Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: 13.1323 PROGRAM CODE: 345 1 Program Quality Improvement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

PORTFOLIO.
Department of Biological Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Biology CIP code: Program Code: Program Quality Improvement Report.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Information Systems (CIS) CIP Code: Program Code: 411.
Department of Biological Sciences Bachelor of Science in Medical Technology CIP Code: 570 Program Quality Improvement Report
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
TeacherSchoolStudent Percentile Average 50 The Effects of Teachers and Schools on Student Achievement Over 2 consecutive years Marzano, R. J. (2003).
Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
Computing & Technology School of Science and Technology A.A.S. in Information Technology CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality Improvement.
Department of Education School of Education and Behavioral Sciences Master of Education Program CIP Code : Program Code: 650.
STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT PLANNING Presentation to CLAS Unit Heads Nov. 16, 2005 Maria Cimitile Julie Guevara Carol Griffin.
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS Masters in Business Administration CIP Code: digit Program Code: Program Quality Improvement Report
1 NCATE Standards. 2  Candidate Performance  Candidate Knowledge, Skills, & Dispositions  Assessment System and Unit Evaluation  Unit Capacity Field.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
What should be the basis of
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Department of Music School of Liberal Arts B.M.Ed In music CIP Code (681) 1 Program Quality Improvement Report
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Department of Computing and Technology School of Science and Technology A.A.S. in Computer Aided Design Drafting (CADD) CIP Code Program Quality.
Education Department M. Ed. in Reading CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Fall 2010.
Department of Mathematical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.A. in Mathematics CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality Improvement.
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Science (CS) CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality.
Department of Education
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Computing and Technology Department School of Science and Technology BS in Information Technology CIP Code Program Code 414 Fall 2010 Program Quality.
Department of Business School of Business Associate of Science in Business CIP Code: Program Code:
Department of English and Foreign Languages School of Liberal Arts B.A. in English Education CIP Code Program Code Program Quality Improvement.
NCATE STANDARD I REVIEW Hyacinth E. Findlay Carol Dawson Gwendolyn V. King.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
Department of Computing and Technology School of Science and Technology Bachelor of Science Technology CIP Code Program Quality Improvement Report.
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology A.A.S. in Electronic Engineering Technology (EET) CIP Code: Program Code:
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
Asma Khalfan Al-Yahyai Mithaa Abdullah Al-Amri. NETS (NETSS) (NETST) (NETSA) (NETSC) (NETSCSE)
Summary of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) and NCATE's Educational Computing and Technology facilitation Standards for K-12.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
It’s Tech Time! Time to review the equipment that you currently have in your classroom. Look through the following files to learn new ways to use this.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Science Department Draft of Goals, Objectives and Concerns 2010.
Columbus State University C ollege of Education and Health Professions PSC Program Review February 14-17, 2010.
National Science Education Standards. Background Working group composed of reps from AAPT, NSTA, ACS, CSSS, AAAS, NABT, and ESEC. Working group composed.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
Wiki High School Comprehensive School Counseling Program
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Curriculum and Accreditation
NJCU College of Education
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
SUMMARY OF Teacher Preparation In US
February 21-22, 2018.
Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession EHHS Conceptual Framework
Presentation transcript:

Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement Report Fall 2010

Student-Learning Outcomes Standards mandated by an accreditation agency (NCATE/NSTA) Outcome 1: The chemistry education major understands the major concepts, principles, theories, laws, and interrelationships found in the discipline of chemistry and related fields. Outcome 2: The chemistry education major understands the major unifying concepts of science. Outcome 3: The chemistry education major understands important personal and technological applications of science. Outcome 4: The chemistry education major understands research and can successfully design, conduct, report evaluate investigations in science.

Outcome 5: The chemistry education major understands the historical and cultural development of science and the evolution of knowledge in chemistry. Outcome 6: The chemistry education major understands the philosophical tenets, assumptions, goals, and values that distinguish science from technology and from other ways of knowing the world. Outcome 7: The chemistry education major understands the legal and ethical responsibilities in chemistry and in science, in general, regarding safety issues related to the proper treatment of animals; the maintenance and disposal of materials; knows and follows emergency procedures; knows how to maintains safety equipment; and knows safety procedures.

Program Goals and Objectives Objective 1: Teachers of science understand and can articulate the knowledge and practices of contemporary science. Objective 2: Teachers of science engage students effectively in studies of the history, philosophy, and practice of science. Objective 3: Teachers of science engage students both in studies of various methods of scientific inquiry and in active learning through scientific inquiry. Objective 4: Teachers of science recognize that informed citizens must be prepared to make decisions and take action on contemporary science- and technology-related issues of interest to the general society. Objective 5: Teachers of science plan and implement an active, coherent, and effective curriculum that is consistent with the goals and recommendations of the National Science Education Standards. 4

Objective 6: Teachers of science relate their discipline to their local and regional communities, involving stakeholders and using the individual, institutional, and natural resources of the community in their teaching. The candidate actively engages students in science- related studies or activities related to locally important issues. Objective 7: Teachers of science construct and use effective assessment strategies to determine that backgrounds and achievements of learners and facilitate their intellectual, social, and personal development. Objective 8: Teachers of science organize safe and effective learning environments that promote the success of students and the welfare of all living things. Objective 9: Teachers of science strive continuously to grow and change, personally and professionally, to meet the diverse needs of their students, school, community, and profession. They have a desire and disposition for growth and betterment.

Alignment of Outcomes Alignment with Cameron University Mission: Foster “a student-centered academic environment that combines innovative classroom teaching with experiential learning”. Prepare “students for professional success, responsible citizenship, life- long learning, and meaningful contributions to a rapidly changing world”. Alignment with School of Science and Technology Mission Educate students based on “excellence in academic work” and “exposure to latest technological advances”. Provide students the skills and confidence to excel as lifelong learners”. “Ensure success of graduates in a diverse and ever-changing environment”. 6

Alignment of Outcomes Alignment with Physical Sciences Department Mission Provide “a rigorous basic education in chemistry and physics both in theory and practice at various levels appropriate for students to prepare to become professionals in their selected fields of study as a major in chemistry …” Provide an education in chemistry and physics appropriate for students preparing for various careers, e.g., teaching science in secondary schools and health care. Relationship with Cameron University Plan 2013 (Goal One): Highest quality in instruction, research, and service to better meet the needs of the citizens of the region. Effective assessment of student learning. University and programmatic accreditation. Efficient, effective course delivery in multiple formats. Student/faculty opportunities to demonstrate scholarship in regional and national forums.

The Principal Program Objective To prepare reflective, well-prepared science teachers in science, particularly in the chemistry discipline. To accomplish the objective, chemistry education majors referred to as candidates (candidates for licensure in the State of Oklahoma as a science teacher) must complete a series of transition points which follow those of the Education Unit.

Assessment Data Eight assessments are used as evidence demonstrating that the candidate is meeting the most current National Science Teachers Association standards. For each assessment used in the chemistry education program, the type of the assessment and the time it is administered is identified below. The eight assessments align with the chemistry education’s specific objectives: content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and professional knowledge. Content knowledge relates to subject area content, the ways of science through investigation and research, and the disposition of liability and safety.

DIRECT MEASURES OF STUDENT-LEARNING: 1a) Content Knowledge – State Licensure Tests Oklahoma Subject Area Tests (OSAT) in Chemistry, Physics, Physical Science, Earth Science 1b) Content Knowledge – Standardized Exams American Chemical Society (ACS) standardized first-year chemistry examination 1c) Content Knowledge – Grades (Courses aligned with NSTA competencies) Completion of chemistry course sequence (i.e. general chemistry)

2a) Pedagogical and Professional Knowledge and Skills Science Integrated Lesson Plan - Inquiry Nature of Science Classroom/Laboratory Safety and Liability Research Design Cultural/Historical Relationships to Science 2b) Pedagogical and Professional Knowledge and Skills Student Teaching Assessment (Rubric) - Part 3 Student Teaching Evaluation EDUC 4965/4975

3a) Effects on Student Learning Teacher Work Sample

IN-DIRECT MEASURES OF STUDENT-LEARNING: 1) Program Entry-Points (defined by the Education Unit) 2)Exit Interview (defined by Department) 3)OGET (general education mean scores)

Action From Previous Priority Outcomes 1.The chemistry education major can successfully design, conduct, report, and evaluate investigations in science. 2.The chemistry education major understands the historical and cultural development of science and the evolution of knowledge in chemistry. 3.The chemistry education major understands the philosophical tenets, assumptions, goals, and values that distinguish science from technology and from other ways of knowing the world (nature of science).

Action From Previous Priority Outcomes Program Outcome Curriculum Area Measurements Of Student Learning or Service Outcomes Measurements Validation Reliability Schedule Procedures Procedures Research Design Nature of Science Historical or Cultural Development of Science CHEM 4772 or Special Problems CHEM 4772

ASSESSMENT DATA

State Mandated Licensure Test (OSAT) Chemical Education Assessment DataSpring 2007Fall 2007 Fall 2008Fall 2009 Cameron University Mean State Score Mean Student Score

Comprehensive Grade Analysis Courses – Knowledge & Content # of students assessed % students complete C or better General Chemistry 2100 General Biology 1100 General Physics 0 Earth Science 0

Standardized Chemistry Exams (ACS) Chemical Education Assessment DataSpring 2007Fall 2007 Fall 2008Fall 2009Fall 2010 Cameron University Mean N/A National Score Mean Student Score 39

Science Integrated Lesson Plan Inquiry Strategy Assessment Module Chemical Education Assessment DataSpring 2007Fall 2007 Fall 2008Fall 2009Fall 2010 Cameron University Mean N/A National Score Mean N/A Student Score N/A

Nature of Science Assessment Module Chemical Education Assessment DataSpring 2007Fall 2007 Fall 2008Fall 2009Fall 2010 Cameron University Mean N/A National Score Mean N/A Student Score N/A

Liability and Laboratory Safety Assessment Module Chemical Education Assessment DataSpring 2007Fall 2007 Fall 2008Fall 2009Fall 2010 Cameron University Mean N/A National Score Mean N/A Student Score N/A

Research Design Assessment Module Chemical Education Assessment DataSpring 2007Fall 2007 Fall 2008Fall 2009Fall 2010 Cameron University Mean N/A National Score Mean N/A Student Score N/A

Historical/Cultural Development of Science Assessment Module Chemical Education Assessment DataSpring 2007Fall 2007 Fall 2008Fall 2009Fall 2010 Cameron University Mean N/A National Score Mean N/A Student Score N/A

Student Teaching Assessment (Part 3 Rubric Evaluation) Chemical Education Assessment DataSpring 2007Fall 2007 Fall 2008Fall 2009Fall 2010 Cameron University Mean N/A National Score Mean N/A Student Score N/A

Teacher Work Sample Teacher- Student Interaction Assessment Module Chemical Education Assessment DataSpring 2007Fall 2007 Fall 2008Fall 2009Fall 2010 Cameron University Mean N/A National Score Mean N/A Student Score N/A

Analysis of Assessment Data A significant amount of data is being collected this semester; however, we only have two students in the program at this time. The data will be limited. We, at this time, do not have enough data to evaluate the program.

Action Plan for Outcomes We are currently collecting initial data to determine outcomes so we can plan for the future.

Ancillary Actions No actions at this time.

Graduate Information We have no graduates at this time.