Final Budget FY 15-16 O&M and rate setting Capital Budget Debt Service Budget 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Calaveras County Water District Capital R&R Program Funding Options March 25,
Advertisements

Municipal & Financial Services Group Water and Sewer Rate Study Revenue Requirements and Rates Workshop April 18, 2012 King George County Service Authority.
Wastewater Fund. Wastewater Revenue $296,
Revised FY 2007 & Proposed FY 2008 Operating & Capital Budgets Retail Rates Committee January 4, 2007.
1 Amador Water Agency Financial Impacts of Water Shortage and Proposed Shortage Strategy April 9, 2015 The Reed Group, Inc.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
1 Amador Water Agency System-Wide Cost of Service and Wastewater Rate Study October 9, 2014 The Reed Group, Inc.
1 Combined Utility System Cost of Service Rate Study Presentation April 6, 2010.
City Of Phoenix Water Rates June 30, 2011 Denise Olson Deputy Finance Director Finance Department.
2016 BUDGET OVERVIEW SANGER, TEXAS. BUDGET PHYLOSOPHY Conservative revenue estimates based on history. Expenditures based on history and anticipated cost.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Central Basin Municipal Water District Fiscal Year Budget and Rates Workshop June 7 th, 2013.
Wilderness Rim Association Water Rate and Reserve Study Board Meeting April 23, 2014 Presented By: Chris Gonzalez, Project Manager.
Page: Water and Wastewater Rate Study and Financial Forecast Council Presentation City of Cottonwood July 2009.
Independent Review of FY 2008 Proposed Rates D.C. Water and Sewer Authority Public Hearing June 13, 2007.
Elk Grove Water District Water Rate Update and Connection Fees Habib Isaac – Principal April 10, 2013.
THE FOSTER GROUP TFGTFG City of Detroit Water and Sewerage Department Wholesale Customer Rates Meeting Sewage Disposal System Meeting #4 Preliminary Proposed.
Finance Committee Meeting Water Rate Study Update Habib Isaac – Principal Gregg Tobler – Task Manager August 13, 2012.
Long Beach Water Department Review of FY 12 Budget.
Financial Impact of Drought March 5, 2008 Updated 3/17/08.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASIBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
THE FOSTER GROUP TFGTFG City of Detroit Water and Sewerage Department Wholesale Customer Rates Meeting Water Supply System Meeting #3 – Allocated FY
Village of Almont WATER, SEWER, AND SSO RATES 2012 – 2013 FISCAL YEAR.
1 Public Hearing User Rate Adjustments April 8, 2008.
2016 Water and Wastewater Rates Committee of the Whole November 16, 2015 Presenter: Mike Mayes – Director, Financial Services/Treasurer.
Pasadena Water and Power Public Hearing Date Water Capital Improvement Charge Pasadena City Council Meeting November 16, 2015 Agenda Item #13.
Proposed MMWD Rate Restructure MCOE District Business Officials November 4, 2015.
Proposed Lisbon FY 2016 Town Budget Public Hearing – 7:00 PM Monday, February 8 th, 2016 Lisbon School.
Pasadena Water and Power Public Hearing Water Capital Improvement Charge Pasadena City Council Meeting January 11, 2016 Item #12.
Western Hills Water DistrictWater Rate Update Board Meeting HF&H Consultants, LLC 0November 4, 2015 HF&H Consultants, LLC Western Hills Water District.
Town of Yountville B ARTLE W ELLS A SSOCIATES Independent Public Finance Advisors Water and Wastewater Rates Prop. 218 Hearing February 15, 2011.
1 Water Department FY 2014 Sources and Uses FY 2014 Sources Retail Sales$54,788,834 Wholesale Sales646,250 Other Operating Revenues145,000 Non-Operating.
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Tuesday, May 3 rd, 2016.
City of Palo Alto Utility Rate Changes FY 2013 Facility Managers’ Meeting August 16, 2012 Ipek Connolly, Senior Resource Planner.
City of Joliet 2016 Proposed Budget November 30, 2015.
WATER & SEWER ENTERPRISE FUNDS. Criteria for Rates  Overall Goal – to set rates to recover costs & avoid significant fluctuations Criteria: o Project.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
Water and Wastewater Rates Public Hearing July 15, 2015 The Reed Group, Inc. 1.
FY 2016 Water & Sewer Rates Presented by: The Department of Public Works Works.
City of East Point FY 2012 Budget Presentation. Comparison of FY11 vs. FY12 Budget Policies Proposal FY 11 TotalFY12 O&M Changes FY11 Current Budget 94,652,326.
Operating Efficiencies Costs to operate and maintain the water and sewer system have not varied significantly during the first 5 years of operation.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA FINANCIAL FORECAST AND CAPITAL FACILITIES FEES ANALYSIS Prepared in Conjunction With the Utility System Revenue.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
Financial and Capital Highlights Fiscal Year Second Quarter Charles Turner, Director of Finance
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Fiscal Year 2015 / 16 First Quarter Enterprise Performance Measures Update John Ward Director of Engineering.
Town of Yountville B ARTLE W ELLS A SSOCIATES Independent Public Finance Advisors Water and Wastewater Financing Plan Rate Study 2010 December 14, 2010.
Current Water Rates $26.66 per month readiness to serve fee (billed on a quarterly basis at $80.00) 5.14 per 1,000 gallons of water used The City of Flushing.
Portugal Cove - St. Philip’s
City of Petersburg Water and Wastewater Rates
Wastewater Fee Increases
Revised Budget Proposed budget
Biennial Budget for Fiscal Years and
City of richmond FY mid-year budget review
MOUNTAIN REGIONAL WATER
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA
SEWER SERVICE FEE RATE STRUCTURE ALTERNATIVE
Final Rate Study Findings
City of Sisters, OR 2017 Water & Sewer Rate Study
FY Proposed Budget and Rates
City of Petersburg Water and Sewer Rates April 26, 2011
FY and FY Biennial Budget Assumptions
Joshua Basin Water District Draft Findings & Rate Scenarios
Comprehensive Rate Study & Cost Allocation Analysis
Joshua Basin Water District Revised Rate Recommendations
Island Energy Advisory Committee Board
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Idyllwild Water District
City of Rehoboth Beach Water and Wastewater Financial and Rates Review
Island Energy Advisory Committee Board
City of Santa Paula Water and Sewer Rate Study Results Public Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Final Budget FY O&M and rate setting Capital Budget Debt Service Budget 1

Water Budget Major Assumptions 67 employees, down 1 from last year Drought Coordinator position will be filled immediately Water tiered rates will be changed January 1, 2016 Other water rates & charges will be changed July 1,

Water Operating Budget Mandatory water cutbacks beginning July 1, 2015 –Cutbacks will be based on FY sales –M&I Customers will be cut back by 15% –SAWR customers will be cut back by 15% Shortage Level 2 has been declared 3

Water Budget CWA’s CY 2016 will not be approved until June –6% overall increase to wholesale cost of water based on draft rates –New Fixed Charge-Supply Reliability Charge –SAWR has been extended to 12/31/20 4

Water Budget Major Assumptions (con’t) How much will we sell? –FY sales of 12,570 AF cut to 10,700 for FY –M&I 6,900 AF –SAWR 3,800 AF –Total 11,400 AF Purchased (6.3% loss factor) –62.2% sold July through Dec –38.8% sold Jan through June 5

Philosophies &Assumptions Water Dept. –80% of M&I fixed costs collected through Service Charges, 20% through water mark up. –100% of Ag fixed costs are collected through Service Charges. No markup on water. –Pass through all increases in MWD/CWA cost of water 6

FY Domestic & LD Water Rate Philosophy Tier 1 water (1-5units) is priced at 90% Base –(8% of D & LD sales) Tier 2 water (16-30 units) is priced at Base –(73% of D & LD sales) Tier 3 water sales is priced at 1.1*Base –(19% of D & LD sales) Shortage Level 2 revenues used to pay penalties levied on the District & conservation programs 7

FY Water Rate Philosophy Remainder of CY 2015: SAWR water is sold for exactly the price FPUD pays for it, $3.18 Commercial Ag water is sold for exactly the price FPUD pays for it, $4.28 The only markup on water is on M&I tiers 2&3 8

Operating Rate Changes effective July 1, % Increase to Ag Ops charge ($1.35 for ¾” meter) 3% Increase to M&I Ops charge ($1.14 for ¾” meter) Increase pumping charge by $.02 to $.33/kgal which is an SDG&E pass through. No change to charge of $.10/kgal for capital replacement of Harris, Donnil, Toyon & Daily pump stations. These rates are a pass through of RTS, IAC and wholesale water rate increases 9

FY Water Rate Philosophy Beginning CY 2016: SAWR water is sold for exactly the price FPUD pays for it, estimated to be $3.28, up from $3.18 Commercial Ag water is sold for exactly the price FPUD pays for it, estimated to be $4.76, up from $4.28 The only markup on water is on M&I tiers 2&3 10

FY Water Rate Philosophy Beginning CY 2016 Tier 1 M&I water is sold at a loss –Tier 1 rate is proposed to be $4.66, an increase of $.28 10% price differential between Tiers 1 & 2 –Tier 2 is proposed to be $5.13, an increase of $.31 10% price differential between Tiers 2 & 3 –Tier 3 is proposed to be $5.65, an increase of $.34 Prices updated and mailed to customers prior to 1/1/16 11

Sample 2016 Water Bill 12 CY 16 Customer Impact Domestic 3/4" meter using 15 units/month (5 units winter use) CurrentProposed Service Chg st 5 kgal (Tier 1) Tier 2 usage Tier RTS IAC Capital Improvement Total Water Bill Impact $ 5.92 % Impact4.8%

13 WATER DEPARTMENT BudgetEst. ActualBudget Revenues Water Sales 15,298,803 15,542,067 14,989,470 Service Charges 4,899,860 4,931,383 4,981,619 MWD RTS Charge 478, , ,649 SDCWA IAC Charge 380, , ,090 Sundry 200, , ,000 Total Revenues 21,258,087 21,645,135 21,107,828 Expenses Production 15,594,824 15,957,708 15,826,064 Customer Service 1,469,063 1,449,532 1,392,385 Distribution 1,623,937 1,409,696 1,693,738 Allocated Admin Expenses 2,299,986 2,181,649 2,398,956 Debt Service Transfer Total Expenses 20,987,810 20,998,587 21,311,144 Net Revenue/(Expense) 270, ,548 (203,316)

14 Water Dept BudgetEst. ActualBudget Net Revenue/(Expense) 270, ,548 (203,316) Transfer to Recycled - - Beginning Fund Balance 5,656,709 4,025,825 4,672,373 Ending Fund Balance 5,926,986 4,672,373 4,469,058 EQUITY REQUIREMENTS Water Reserve 1,384,320 1,487,748 Repair 750,000 Working Capital 1,637,879 1,538,135 Rate Stabilization 370, ,315 Total Equity Required 4,143,150 3,942,198 Unappropriated Funds 1,783, , ,860

Philosophies &Assumptions Wastewater Dept. –New methodology began FY –Single Family Residences Rate based on lowest water usage in month during 5 months of winter, November ‘14 through March ‘15 Assumed 90% of this water is returned to the sewer Median usage is 5, same as last year. Median has been 5 for 5 of the seven years Cap remains at 18 units (100% of use over 18 for irrigation) 10% lower flows into plant with water cutbacks 15

16 Single Family - FY (current year) Single Family - FY (current year) Consumptio n (1,000 gal)RTS Sewer Flow Fixed Charge Commodity Rate Consump tion ChargeTotal Bill Fixed Charge Commodity Rate Consumption ChgTotal Bill % Increase 090%0.0 $ $ 7.64 $ - $ $ $ 8.21 $ - $ % 190%0.9 $ $ 7.64 $ 6.88 $ $ $ 8.21 $ 7.39 $ % 290%1.8 $ $ 7.64 $ $ $ $ 8.21 $ $ % 390%2.7 $ $ 7.64 $ $ $ $ 8.21 $ $ % 490%3.6 $ $ 7.64 $ $ $ $ 8.21 $ $ % 590%4.5 $ $ 7.64 $ $ $ $ 8.21 $ $ % 690%5.4 $ $ 7.64 $ $ $ $ 8.21 $ $ % 790%6.3 $ $ 7.64 $ $ $ $ 8.21 $ $ % 890%7.2 $ $ 7.64 $ $ $ $ 8.21 $ $ % 990%8.1 $ $ 7.64 $ $ $ $ 8.21 $ $ % 1090%9.0 $ $ 7.64 $ $ $ $ 8.21 $ $ % 1190%9.9 $ $ 7.64 $ $ $ $ 8.21 $ $ % 1290%10.8 $ $ 7.64 $ $ $ $ 8.21 $ $ % 1390%11.7 $ $ 7.64 $ $ $ $ 8.21 $ $ % 1490%12.6 $ $ 7.64 $ $ $ $ 8.21 $ $ % 1590%13.5 $ $ 7.64 $ $ $ $ 8.21 $ $ % 1690%14.4 $ $ 7.64 $ $ $ $ 8.21 $ $ % 1790%15.3 $ $ 7.64 $ $ $ $ 8.21 $ $ % 1890%16.2 $ $ 7.64 $ $ $ $ 8.21 $ $ %

Philosophies &Assumptions Commercial Users –Based on actual monthly water usage –Strength classifications based on SIC code Strength appeals available –RTS (Return to Sewer) percentages may vary depending on outdoor irrigation & business type, such as a water store RTS appeals available –RTS categories are set at 10% intervals 17

Philosophies &Assumptions Multi family & other users such as schools, churches & government –Based on actual monthly water usage –RTS (Return to Sewer) percentages will vary 18

Sample 2016 Water & Sewer Bill 19 CY 16 Customer Impact Domestic 3/4" meter using 15 units/month (5 units winter use) CurrentProposed Service Chg st 5 kgal (Tier 1) Tier 2 usage Tier RTS IAC Capital Improvement Total Water Bill Impact $ 5.92 % Impact 4.8% CurrentProposed Sewer Svc Capital Improvement Chg Tax Takeaway 0.00 Total Sewer Sewer Bill Impact $ 2.95 Combined Impact $8.87 Impact as a percentage 4.9%

20 Wastewater Dept. Budget Summary BudgetEst. ActualBudget Revenues Service Charges 5,349,792 5,581,200 5,634,832 Class A Biosolids Sales 100 Sundry 1,000 4,081 1,000 Total Revenues 5,350,892 5,585,381 5,635,932 Expenses Collection 1,010, ,394 1,032,724 Treatment 864, , ,707 Disposal/Regulatory Compliance 895, , ,576 Allocated Admin Expenses 1,857,681 1,728,854 1,937,618 Debt Service Transfer 671, ,528 Total Expenses 5,299,703 5,184,756 5,516,153 Net Revenue/(Expense) 51, , ,779

21 Wastewater Fund Balance Summary BudgetEst. ActualBudget Net Revenue/(Expense) 51, , ,779 Beginning Fund Balance 1,534, , ,226 Ending Fund Balance 1,585, ,226 1,040,005 EQUITY REQUIREMENTS Working Capital 1,157,162 1,208,406 Catastrophic Repair 250,000 Total Equity Required 1,407,162 1,458,406 Unappropriated Funds 178,080 (486,936) (418,401)

Summary of Changes Wastewater new methodology –Increase monthly fixed charge $.13 to $14.23/month fixed charge for ¾” meter –Increase low strength $.57 to $8.21/kgal –Increase medium strength $.81 to $12.35 –Increase high strength $1.28 to $

Philosophies &Assumptions Recycled Dept. –Rates set at greater of 85% Tier 1 rate or 80% of the average T1 and T2 M&I rates. –Continue to find new recycled customers, new capital pipeline project budgeted for FY –Monitor Regional Board’s permitting requirements and fees. 23

24 Recycled Budget Summary BudgetEst. ActualBudget Revenues Water Sales 712, , ,786 Service Charges 51,791 54,162 54,867 MWD/CWA Incentive 224, , ,000 Sundry * 5,000 Total Revenues 993, ,159 1,003,653 Expenses Production 592, , ,753 Distribution 72,953 43,054 73,198 Allocated Admin Expenses 265, , ,803 Debt Service Transfer 92,400 94,248 Total Expenses 1,022, , ,002 Net Revenue/(Expense) (29,442) 94,538 16,651

FY Recycled Dept. Projected Operating Revenue $16k –MWD Rebate ended 1/31/15 Any shortfall made up by Water Dept. Increase rate by $.22 from $3.74 to $3.96 effective 1/1/16 Project to sell 675 AF for FY

Philosophies &Assumptions Administrative Dept. & Engineering Dept. –Are not revenue generating departments. –Admin & Eng costs must be allocated between Water (52%) Wastewater (42%) Recycled (6%) 26

27 Admin Dept. Budget Summary BudgetEst. ActualBudget Expense Allocation Water Department 2,299,986 2,181,649 2,398,956 Wastewater Department 1,857,681 1,728,854 1,937,618 Recycled Water Department 265, , ,803 Total Allocation 4,423,050 4,116,320 4,613,377 Expenses Administration & Financial Mgmt 2,570,320 2,512,316 2,691,278 Engineering 854, , ,117 Community Relations 249, , ,069 Personnel Support 748, , ,912 Total Expenses 4,423,050 4,116,320 4,613,377 Net Revenue/(Expense) - - -

Warehouse & Equipment Includes: –Warehouse Ops-purchases & issues of inventory –Vehicle Maintenance-fuel –Part of the costs are seen in every program under “Equipment Allocation” –Other costs are recovered through inventory markup 28

FY Capital Budget Water Wastewater Recycled Admin 29

Water Capital Funding $6.2M capital budget for water projects for FY for pipelines, pump stations & Santa Margarita Conjunctive Use project Funding: –Increase Capital Improvement Charge to $9.06/EMU from $8.59 with ENR of 2.5%+3% inflator to 2033 to bring replacement cycle to 84 years –We will receive $900k in Prop 50 funds for Conjunctive Use Project –No Increase to pumping charge $0.10/kgal to fund Harris/Donnil/Toyon & Daily capital improvements 30

Wastewater & Recycled Capital Funding $5.6M budgeted for FY to complete two year construction of WWTP rehab project. Total expected project cost $28.4M $1.7M Recyc Water Eastline extension –$800k funded by Prop 84 funding Increase Wastewater Capital Improvement Charge of $10.44/EDU to $10.70 to raise $1.075M towards $1.7M annual debt service payment and collections systems improvements. 31

FY Debt Service $7.2M QECB Solar loan at WWTP ($4.96M balance) –Sources of funding: CSI Rebate of $.32/kWh generates $752,819/yr. for 5 years, this is year 5. SDG&E offset of $393,928/yr. Sequestration has cost 8.7% of Federal Interest subsidy, $13.4k in FY $28.3M SRF loan for WWTP rehab –How to pay $1.7M debt service? Payments begin 12/2017 1% property taxes of $800,000 Transfers from WW/Recyc Ops $382,000/year Wastewater Capital Improvement Charge from $10.44 to $10.70/EDU to raise the remainder 32

FY Debt Service $6.2M Red Mtn. SRF ($5M balance) –Annual payments of $395,893 come from 1% property tax revenues. 33

Final Budget FY O&M and rate setting Capital Budget Debt Service Budget 34