Wastewater Collection System Optimization An Innovative Approach to Capital Improvement Planning COPYRIGHT – OPTIMATICS PTY LTD www.optimatics.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
InfoWorks CS Enables Design of Hybrid Pressure/Gravity Sewer Systems
Advertisements

Software Analysis Tools
Sistan & Balouchestan Electric Power Distribution Company
AQUAREC Project Centre for Water Systems AQUAREC Project Centre for Water Systems D. Joksimovic.
Design of W.W. Collection System
The Benefits of Modeling with Bentley’s Haestad Methods Solutions.
Evaluation of Private Property I/I Sources for Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Study City of Grand Rapids – E. Leonard Heights Area Presenter: Jay Zawacki, CDM.
1 CE 548 Analysis and Selection of Wastewater Flowrates and Constituent Loading.
ADRICOSM-EXT PROJECT (ADRIatic sea integrated COastal areaS and river basin Management system pilot project - EXTension) WP2 – INTEGRATED CATCHMENT SIMULATOR.
Data and Computer Communications Ninth Edition by William Stallings Chapter 12 – Routing in Switched Data Networks Data and Computer Communications, Ninth.
Modelling Developments at Power Systems Research Tom Halliburton EPOC Meeting 9 th July 2014.
7 th International Conference on Sewer Processes and Networks (SPN7) Isaac Volschan Jr. Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Department Federal.
II. Dimensioning of a Branched Distribution System Main Procedures 1. Determination of the design water flowrates 2. Determination of the pipe diameters.
AIACC Regional Study AS07 Southeast Asia Regional Vulnerability to Changing Water Resources and Extreme Hydrological due to Climate Change.
Dave Stropky, Paul Nowak, Suqin Dong Process Simulations Ltd. Konstantin Pougatch, Martha Salcudean University of British Columbia P.S. Pagoria, W.A. Barkley,
CE 3372 Water Systems Design
The City of North Bend Sanitary Sewer System
Decision Making: An Introduction 1. 2 Decision Making Decision Making is a process of choosing among two or more alternative courses of action for the.
WATER I NNOVATE Pascal Harper Product Manager. 2 What is ?
1 Anglian Water - Sewernet David Singerton, Innovation Projects Manager Evolving an Extreme Rainfall Management system Sewernet proposals 20 th November.
Analysis of wind energy with pumped storage systems in autonomous islands George Caralis Mechanical Engineer NTUA National Technical University of Athens.
1SlideBusiness Modelling Team, Consultancy UK OR in Shell Lauretta Ciuffardi Strategy & Business Modelling Consultancy UK.
Hydraulic Engineering
Cortez Sanitation DistrictSeptember 2002 Arber Cortez UV Disinfection Steven M. Ravel, P.E. Travis E. Meyer, P.E. Richard P. Arber Associates.
Reading Group Meeting PhD thesis: Modelling the Performance of an Integrated Urban Wastewater System under Future Conditions 29 August 2013 Maryam Astaraie-Imani.
HydroAsia face-to-face meeting Opening presentation.
CRESCENDO Full virtuality in design and product development within the extended enterprise Naples, 28 Nov
OUTLINE 2 INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES METHODOLOGY RESULTS FOR SEWAGE SYSTEM RESULTS FOR SEWAGE SYSTEM CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMANDATIONS CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMANDATIONS.
1 Underground Asset Management Jonathan Mongie. 2 Asset Management ► Improved Asset Condition l Increased System Efficiency ► Prolonged Asset Life l Reduced.
Best for the Buck: Using Asset Management for Project Design at Highline Water District Matthew J. Maring, P.E. April 30, 2008.
1 Water Services Training Group 19 th Annual Conference Optimising Services Delivery in the Water Industry Radisson Blu Hotel Sligo, 3 rd. September 2015.
GIE Annual Conference – Bratislava, 29 September 2006 DEVELOPING CAPACITIES: THE NEW CHALLENGES A. Stegher Head of Planning and Business Development HANDLING.
A MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR OPTIMIZING OPERATING RULES OF MULTIPURPOSE RESERVOIRS ALLOWING FOR BOTH EXTREME FLOODS AND ECOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE 4 th International.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Il Problem CE 572 Spring 2006.
Prepared by: Ayah Yasin SUPERVISOR Dr. HAFEZ SHAHEEN PROJECT 2 : FALL Wastewater Collection system for Anin 1.
Outline Introduction. Population Analysis Study Area Objectives
An-Najah National University Civil Engineering Department
1 Briefing for IMA Participants on Results of Flow Studies October 31, 2006 District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority.
An-Najah National University Engineering College Civil Engineering Department Project title : Management of stormwater for a portion of Faisal street “Nablus”
CE 3372 Water Systems Design Lecture 005: Engineering Drawings.
1 Case study: Sofia District Heating Dr. Venkata R. Putti Team Leader, Carbon Finance Assist The World Bank Minsk / Belarus, March 2007.
Road Map to the Future: The Consolidation of Sewer Infrastructure in Rutherford County, NC November 16 th, 2015.
16469 Low Energy Building Design Conflict and Interaction in Environmental Engineering Design.
An optimal water allocation in a Metropolitan region June An Integrated Operation of Multi-Regional Water Supply Networks for Tae-Sang Ryu, Sung.
Flood Analysis Study of Incheon-Gyo Catchment with SOBEK Model 24 August 2007 BLUE TEAM Advisor : Shie – Yui Liong (NUS) Leader : He Shan (NUS) Members.
Topic II. 8. Hydraulic Dimensioning of Sewers
Analysis Of Pumping System By Ir
Kevin Colvett, P.E. Nashville Corrective Action Plan and Engineering Report, Phase III for Metro Water Services and the City of Brentwood, TN Presentation.
15 th October 2007SRMCwww.orhltd.com How are you solving the puzzle? Integrated Risk Management Plans.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PETRIT TARE GENERAL DIRECTOR OF UKKO JSC CONFORMING TO EU WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIRECTIVE CASE STUDY OF KORCA CITY, ALBANIA.
City of McCall Sanitary Sewer I&I Study Community Stewardship for Economic Benefits Nathan Stewart, PE, City Engineer Matt Neukom, PE, Project Manager.
24 – Wastewater Conveyance Demand Analysis April, 18, 2013 Professor Doran CEE 410.
Remedial Measures Plans Response to EQC Questions June 21, 2011 Presentation to Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government Environmental Quality Committee.
25 – Wastewater Conveyance System Design April, 23, 2013 Professor Doran CEE 410.
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 4
Multiscale energy models for designing energy systems with electric vehicles André Pina 16/06/2010.
Approval of FY-2016 Capital Budget and the 10-Year Capital Plan February 11, 2015.
Decision Making Reading: pp. 134 – 139.
Welcome to the Libertyville Stormwater Master Plan Open House
EXERCISES Two water reservoirs are connected by a pipe 610m of 0.3m diameter, f’=0.038 and the flow produced by the difference in water surface elevations.
Prepared By : Kamal Hamaydeh Ahmad Odet-allah
Rehabilitation Program impact on Sewer Management
City Council Meeting February 16, 2010
Prepared By : Osama amr Qutayba mElhim
Multi-hop Coflow Routing and Scheduling in Data Centers
City of Rehoboth Beach Water and Wastewater Financial and Rates Review
Biosolids Planning – Core Team Meeting
Software Analysis Tools
Decentralized wastewater solutions in rural areas
Sanitation Study and Wastewater Network System AL Tayba Village
Presentation transcript:

Wastewater Collection System Optimization An Innovative Approach to Capital Improvement Planning COPYRIGHT – OPTIMATICS PTY LTD

Collection System Improvement Options / Objectives Combinations of Alternatives Conveyance / Treatment I/I Reduction Flow Equalization Capital Cost O&M Cost Enviro / Social Impact Level of Risk

Options Analysis Process

New Zealand North Shore City, New Zealand Auckland North Shore City Service Area – 130 km 2 Coastline – 141 km Existing Population – 227,000 Population in 2056 – 374,000  Population increase of 65%

Total Length of Sewer – 1346 km Total Length of Trunk – 112 km Pump Stations – 18 Calibrated Hydraulic Model 17-Year Long Time Series NSCC Optimisation – Existing Network Existing Trunk Network

Planning Objectives Overflow frequency < 6-months (based on year LTS) Pressure main velocity < 2.5 m/s Perform options analysis for: I/I reduction, conveyance, storage, and WWTP upgrade Identify least-cost solution NSCC Optimisation Overflows in Existing Network for month Event

Improvement Options Parallel sewer main – 105 km Diversion sewer main – 55 km Pump station upgrades – 18 New pump stations – 7 I/I reduction – 51 sub-cat’s WWTP Upgrades - 1 Storage locations > 200  Over 10 9 option configurations NSCC Optimisation – Improvement Options Improvement Options Parallel sewer main – 105 km (dark blue) Diversion sewer main – 55 km (blue) Improvement Options Parallel sewer main – 105 km Diversion sewer main – 55 km Pump station upgrades – 18 (purple) New pump stations – 7 (yellow) Improvement Options Parallel sewer main – 105 km Diversion sewer main – 55 km Pump station upgrades – 18 New pump stations – 7 I/I reduction – 51 sub-cat’s (shaded) Note: Substantial rehabilitation completed by NSCC over past 10 years Improvement Options Parallel sewer main – 105 km Diversion sewer main – 55 km Pump station upgrades – 18 New pump stations – 7 I/I reduction – 51 sub-cat’s WWTP Upgrades – 1 Improvement Options Parallel sewer main – 105 km Diversion sewer main – 55 km Pump station upgrades – 18 New pump stations – 7 I/I reduction – 51 sub-cat’s WWTP Upgrades - 1 Storage locations > 200  Over Possible Configurations Improvement Options – Relief SewersImprovement Options – Pump StationsImprovement Options – I/I ReductionImprovement Options – WWTP UpgradeImprovement Options – StorageImprovement Options – Too many for trial-and-error

NSCC Optimisation – Improvement Options Improvement Options – Relief SewersImprovement Options – Pump StationsImprovement Options – I/I ReductionImprovement Options – WWTP UpgradeImprovement Options – StorageGenetic Algorithm Optimisation Find the best solution to a problem that has many possible solutions Evolutionary, directed search technique GA optimisation linked with hydraulic model

Options Analysis Process

- Import Hydraulic Model - Import Sewer Costs / Options Formulate Optimisation Model - Import Pump Station Costs - Import WWTP Upgrade Costs - Import Storage Costs - Import RDII Reduction Costs - Define Planning Criteria Overflow Frequency No overflows in selected design storm event/s Velocity Constraint Pressure main velocity < 2.5 m/s Minimum Cover Top of pipe to ground surface > 900mm - Link Option Data to Model Pipe Cost Tables Diameter Options Velocity Criteria Min Cover Criteria - Optimizer WCS

Current Solution – Being Processed Processing 1 st generation Performing 200 fully dynamic model simulations of various trial solutions Cost Item Capital Cost ($M) O&M ($M) Total Cost ($M) Sewer Main Pump Station Storage I/I Reduction WWTP Upgrade TOTAL ($M) Run Optimisation Model

Current Solution – Being Processed Processing 1 st generation Performing 200 fully dynamic model simulations of various trial solutions Cost Item Capital Cost ($M) O&M ($M) Total Cost ($M) Sewer Main Pump Station Storage I/I Reduction WWTP Upgrade TOTAL ($M) Run Optimisation Model

Current Solution - $1079 M Best solution in 1 st generation Total of 200 trial solutions evaluated Actual processing time: 8 minutes (120 cores) Cost Item Capital Cost ($M) O&M ($M) Total Cost ($M) Sewer Main Pump Station Storage I/I Reduction1670 WWTP Upgrade000 TOTAL ($M)

Current Solution - $831 M Best solution in 32 nd generation Total of 6,400 trial solutions evaluated Actual processing time: 4 hours (120 cores) Cost Item Capital Cost ($M) O&M ($M) Total Cost ($M) Sewer Main Pump Station Storage I/I Reduction 1000 WWTP Upgrade 909 TOTAL ($M)

Current Solution - $674 M Best solution in 100 th generation Total of 20,000 trial solutions evaluated Actual processing time: 12.5 hours (120 cores) Cost Item Capital Cost ($M) O&M ($M) Total Cost ($M) Sewer Main Pump Station Storage I/I Reduction 530 WWTP Upgrade 909 TOTAL ($M)

Current Solution - $558 M Best solution in 350 th generation Total of 70,000 trial solutions evaluated Actual processing time: 44 hours (120 cores) Cost Item Capital Cost ($M) O&M ($M) Total Cost ($M) Sewer Main Pump Station Storage I/I Reduction 420 WWTP Upgrade 909 TOTAL ($M)

Optimised Solution - $540 M Best solution in 450 th generation Total of 90,000 trial solutions evaluated Actual processing time: 56 hours (120 cores) Cost Item Capital Cost ($M) O&M ($M) Total Cost ($M) Sewer Main Pump Station Storage I/I Reduction 420 WWTP Upgrade 909 TOTAL ($M)

Options Analysis Process

Objective: Run Optimizer WCS without storage or I/I reduction options Develop solution for conveyance-only Compare conveyance-only solution cost with least-cost solution NSCC Optimisation – Conveyance-Only Scenario

Formulate Optimisation Model - Conveyance-Only Scenario Switch-Off: I/I Reduction OptionsSwitch-Off: Storage Options

Conveyance-Only Optimisation Scenario Processing optimisation scenario Performing 90,000 fully dynamic model simulations of various trial solutions Cost Item Capital Cost ($M) O&M ($M) Total Cost ($M) Sewer Main Pump Station Storage I/I Reduction WWTP Upgrade TOTAL ($M) Run Optimisation Model

Conveyance-Only Optimisation Scenario Processing optimisation scenario Performing 90,000 fully dynamic model simulations of various trial solutions Cost Item Capital Cost ($M) O&M ($M) Total Cost ($M) Sewer Main Pump Station Storage I/I Reduction WWTP Upgrade TOTAL ($M) Run Optimisation Model

Conveyance-Only Solution - $809 M Best solution in 450 th generation Total of 90,000 trial solutions evaluated Actual processing time: 56 hours (120 cores) Cost Item528 Capital Cost ($M) O&M ($M) Total Cost ($M) Sewer Main Pump Station Storage --- I/I Reduction --- WWTP Upgrade 1070 TOTAL ($M)

Solution Comparison – $809 M / $540 M Best solution in 450 th generation Total of 90,000 trial solutions evaluated Actual processing time: 56 hours (120 cores) Cost Item Conveyance Only ($M) Least Cost ($M) Saving Sewer Main Pump Station Storage -111 I/I Reduction -42 WWTP Upgrade 1079 TOTAL ($M) % 33% Saving $540 M$809 M

Solution Comparison – $809 M / $540 M Best solution in 450 th generation Total of 90,000 trial solutions evaluated Actual processing time: 56 hours (120 cores) Cost Item Conveyance Only ($M) Least Cost ($M) Saving Sewer Main Pump Station Storage -111 I/I Reduction -42 WWTP Upgrade 1079 TOTAL ($M) % 33% Saving $540 M$809 M

Options Analysis Process

Objective: Run Optimizer WCS with WWTP peak inflow limited to 3000 L/s Develop CEA Curve for NSCC NSCC Optimisation – WWTP Min. Inflow Scenario

Formulate Optimisation Model - WWTP Min. Inflow Scenario Set max WWTP capacity to 3000 L/s

WWTP Min. Inflow Optimisation Scenario Processing optimisation scenario Performing 90,000 fully dynamic model simulations of various trial solutions Cost Item Capital Cost ($M) O&M ($M) Total Cost ($M) Sewer Main Pump Station Storage I/I Reduction WWTP Upgrade TOTAL ($M) Run Optimisation Model

WWTP Min. Inflow Optimisation Scenario Processing optimisation scenario Performing 90,000 fully dynamic model simulations of various trial solutions Cost Item Capital Cost ($M) O&M ($M) Total Cost ($M) Sewer Main Pump Station Storage I/I Reduction WWTP Upgrade TOTAL ($M) Run Optimisation Model

Preliminary Solution Comparison Best solution in 450 th generation Total of 90,000 trial solutions evaluated Actual processing time: 56 hours (120 cores) Cost Item Conveyance Only ($M) Least Cost ($M) Min WWTP Inflow ($M) Sewer Main Pump Station Storage I/I Reduction WWTP Upgrade TOTAL ($M) Conveyance-Only No WWTP Upgrade Optimised Solution

Conclusion – Value of Optimisation Capital cost savings Reduce energy costs Leverage investment already made in hydraulic modelling Achieve multi-criteria objectives Perform sensitivity analyses The real value of optimisation is not in finding a single, absolute optimal solution… … but rather in having an efficient planning tool which, when integrated with sound engineering judgment, can be used to help develop robust, cost-effective and highly defensible solutions…  planning engineers greater confidence in the output from models and modelers more time to participate in engineering.

Wastewater Collection System Optimization An Innovative Approach to Capital Improvement Planning Paul Smith Joel Wilson – Wastewater Team Leader