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning
Medicaid Eligibility for Working Parents by Income, January 2013
House Price
Existing laws requiring abortion clinics to meet surgical center standards and require abortion providers to have hospital privileges WY WIǂ WV WA VA VT.
House price index for AK
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Children's Eligibility for Medicaid/CHIP by Income, January 2013
Chapter 15 Tax Research 1.
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Other Adults, January 2017
NJ WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NH NV
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
Medicaid Costs are Shared by the States and the Federal Government
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Chapter 1: Tax Research Chapter 1: Tax Research.
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
Populations included in States’ SIMRs for Part C FFY 2013 ( )
©2008 Prentice Hall, Inc..
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
619 Involvement in State SSIPs
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
States including governance in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including governance in their SSIP improvement.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Mean
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Parents, January 2017
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Mean
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Chapter 16 Tax Research Murphy & Higgins
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
States’ selected SIMRs for Part C FFY 2013 ( )
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Presentation transcript:

1-1 ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-2 TAX RESEARCH (1 of 2)  Overview of tax research  Steps in the tax research process  Importance of facts to the tax consequences  Sources of tax law  Tax services ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-3 TAX RESEARCH (2 of 2)  Citators  Internet as a research tool  Professional guidelines for tax services ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-4 Overview of Tax Research (1 of 2)  Close-fact or tax compliance  Facts already occurred  Discovery of tax consequences  Proper disclosure ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-5 Overview of Tax Research (2 of 2)  Open-fact or tax-planning  Before structuring or concluding a transaction  Minimization of taxes  Careful compliance permits legal avoidance of taxation ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-6 Steps in the Tax Research Process (1 of 2)  Determine the facts  Identify the issues (questions)  Locate applicable authorities  Evaluate authorities  Choose which to follow when authorities conflict ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-7 Steps in the Tax Research Process (2 of 2)  Analyze facts in terms of applicable authorities  Communicate conclusions and recommendations to client  Treas. Dept. Circular 230 covers all written advice communicated to clients ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-8 Importance of the Facts to the Tax Consequences  Ambiguous situations (gray areas)  Facts are clear but the law is not  Law is clear but the facts are not  Advance planning permits facts to develop that produce favorable tax consequences ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-9 Sources of Tax Law (1 of 2)  Legislative process  Internal Revenue Code  Treasury Regulations  Administrative pronouncements  Judicial decisions  Tax treaties  Tax periodicals ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-10 Legislative Process  House Ways and Means Committee  Voted on by full House  Senate Finance Committee  Voted on by full Senate  Conference Committee  Voted by both full House and Senate  Signed or vetoed by President  Override veto by 2/3 vote by both houses ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-11 Internal Revenue Code (IRC)  Title 26 of the United States Code enacted by Congress  Organization  Title  Subtitle  Chapter Subchapter - Part - Subpart - Section ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-12 Treasury Regulations (1 of 3)  Treasury Dept. delegates authority to IRS to promulgate Treas. Regs.  Types of Treasury Regulations  Proposed: no authoritative weight  Temporary  Provide immediate guidance  Same authority as Final Regs.  Final ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-13 Treasury Regulations (2 of 3)  Interpretative Regulations  Interpret related Code section  Less authority than IRC  Legislative Regulations  Almost the same authority as IRC  Legislative reenactment doctrine  Check date of Regs.  Law may have changed after written ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-14 Treasury Regulations (3 of 3)   1 – Income tax  165 – IRC citation  5 – 5 th regulation  Subject matter  1 – Income tax  20 – Estate tax  25 – Gift tax  301 – Admin/procedural matters  601 – Procedural rules ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-15 Administrative Pronouncements (1 of 5)  Revenue Rulings  More specific than Regs.  Less authority than Regs.  Revenue Procedures  IRS guidance on procedural matters ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-16 Administrative Pronouncements (2 of 5)  Citation of Revenue Rulings and Procedures  Rev. Rul. (or Proc.) 97-4, C.B. 5  4 th Rev. Ruling of 1997  Beginning with 2000, all four digits of the year are used (e.g., Rev. Rul )  In Cumulative Bulletin on p. 5 ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-17 Administrative Pronouncements (3 of 5)  Letter Rulings  Reply to specific taxpayer question  Only authority for specific taxpayer  Ltr. Rul (August 6, 2001)  2001 – year  30 – week  006 – 6 th letter ruling of the 30 th week ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-18 Administrative Pronouncements (4 of 5)  Other interpretations  Technical Advice Memoranda  IRS advice to an IRS agent on technical matters  Issued to public in form of letter rulings  Information releases  Like press releases  Written in lay terms  Sent to newspapers ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-19 Administrative Pronouncements (5 of 5)  Other interpretations (continued)  Announcements and notices  More technical than information releases  Address current tax developments  IRS bound by to follow  Just like Revenue Rulings and Procedures ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-20 Judicial Decisions  Overview of court system  U.S. Tax Court  U.S. District Courts  U.S. Court of Federal Claims  U.S. Supreme court  Precedential value of various decisions ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-21 Overview of Court System (1 of 2) ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Appellate Courts

1-22 Overview of Court System (2 of 2) ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall CircuitStates Included in Circuit 1 st ME, MA, NH, RI, PR 2 nd CT, NY, VT 3 rd DE, NJ, PA, VI 4 th MD, NC, SC, VA, WV 5 th LA, MS, TX 6 th KY, MI, OH, TN 7 th IL, IN, WI 8 th AR, IA, MN, MO, NE, ND, SD 9 th AK, AZ, CA, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR, WA, GU, MP 10 th CO, KS, NM, OK, UT, WY 11 th AL, FL, GA D.C.District of Columbia FederalAll Districts

1-23 U.S. Tax Court (1 of 3)  Taxpayer does not pay deficiency before litigating case  No jury trial available  Regular and Memorandum decisions  Small Cases Procedure  Acquiescence policy ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-24 U.S. Tax Court (2 of 3)  Regular decisions  First time court hears case  Memo decisions  Factual variations of previous cases  Small cases procedure  Cases of <$50,000 eligible  Less formal than regular tax court ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-25 U.S. Tax Court (3 of 3)  Acquiescence policy  IRS announces whether or not it agrees with Tax Court decisions ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-26 U.S. District Courts  May request a jury trial  Must pay deficiency first  Unreported decisions  Decisions not officially reported  Published by RIA and CCH ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-27 U.S. Court of Federal Claims  No jury trial  Must pay deficiency first  Decisions appealable to Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-28 Circuit Courts of Appeals  Losing party at trial level may appeal decision to appellate court  Circuit Courts of Appeals  Appeals from Tax Court & district courts  Based upon geography  Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit  Appeals from U.S. Court of Federal Claims ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-29 Supreme Court  Very few tax cases are heard  Hears cases when  Circuit courts are divided or  Issue of great importance  Same authority as IRC ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-30 Precedential Value of Decisions ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-31 Tax Services (1 of 2)  Annotated services  Organized by IRC section  United States Tax Reporter by RIA  Standard Federal Tax Reporter by CCH ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-32 Tax Services (2 of 2)  Topical services organized by topic  Federal Tax Coordinator 2d by RIA  Tax Management Portfolios by BNA  CCH Federal Tax Service by CCH ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-33Citators  History of the case  List of other authorities that have cited the case in question  Refer to Table 4 in book for list of terms describing status change in IRS rulings  CCH Citator  RIA Citator 2nd Series ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-34 Internet as a Research Tool ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall InformationCHECKPOINTCCH NETWORK Recent developmentsNewsstandMyCCH Primary & secondary sources Federal State and local reportersState & LocalState All int’l referencesInternational Estate taxEstate Planning Financial & Estate Planning Pension taxationPension & BenefitsPension & Payroll Payroll taxationPayrollPension & Payroll

1-35 Professional Guidelines for Tax Services (1 of 2)  Treas. Dept. Circular 230  Pertains to all tax practitioners  Rules to practice before IRS  Guidance on written advice to taxpayers  Gives gov’t authority to impose fines for violations of rules ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

1-36 Professional Guidelines for Tax Services (2 of 2)  AICPA SSTSs  Ethical framework for taxpayer/client relationship  High standards of care  No duty to verify client information if not suspicious ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

Comments or questions about PowerPoint Slides? Contact Dr. Richard Newmark at University of Northern Colorado’s Kenneth W. Monfort College of Business 1-37 ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall