DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF A PEER-TUTORING PROGRAM FOR BASIC SKILLS DEVELOPMENT February 19, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
{ Learning Agreement Debs Wilson.  A Learning Agreement (LA) is an opportunity for you to reflect upon your goals for this course as well as your goals.
Advertisements

Assignment Options Writing to learn and/or writing to communicate School-based audience, other audience Exploratory/Formal Low stakes/ High stakes Group/individual.
Presenters: Beth Kilmer and Kari Mueller Northeastern Junior College.
Key Communities and Objectives Outcomes- Based Assessment Telling the Story Results Closing the Loop.
SIM SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE Instructor: Masrah Azrifah Azmi Murad, PhD Room: C masrah.azrifah [at] gmail.com OR masrah [at] fsktm.upm.edu.my.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
Assessing Peer Performance in PBL Groups: how technology can help Carolyn K. Manning Associate Professor Dept of Health, Nutrition & Exercise Sciences.
Jeopardy Review Accommodations for LD students Bloom’s Taxonomy Maslow’s Hierarchy UBD Habits of Mind $100 $200 $300 $400 $200 $300 $400.
Learning from Practice: Continuous Improvement and Evaluation A-011B Candice Bocala, Ed.D. Spring 2015 Module 1.
Tools of the Trade: Using Technology in Your Course Tools of the Trade: Using Technology in Your Course 1 Ms. Darla Runyon Assistant Director/Curriculum.
Blended Courses: How to have the best of both worlds in higher education By Susan C. Slowey.
COURSE NAME & # Redesigning Introductory Spanish: A Blended Approach Glynis Cowell, Director, Spanish Language Program Hosun Kim, Director, Foreign Language.
AET/515 Spanish 101 Instructional Plan SofiaDiaz
Thoughts on Teaching Public Health and the Health Work Force University of Medical Sciences Thimphu February 26, 2015.
LECTURER OF THE 2010 FIRST-YEAR STUDENT: How can the lecturer help? February 2010.
2015 TEAm Grant Innovations Convening – Tampa, FL Undergraduate Learning Assistants Program Mark Allen Weiss Florida International University April 18,
Strategies for Success
A Work in Progress The Process of Revising EAP Curriculum.
Recitation Week #1 Chem Queens College Spring 2010.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
Assessing SLOs in Retention Services Dr. Edward Pohlert, Faculty Director Retention Services: Tutoring and Academic Support Center SPEED SLOing January.
Transforming Lives Through Outreach in Academic Advisement.
The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess.
EVAL 6000: Foundations of Evaluation Dr. Chris L. S. Coryn & Carl D. Westine September 9, 2010.
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
University of Maryland Baltimore County Department of Psychology Psyc100: Introductory Psychology Eileen O’Brien, Ph.D.
Introduction to Computer Applications MIS105 Introductory Session Instructor: Irfan Ilyas.
Assessment Summative Versus Formative. What is Assessment Assessment measures if and how students are learning and if the teaching methods are effectively.
Faustino Jerome G. Babate Nursing Research I Brokenshire College SOCSKSARGEN.
Teaching Thermodynamics with Collaborative Learning Larry Caretto Mechanical Engineering Department June 9, 2006.
The Redesigned Elements of Statistics Course University of West Florida March 2008.
Formative Assessment in Flanders Second Chance Learning in Hoboken.
Course Overview Prepared by L. Nouf Almujally 1. Course Objectives Fundamental concepts of database systems, in particular, relational database systems.
IPC144 An Introduction to Programming Using C. Instructor Murray Saul Office: Rm –Office hours are posted on my IPC144 web page or on bulletin board.
[CS-225: Software Engineering] Course Guide Fatima Khan Prince Sultan University, College for Women.
Tutoring Groups School of Electrical Engineering Systems.
Making the Transition to College Dual Enrollment Psychology Introductory Unit.
Digital Transformation Interactions for Deep and Meaningful Learning Student TeacherContent Student.
Using Alice in an introductory programming course for non-CS majors Adelaida A. Medlock Department of Computer Science Drexel University
The Evolution of Peer Assisted Learning at Penn State, University Park.
Evaluation & Assessment 10/31/06 10/31/06. Typical Point Breakdown COURSE GRADES: Grades will be assigned on the basis of 450 points, distributed as follows:
MSJC Fall 2009 BSI Supplemental Instruction (SI) MSJC SI Coordinator: Janice Levasseur, M.S. MVC Math Center Coordinator Instructor of Mathematics.
Physical Science 150 An Inquiry into Energy Course Syllabus Fall nova_course_website/nova_150_syllabus_sp06.html.
Final Report. WST 100 and WST 300 Large introductory course traditionally serving up to 2400 students a year in 18 sections With redesign we are able.
Alessio Peluso 1 Critical evaluation of the module ‘Introduction to Engineering Thermo Fluid Dynamics’ First Steps in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.
The Many Faces of Giving Prompt Feedback Jeffrey Henriques Department of Psychology February 10, 2011.
ALLA Annual Convention April 25-28, Collaboration with Faculty to Develop Course-integrated Library Orientations Jo Anne Bryant,
Tutor Training Alpha Scholars: The Tutor Role. Purpose of Course To help tutors do tutoring well To help tutors do tutoring well To help tutors learn.
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
Acadia Institute for Teaching and Technology Peer Review.
Course Report Presentation Semester 1 ( ) Instructor: Instructor’s Name King Faisal University College of ……………
The Role of Writing in Students’ Learning “Challenges in Teaching” Faculty Learning Community Ping-Yuan Wang, April 13, 2015.
Data Supporting Math 096 Supplemental Instruction Intervention LaGuardia Community College Frank Wang, Marina Dedlovskaya, Joyce Zaritsky, Prabha Betne.
TRANSLATING PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR STUDENTS INTO THE CS1 CONTEXT By Claudia Ott, Anthony Robins and Kerry Shepard Presented by Laurel Powell.
Increasing the Retention of Incoming Chemical Engineering Undergraduates through Increased Student Connectedness and Autonomy Bryan W. Boudouris School.
Teaching and Learning Online What Makes Sense When Moving Courses Online.
Experiences and Thoughts on Teaching Standards Heejin Lee, Professor, Younsei University WSC Academic Day 2015 Education about.
Issues in Teaching EDU Session 1 The Conceptual Understanding of What You are Teaching.
Strategies for Success in Earth Science Travis Ramage, Academic Advisor.
Summer Scholars Promise to Practice
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTING-I ACCT 2003
Assessment and Course Redesign in Community College Geosciences
GTECH 709 Criteria for evaluation
MyMathLab® Student Overview QRB/501
Criminal Investigation Program School of Science, Health, and CJ Fall 2015 Assessment Report
Program/Department Canino School of Engineering Technology Fall 2016 Assessment Report
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Para Date of Presentation: Jan. 20, 2017
Applied Psychology Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
Chair: Nadine Jennings Date of Presentation: January 19, 2017
MA Fall 2018 Instructor: Hunter Simper Office: Math 607
Presentation transcript:

DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF A PEER-TUTORING PROGRAM FOR BASIC SKILLS DEVELOPMENT February 19, 2010

Here’s a sample of the problem: % of students who erroneously identified concepts essential to critical thinking in Geography Methodology of spatial analysis52% Relationship of Geography to other sciences 50% Composition of Earth’s crust60% Location of the International Date Line59% Longitude of the Prime Meridian55% data from early quiz results, fall 2009

Learning Connection (PATH) Instructor Successful geography students Tutored student outcomes Untutored Student outcomes Tutoring participants Untutored student group Final eval. of essential concepts Initial eval. of essential concepts Compilation of initial results Eval. of interested students criteria Interested students Concepts assessment formatting Quizzes/ exercises assessment methods Essentialconcepts Midterm /final exams assessment methods concept assessment Current geography students student responses evaluation data Potential tutoring group Geography Tutors (PATH) Interview and sel. of candidates Hired tutors Recruit tutoring participant Instructor incentives enrolled participant Compilation of final results evaluation data Tutoredresponses concept assessment untutored responses problematic concepts findings tutoring activiity tutoring methods concept questions repeated problematic concepts PROCESS DIAGRAM: PEER TUTORING - GEOGRAPHY candidate tutors

 Recruit peer tutors for introductory physical geography from population of recently successful students  Identify essential concepts with high frequencies of misunderstanding early in the course  Assess understanding of basic concepts before and after tutoring, for each student and for the two populations: tutored and untutored student groups

 Evaluate early assessment results to identify basic concepts not easily grasped in early stages of the course  Begin tutoring sessions only after 4-5 weeks of assessment by the instructor and by the students themselves  Encourage participation through stories offered by the tutors, and through extra credit points

 Students less inhibited to ask questions and admit deficiencies in study skills  Adds regularly scheduled periods to focus on the textbook and/or other learning resources  Peer tutors have recent empathy for students’ particular problems interfacing with the instructor  Encourages active learning

 ??

Problems encountered Recruitment & motivation – Voluntary process  some mismatch between those in need and participants Communication among instructors and tutors – Regular meetings for feedback & strategies would be helpful: scheduling issues – Different tactics among instructors and tutors toward improving students’ study skills PATH Center restricted hours & student schedules Persistence of all involved

 ??