High School Content Expectations: Science. Overview of Process  Academic Work Group – January, 2006  Dr. Andy Anderson (MSU), Co-Chair  Dr. Robert.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections
Advertisements

Curriculum Maps Public Release: February 10, 2014
Science K-7 Content Expectations Web/Public Review May 14 – June 29, 2007 Office of School Improvement.
Michigan High School Science Content Expectations October 2006.
The Adventure Continues: Exploring the Next Generation Science Standards.
“Educating and Empowering the Next Generation of Leaders”
Next Generation Science Standards Public Release II.
Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Launch Event November 16, 2013.
Florida Association of Science Supervisors Florida Department of Education Update May 5, 2005 Susan McNally Director Office of Curriculum Support.
Common Core Standards General Information and Stakeholder Feedback Process Review of DRAFT v
DOE Updates. High School 2025 Labor Workforce 2025 – Grow Dakota: Prepare students for tomorrows workforce Relevance: Advance career goals Relationships:
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
Math and Science Teacher’s Workshop September 21, 2011 Luke Dowell - Presenter.
Created using: Wordle,
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
Up-Date on Science and SS February 2015 Faculty Meeting.
NEXUS: Developing Competency-based Undergraduate Science Curricula Cynthia Bauerle, Ph.D. Assistant Director Precollege and Undergraduate Science Education.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
April 16, 2015 Macomb Science Leadership Council.
GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS Senate Bill COLLEGE & CAREER READINESS Department of School Counseling Cynthia Park, Director Ralph Aiello, Coordinator.
Challenges and Opportunities: Putting the Puzzle Together The Michigan Merit Exam: Looking at Mathematics Fall 2006.
Next Generation Science Standards Update Cheryl Kleckner Education Specialist.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
“Knowledge” Do Now: As a teacher, what does this statement make think about or feel: “He Who Can Does He Who cannot Teaches” George Bernard Shaw.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
May 10, 2007 Social Studies K-12 Content Expectations Information and Survey.
SOCIAL SCIENCES STANDARDS REVIEW AND REVISION February 2009-June 2011 PRESENTATION TO THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION.
Engaging in Next Generation Science Standards. Amber Farthing Professional Learning and Program Assistance Coordinator, LASER Ellen Ebert Science Director,
Michigan High School Graduation Requirements Online Learning Experience October 2006.
the draft curriculum Proposed Science Courses  The draft senior secondary science curriculum documents were released for consultation on 14 May.
Connecticut State Department of Education Bureau of Curriculum & Instruction CONNECTING WITH THE NEW CORE SCIENCE CURRICULUM FRAMEWORK CORE SCIENCE CURRICULUM.
Introducing the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)
The Next Generation Science Standards From Awareness to Transition
BAY COLLEGE SYMPOSIUM January 12, 2007 Social Studies Merit Curriculum Breakout I Wendy Bruno, DSISD; Mike Powers, Manistique High School.
1 Introduction to the 2 nd Draft of the Next Generation Science Standards January 15, 2013 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant.
Michigan High School Science Content Expectations October 2006.
Michigan’s New Content Expectations for K-7 Science Monday, January 28, 2008 Kellogg Hotel and Conference Center East Lansing, Michigan.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
10/22/2015 5:20:08 PM EEC IT Strategic Plan June Board Meeting June 12, 2007 Quinsigamond Community College Harrington Learning Center 670 West Boylston.
EngageNY.org Updates on Social Studies and Science S/CDN December 13, 2012 Mary Cahill, Director of Curriculum Casey Jakubowski, Social Studies Associate.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Update on Science Curriculum Connie.
David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron Writing Learning Outcomes October 2013.
South Forsyth High School Expecting Excellence... Advanced Studies Night
Update for TN State Board of Education July 24, 2013 Next Generation Science Standards for Today’s Students and Tomorrow’s Workforce.
Superintendents Quarterly July 30, NCDPI’s Response to Framework For Change SBE’s Framework For Change Blue Ribbon Commission Report.
1 Draft Content Standards for K-12 Science First Reading Helen Maguire, Cheryl Kleckner Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation Oregon Department.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Career Technical Education Model Standards Update.
Slide 2 Legislative History: 2003 and later Profile of Learning repealed Commissioner required to create rigorous academic standards (Minn. Stat. §120B.02)
HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE RECOMMENDATIONS MARCH 11, 2013.
An Introduction to Virginia’s Standards of Learning, Assessments, and Related Resources Provided by the Virginia Department of Education Dr. Linda Wallinger.
1. October 25, 2011 Louis Everett & John Yu Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation October 26, 2011 Don Millard & John Yu Division.
Michigan Science K-7 Grade Level Content Expectations GLCE Writing Team Kickoff Meeting January 25, 2007.
85% of AP students continue their education beyond high school. 76% of students who take two or more AP courses attain a bachelor’s degree (regardless.
Videocases for Science Teaching Analysis (ViSTA) Dr. George O’Brien, Instructor, SCE 4310 PLANTS MODULE Fall, 2012.
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
Nevada State Science Standards Revision: Why NGSS?
Minnesota Academic Standards and Graduation Requirements Assessment and Accountability Task Force Dr. Beth Aune July 31, 2012 “Leading for educational.
IB-MYP at Agassiz School. Aims and Objectives: Aims: - Develop an understanding of the IB-MYP program Objectives: - Explore authorization timeframe.
Module 5: Questioning, Inquiry and Problem Based Learning Introduction and Module Overview Standards Knowledge and skills Assignments.
State Board of Education Achievement and Graduation Requirements Committee October 19, 2015.
1 Digging into the 2 nd Draft of the Next Generation Science Standards January 31, 2013 Kevin J. B. Anderson, Ph.D. CESA #2 STEM Education Consultant.
Fall 2010 Presenter: Jan Vogel Consultant Special Projects
Draft Elementary Education Preparation Standards: An Opportunity for Review and Feedback James McLeskey Teacher Education Division Conference Tempe,
Introducing Science.
Common Core State Standards: A Statewide Dialogue
Michael Heinz, Science Coordinator NJDOE Science Homepage
Common Core State Standards: A Statewide Dialogue
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Module 4: The Highlights!
Presentation transcript:

High School Content Expectations: Science

Overview of Process  Academic Work Group – January, 2006  Dr. Andy Anderson (MSU), Co-Chair  Dr. Robert Poel (WMU), Co-Chair  Sub-committees for Earth Space, Biology, Physics, Chemistry  First Draft to State Board – May, 2006  Public/Web Review – May 15 – July 1, 2006  National Review – June, 2006  Final Approval by State Board – August, 2006

Content Expectations Goal These expectations were developed to provide a description of what students should know and be able to do in Science by the end of high school for postsecondary success – college, careers and community.

Content Expectations Goal The Expectations provide a foundation for curriculum and assessment development that represents rigorous and relevant learning for ALL high school students.

Content Expectations Goal The Expectations:  Revise and extend the current Michigan Curriculum Framework High School Standards and Benchmarks.  They will also become the basis for the non-ACT elements within the Michigan Merit Exam.

Rigor, Relevance, and Applied Learning Standards These Expectations will engage students to…  Master content knowledge  Have the ability to apply that knowledge to analyze and propose solutions to real-world problems  Make connections between what they read, hear, and learn in class and the world around them

Rigor, Relevance, and Applied Learning Standards These Expectations will:  Challenge students intellectually  Require that students make a substantial investment in their own learning  Foster the development of cognitive abilities  Promote inquiry

Science Development Work Group Academic Review Andy Anderson, Co-Chair, MSU Robert Poel, Co-Chair, WMU  Theron Blakeslee, Ingham ISD  Carol Clark, DLEG  Brian Coppola, U of M  Mark Davids, Grosse Pointe South HS  Claudia Douglass, CMU  Kaz Fujita, MSU  George Goff, Detroit King HS  Annis Hapkiewicz, Okemos HS  Marilyn Rands, LTU  Walter Rathkamp, SVSU  Kevin Richard, MDE  Judy Ruddock, Flint PS  Sandra Rutherford, EMU  Michael Seymour, Hope College  Randy Showerman, DLEG  Betty Underwood, MDE Internal Review  Larry Calser, Genesse Math/Science  Paul Drummond, Macomb ISD  Mandi Frantii, Munising HS  Michael Gallagher, Oakland Schools  Shamarion Green, Flint Schools  Joseph Grigas, Lake Fenton HS  Cheryl Hach, Kalamazoo Math/Science  Ardis Herrold, Grosse Pointe South HS  Michael Klein, Macomb ISD  David Peters, East Kentwood HS  Kevin Richard, MDE  Gary Waterson, Benzie Central HS Project Coordinator  Susan Codere Kelly, MDE

Organizing Structure

Levels of Content  Pre-requisites  Knowledge needed when entering high school (K – 7)  Essential  Critical knowledge regardless of course  Aligned to large-scale assessment  Core  Specific to the discipline (course)  Required for credit in required areas (Biology, and Chemistry or Physics)  Preparation for advanced study

Science Content Structure A ll Choic e A ll Choic e A ll Credit for high school Earth and Space Science, Biology, Physics, and Chemistry will be defined as meeting BOTH essential and core subject area content expectations. Represents required for graduation

Science Application Construct

Levels of Construct  Identifying  Recall, define, relate, represent basic principles  Using  Make sense of the natural world, predict and explain observations  Inquiry  Identify and explain patterns, habits of mind  Reflecting  Critique and justify strengths and weaknesses of scientific knowledge

Next Steps  Public/Web Review – May – July 1, 2006  National Review – June, 2006  State Board Approval – August, 2006  Statewide Launch – September, 2006  Model Lesson Development – October, 2006 to June, 2007

Viewing For the complete Science High School Content Expectations document, please click on the image below. For the Science Content Expectations by standard, please continue to the next slide.

Viewing We invite you to view these Expectations. Click on the Back button in your browser window to return back to Science HSCE PowerPoint.  Earth & Space Science Earth & Space Science  Biology Biology  Physics Physics  Chemistry Chemistry

Viewing Earth and Space Science: To view a copy of the Expectations, click here: To view a paper copy of the Survey, click on this link: Paper Copy

Viewing Biology: To view a copy of the Expectations, click here: To view a paper copy of the Survey, click on this link: Paper Copy

Viewing and Commenting Physics: To view a copy of the Expectations, click here: To view a paper copy of the Survey, click on this link: Paper Copy

Viewing and Commenting Chemistry: To view a copy of the Expectations, click here: To view a paper copy of the Survey, click on this link: Paper Copy

Contact Information For additional information, contact: Susan Codere Kelly, Project Coordinator Office of School Improvement Kevin Richard, Science Consultant Office of School Improvement