Skit on Reserving Committee on Professionalism Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants
Advertisements

©Towers Perrin Emmanuel Bardis, FCAS, MAAA Cane Fall 2005 meeting Stochastic Reserving and Reserves Ranges Fall 2005 This document was designed for discussion.
ASAC Annual Conference – St. Louis, MO October 21, 2014 Presented by: Paige Gilligan, CAC.
Course on Professionalism ASOP 43 – Property / Casualty Unpaid Claim Estimates.
Skit on Reserving Committee on Professionalism Education.
1 Code of Professional Conduct Darrell Knapp Kansas City Actuaries Club Seminar June 24, 2009.
Page 1 | Confidential and Proprietary Information Part C – Section 320 Presenting Information Jim Gaa, Chair, Part C Task Force IESBA Meeting Toronto,
ACCOUNTING ETHICS Lect. Victor-Octavian Müller, Ph.D.
Discussion on SA-500 – AUDIT EVIDENCE
Reserve Risk Within ERM Presented by Roger M. Hayne, FCAS, MAAA CLRS, San Diego, CA September 10-11, 2007.
Skit on Ratemaking Committee on Professionalism Education.
Code of Professional Conduct and Relevant Actuarial Standards of Practice March, 18, 2008 Ratemaking Seminar Boston.
Casualty Actuaries Society Tax Issues Associated with Unpaid Losses September 12, 2006.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates, and Related Disclosures ISA Implementation.
Current Developments at the PCAOB Ensuring Integrity: 3 rd Annual Auditing Conference at Baruch College December 4, 2008.
COURSE ON PROFESSIONALISM ASOP #17 - Expert Testimony by Actuaries.
Chapter 9 Ethical Issues.
1 APRA & Developments in General Insurance Robert Thomson Monday 13 September 2004.
Internal Control and Internal Audit
Nature of an Integrated Audit
SUNY Board of Trustees Audit Committee Presentation October 28, 2011 Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook University REPORT ON RESULTS OF 2010.
Course on Professionalism Actuarial Organizations and Qualification Standards.
Lights! Camera! Action! A Sequel MAF Spring Meeting Committee On Professionalism Education April 11, 2014.
M. ANGELA JIMENEZ 1 UNIT 5. REGULATION OF EXTERNAL AUDIT IFAC AND E.C.
Course on Professionalism ASOP Presentation. 2 Contents Introduction Introduction ASOP Highlights ASOP Highlights ASOP in Asia ASOP in Asia.
Introduction to Experience Rating Kyle Vrieze, FCAS Senior Vice President, Willis Re CAS Ratemaking Seminar Cambridge, Massachusetts March 17, 2008.
Basic Track I 2007 CLRS September 2007 San Diego, CA.
Skit on Predictive Modeling Committee on Professionalism Education.
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Minneapolis, Minnesota September 18 – 19, 2000 Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 36 Discussion of Implementation Considerations.
Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants of HKICPA
1 CLRS Basic Track I Basic Track I 1998 CLRS September 28, 1998 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ratemaking ASOPS By the CAS Committee on Professionalism Education.
Course on Professionalism Statement of Principles.
Course on Professionalism ASOP 1 – Introductory Actuarial Standard of Practice (ASOP)
ABCD Case Studies Speaker Janet Fagan FCAS, MAAA Moderator: Wendy Germani FCAS, MAAA Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Atlanta, Georgia September 9 – 11, 2015.
May 18, 2004CAS Spring Meeting1 Demand Based Pricing: A Company Perspective CAS Spring Meeting May 18, 2004 Floyd M. Yager, FCAS, MAAA Allstate Insurance.
Discussion of Unpaid Claim Estimate Standard  Raji Bhagavatula  Mary Frances Miller  Jason Russ November 13, 2006 CAS Annual Meeting San Francisco,
Loss Reserves from the Actuarial, Accounting and IRS Perspectives Actuary’s Perspective by Alan E. Kaliski, FCAS, MAAA.
US Standard of Practice #43 Unpaid Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Estimates Mary Frances Miller Christopher Carlson Casualty Actuarial Society Quebec,
A.S. FlemingFall 2009 Acct 431 – Cost Management "Ethics in its broader sense, deals with human conduct in relation to what is morally good and bad, right.
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Actuaries September 2008 Reserve Ranges – A Summary of the COPLFR Issue Brief Marc F. Oberholtzer, FCAS, MAAA.
Regulatory Guidance to the 2004 Changes to the Actuarial Opinion SWAF Fall 2004 Wendy Germani, FCAS, MAAA Nicole Elliott, Aspiring Actuary.
Copyright © 2008 by the Actuarial Board for Counseling and Discipline A Presentation by Michael Toothman, June 5, 2008 Actuarial Board for Counseling and.
Ranges of Reasonable Estimates Charles L. McClenahan, FCAS, MAAA Iowa Actuaries Club, February 9, 2004.
COURSE ON PROFESSIONALISM ASOP #17 - Expert Testimony by Actuaries.
Estimation and Application of Ranges of Reasonable Estimates Charles L. McClenahan, FCAS, MAAA 2003 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar.
Proposed ASB Actuarial Standard of Practice on Statements of Actuarial Opinion Regarding Property/Casualty Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves Status.
2002 CLRS - Arlington, VA Reserve/Opinion Issues from a Regulatory Perspective Proposed Revision to the NAIC Annual Statement Instructions Richard Marcks,
IRS/Actuary Actuary’s Perspective by Alan E. Kaliski, FCAS, MAAA.
STATUTORY STATEMENTS OF ACTUARIAL OPINION – Changes for Today and Tomorrow Changes for CLRS Chicago, IL.
Fall Conference Ethics Presentation November 13, 2015.
Copyright © 2011 by the American Academy of Actuaries Southwest Actuarial Forum June Lisa Slotznick, FCAS, MAAA Member, COPLFR Revised ASOP No.
Charles L. McClenahan 10 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL Dancin’ With the Devil Ranges and Adverse Deviation Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar, September.
PROFESSIONALISM IN RESERVING: DO I REALLY WANT TO DO THAT? CLRS September 12-14, 2004 Moderator: David J. Otto, FCAS, MAAA Panelist:Patrick J. Gilhool,
Course On Professionalism Actuarial Organizations And Qualification Standards 1.
Lights! Camera! Professionalism! CANE Regional Meeting April 7, 2016.
1$1001 2$2002 3$3003 4$5004 6$2,0006 7$4,0007 8$8,0008 9$16, $50, $100, $250, $500, $1, $25, $1 Million15.
Basic Track I 2008 CLRS September 2008 Washington, DC.
Actuarial Credibility Task Force Report & The Potential Impact to ASOP 36 Chris Carlson, FCAS, MAAA Pinnacle Actuarial Resources, Chair Casualty Committee.
15 $1 Million 14 $500, $250, $100, $50, $25,000 9 $16,000 8 $8,000 7 $4,000 6 $2,000 5 $1,000 4 $500 3 $300 2 $200 1 $100.
Assurance, Related Services and Internal Auditing
Risk adjustment (margin)
Casualty Actuarial Society Practical discounting and risk adjustment issues relating to property/casualty claim liabilities Research conducted.
Discussion Draft of Proposed Revision to 1988 Statement of Principles Regarding Property and Casualty Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves May 16,
Bermuda Economic Balance Sheet (EBS) Technical Provisions
ACCOUNTING ETHICS Conf.univ.dr. Victor-Octavian Müller.
ACCOUNTING ETHICS Conf.univ.dr. Victor-Octavian Müller.
ACCOUNTING ETHICS Conf.univ.dr. Victor-Octavian Müller.
ACCOUNTING ETHICS Conf.univ.dr. Victor-Octavian Müller.
ACCOUNTING ETHICS Lect. Victor-Octavian Müller, Ph.D.
Presentation transcript:

Skit on Reserving Committee on Professionalism Education

Skit Background Linda, an FCAS, is the Chief Actuary for a mid-size company writing only Workers’ Compensation insurance in a large state. Linda has the responsibility of signing the Statement of Actuarial Opinion for the company. In the past two years, this state has passed several reforms which limit the amounts of compensation to be paid out in a variety of circumstances. There have been and continue to be attempts to have these reforms repealed but as of yet these have been unsuccessful.

Skit Background Mike, also an FCAS, is the internal actuary who leads the reserving unit for the company. Using reasonable assumptions, he has developed a best estimate of the loss and loss adjustment expense reserves that he believes the company should book for the December 31, 2011 evaluation. Fred, an FCAS as well, is the actuary from the company’s auditing firm. Using reasonable assumptions, he has calculated a range in which he believes the best estimate should fall. Mike’s best estimate is above the high end of Fred’s range.

Skit Background Fred and Mike have discussed the situation and it is due to different opinions with respect to both the actual effectiveness of the reforms and the possibility of those opposing them being successful in repealing any one or even all of the reforms. All three actuaries are meeting to discuss the findings.

Legal Disclosure The views expressed by the panelists are their own and may not necessarily reflect those of their respective employers.

Lights, Camera, Action!

Considerations in Making Selection From the standpoint of choosing between the two recommendations, what are the key considerations for Linda? Does Linda have the relevant information to make a decision?

Professional Guidance From ASOP 43 – definition of “Actuarial Central Estimate” Estimate that represents an expected value over the range of reasonably possible (but not all possible) outcomes Typical actuarial methods do not produce true “expected values” and exclude doomsday and/or systematic shocks in the tail of the distribution Estimate that in the actuary’s professional judgment, is neither optimistic nor pessimistic Definition intended to clarify the concept rather than assign a precise statistical measure, as commonly used actuarial methods typically do not result in a statistical mean

Professional Guidance From ASOP 43 – required disclosures Intended Purpose or Use Constraints/Limitations Scope of the Unpaid Claim Estimate Dates Significant events, assumptions, or reliances Type of range (if applicable) Changes in assumptions, procedures, methods, or models if material Reliance on Single Method Deviation from Standard

Professional Guidance CAS Statement of Principles Regarding Property and Casualty Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves Principle 3: The uncertainty inherent in the estimation of required provisions for unpaid losses or loss adjustment expenses implies that a range of reserves can be actuarially sound. Principle 4: The most appropriate reserve within a range of actuarially sound estimates depends on both the relative likelihood of estimates within the range and the financial reporting context in which the reserve will be presented.

Professional Guidance CAS Statement of Principles Regarding Property and Casualty Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves – Considerations Settlement Patterns Development Patterns External Influences

Audience Discussion on Considerations for Making Selection

Additional Considerations in Making Selection What are Linda's obligations to her employer? What, if any, are Linda's obligations to Mike? To what extent can and should Linda allow Mike's personal appeal to affect her decision?

Professional Guidance Precept 1 of the Code of Conduct: “An Actuary shall act honestly, with integrity and competence, and in a manner to fulfill the profession's responsibility to the public and to uphold the reputation of the actuarial profession.”

Professional Guidance An Actuary shall ensure that Actuarial Services performed by or under the direction of the Actuary satisfy applicable standards of practice” Precept 3 of the Code of Conduct: “An Actuary shall ensure that Actuarial Services performed by or under the direction of the Actuary satisfy applicable standards of practice”

Professional Guidance Precept 10 of the Code of Conduct: “An Actuary shall perform Actuarial Services with courtesy and professional respect and shall cooperate with others in the Principal's interest.”

Audience Discussion on Other Considerations

Possible Courses of Action Alternative 1 – Linda is on the fence between the two recommendations; she takes Mike’s appeal to heart and it is a key factor in choosing his recommendation Alternative 2 – Linda is on the fence between the two recommendations; she is troubled by Mike’s behavior (both as reported by Fred and as she observed herself in their subsequent meeting) and starts to question his judgment as a result; this is a key factor in choosing Fred’s recommendation

Possible Courses of Action Alternative 3 – Linda, in her decision-making process, disregards her interactions with Mike and Fred subsequent to the meeting; she is ultimately swayed by Mike’s analysis and goes forward with his recommendation Alternative 4 – Linda, in her decision-making process, disregards her interactions with Mike and Fred subsequent to the meeting; she is ultimately swayed by Fred’s analysis and goes forward with his recommendation

Key Takeaways The politics of workplace interactions can cause an actuary to blur ethical lines Know the Standards relevant to the work you are doing and apply them appropriately