Planning a strategy for publication in 4* journals Dr Caroline Gatrell Lancaster University Management School Co-Editor-in Chief International Journal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
So you want to get published? Kristen L. Mauk PhD, DNP, RN, CRRN, GCNS-BC, GNP-BC, FAAN President Senior Care Central.
Advertisements

Peer Review Process and Responding to Reviewers APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.
How to review a paper for a journal Dr Stephanie Dancer Editor Journal of Hospital Infection.
A Guide to Writing Research Papers Rob Briner Organizational Psychology Birkbeck.
1 Publishing in European Journal of Teacher Education 28th August 2010 Kay Livingston, Editor, EJTE Geri Smyth, Co-Editor, EJTE Katie Peace, Publisher,
Feminism & Psychology Publishing Workshop Virginia Braun (& Nicola Gavey) Incoming Co-editor(s)
Tips for Publishing Qualitative Research Sandra Mathison University of British Columbia Editor-in-Chief, New Directions for Evaluation.
What happens after submission? Sadeghi Ramin, MD Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
Approaches to Publish rather than Perish: Some Lessons from the School of Hard Knocks Dr. John Loomis, Professor Dept. of Ag & Resource Economics Colorado.
GETTING PUBLISHED Chapter 18.
Professor Ian Richards University of South Australia.
TOOLS AND TIPS TO SUPPORT YOUR RESEARCH
Writing for Publication
Publishing Journal Articles Simon Hix Prof. of European & Comparative Politics LSE Government Department My experience How journals work Choosing a journal.
School of Town and Regional Planning Professor Jenny Dixon Presentation to The Geddes Institute PhD Seminar Series 3 November 2005 GETTING PUBLISHED.
The Rosabeth Moss Kanter Award Module 2, Class 2 A Teaching Module Developed by the Curriculum Task Force of the Sloan Work and Family Research Network.
Reviewing Papers: What Reviewers Look For Session 19 C507 Scientific Writing.
Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities Peer Review Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities.
International Business Review The official journal of.
H E L S I N G I N K A U P P A K O R K E A K O U L U H E L S I N K I S C H O O L O F E C O N O M I C S Orientaatiopäivät 1 Writing Scientific.
Some Suggested Guidelines for Publishing in “A” Journals Rick Iverson 1.Contribution of your work: Originality of ideas  Demonstrate how have you extended.
II THE PUBLICATION PROCESS. Conduct literature review Start the paper Conduct study/analyze data Organize/summarize results succinctly Get early, frequent.
Manuscript Writing and the Peer-Review Process
Publishing a Journal Article: An Overview of the Process Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University
Dr Chris
Getting published (during your PhD studies) Professor Jennifer Rowley Department of Information and Communications Manchester Metropolitan University.
Writing a Good Journal Paper Cecilia Wong Professor of Spatial Planning and Director of Centre for Urban Policy Studies The University of Manchester
Writing a research paper in science/physics education The first episode! Apisit Tongchai.
Getting published : how to enhance your chances of publishing in international journals PhD-school Faculty of Social Sciences, 1 december 2008 Wouter Vandenabeele.
So you want to publish an article? The process of publishing scientific papers Williams lab meeting 14 Sept 2015.
©2006 Richard Watson Todd Publishing in international refereed journals Richard Watson Todd.
An Introduction to Empirical Investigations. Aims of the School To provide an advanced treatment of some of the major models, theories and issues in your.
Publishing your work Güliz Ger Bilkent Üniversitesi.
Ginny Smith Managing Editor: Planning and Urban Studies Taylor & Francis Ltd.
The Publication Process. Publication Steps Pre-Submission Initial Submission Behind the Scenes First Response Revise and Resubmit Revise for Submission.
Successful publishing managing the review process Professor Janet R. McColl-Kennedy, PhD 2004 Services Doctoral Consortium Miami, Florida 28 October.
Ian White Publisher, Journals (Education) Routledge/Taylor & Francis
How to write a professional paper. 1. Developing a concept of the paper 2. Preparing an outline 3. Writing the first draft 4. Topping and tailing 5. Publishing.
Geography writing workshop Peter Jackson and the editorial collective GA annual conference, Derby, April 2010.
Dr Andrea Whittaker, Asia Institute, University of Melbourne Publishing in international journals: Realities, tips and tricks.
"Writing for Researchers" Monday, July :35-3:45PM. Laurence R Weatherley– Spahr Professor of Chemical Engineering, Department of Chemical and.
How to Satisfy Reviewer B and Other Thoughts on the Publication Process: Reviewers’ Perspectives Don Roy Past Editor, Marketing Management Journal.
British Academy of Management Doctoral Symposium (publication) IJMR Co-editors: Ossie Jones & Caroline Gatrell.
Publications Dr Sarah Wendt. Context PhD conferred Oct 2005, fulltime lecturer in 2006 at UniSA (40/40/20). Promoted to Senior Lecturer (2010). Social.
AuthorAID Workshop on Research Writing Tanzania June 2010.
1 CH450 CHEMICAL WRITING AND PRESENTATION Alan Buglass.
FEMS Microbiology Ecology Getting Your Work Published Telling a Compelling Story Working with Editors and Reviewers Jim Prosser Chief Editor FEMS Microbiology.
Manuscript Review Prepared by Noni MacDonald MD FRCPc Editor-in-Chief Paediatrics and Child Health Former Editor-in -Chief CMAJ
Ian F. C. Smith Writing a Journal Paper. 2 Disclaimer / Preamble This is mostly opinion. Suggestions are incomplete. There are other strategies. A good.
Publishing in Feminist Economics Günseli Berik Editor, Feminist Economics Preconference IAFFE Conference, Berlin, July 15, 2015.
How to publish paper in journal. Step 1.Familiarize yourself with potential publications.
Publishing Papers© Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid, CS5014, Fall CS5014 Research Methods in CS Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid Computer Science Department Virginia.
Publishing in Journals: Some Tips Dr Felix B Tan Professor and Head Business Information Systems Faculty of Business & Law Auckland U of Technology, New.
Publishing in Theoretical Linguistics Journals. Before you submit to a journal… Make sure the paper is as good as possible. Get any feedback that you.
Dr. Sundar Christopher Navigating Graduate School and Beyond: Sow Well Now To Reap Big Later Writing Papers.
How to get a paper published Derek Eamus Department of Environmental Sciences.
UEF // University of Eastern Finland How to publish scientific journal articles? 10 STEPS TO SUCCESS lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll.
REPORTING YOUR PROJECT OUTCOMES HELEN MCBURNEY. PROGRAM FOR TODAY: Report Reporting to local colleagues Reporting to the Organisation Tips for abstract.
Reporting your Project Outcomes Helen McBurney. Program for today: Report Reporting to local colleagues Reporting to the Organisation Tips for abstract.
How to Get Published: Surviving in the Academic World Stephen E. Condrey, Ph.D. Vice President, American Society for Public Administration Editor-in-Chief,
Getting published Sue Symons Editorial Manager Karen Mattick
Publishing research in a peer review journal: Strategies for success
Academic writing.
Writing for Publication: The Joys, Delights & Frustrations
Journeys into journals: publishing for the new professional
Publishing Academic Work
Publishing a paper.
From PhD chapter to article
How to publish from your MEd or PhD research
Presentation transcript:

Planning a strategy for publication in 4* journals Dr Caroline Gatrell Lancaster University Management School Co-Editor-in Chief International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) Dr C Gatrell 2014

4* journals Focus on refereed journals Editorial process Getting through the door A personal view Dr C Gatrell 2014

Focus on refereed journals Chapters v. Papers in refereed journals Selecting where to publish  Journal rankings and why they matter The publication process  Submitting  Role of working papers, conferences, feedback  You and the editorial process  Reviews and reviewers Dr C Gatrell 2014

Review process Paper submitted Rejectsend for review Reject revise resubmit (major /minor) accept r Reject send for further reviewaccept publish Dr C Gatrell 2014

Editorial process Editor in Chief may send to Associate editor who may send to Anonymous Reviewers (who are they?) May be hard to find reviewers – cite key names in paper All decisions recorded by journal (S1M) Reviewers may be those whom you have cited in your paper so be careful what you say about other’s work: building on; extending important work of.... Dr C Gatrell 2014

Editorial process  Reject, revise and resubmit, minor revisions; accept  how to read the code… Rejection (be sure about this!) Resubmit to journal as new paper? reviews and send elsewhere. Revise and resubmit This is a good result. They are making no promises but once again, look for clues – what do they like, where do they want you do concentrate? Accept subject to revisions This is a great result. Do as you are asked and send back Accept as is (happens very rarely/never!) Dr C Gatrell 2014

Planning your paper (getting through the door) Check out the style of your target journal. Does your paper meet their criteria? What does the journal ask you to do? Do exactly what they say e.g. submit a paper no longer or shorter than the number of words specified Ensure you are familiar with the journal and its perspectives – what has been published in it and by whom? is it focused on empirical studies (quant, qual?) does it publish tables/appendices; does it address social problems etc…. If asked to review for the journal, accept and do a good job. Dr C Gatrell 2014

Getting through the door What you need to do to hook them in Does your paper meet aims of target journal? Does it advance debate within the journal and/or field? How does it depart from/extend/challenge what is already known? Article fits style, interest and perspective of journal. Look at what others have written. Contribution is clear (can be a small step). What is new about what you are doing? Extending existing arguments; looking at things from a new angle; filling a gap in literature; challenging existing literature; turning the field on its head? Dr C Gatrell 2014

Getting through the door Make clear links to explain how your paper is in keeping with what the journal does Methods are detailed and clear. Spend time on this – look at how others justify approach Argument is logical Allow more writing time than you think you need – go for polish. Presentation in style of journal, no grammatical errors, references complete Relate your paper to others published in journal Good relevant title Dr C Gatrell 2014

Getting through the door Seek advice from your supervisor/writing partners. Sort out in advance whose name goes on the paper, and in what order. Proof read so manuscript is really tidy Submit with a polite letter saying who you are, why you are doing the research and situating the research. Your letter should be short. You may need to work with inflexible electronic submission processes so be aware of rules. Give yourself plenty of time to submit (S1M not intuitive or empathetic, lots of questions to answer) Dr C Gatrell 2014

A personal view  Team strategy to get research on fathers published in 4* journals  Burnett, S., Gatrell, C., Cooper, C.L. and Sparrow, P. (2010) Fatherhood and Flexible working: A contradiction in terms? in Kaiser, S., Ringlstetter, M.J., Pina e Cunha, M., & Eikhof D. R., (eds.), Creating balance?! International perspectives on the work-life integration of professionals, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 157 – 172. Dr C Gatrell 2014

A personal view  Burnett, S., Gatrell, C., Cooper, C. L., and Sparrow, P. (2010). Well balanced Families: A gendered analysis of work-life balance policies and work-family practices, Gender in Management, an International Journal, Vol. 25 (7), 534 – *  Burnett, S. B., Gatrell, C. J., Cooper, C., & Sparrow, P. (2012). Fathers at Work: A Ghost in the Organizational Machine. Gender, Work & Organization. 20 (6) 632 – * Dr C Gatrell 2014

A personal view  Gatrell, C., Burnett, S. B., Cooper C. L., and Sparrow P. (2012). Work-life Balance and Parenthood: A comparative and transdisciplinary review and analysis. International Journal of Management Reviews. Vol.15 (3), 300 – *  Gatrell, C.J., Burnett, S., Cooper, C.L.C and Sparrow, P. Parents, perceptions and belonging: Exploring flexible working among UK fathers and mothers. British Journal of Management 4* DOI: / Dr C Gatrell 2014

A Personal View  Strategy to mainstream research on maternal body in 3* and 4* management journals for REF.  IJMR and Human Relations May  Revise and resubmit from IJMR, expression of interest, Human Relations. Pursue IJMR as platform for empirical research in Human Relations Dr C Gatrell 2014

A personal view  Gatrell, C. (2007). ‘A fractional commitment? Part-time employment and the maternal body’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 18 (3), 462 – *  Gatrell C. (2010). 'Pregnancy on Stage Please’: The Erasure of the Pregnant Body from Workplace Space' in Revealing and Concealing Gender, Lewis P. and Simpson R (eds) London: Palgrave, 54 – 75. Dr C Gatrell 2014

A personal view  Gatrell, C. (2010). Breastfeeding Under the Blanket: Exploring the tensions between health and social attitudes to breastfeeding in the United States, Ireland and the United Kingdom, in Liamputtong, P., (ed.), Cultural and Global Perspectives on the Management of Infant Feeding, New York: Springer, 109 – 124. Dr C Gatrell 2014

A personal view  Gatrell C. (2011). Managing the Maternal Body. International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 13, 97 – *  Gatrell C. (2011). Policy and the Pregnant Body at Work: Strategies of Secrecy, Silence and Supra- Performance, Gender, Work and Organization. Vol. 18 (2), 158 – *  Gatrell, C. (2013). Maternal body work: How women managers and professionals negotiate pregnancy and new motherhood at work. Human Relations. Vol. 66 (5), 621 – * Dr C Gatrell 2014

A Personal View  Human Relations  2009 submission v #1  2009 Reject ‘this version’ of the paper.  2011 re-submit new version v#2  2011 asked to revise and resubmit v#3  May 2012 asked to revise and resubmit v#4  July 2012 submit V #4  Sept 2012 ‘provisionally accept’ further to more revisions  Sept 2012 submit v #5  Oct 2012 accepted. Dr C Gatrell 2014